CEDH · CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG — 21 mars 2024

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s2EF17D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:2pt } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s34DFC730 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s10950C61 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sB9D5CABB { width:28.35pt; display:inline-block } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s3AAE10DF { margin-top:14pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s3CA22BA { font-family:Arial; text-transform:uppercase } .s2D9C6089 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s84651E4E { margin-top:14pt; margin-left:14.2pt; margin-bottom:3pt; text-align:justify } .s69DCC830 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sC986E16F { font-family:Arial; color:#ffffff } .sC646A315 { width:14.54pt; display:inline-block } .s459D9084 { width:131.09pt; display:inline-block } .s9852CA4C { width:7.54pt; display:inline-block } .s9E436411 { width:138.09pt; display:inline-block } .s4ACA9207 { page-break-before:always; clear:both; mso-break-type:section-break } .s6DB91820 { text-align:center } .s8BB62139 { margin-right:auto; margin-left:auto; border-collapse:collapse } .s3695F815 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .s2EB42ED2 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:10pt } .sEECE831 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .sE8934522 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold }   SECOND SECTION DECISION Application no. 12702/18 Nazım AŞÇI against Türkiye and 26 other applications (see appended table) The European Court of Human Rights (Second Section), sitting on 21   March 2024 as a Committee composed of:   Frédéric Krenc , President ,   Diana Sârcu,   Davor Derenčinović , judges , and Viktoriya Maradudina, Acting Deputy Section Registrar, Having regard to the above applications lodged on the various dates indicated in the appended table, Having deliberated, decides as follows: FACTS AND PROCEDURE The list of the applicants is set out in the appendix. The applicants’ complaints under Article 5 § 1 of the Convention concerning the unlawful detention were communicated to the Turkish Government (“the Government”), who submitted observations on the admissibility and merits. On various dates the Registry sent letters to the applicants requesting information or certain documents essential to the processing of their applications. No reply was received to these letters. By letters sent by registered post, the applicants were then notified that the period allowed for submission of the requested information or documents had expired and that no extension of time had been requested. The applicants’ attention was drawn to Article 37 § 1 (a) of the Convention, which provides that the Court may strike an application out of its list of cases where the circumstances lead to the conclusion that the applicant does not intend to pursue the application. No response followed. THE LAW Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single decision. In the light of the foregoing, and in the absence of any special circumstances regarding respect for the rights guaranteed by the Convention and the Protocols thereto, the Court, in accordance with Article 37 § 1 (a) of the Convention, considers that it is no longer justified to continue the examination of the applications. Accordingly, the cases should be struck out of the list. For these reasons, the Court, unanimously, Decides to join the applications; Decides to strike the applications out of its list of cases. Done in English and notified in writing on 11 April 2024.     Viktoriya Maradudina   Frédéric Krenc   Acting Deputy Registrar   President   APPENDIX List of applications No. Application no. Case name Lodged on Applicant Year of Birth Place of Residence Nationality Represented by 1. 12702/18 Aşçı v. Türkiye 07/03/2018 Nazım AŞÇI 1991 Istanbul Turkish   2. 25833/18 Demir v. Türkiye 22/05/2018 Cengiz DEMİR 1991 Ankara Turkish   3. 32992/18 Körün v. Türkiye 27/06/2018 Yemliha KÖRÜN 1969 Bursa Turkish   4. 40005/18 Kolcu v. Türkiye 03/08/2018 Salih KOLCU 1990 Van Turkish   5. 57189/18 Gündüz v. Türkiye 13/11/2018 Nusret GÜNDÜZ 1989 Bursa Turkish   6. 3764/19 Aktaş v. Türkiye 14/12/2018 Raif AKTAŞ 1955 İzmir Turkish Sabri YURDAKUL 7. 18486/19 Macit v. Türkiye 21/03/2019 Cengiz MACİT 1978 Istanbul Turkish   8. 21998/19 Efe v. Türkiye 03/04/2019 Yavuz EFE 1983 Zonguldak Turkish   9. 24236/19 Bilgili v. Türkiye 11/04/2019 Avni BİLGİLİ 1965 İzmir Turkish   10. 27386/19 Erduran v. Türkiye 29/04/2019 Mehmet ERDURAN 1992 Çorum Turkish   11. 29123/19 Aslan v. Türkiye 10/05/2019 Cemal ASLAN 1961 Istanbul Turkish Dilan ASLAN 12. 35047/19 Ürkmez v. Türkiye 01/07/2019 Mehmet ÜRKMEZ 1989 Mersin Turkish   13. 36053/19 Dülgeroğlu v. Türkiye 26/06/2019 Nail DÜLGEROĞLU 1975 Ağrı Turkish   14. 37298/19 Demirkazık v. Türkiye 27/06/2019 Necati DEMİRKAZIK 1991 Afyonkarahisar Turkish   15. 38703/19 Tırış v. Türkiye 04/07/2019 İzzet TIRIŞ 1974 Trabzon Turkish   16. 48091/19 Sarıkaya v. Türkiye 02/09/2019 Adem SARIKAYA 1992 İzmir Turkish       17. 2243/20 Sünbül v. Türkiye 24/12/2019 Fehmi SÜNBÜL 1989 Konya Turkish   18. 4432/20 Erdoğan v. Türkiye 06/01/2020 Nevzat ERDOĞAN 1986 İzmir Turkish   19. 8050/20 Erarslan v. Türkiye 22/01/2020 Ömer ERARSLAN 1990 Kayseri Turkish   20. 11568/20 Tekinasa v. Türkiye 17/02/2020 Mücahit Ahmet TEKİNASA 1980 Manisa Turkish   21. 17570/20 Önder v. Türkiye 03/04/2020 Muharrem ÖNDER 1984 Isparta Turkish   22. 22995/20 Dündar v. Türkiye 28/05/2020 Murat DÜNDAR 1987 Istanbul Turkish Halime DÜNDAR 23. 24402/20 Güler v. Türkiye 20/05/2020 Ümit GÜLER 1977 Sakarya Turkish Şengül GÜLER 24. 26045/20 Ay v. Türkiye 25/06/2020 Şaban AY 1989 Nevşehir Turkish Aysel AY 25. 28118/20 Yılmaz v. Türkiye 24/06/2020 Nurullah YILMAZ 1984 Çorum Turkish   26. 34782/20 Altun v. Türkiye 20/07/2020 Gündüz ALTUN 1970 Ankara Turkish   27. 45661/21 Aslan v. Türkiye 27/08/2021 Yusuf ASLAN 1997 Istanbul Turkish