CEDH · CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG — 1 février 2024

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .sFE10DC93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s665E407E { margin-top:66pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .s34DFC730 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s82B4DA5F { page-break-before:right; clear:both; mso-break-type:section-break } .s10950C61 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .sB9D5CABB { width:28.35pt; display:inline-block } .s3AAE10DF { margin-top:14pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s3CA22BA { font-family:Arial; text-transform:uppercase } .s6B505E72 { margin:0pt; padding-left:0pt } .sDECD9755 { margin-left:11.67pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; padding-left:6.78pt; font-family:Arial; text-transform:uppercase } .sDA7B489D { margin-top:14pt; margin-left:15pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; padding-left:3.45pt; font-family:Arial; text-transform:uppercase } .s5C5C410E { margin-top:14pt; margin-left:18.34pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; padding-left:0.11pt; font-family:Arial; text-transform:uppercase } .s9D48DD53 { margin-top:6pt; margin-left:21.25pt; margin-bottom:6pt; text-indent:7.1pt; text-align:justify; font-size:10pt } .s67CAFE05 { margin-top:14pt; margin-left:18.45pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-family:Arial; text-transform:uppercase } .s7C22C014 { margin-top:14pt; margin-left:16.34pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; padding-left:2.11pt; font-family:Arial; text-transform:uppercase } .sD11CFAB7 { margin-top:14pt; margin-left:15.01pt; margin-bottom:3pt; text-align:justify; padding-left:1.99pt; font-family:Arial } .sFBC99493 { font-style:italic } .s74818F78 { margin-top:14pt; margin-bottom:3pt; text-align:justify; font-family:Arial; list-style-position:inside } .sE7B3A78A { width:1.99pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } .sD58C010 { margin-top:14pt; margin-left:15.01pt; margin-bottom:3pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; padding-left:1.99pt; font-family:Arial } .sBB6E85D0 { margin-top:0pt; margin-left:34pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:-17pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .sE5BF05B1 { width:2.33pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } .s2D9C6089 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s69DCC830 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sC986E16F { font-family:Arial; color:#ffffff } .sC646A315 { width:14.54pt; display:inline-block } .sD046859D { width:101.74pt; display:inline-block } .s9852CA4C { width:7.54pt; display:inline-block } .s9E436411 { width:138.09pt; display:inline-block } .s4ACA9207 { page-break-before:always; clear:both; mso-break-type:section-break } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .sCC22C24E { font-family:Arial; color:#3e3e3e } .s6DB91820 { text-align:center } .s8BB62139 { margin-right:auto; margin-left:auto; border-collapse:collapse } .s3695F815 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .sDF237D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:8pt } .sEECE831 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .sC39F4804 { font-family:Arial; font-size:5.33pt; font-weight:bold; vertical-align:super; color:#474747 } .sE8934522 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s4F2ADFDB { text-align:center; font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; list-style-position:inside } .sBB6163A7 { width:2.48pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } .s46426D70 { height:48.05pt } .s205D756B { height:52.35pt } .sA5702762 { height:91.1pt } .sF6A12959 { width:33%; height:1px; text-align:left } .s5FFF0A7E { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:8pt } .sA4BC3E2E { font-family:Arial; font-size:5.33pt; vertical-align:super; color:#000000 }       SECOND SECTION CASE OF DZUNDZA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA (Applications nos. 26285/19 and 46 others – see appended list)             JUDGMENT   STRASBOURG 1 February 2024   This judgment is final but it may be subject to editorial revision. In the case of Dzundza and Others v. Russia, The European Court of Human Rights (Second Section), sitting as a Committee composed of:   Lorraine Schembri Orland , President ,   Frédéric Krenc,   Davor Derenčinović , judges , and Viktoriya Maradudina, Acting Deputy Section Registrar, Having deliberated in private on 11 January 2024, Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on that date: PROCEDURE 1.     The case originated in applications against Russia lodged with the Court under Article   34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) on the various dates indicated in the appended table. 2.     The Russian Government (“the   Government”) were given notice of the applications. THE FACTS 3.     The list of applicants and the relevant details of the applications are set out in the appended table. 4.     The applicants complained about their confinement in a metal cage in the courtroom during the criminal proceedings against them. Some applicants also raised other complaints under the provisions of the Convention. THE LAW JOINDER OF THE APPLICATIONS 5.     Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single judgment. Jurisdiction 6.     The Court observes that the facts giving rise to the alleged violations of the Convention occurred prior to 16 September 2022, the date on which the Russian Federation ceased to be a party to the Convention. The Court therefore decides that it has jurisdiction to examine the present applications (see Fedotova and Others v. Russia [GC], nos. 40792/10 and 2 others, §§   68 ‑ 73, 17 January 2023). ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLEs   3 and 13 OF THE CONVENTION on account of confinement in a metal cage in the courtroom 7.     The applicants complained principally about their confinement in a metal cage in the courtroom during the criminal proceedings against them. They relied on Article 3 of the Convention, which reads as follows: “No one shall be subjected to torture or to inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment.” Some applicants also complained that they had not had an effective domestic remedy in respect of their grievance under Article 3, contrary to Article 13 of the Convention, which reads as follows: “Everyone whose rights and freedoms as set forth in [the] Convention are violated shall have an effective remedy before a national authority notwithstanding that the violation has been committed by persons acting in an official capacity.” 8.     The Court notes that the applicants were kept in a metal cage in the courtroom in the context of their trial. In the leading cases of Svinarenko and Slyadnev v. Russia [GC], nos. 32541/08 and 43441/08, ECHR 2014 (extracts) and Vorontsov and Others v. Russia, nos. 59655/14 and 2 others, 31 January 2017, the Court already dealt with the issue of the use of metal cages in courtrooms and found that such a practice constituted in itself an affront to human dignity and amounted to degrading treatment prohibited by Article   3 of the Convention. 9.     Having examined all the material submitted to it, the Court has not found any fact or argument capable of persuading it to reach a different conclusion on the admissibility and merits of these complaints. Having regard to its case-law on the subject, the Court considers that in the instant case the applicants’ confinement in a metal cage before the court during the criminal proceedings against them amounted to degrading treatment. 10.     These complaints are therefore admissible and disclose a breach of Article 3 of the Convention. 11.     In view of the above findings under Article 3 of the Convention, the Court considers that there is no need to deal separately with the applicants’ complaints under Article 13 of the Convention (for similar approach see Valyuzhenich v. Russia , no. 10597/13, § 27, 26 March 2019). OTHER ALLEGED VIOLATIONS UNDER WELL-ESTABLISHED CASE-LAW 12.     Some applicants submitted other complaints which also raised issues under the Convention, given the relevant well-established case-law of the Court (see the appended table). These complaints are not manifestly ill ‑ founded within the meaning of Article   35   §   3   (a) of the Convention, nor are they inadmissible on any other ground. Accordingly, they must be declared admissible. Having examined all the material before it, the Court concludes that they also disclose violations of the Convention in the light of its well-established case-law (see Sergey Babushkin v. Russia , no. 5993/08, 28   November 2013, concerning inadequate conditions of post-conviction detention and the lack of an effective remedy in that respect; Idalov v. Russia [GC], no. 5826/03, §§ 103-08, 22 May 2012, and Tomov and Others v.   Russia , nos. 18255/10 and 5 others, §§ 92-156, 9 April 2019, concerning inadequate conditions of transport and the lack of an effective remedy in that respect; Dirdizov v. Russia , no. 41461/10, §§ 101-11, 27 November 2012, concerning the excessive length of pre-trial detention; Gorlov and Others v.   Russia , nos. 27057/06 and 2 others, 2 July 2019, concerning permanent video surveillance of detainees). APPLICATION OF ARTICLE   41 OF THE CONVENTION 13.     Regard being had to the documents in its possession and to its case ‑ law (see, in particular, Vorontsov and Others, cited above), the Court considers it reasonable to award the sums indicated in the appended table. FOR THESE REASONS, THE COURT, UNANIMOUSLY, Decides to join the applications; Holds that it has jurisdiction to deal with these applications as they relate to facts that took place before 16   September 2022; Declares the applications admissible; Holds that these applications disclose a breach of Article   3 of the Convention on account of the applicants’ placement in a metal cage before the court during the criminal proceedings against them; Holds that there has been a violation of the Convention as regards the other complaints raised under the well-established case-law of the Court (see the appended table); Holds that it is not necessary to deal separately with the applicants’ complaints under Article 13 of the Convention related to the lack of an effective domestic remedy to complain about placement in a metal cage in courtrooms; Holds (a)   that the respondent State is to pay the applicants, within three months, the amounts indicated in the appended table, to be converted into the currency of the respondent State at the rate applicable at the date of settlement; (b)   that from the expiry of the above-mentioned three months until settlement simple interest shall be payable on the above amounts at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points. Done in English, and notified in writing on 1 February 2024, pursuant to Rule   77   §§   2 and   3 of the Rules of Court.     Viktoriya Maradudina   Lorraine Schembri Orland   Acting Deputy Registrar   President     APPENDIX List of applications raising complaints under Article 3 of the Convention (use of metal cages and/or other security arrangements in courtrooms) No. Application no. Date of introduction Applicant’s name Year of birth   Representative’s name and location Name of the court Date of the relevant judgment Start date End date Other complaints under well-established case-law Amount awarded for pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage and costs and expenses per applicant (in euros) [1]     26285/19 06/05/2019 Aleksey Alekseyevich DZUNDZA 1977     Kirovskiy District Court of Krasnoyarsk   27/10/2018 08/11/2018   7,500     26496/19 13/05/2019 Koba Shalvovich SHURGAYA 1972 Krikun Leonid Leonidovich St Petersburg Segezha Town Court of the Karelia Republic In a courtroom Supreme Court of the Karelia Republic Video link 13/11/2018   Segezha Town Court of the Karelia Republic Video link from IK-7, the Karelia Republic 19/08/2020 30/01/2018               19/08/2020 13/11/2018               19/08/2020   7,500     26648/19 06/05/2019 Ivan Anatolyevich RYDANOV 1990     Voroshilovskiy District Court of Volgograd; Volgograd Regional Court 10/04/2019   15/06/2018 10/04/2019   7,500     26688/19 06/05/2019 Sergey Vasilyevich PUPENKO 1990 Prokofyeva Viktoriya Pavlovna St Petersburg Nevskiy District Court of St   Petersburg 26/03/2019 08/11/2018 26/03/2019 Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of inadequate conditions of detention during transport;   Art. 3 - inadequate conditions of detention during transport - transport by van on a number of occasions from the detention facility to the courthouse; inadequate temperature, lack of fresh air, overcrowding; from 08/11/2018 to 26/03/2019 8,500     28605/19 14/05/2019 Aleksandr Sergeyevich NESMACHNYKH 1989     Ingodinskiy District Court of Chita 24/12/2018 17/09/2018 24/12/2018   7,500     28993/19 27/05/2019 Andrey Andreyevich POPOV 1996 Urlashov Aleksey Mikhaylovich St Petersburg Gatchina Town Court of the Leningrad Region 05/04/2019 10/05/2018 05/04/2019 Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of inadequate conditions of detention during transport;   Art. 3 - inadequate conditions of detention during transport - transport on numerous occasions from the detention facility to the courthouse from 10/05/2018 to 05/04/2019: less than 3 sq. m of personal space, transfers lasted from 1.5 to 5 hours; no hot meals on the days of the hearings 8,500     29154/19 20/05/2019 Aleksandr Yuryevich BELYAKOV 1964 Urlashov Aleksey Mikhaylovich St Petersburg St Petersburg City Court Video link from SIZO-6, St Petersburg 28/11/2018           26/11/2018 28/11/2018   7,500     29410/19 23/05/2019 Artem Anatolyevich LOSEV 1990 Urlashov Aleksey Mikhaylovich St Petersburg Kuybyshevskiy District Court of St   Petersburg; Vyborg Town Court of Leningrad Region, Leningrad Regional Court. In person at courts and via video link from   SIZO-3, Leningrad Region 11/01/2018 16/01/2016 21/05/2019   7,500     30273/19 27/05/2019 Aleksandr Aleksandrovich BARTENEV 1980     Sysolskiy District Court of the Komi Republic   03/04/2019 07/05/2019   7,500   30353/19 21/05/2019 Maksim Dzhabrailovich NURMAGOMEDOV 1980 Pavlov Anton Sergeyevich Saint Petersburg On numerous occasions starting from 30/04/2017 before the courts of St   Petersburg 26/02/2019 30/04/2017 26/02/2019   7,500   30658/19 27/05/2019 Ruslan Vladimirovich VORONTSOV 1977     Leninskiy District Court of Krasnoyarsk   Krasnoyarsk Regional Court 02/12/2019   Tsentralnyy District Court of Krasnoyarsk 02/12/2020 21/08/2018     25/02/2019       13/07/2020       21/09/2020       24/08/2020 Art. 3 - inadequate conditions of detention during transport - numerous occasions of transport from the detention facility in Sosnovoborsk to the courthouse, starting from 21/08/2018 and on-going; several hours of transport by van; overcrowding; restricted access to toilet;   Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of inadequate conditions of detention during transport 7,500   31524/19 30/08/2019 Aleksey Mikhaylovich MAMROV 1987     Milkovskiy District Court of Kamchatka Region from 05/02/2019 to 18/06/2019 05/02/2019 18/06/2019   7,500   31894/19 03/06/2019 Sergey Anatolyevich ZEMTSOV 1974 Petrov Roman Nikolayevich Cheboksary Kanavinskiy District Court of Nizhniy Novgorod, Nizhniy Novgorod Regional Court (by way of videoconference from the detention facility) 28/03/2019 04/05/2018 28/03/2019 Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of poor conditions of detention and inadequate conditions of transport,   Art. 3 - inadequate conditions of detention during transport - inadequate conditions of transport by prison van on numerous occasions between the detention facility and the courthouse in the period from 04/05/2018 to 04/02/2019; 0.3 sq. m of personal space; lack of fresh air; restricted access to toilet;   Art. 3 - inadequate conditions of detention after conviction - IK-11 Nizhniy Novgorod Region, detention from 22/04/2019, pending as of 16/09/2022; less than 2 sq. m of personal space; overcrowding, lack of or inadequate hygienic facilities, no or restricted access to warm water, lack of or insufficient natural light, lack of or insufficient electric light, lack of fresh air;   Art. 8 (1) - permanent video surveillance of detainees in pre-trial or post-conviction detention facilities - SIZO-1 Nizhniy Novgorod 19/02/2019-23/02/2019 in cell 15/171, opposite-sex operators 11,000   33728/19 19/06/2019 Maksim Aleksandrovich MORALEV 1980 Semyanovskiy Dmitriy Aleksandrovich Astrakhan Trusovskiy District Court of Astrakhan, Astrakhan Regional Court 14/05/2019 30/08/2018 14/05/2019   7,500   34112/19 23/05/2019 Anton Ivanovich SOFRONOV 1989     Pryazhinskiy District Court of the Kareliya Republic   18/11/2018 Pending on the date when the application was lodged with the Court   7,500   34944/19 09/06/2019 Ivan Viktorovich ZHEREBTSOV 1988     Syktyvkar Town Court 11/02/2019 Beginning date unknown 11/02/2019 Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic in respect of poor conditions of detention;   Art. 3 - inadequate conditions of detention after conviction - detention in IK-19 Komi Republic, from 04/01/2019, pending as of 16/09/2022; 2.4 sq. m of personal space; overcrowding, poor quality of food, mouldy or dirty cell, lack of fresh air, lack of or poor quality of bedding and bed linen 16,300   35714/19 27/01/2020 Arkadiy Vladimirovich LESHCHEV 1990 Sergeyeva Yelizaveta Alekseyevna Tyumen Nefteyuganskiy District Court of Khanty-Mansi Autonomous Region 09/08/2019 21/08/2018 09/08/2019   7,500   35723/19 24/08/2019 Anton Yuryevich CHAKHLOV 1988     Oktyabrskiy District Court of Krasnoyarsk   18/01/2019 22/05/2019   7,500   36528/19 28/06/2019 Ivan Vladimirovich KOROLEV 1982 Petrov Roman Nikolayevich Cheboksary Pavlov Posad Town Court of the Moscow Region (metal cages during trial court hearings in person) Moscow Regional Court (from SIZO -2, Yaroslavl Region) 05/03/2019     20/04/2018 05/03/2019   7,500   36939/19 25/06/2019 Omar Guramovich USOYAN 1990 Fedorkov Andrey Aleksandrovich St Petersburg Moscow District Court of St   Petersburg 25/12/2018 22/09/2015 25/12/2018 Art. 3 - inadequate conditions of detention during transport - transfers between courthouses and remand prisons in St   Petersburg from 22/09/2015 to 18/04/2019; 0.25 sq. m; overcrowding, lack of fresh air 8,500   38505/19 14/07/2019 Olga Viktorovna GORBACHEVA 1980 Kostetskiy Denis Gennadiyevich Moscow Oktyabrskiy District Court of Tambov; Tambov Regional Court;   Video link from SIZO-1, Tambov Region 29/03/2019 18/09/2018       18/02/2019 11/02/2019       29/03/2019   7,500   38820/19 08/07/2019 Akhmed Magomedrasulovich MAGOMEDOV 1990     Krasnoyarsk Region Court 10/01/2019 10/01/2019 10/01/2019   7,500   41684/19 13/07/2019 Dmitriy Vladislavovich SINEV 1991 Petrov Roman Nikolayevich Cheboksary Elektrostal Town Court of Moscow Region (hearings in person); Moscow Regional Court (video link during an appeal hearing from SIZO-1, Ivanovo Region) 19/03/2019 30/06/2017 19/03/2019   7,500   43156/19 31/07/2019 Mikhail Mikhaylovich TERENTYEV 1977 Loskutov Vyacheslav Alekseyevich Moscow North-Caucasus Circuit Military Court 31/01/2019 22/11/2018 31/01/2019   7,500   44803/19 05/08/2019 Igor Nikolayevich SIGIDA 1963     Novocherkassk Town Court of the Rostov Region, Rostov Regional Court   02/11/2018 13/02/2019   7,500   44876/19 30/07/2019 Sergey Viktorovich KONNOV 1980     Slavyansk-on-Kuban Town Court of the Krasnodar Region 29/03/2019 28/03/2017 29/03/2019 Art. 3 - inadequate conditions of detention during transport - transport on 03-05/05/2019 and 08-09/05/2019 by train; lack of an individual sleeping place; overcrowding; restricted access to toilet; poor sanitary conditions; restricted access to potable water and food; conditions of transport by van on multiple occasions between 04/04/2017 and 29/03/2019, SIZO-3 Novorossiysk - Slavyansk Town Court - SIZO-1 Krasnodar - IVS Slavyansk-on-Kuban; lack of a place to seat, overcrowding;   Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of inadequate conditions of transport 8,500   45367/19 02/08/2019 Nikita Igorevich CHERNOMORETS 1990     Vakhitovskiy District Court of Kazan 17/04/2019     Supreme Court of the Republic of Tatarstan 29/05/2019 17/04/2019         29/05/2019 17/04/2019         29/05/2019 Art. 3 - inadequate conditions of detention during transport - from 04/04/2018 to 05/10/2021 from SIZO-1 Republic of Tatarstan to the Sovetskiy District Court of Kazan in vans (59   transfers; return trip: 5 to 6 hours) and detention in holding cells: overcrowding, no or restricted access to toilet, no food provided on the dates of the court hearings;   Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of inadequate conditions of detention during transport 8,500   45955/19 25/07/2019 Andrey Andreyevich ZAMOTAYEV 1996     Krasnoyarsk Regional Court   29/01/2019 07/02/2019   7,500   46996/19 25/08/2019 Maksim Nikolayevich ZAGORULYA 1981 Gerasimov Valeriy Vladimirovich Minkino Cherepovets Town Court, Vologda Regional Court; Video link from an unidentified facility 27/02/2019 12/08/2017 27/02/2019   7,500   47605/19 27/08/2019 Nikolay Sergeyevich POKHORUKOV 1985 Petrov Roman Nikolayevich Cheboksary Istra Town Court of the Moscow Region; Moscow Regional Court Video link from SIZO-1, Ivanovo Region 04/04/2019 17/08/2018         04/04/2019   7,500   47622/19 04/08/2019 Aleksandr Vladimirovich SILANTYEV 1985     Kirovskiy District Court of Krasnoyarsk, Tsentralnyy District Court of Krasnoyarsk 30/08/2018 06/02/2019   7,500   47913/19 05/08/2019 Dun CHEN 1985 Murashkin Igor Gennadyevich St Petersburg Saint-Petersburg City Court; Video link from SIZO-1 in St Petersburg and Leningrad Region 08/04/2019 08/04/2019 08/04/2019   7,500   48265/19 26/08/2019 Yevgeniy Aleksandrovich ANIKIYENKO 1980     Pushkinskiy Town Court of St   Petersburg and St Petersburg City Court, on numerous occasions during court hearings   20/01/2017 21/03/2019 Art. 3 - inadequate conditions of detention during transport - transport by van on numerous occasions from the detention facility to the court houses to take part in the hearings from 20/01/2017 to 21/03/2019; overcrowding; 2-4 hours of transport; restricted access to toilet; no lighting; and poor conditions of transport between SIZO-1 of St   Petersburg and IK-2 Zabaykalskiy Region during 20/04/2019-21/06/2019;   Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of poor conditions of transport 8,500   48294/19 02/09/2019 Aleksey Gennadyevich KEYS 1980 Yezhov Yevgeniy Sergeyevich Velikiy Novgorod Novgorodskiy District Court of Novgorod Region, numerous occasions 13/06/2019 16/12/2018 13/06/2019   7,500   48920/19 09/08/2019 Rafail Failovich GALIKEYEV 1982 Stasyuk Olga Andreyevna St Petersburg Petrozavodsk Town Court of the Karelia Republic, Supreme Court of Karelia (videoconference) 13/02/2019 26/10/2017 13/02/2019 Art. 3 - inadequate conditions of detention during transport - transport by van and train on 26/03/2019; overcrowding, no or restricted access to toilet, no or restricted access to potable water;   Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of inadequate conditions of detention during transport 8,500   49568/19 07/09/2019 Ryskeldi Abdygaparovich ABDYGAPAROV 1992 Kondratyuk Yegor Ivanovich Moscow Kuzminskiy District Court of Moscow   25/02/2019 14/08/2019   7,500   49980/19 09/09/2019 Magomedsalakh Balavdiyevich ALBEKOV 1962 Isayev Ayndi Khamzatovich Krasnoyarsk Tsentralnyy District Court of Krasnoyarsk, Krasnoyarsk Regional Court 30/09/2019 15/03/2018 30/09/2019   7,500   50383/19 07/09/2019 Nikita Sergeyevich NIKONOV 1986 Urlashov Aleksey Mikhaylovich St Petersburg Nevskiy District Court of St   Petersburg 15/04/2019 01/11/2018 15/04/2019 Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of inadequate conditions of detention during transport;   Art. 3 - inadequate conditions of detention during transport - numerous occasions of transport from the detention facility to the courthouse; between 18/11/2015 and 05/06/2019; 0.3   sq.   m, lack of fresh air, overcrowding, lack of hot meal during the day, lack of or insufficient physical exercise in fresh air, inadequate temperature, mouldy or dirty cell, no or restricted access to toilet   8,500   50544/19 13/09/2019 Marat Aukhatovich TULYAKOV 1979     Privolzhskiy Circuit Military Court 13/03/2019 03/10/2018 13/03/2019 Art. 3 - inadequate conditions of detention during transport - transport by a van to the courthouse on numerous occasions in the period between 03/10/2018 to 13/03/2019; lack of fresh air, lack of or insufficient natural light, overcrowding, passive smoking, no or restricted access to toilet, lack or inadequate furniture;   Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of inadequate conditions of detention during transport 8,500   53801/19 18/01/2020 Tikhon Aleksandrovich KOSTIN 1987 Dvizov Aleksey Vladimirovich Nyagan Altai Regional Court Video link from SIZO, Biysk Altai Region 01/08/2019 01/08/2019 01/08/2019   7,500   54101/19 04/10/2019 Anton Sergeyevich STETSENKO 1979 Markin Maksim Aleksandrovich St Petersburg Detention in a metal cage during the trial hearings at the Sergiyev Posad Town Court 17/04/2019 01/03/2019 17/04/2019 Art. 3 - inadequate conditions of detention during transport - transport between the remand prison and the domestic courts on several occasions from 01/03/2019 to 17/04/2019 (overcrowding, lack of fresh air, lack of or insufficient natural light, lack of or insufficient electric light, inadequate temperature, passive smoking, lack of privacy for toilet, lack or insufficient quantity of food, no or restricted access to toilet, no or restricted access to potable water). Transport by train from 15/06/2019 to 16/06/2019 (overcrowding, insufficient number of sleeping places, lack of or poor quality of bedding and bed linen, mouldy or dirty cell, lack of fresh air, passive smoking, no or restricted access to potable water, no or restricted access to toilet) 8,500   54289/19 09/10/2019 Aydan Aleksandrovich BAZYR-SADY 1989 Pleshkov Maksim Alekseyevich Moscow Ulug-Khemskiy District Court of the Republic of Tyva 09/04/2019 09/04/2019 09/04/2019   7,500   54593/19 09/10/2019 Sergey Vitalyevich KATAYEV 1978 Pleshkov Maksim Alekseyevich Moscow Kyzyl Town Court; Supreme Court of the Republic of Tyva 03/06/2019 18/01/2018 03/06/2019   7,500   58119/19 16/10/2019 Arsen Anatolyevich YERIZHOKOV 1980 Khorikov Andrey Vladimirovich St Petersburg Primorskiy District Court of St   Petersburg and the Petrogradskiy District Court of St Petersburg, detention and trial hearings, and the appellate hearings concerning the applicant’s detention held at the St Petersburg City Court through videoconference 14/10/2019 10/09/2018 14/10/2019 Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of inadequate conditions of detention during transport;   Art. 3 - inadequate conditions of detention during transport - van on multiple occasions from 24/08/2018 to 14/10/2019 (overcrowding, 0.3-0.4 sq.m. per inmate, lack of fresh air, lack of heating, lack of safety belts, handcuffing during transport) 8,500   58293/19 25/10/2019 Valeriy Valeryevich MOROZOV 1977 Avanesyan Aleksey Viktorovich Yekaterinburg Pervomayskiy District Court of the Krasnodar Region, Oktyabrskiy District Court of the Krasnodar Region, Krasnodar Regional Court   06/04/2019 21/10/2019 Art. 5 (3) - excessive length of pre-trial detention - from 04/04/2019 to 19/06/2020, 1 year(s) and 2 month(s) and 16   day(s); specific defects: use of assumptions, in the absence of any evidentiary basis, of the risks of absconding or obstructing justice; failure to assess the applicant’s personal situation reducing the risks of re-offending, colluding or absconding; failure to examine the possibility of applying other measures of restraint; 8,500   59391/19 06/11/2019 Konstantin Gennadyevich ANTONKIN 1969 Voronkina Anna Aleksandrovna Kemerovo Tsentralnyy District Court of Kemerovo   01/08/2018 Proceedings pending on the date when the application was lodged with the Court   7,500   60716/19 15/11/2019 Artem Aleksandrovich CHURINOV 1983 Semyanovskiy Dmitriy Aleksandrovich Astrakhan Astrakhan Regional Court (by way of videoconference from SIZO-1 Astrakhan Region) 11/07/2019 11/07/2019 11/07/2019   7,500     [1] Plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicants.