CEDH · CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG — 7 mars 2024

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .sFE10DC93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s665E407E { margin-top:66pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .s34DFC730 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s82B4DA5F { page-break-before:right; clear:both; mso-break-type:section-break } .s10950C61 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .sB9D5CABB { width:28.35pt; display:inline-block } .s3AAE10DF { margin-top:14pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s3CA22BA { font-family:Arial; text-transform:uppercase } .s6B505E72 { margin:0pt; padding-left:0pt } .sDECD9755 { margin-left:11.67pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; padding-left:6.78pt; font-family:Arial; text-transform:uppercase } .sDA7B489D { margin-top:14pt; margin-left:15pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; padding-left:3.45pt; font-family:Arial; text-transform:uppercase } .s5C5C410E { margin-top:14pt; margin-left:18.34pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; padding-left:0.11pt; font-family:Arial; text-transform:uppercase } .s67CAFE05 { margin-top:14pt; margin-left:18.45pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-family:Arial; text-transform:uppercase } .s7C22C014 { margin-top:14pt; margin-left:16.34pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; padding-left:2.11pt; font-family:Arial; text-transform:uppercase } .sD11CFAB7 { margin-top:14pt; margin-left:15.01pt; margin-bottom:3pt; text-align:justify; padding-left:1.99pt; font-family:Arial } .sFBC99493 { font-style:italic } .s4EFA53D { margin-top:14pt; margin-left:15.01pt; margin-bottom:3pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; padding-left:1.99pt; font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .sBB6E85D0 { margin-top:0pt; margin-left:34pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:-17pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .sE5BF05B1 { width:2.33pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } .s2D9C6089 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s69DCC830 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sC646A315 { width:14.54pt; display:inline-block } .sF5B27E79 { width:130.75pt; display:inline-block } .s9852CA4C { width:7.54pt; display:inline-block } .s9E436411 { width:138.09pt; display:inline-block } .s4ACA9207 { page-break-before:always; clear:both; mso-break-type:section-break } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .sCC22C24E { font-family:Arial; color:#3e3e3e } .s6DB91820 { text-align:center } .s8BB62139 { margin-right:auto; margin-left:auto; border-collapse:collapse } .s3695F815 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .sDF237D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:8pt } .sEECE831 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .sC39F4804 { font-family:Arial; font-size:5.33pt; font-weight:bold; vertical-align:super; color:#474747 } .sE8934522 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s4F2ADFDB { text-align:center; font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; list-style-position:inside } .sBB6163A7 { width:2.48pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } .s5FFF0A7E { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:8pt } .sDE044F24 { height:70pt } .sF6A12959 { width:33%; height:1px; text-align:left } .sA4BC3E2E { font-family:Arial; font-size:5.33pt; vertical-align:super; color:#000000 }     FIRST SECTION CASE OF BORODIN AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA (Applications nos. 50067/18 and 37 others – see appended list)             JUDGMENT   STRASBOURG 7 March 2024   This judgment is final but it may be subject to editorial revision. In the case of Borodin and Others v. Russia, The European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting as a Committee composed of:   Lətif Hüseynov , President ,   Ivana Jelić,   Erik Wennerström , judges , and Viktoriya Maradudina, Acting Deputy Section Registrar, Having deliberated in private on 8 February 2024, Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on that date: PROCEDURE 1.     The case originated in applications against Russia lodged with the Court under Article   34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) on the various dates indicated in the appended table. 2.     The Russian Government (“the   Government”) were given notice of the applications. THE FACTS 3.     The list of applicants and the relevant details of the applications are set out in the appended table. 4.     The applicants complained of the disproportionate measures taken against them as organisers or participants of public assemblies. Some applicants also raised other complaints under the provisions of the Convention and its Protocols. THE LAW JOINDER OF THE APPLICATIONS 5.     Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single judgment. JURISDICTION 6.     The Court observes that the facts giving rise to the alleged violations of the Convention occurred prior to 16 September 2022, the date on which the Russian Federation ceased to be a party to the Convention. The Court therefore decides that it has jurisdiction to examine the present applications (see Fedotova and Others v. Russia [GC], nos.   40792/10 and 2   others, §§   68 ‑ 73, 17   January 2023). ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE   11 OF THE CONVENTION 7.     The applicants complained principally of disproportionate measures taken against them as organisers or participants of public assemblies, namely their arrest in relation to the dispersal of these assemblies and their conviction for administrative offences. They relied, expressly or in substance, on Article   11 of the Convention. 8.     The Court refers to the principles established in its case-law regarding freedom of assembly (see Kudrevičius and Others v.   Lithuania [GC], no.   37553/05, ECHR 2015, with further references) and proportionality of interference with it (see Oya Ataman v.   Turkey , no.   74552/01, ECHR   2006 ‑ XIV, and Hyde Park and Others v.   Moldova , no.   33482/06, 31   March 2009). 9.     In the leading cases of Frumkin v. Russia, no. 74568/12, ECHR 2016 (extracts), Navalnyy and Yashin v. Russia, no. 76204/11, 4 December 2014 and Kasparov and Others v. Russia, no. 21613/07, 3 October 2013, the Court already found a violation in respect of issues similar to those in the present case. 10.     Having examined all the material submitted to it, the Court has not found any fact or argument capable of persuading it to reach a different conclusion as to the admissibility and merits of these complaints. Having regard to its case-law on the subject, the Court considers that in the instant case the interferences with the applicants’ freedom of assembly were not “necessary in a democratic society”. 11 .     These complaints are therefore admissible and disclose a breach of Article 11 of the Convention. OTHER ALLEGED VIOLATIONS UNDER WELL-ESTABLISHED CASE-LAW 12.     Some applicants submitted other complaints which also raised issues under the Convention and its Protocols, given the relevant well-established case-law of the Court (see appended table). These complaints are not manifestly ill-founded within the meaning of Article 35 § 3 (a) of the Convention, nor are they inadmissible on any other ground. Accordingly, they must be declared admissible. 13 .     Having examined all the material before it, the Court concludes that these complaints also disclose violations of the Convention and its Protocols in the light of its findings in Butkevich v. Russia , no.   5865/07, §§   63-65, 13   February 2018, Tsvetkova and Others v. Russia , nos.   54381/08 and   5   others, §§ 115-31, 10 April 2018, and Korneyeva v.   Russia , no.   72051/17, §§ 34-36, 8 October 2019, concerning various aspects of unlawful deprivation of liberty of organisers or participants of public assemblies; Karelin v. Russia , no. 926/08, §§ 58-85, 20 September 2016, concerning the absence of a prosecuting party in the proceedings under the Code of Administrative Offences (the CAO); Martynyuk v.   Russia , no.   13764/15, §§ 38-42, 8   October 2019, relating to the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal against the sentence of administrative detention, Korneyeva , cited above, §§ 62-65 as to the right of the organisers or participants of public assemblies not to be tried and punished twice for the same offence, and Elvira Dmitriyeva v.   Russia , nos. 60921/17 and 7202/18, §§ 77-90, 30 April 2019, concerning administrative convictions for making calls to participate in public events. REMAINING COMPLAINTS 14.     Some applicants raised further additional complaints under Article 6 of the Convention concerning other aspects of fairness of the administrative ‑ offence proceedings. In view of the findings in paragraph 13 above, the Court considers that there is no need to deal separately with these remaining complaints. APPLICATION OF ARTICLE 41 OF THE CONVENTION 15.     Regard being had to the documents in its possession and to its case ‑ law (see in particular Navalnyy and Others v. Russia [Committee], nos.   25809/17 and 14 others, §   22, 4   October 2022), the Court finds it reasonable to award the sums indicated in the appended table. FOR THESE REASONS, THE COURT, UNANIMOUSLY, Decides to join the applications; Holds that it has jurisdiction to deal with these applications as they relate to the facts that took place before 16   September 2022; Declares the complaints under Article 11 of the Convention and the other complaints under the well-established case-law of the Court, as set out in the appended table, admissible, and finds that there is no need to examine separately the remaining complaints under Article 6 of the Convention; Holds that these applications disclose a breach of Article   11 of the Convention; Holds that there has been a violation of the Convention and the Protocols thereto as regards the other complaints raised under the well-established case-law of the Court (see appended table); Holds (a)   that the respondent State is to pay the applicants, within three months, the amounts indicated in the appended table, to be converted into the currency of the respondent State at the rate applicable at the date of settlement; (b)   that from the expiry of the above-mentioned three months until settlement simple interest shall be payable on the above amounts at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points. Done in English, and notified in writing on 7 March 2024, pursuant to Rule   77   §§   2 and   3 of the Rules of Court.   Viktoriya Maradudina   Lətif Hüseynov   Acting Deputy Registrar   President     APPENDIX List of applications raising complaints under Article 11 of the Convention (disproportionate measures against organisers and participants of public assemblies) No. Application no. Date of introduction Applicant’s name Year of birth   Representative’s name and location Name of the public event Location Date Administrative / criminal charges Penalty Final domestic decision Court Name Date Other complaints under well-established case-law Amount awarded for pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage and costs and expenses per applicant (in euros) [1]     50067/18 10/10/2018 Georgiy Andreyevich BORODIN 1998 Zhdanov Ivan Yuryevich Vilnius Manifestation against Putin’s re-election   Voronezh 05/05/2018 Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB 10,000 Voronezh Regional Court 04/07/2018 Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings,     Prot. 7 Art. 4 - right not to be tried or punished twice in criminal proceedings - overlap of the facts constituting the basis for the applicant’s prosecution in the second set of proceedings ended on 04/07/2018 (Art. 20.2 § 5 of CAO) with substantially the same facts underlying his conviction in the first set of proceedings ended on 21/06/2018 (Art. 19.3 §   1 of CAO) 4,000     26536/21 30/04/2021 Kseniya Alekseyevna PAKHOMOVA 1994 Solovyev Leonid Alekseyevich Moscow Manifestation to support A. Navalnyy   Pokrov 06/04/2021 article 20.2.2 §   3 of CAO detention for 9 days Vladimir Regional Court 14/04/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - (i) escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence report from 4.00 p.m. on 06/04/2021 until the hearing in the first-instance court on 07/04/2021; (ii) escorting to the police station on 25/04/2021,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - both sets of administrative proceedings,   Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - the sentences of administrative detention imposed on the applicant (both sets of administrative proceedings) were executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO,   Art. 10 (1) - conviction for making calls to participate in public events - rally to support A. Navalnyy on 21/04/2021 in Moscow, Article 20.2 §   2 of CAO, detention for 10 days, final decision Moscow City Court 29/04/2021 5,000     49537/21 16/09/2021 Nina Aleksandrovna RESHETILOVA 1970 Zboroshenko Nikolay Sergeyevich Mytishchi Rally against construction works in Mitino Park   Moscow 27/09/2020 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB 10,000 Moscow City Court 22/03/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence report on 22/04/2021,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings,   Art. 10 (1) - conviction for making calls to participate in public events - rally to support A.   Navalnyy on 21/04/2021 in Moscow, Article 20.2 §   8 of CAO, detention for 15 days, final decision Moscow City Court 26/04/2021         4,000     51178/21 08/10/2021 Maksim Vyacheslavovich PAYELOV 1987     Rally “Free Navalnyy”   Moscow 23/01/2021   Manifestation to support A.   Navalnyy Moscow 21/03/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO         Article 20.2 § 8 of CAO fine of RUB 10,000       fine of RUB 150,000 Moscow City Court 14/04/2021       Moscow City Court 25/08/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence report from 3.00   p.m. until 7.30 p.m. on 23/01/2021 and on 11/05/2021,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - both sets of administrative proceedings 4,000     51346/21 18/09/2021 Darya Andreyevna UDACHINA 2001 Zboroshenko Nikolay Sergeyevich Mytishchi Rally “Free Navalnyy”   Moscow 31/01/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB 15,000 Moscow City Court 17/06/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence report on 31/01/2021,     Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings 4,000     51913/21 08/10/2021 Maksim Igorevich CHERKASOV 1986 Zhdanov Ivan Yuryevich Vilnius Rally to support A. Navalnyy   Tambov 12/03/2021 article 20.2 §   6.1 of CAO detention for 6 days Tambov Regional Court 26/05/2021 Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings,   Prot. 7 Art. 4 - right not to be tried or punished twice in criminal proceedings - overlap of the facts constituting the basis for the applicant’s prosecution in the second set of proceedings which ended on 28/06/2021 (Art. 20.2 § 2 of CAO) with substantially the same facts underlying his conviction in the first set of proceedings which ended on 26/05/2021 (Art. 20.2 §   6.1 of CAO),   Art. 10 (1) - conviction for making calls to participate in public events - rally to support A. Navalnyy on 31/01/2021 in Tambov, Article 20.2 § 2 of CAO, detention for 7 days, final decision Tambov Regional Court 26/05/2021 5,000     54830/21 29/10/2021 Olga Aleksandrovna KARTAVTSEVA 1980 Zhdanov Ivan Yuryevich Vilnius Rally “Free Navalnyy”   Omsk 31/01/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB 10,000 Omsk Regional Court 11/05/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence report from 12.20   p.m. until 3.00 p.m. on 31/01/2021,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings 4,000     54934/21 27/10/2021 Konstantin Valentinovich POKHILCHUK 1996 Semenov Daniil Aleksandrovich St Petersburg Opposition gathering   St Petersburg 22/06/2020 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB 10,000 St Petersburg City Court 27/04/2021 Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings 3,500     56688/21 02/11/2021 Alipat Magomedovna SULTANBEGOVA 1991 Vertegel Feliks Yevgenyevich Krasnodar Rally “Free Navalnyy”   Krasnodar 23/01/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB 10,000 Krasnodar Regional Court 05/05/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence report: (i) from 5.30   p.m. until 11.00 p.m. on 23/01/2021; (ii) from 18.30 p.m. on 19/04/2021 until 7.00 p.m. on 20/04/2021,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - both sets of administrative proceedings,   Art. 10 (1) - conviction for making calls to participate in public events - rally to support A. Navalnyy on 21/04/2021 in Krasnodar, Article 20.2 § 2 of CAO, detention for 10 days, final decision Krasnodar Regional Court 09/08/2021,   Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - the sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant (proceedings ended on 09/08/2021) was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO 5,000   56883/21 31/10/2021 Alina Dmitriyevna MACHULSKAYA 1991 Zboroshenko Nikolay Sergeyevich Mytishchi Forum of independent local elected representative   Moscow 13/03/2021 article 20.33 of CAO fine of RUB 15,000 Izmaylovskiy District Court in Moscow 21/05/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence report from 10.30   a.m. until 6.00 p.m. on 13/03/2021 4,000   57098/21 08/11/2021 Sergey Yevgenyevich VDOVIN 1969 Zboroshenko Nikolay Sergeyevich Mytishchi Forum of independent local elected representatives   Moscow 13/03/2021 article 20.33 of CAO fine of RUB 15,000 Izmaylovskiy District Court in Moscow 18/05/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence report from 10.30   a.m. until 3.30 p.m. on 13/03/2021 4,000   57102/21 08/11/2021 Dmitriy Igorevich GOLIKOV 1983 Zboroshenko Nikolay Sergeyevich Mytishchi Forum of independent local elected representatives   Moscow 13/03/2021 article 20.33 of CAO fine of RUB 15,000 Izmaylovskiy District Court in Moscow 25/05/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence report from 1.00   p.m. until 4.30 p.m. on 13/03/2021   4,000   57633/21 07/11/2021 Maksudzhon Mashrabovich KOMILOV 1990 Zboroshenko Nikolay Sergeyevich Mytishchi Gathering in front of Tadjik Embassy   Moscow 02/04/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB 10,000 Moscow City Court 13/07/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence report on 02/04/2021,     Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings 4,000   61502/21 19/11/2021 Vladislav Vladimirovich BAYKOV 1995 Kseniya Andreyevna KOCHERGO 1997   Nechiporenko Natalya Aleksandrovna Moscow Rally “Free Navalnyy”   Moscow 31/01/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB 15,000 Moscow City Court 19/05/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence report from 3.22   p.m. until 11.20 p.m. on 31/01/2021,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings 4,000   323/22 08/12/2021 Timofey Viktorovich ANDRONOV 1996 Zhdanov Ivan Yuryevich Vilnius Rally “Free Navalnyy”   Volgograd 31/01/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB 10,000 Volgograd Regional Court 21/07/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence report from 1.20   p.m. until 8.00 p.m. on 31/01/2021,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings 4,000   1414/22 30/12/2021 Aleksandr Vasilyevich POPOV 1979 Zhdanov Ivan Yuryevich Vilnius Rally “Free Navalnyy”   Yaroslavl 31/01/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB 10,000 Yaroslavl Regional Court 08/09/2021 Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings 3,500   2791/22 30/12/2021 Zhanna Yevgenyevna VAGINA 1972 Zhdanov Ivan Yuryevich Vilnius Rally in support of A.   Navalnyy   Polyarniye Zori 21/04/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB 10,000 Murmansk Regional Court 23/07/2021 Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings,   Art. 10 (1) - conviction for making calls to participate in public events - rally to support A. Navalnyy on 21/04/2021 in Polyarniye Zori, Article 20.2 § 2 of CAO, fine of RUB 20,000, final decision by the Murmansk Regional Court on 23/07/2021 4,000   2825/22 30/12/2021 Nikolay Pavlovich PRIBYLOV 1979 Zhdanov Ivan Yuryevich Vilnius Rally in support of A.   Navalnyy   Polyarniye Zori 21/04/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB 10,000 Murmansk Regional Court 13/08/2021 Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings,   Art. 10 (1) - conviction for making calls to participate in public events - rally to support A. Navalnyy on 21/04/2021 in Polyarniye Zori, Article 20.2 § 2 of CAO, fine of RUB 20,000, final decision by the Murmansk Regional Court on 13/08/2021 4,000   3298/22 30/12/2021 Aleksandr Vasilyevich POPOV 1979 Zhdanov Ivan Yuryevich Vilnius Rally “Free Navalnyy”   Yaroslavl 23/01/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB 10,000 Yaroslavl Regional Court 20/07/2021 Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings 3,500   3951/22 21/12/2021 Andrey Sergeyevich VOROBYEV 1988 Tkachenko Ilya Valeryevich Gatchina Rally “Free Navalnyy”   St Petersburg 31/01/2021 article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO fine of RUB 15,000 St Petersburg City Court 22/06/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to the police station on 31/01/2021 for compiling an offence report,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings 4,000   4130/22 24/12/2021 Yana Vladimirovna BELYAYEVA 2000 Memorial Human Rights Centre Moscow Rally “Free Navalnyy”   Krasnoyarsk 31/01/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB 5,000 Krasnoyarsk Regional Court 24/06/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station from 1.20 p.m. until 5.20 p.m. on 31/01/2021,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings 4,000   4182/22 23/12/2021 Emiliya Sergeyevna ALEKSEYEVA 1989 Memorial Human Rights Centre Moscow Rally “Free Navalnyy”   St Petersburg 31/01/2021 article 20.2.2 §   1 of CAO fine of RUB 10,000 St Petersburg City Court 24/06/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence report from 3.58   p.m. until 10.10 p.m. on 31/01/2021,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings 4,000   4226/22 18/12/2021 Yelena Georgiyevna MURGANOVA 1988 Peredruk Aleksandr Dmitriyevich St Petersburg Opposition gathering   St Petersburg 18/06/2020 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB 10,000 St Petersburg City Court 01/07/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence report from 12.42   p.m. until 6.41 p.m. on 18/06/2020,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings 4,000   4597/22 24/12/2021 Andrey Pavlovich SYCHEV 1988 Prosvirkina Kseniya Dmitriyevna Moscow Rally “Free Navalnyy”   Moscow 31/01/2021 article 20.2 §   6.1 of CAO fine of RUB 15,000 Moscow City Court 15/09/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence report from 12.52   p.m. on 31/01/2021 until 12.50 a.m. on 01/02/2021,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings 4,000   4625/22 24/12/2021 Yevgeniy Aleksandrovich OVCHINNIKOV 2002 Prosvirkina Kseniya Dmitriyevna Moscow Rally “Free Navalnyy”   Moscow 31/01/2021 article 20.2 §   6.1 of CAO fine of RUB 10,000 Moscow City Court 29/06/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence report from 12.05 p.m. on 31/01/2021 until 5.20 p.m. on 01/02/2021,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings 4,000   4766/22 24/12/2021 Denis Anatolyevich GETMAN 1987 Gerasimova Yekaterina Viktorovna St Petersburg Opposition gathering   St Petersburg 22/06/2020 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB 10,000 St Petersburg City Court 06/07/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence report from 12.49   p.m. until 9.49 p.m. on 22/06/2021,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings 4,000   7502/22 30/12/2021 Andrey Andreyevich NOVOKRESHCHENNYKH 1987 Vasin Vladimir Valeryevich Krasnoyarsk Rally “Free Navalnyy”   Krasnoyarsk 31/01/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB 10,000 Krasnoyarsk Regional Court 15/07/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence report from 12.50   p.m. until 4.02 p.m. on 31/01/2021,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings           4,000   7538/22 24/01/2022 Farit Zufarovih SHARAFUTDINOV 1988 Pershakova Yelena Yuryevna Moscow Rally “Free Navalnyy”   Moscow 02/02/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB 10,000 Moscow City Court 29/07/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence report from approximately 11.00 a.m. until 8.00 p.m. on 02/02/2021,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings 4,000   7631/22 18/01/2022 Naum Isayevich GURALNIK 1934 Zboroshenko Nikolay Sergeyevich Mytishchi Forum of independent local elected representatives   Moscow 13/03/2021 article 20.33 of CAO fine of RUB 15,000 Izmaylovskiy District Court in Moscow 22/07/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence report from 10.00   a.m. until 11.00 p.m. on 13/03/2021 4,000   7733/22 13/01/2022 Olga Anatolyevna NIKOLAYEVA 1986 Memorial Human Rights Centre Moscow Rally “Free Navalnyy”   Tver 21/04/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB 12,000 Tver Regional Court 21/07/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence report from 7.05   p.m. until 8.25 p.m. on 21/04/2021,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings 4,000   7746/22 13/01/2022 Mariya Mikhaylovna SHCHETININA 2000 Memorial Human Rights Centre Moscow Rally “Free Navalnyy”   Moscow 31/01/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB 15,000 Moscow City Court 15/07/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence report from 3.00   p.m. on 31/01/2021 until 2.35 a.m. on 01/02/2021,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings 4,000   8030/22 14/01/2022 Sofya Olegovna MEDVEDEVA 1995 Popkov Aleksandr Vasilyevich Sochi Rally “Free Navalnyy”   Sochi 23/01/2021 article 20.2 §   6.1 of CAO fine of RUB 19,000 Krasnodar Regional Court 11/08/2021 Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings 3,500   8097/22 15/01/2022 Yelena Borisovna FERDMAN 1980 Kachanov Roman Yevgenyevich Yekaterinburg Rally “Free Navalnyy”   Ekaterinburg 23/01/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB 15,000 Sverdlovsk Regional Court 21/07/2021 Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings 3,500   8100/22 14/01/2022 Valentin Vladimirovich YAKUNIN 1967 Usanova Olimpiada Valentinovna Nizhniy Novgorod Rally “Free Navalnyy”   Nizhniy Novgorod 31/01/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB 10,000 Nizhniy Novgorod Regional Court 14/07/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence report from 12.40   p.m. until 6.40 p.m. on 31/01/2021,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings 4,000   8245/22 29/01/2022 Anastasiya Arnoldovna MOISEYEVA 2003 Markin Konstantin Aleksandrovich Velikiy Novgorod Rally “Free Navalnyy”   Novgorod 21/04/2021 article 20.2 § 5 du CIA fine of RUB 5,000 Novgorod Regional Court 12/08/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station from 8.00 p.m. until 10.10 p.m. on 21/04/2021,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - absence of a prosecutor in the appeal instance 4,000   27426/22 17/05/2022 Polina Pavlovna BASHUROVA 1998 Zyryanova Mariya Sergeyevna St Petersburg Gathering on occasion of International Day for the Elimination of Violence against Women   St Petersburg 25/11/2021 article 20.2 § 2 of CAO fine of RUB 20,000 St Petersburg City Court 18/01/2022 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence report from 8.15   p.m. on 25/11/2021 until the hearing in the first-instance court on 27/11/2021,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings 4,000   32097/22 31/05/2022 Mikhail Grigoryevich FEDOROV 1972 Podolskiy Sergey Viktorovich St Petersburg Protest against the war in Ukraine   St Petersburg 06/03/2022   Protest against the war in Ukraine   St Petersburg 13/03/2022 article 20.2 §   6.1 of CAO           article 20.2 §   6.1 of CAO fine of RUB 10,000         detention for 5 days St Petersburg City Court 09/06/2022         St Petersburg City Court 17/03/2022 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence report: (i) first set of the proceedings - from 1.50 p.m. on 06/03/2022 until 1.30 a.m. on 07/03/2022; (ii) second set of the proceedings - from 2.30   p.m. on 13/03/2022 until the hearing in the first-instance court on 14/03/2022,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in both sets of the administrative-offence proceedings,   Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - the sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO     5,000   45432/22 26/08/2022 Arina Sergeyevna ZABOLOTSKIKH 2002 Sabirov Rim Faridovich Kazan Protest against the war in Ukraine   Kazan 06/03/2022 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB 10,000 Supreme Court of the Republic of Tatarstan 27/04/2022 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence report: (i) first set of the proceedings - from 2.05 p.m. on 06/03/2022 until the hearing in the first-instance court on 07/03/2022; (ii) second set of the proceedings - from 3.50 on 15/03/2022 until the hearing in the first-instance court on the same day,   Art. 10 (1) - conviction for the display of slogans/banners/other symbols by participants in public events - displaying banner, Art. 20.3.3 § 1 of CAO, fine of RUB 30,000, Supreme Court of the Republic of Tatarstan, 25/05/2022 5,000     [1] Plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicants.