CEDH · CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG — 21 mars 2024

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .sFE10DC93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s665E407E { margin-top:66pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .s34DFC730 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s82B4DA5F { page-break-before:right; clear:both; mso-break-type:section-break } .s10950C61 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .sB9D5CABB { width:28.35pt; display:inline-block } .s3AAE10DF { margin-top:14pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s3CA22BA { font-family:Arial; text-transform:uppercase } .s6B505E72 { margin:0pt; padding-left:0pt } .sDECD9755 { margin-left:11.67pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; padding-left:6.78pt; font-family:Arial; text-transform:uppercase } .sDA7B489D { margin-top:14pt; margin-left:15pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; padding-left:3.45pt; font-family:Arial; text-transform:uppercase } .s5C5C410E { margin-top:14pt; margin-left:18.34pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; padding-left:0.11pt; font-family:Arial; text-transform:uppercase } .s67CAFE05 { margin-top:14pt; margin-left:18.45pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-family:Arial; text-transform:uppercase } .s7C22C014 { margin-top:14pt; margin-left:16.34pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; padding-left:2.11pt; font-family:Arial; text-transform:uppercase } .sD11CFAB7 { margin-top:14pt; margin-left:15.01pt; margin-bottom:3pt; text-align:justify; padding-left:1.99pt; font-family:Arial } .sFBC99493 { font-style:italic } .sD58C010 { margin-top:14pt; margin-left:15.01pt; margin-bottom:3pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; padding-left:1.99pt; font-family:Arial } .sBB6E85D0 { margin-top:0pt; margin-left:34pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:-17pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .sE5BF05B1 { width:2.33pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } .s2D9C6089 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s69DCC830 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sC986E16F { font-family:Arial; color:#ffffff } .sC646A315 { width:14.54pt; display:inline-block } .s3DF5EF88 { width:128.75pt; display:inline-block } .s9852CA4C { width:7.54pt; display:inline-block } .s9E436411 { width:138.09pt; display:inline-block } .s4ACA9207 { page-break-before:always; clear:both; mso-break-type:section-break } .sCC22C24E { font-family:Arial; color:#3e3e3e } .s6DB91820 { text-align:center } .s8BB62139 { margin-right:auto; margin-left:auto; border-collapse:collapse } .s3695F815 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .sDF237D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:8pt } .sEECE831 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .sC39F4804 { font-family:Arial; font-size:5.33pt; font-weight:bold; vertical-align:super; color:#474747 } .sE8934522 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s4F2ADFDB { text-align:center; font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; list-style-position:inside } .sBB6163A7 { width:2.48pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } .s5FFF0A7E { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:8pt } .sF6A12959 { width:33%; height:1px; text-align:left } .sA4BC3E2E { font-family:Arial; font-size:5.33pt; vertical-align:super; color:#000000 }       THIRD SECTION CASE OF SKOBELEV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA (Applications nos. 13038/18 and 39 others – see appended list)             JUDGMENT   STRASBOURG 21 March 2024   This judgment is final but it may be subject to editorial revision. In the case of Skobelev and Others v. Russia, The European Court of Human Rights (Third Section), sitting as a Committee composed of:   Peeter Roosma , President ,   Ioannis Ktistakis,   Andreas Zünd , judges , and Viktoriya Maradudina, Acting Deputy Section Registrar, Having deliberated in private on 22 February 2024, Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on that date: PROCEDURE 1.     The case originated in applications against Russia lodged with the Court under Article   34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) on the various dates indicated in the appended table. 2.     The Russian Government (“the   Government”) were given notice of the applications. THE FACTS 3.     The list of applicants and the relevant details of the applications are set out in the appended table. 4.     The applicants complained of the disproportionate measures taken against them as organisers or participants of public assemblies. They also raised other complaints under the provisions of the Convention. THE LAW JOINDER OF THE APPLICATIONS 5.     Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single judgment. JURISDICTION 6.     The Court observes that the facts giving rise to the alleged violations of the Convention occurred prior to 16 September 2022, the date on which the Russian Federation ceased to be a party to the Convention. The Court therefore decides that it has jurisdiction to examine the present applications (see Fedotova and Others v. Russia [GC], nos.   40792/10 and 2   others, §§   68 ‑ 73, 17   January 2023). ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE   11 OF THE CONVENTION 7.     The applicants complained principally of disproportionate measures taken against them as organisers or participants of public assemblies, namely their arrest in relation to the dispersal of these assemblies and their conviction for administrative offences. They relied, expressly or in substance, on Article   11 of the Convention. 8.     The Court refers to the principles established in its case-law regarding freedom of assembly (see Kudrevičius and Others v.   Lithuania [GC], no.   37553/05, ECHR 2015, with further references) and proportionality of interference with it (see Oya Ataman v.   Turkey , no.   74552/01, ECHR 2006 ‑ XIV, and Hyde Park and Others v.   Moldova , no.   33482/06, 31   March 2009). 9.     In the leading cases of Frumkin v. Russia, no. 74568/12, ECHR 2016 (extracts), Navalnyy and Yashin v. Russia, no. 76204/11, 4 December 2014 and Kasparov and Others v. Russia, no. 21613/07, 3 October 2013, the Court already found a violation in respect of issues similar to those in the present case. 10.     Having examined all the material submitted to it, the Court has not found any fact or argument capable of persuading it to reach a different conclusion as to the admissibility and merits of these complaints. Having regard to its case-law on the subject, the Court considers that in the instant case the interferences with the applicants’ freedom of assembly were not “necessary in a democratic society”. 11.     These complaints are therefore admissible and disclose a breach of Article 11 of the Convention. OTHER ALLEGED VIOLATIONS UNDER WELL-ESTABLISHED CASE-LAW 12.     Some applicants submitted other complaints which also raised issues under the Convention and its Protocols, given the relevant well-established case-law of the Court (see appended table). These complaints are not manifestly ill-founded within the meaning of Article 35 § 3 (a) of the Convention, nor are they inadmissible on any other ground. Accordingly, they must be declared admissible. 13.     Having examined all the material before it, the Court concludes that these complaints also disclose violations of the Convention and its Protocols in the light of its findings in Butkevich v. Russia , no.   5865/07, §§   63-65, 13   February 2018, Tsvetkova and Others v. Russia , nos.   54381/08 and 5   others, §§ 115-31, 10 April 2018, and Korneyeva v.   Russia , no.   72051/17, §§ 34-36, 8 October 2019, as to various aspects of unlawful deprivation of liberty of organisers or participants of public assemblies; Karelin v. Russia , no. 926/08, §§ 58-85, 20 September 2016, concerning the absence of a prosecuting party in the proceedings under the Code of Administrative Offences (the CAO); Martynyuk v.   Russia , no.   13764/15, §§ 38-42, 8   October 2019, relating to the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal against the sentence of administrative detention. REMAINING COMPLAINTS 14.     Some applicants raised further additional complaints under Article 6 of the Convention and under Article 4 of Protocol No. 7 concerning other aspects of fairness of the administrative-offence proceedings. In view of the findings in the above paragraphs, the Court considers that there is no need to deal separately with these remaining complaints. APPLICATION OF ARTICLE 41 OF THE CONVENTION 15.     Regard being had to the documents in its possession and to its case ‑ law (see in particular Navalnyy and Others v. Russia [Committee], nos.   25809/17 and 14 others, §   22, 4   October 2022), the Court finds it reasonable to award the sums indicated in the appended table. FOR THESE REASONS, THE COURT, UNANIMOUSLY, Decides to join the applications; Holds that it has jurisdiction to deal with these applications as they relate to facts that took place before 16   September 2022; Declares the complaints under Article 11 of the Convention and the other complaints under the well-established case-law of the Court, as set out in the appended table, admissible, and finds that there is no need to examine separately the remaining complaints; Holds that these applications disclose a breach of Article   11 of the Convention; Holds that there has been a violation of the Convention and the Protocols thereto as regards the other complaints raised under the well-established case-law of the Court (see appended table); Holds (a)   that the respondent State is to pay the applicants, within three months, the amounts indicated in the appended table, to be converted into the currency of the respondent State at the rate applicable at the date of settlement; (b)   that from the expiry of the above-mentioned three months until settlement simple interest shall be payable on the above amounts at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points. Done in English, and notified in writing on 21 March 2024, pursuant to Rule   77   §§   2 and   3 of the Rules of Court.     Viktoriya Maradudina   Peeter Roosma   Acting Deputy Registrar   President     APPENDIX List of applications raising complaints under Article 11 of the Convention (disproportionate measures against organisers and participants of public assemblies) No. Application no. Date of introduction Applicant’s name Year of birth   Representative’s name and location Name of the public event Location Date Administrative / criminal offence Penalty Final domestic decision Court Name Date Other complaints under well-established case-law Amount awarded for pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage and costs and expenses per applicant (in euros) [1]     13038/18 10/02/2018 Yevgeniy SKOBELEV 1975     Anti-corruption rally   St Petersburg   12/06/2017 article 19.3 § 1 of CAO, article   20.2 § 5 of CAO two fines of RUB   10,000 each St   Petersburg City Court 10/09/2017 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 2.51 p.m. until 9.53 p.m. on 12/06/2017;   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - in both sets of administrative-offence proceedings. 4,000     18226/19 27/03/2019 Yuriy Nikolayevich ZAVARIN 1987 Laptev Aleksey Nikolayevich Moscow Rally to call for fair elections   St Petersburg   05/05/2018 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB   10,000 St Petersburg City Court 27/09/2018 Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings     3,500     32325/19 20/05/2019 Aleksey Vladimirovich OTRYAKHIN 1986 Yatsenko Irina Aleksandrovna Moscow Opposition rally   Moscow   05/05/2018 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO, and   article   19.3 § 1 of CAO fine of RUB   15,000 and     fine RUB   1,000 Moscow City Court 20/11/2018 (both sets of the proceedings)   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - in both sets of administrative-offence proceedings     3,500     46710/21 08/09/2021 Yelena Nikitichna SANNIKOVA 1959 Pershakova Yelena Yuryevna Moscow Rally "Free Azat Miftakhov"   Moscow   25/12/2020 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB   10,000 Moscow City Court 06/04/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 4.20 p.m. until 10.30 p.m. on 25/12/2020;   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings 4,000     46952/21 01/09/2021 Andrey Aleksandrovich BALUSHKIN 2002 Tkachenko Nikita Nikolayevich Belgorod Rally "Free Navalnyy"   Belgorod   23/01/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO 20 hours of community work Belgorod Regional Court 01/03/2021   3,500     47049/21 01/09/2021 Sergey Dmitriyevich KOTELNIKOV 2001 Tkachenko Nikita Nikolayevich Belgorod Rally "Free Navalnyy"   Belgorod   23/01/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO 30 hours of community work Belgorod Regional Court 01/03/2021   3,500     47050/21 07/09/2021 Andrey Gennadyevich DEMIN 1960 Memorial Human Rights Centre Moscow Rally "Free Navalnyy"   Moscow   23/01/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB   10,000 Moscow City Court 04/03/2021 (decision served on the applicant after 07/03/2021)   Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 2.30 p.m. on 23/01/2021 until 00.15   a.m. on 24/01/2021;     Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings   4,000     47109/21 02/09/2021 Yevgeniy Andreyevich SELIVANOV 1989 Memorial Human Rights Centre Moscow Rally "Free Navalnyy"   Volgograd   31/01/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO, article   20.2 § 2 of CAO fine of RUB   10,000 and detention for 5 days Volgograd Regional Court 11/03/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 1.30 p.m. until 10.00 p.m. on 31/01/2021;   Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - the sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO 5,000     47129/21 02/09/2021 Nikita Yuryevich KOZLOV 2001 Memorial Human Rights Centre Moscow Rally "Free Navalnyy"   Moscow   31/01/2021 article 20.2 §   6.1 of CAO detention for 8 days Moscow City Court 02/03/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 6.04 p.m. on 31/01/2021 until 6.00 p.m. on 01/02/2021;     Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings;     Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - the sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO 5,000   47246/21 16/09/2021 Amir Damirovich FATTAKHOV 1994 Memorial Human Rights Centre Moscow Rally "Free Navalnyy"   Moscow   31/01/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB   10,000 Moscow City Court 19/05/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 1.43 p.m. until 10.30 p.m. on 31/01/2021;     Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings         4,000   47445/21 09/09/2021 Maksim Alekseyevich NIKITIN 2000 Markin Konstantin Aleksandrovich Velikiy Novgorod Rally "Free Navalnyy"   Velikiy Novgorod   23/01/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO 20 hours of community work Novgorod Regional Court 23/04/2021     4,000   47650/21 01/09/2021 Yekaterina Nikolayevna LEZHNEVA 1997 Tkachenko Nikita Nikolayevich Belgorod Rally "Free Navalnyy"   Belgorod   23/01/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB   10,000 Belgorod Regional Court 01/03/2021   3,500   47652/21 01/09/2021 Artur Vladimirovich GARKOVSKIY 1993 Tkachenko Nikita Nikolayevich Belgorod Rally "Free Navalnyy"   Belgorod   23/01/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO 20 hours of community work Belgorod Regional Court 01/03/2021   3,500   47658/21 15/09/2021 Kirill Yevgenyevich NADEZHDIN 1994 Pomazuyev Aleksandr Yevgenyevich Vilnius Rally "Free Navalnyy"   Naberezhnye Chelny   23/01/2021     article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB   10,000 Supreme Court of the Tatarstan Republic 24/03/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to the police station on 02/02/2021 for compiling an offence report 4,000   48209/21 24/09/2021 Sergey Nikolayevich POTANIN 1986 Memorial Human Rights Centre Moscow Rally "Free Navalnyy"   Penza   23/01/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB   10,000 Penza Regional Court 01/04/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 2.15 p.m. until 6.45 p.m. on 23/01/2021;   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings 4,000   48333/21 30/08/2021 Aleksandr Konstantinovich KOTELNIKOV 1980 Pershakova Yelena Yuryevna Moscow Rally "Free Navalnyy"   Moscow   31/01/2021 article 20.2 §   6.1 of CAO fine of RUB   10,000 Moscow City Court 06/04/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 3.20 p.m. on 31/01/2021 until 2.00 p.m. on 01/02/2021;   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings 4,000   48722/21 26/08/2021 Yuriy Olegovich DMITRIYEV 1988 Pomazuyev Aleksandr Yevgenyevich Vilnius Rally “Free Navalnyy”   Kazan 31/01/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB   10,000 Supreme Court of Tatarstan 17/03/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to the police station on 31/01/2021 for compiling an offence report 4,000   50600/21 30/09/2021 Pavel Borisovich MOREV 2002 Valenkov Andrey Olegovich Nizhniy Novgorod Rally "Free Navalnyy"   Nizhniy Novgorod   31/01/2021 article 20.2 §   6.1 of CAO fine of RUB   10,000 Nizhniy Novgorod Regional Court 31/03/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 1.30 p.m. on 31/01/2021 until 6.00 p.m. on 01/02/2021     4,000   50608/21 22/08/2021 Mars Vygyzovich KHUSAINOV 1982 Antokhin Yevgeniy Vyacheslavovich Moscow Rally "Free Navalnyy"   Moscow   31/01/2021 article 20.2 §   6.1 of CAO detention for 5 days Moscow City Court 02/04/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 2.30 p.m. on 31/01/2021 until 2.25 p.m. on 02/02/2021;   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings;   Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - the sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO 5,000   50618/21 22/09/2021 Olga Mikhaylovna BOGDANOVA 1985 Antokhin Yevgeniy Vyacheslavovich Moscow Rally "Free Navalnyy"   Moscow   31/01/2021 article 20.2 §   6.1 of CAO detention for 3 days Moscow City Court 02/04/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 3.00 p.m. on 31/01/2021 until 1.30 a.m. on 03/02/2021;   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings;     Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - the sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO 5,000   50621/21 22/09/2021 Ilya Andreyevich MALOV 1986 Antokhin Yevgeniy Vyacheslavovich Moscow Rally "Free Navalnyy"   Moscow   31/01/2021 article 20.2 §   6.1 of CAO detention for 8 days Moscow City Court 02/04/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 1.35 p.m. on 31/01/2021 until 9.00 a.m. on 02/02/2021;   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings;     Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - the sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO     5,000   50624/21 24/09/2021 Yuliya Aleksandrovna YUDINA 2000 Kachanov Roman Yevgenyevich Yekaterinburg Rally "Free Navalnyy"   Yekaterinburg   31/01/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO 30 hours of community work Sverdlovsk Regional Court 25/03/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to the police station on 31/01/2021 for compiling an offence report;   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings 4,000   51114/21 12/10/2021 Vyacheslav Igorevich PYATAKOV 2002 Memorial Human Rights Centre Moscow Rally "Free Navalnyy"   Moscow   02/02/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB   15,000 Moscow City Court 12/04/2021 Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings;   Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 10.05. a.m. until 3.20 p.m. on 02/02/2021 4,000   54788/21 10/10/2021 Viktoriya Vladimirovna KOZYREVA 1996 Tkachenko Nikita Nikolayevich Belgorod Rally "Free Navalnyy"   Belgorod   21/04/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB   10,000 Belgorod Regional Court 09/08/2021   3,500   54791/21 10/10/2021 Tatyana Andreyevna KUPRIYENKO 1960 Tkachenko Nikita Nikolayevich Belgorod Rally "Free Navalnyy"   Belgorod   31/01/2021 article 20.2 § 2 of CAO fine of RUB   5,000 Belgorod Regional Court 28/06/2021   3,500   55546/21 11/11/2021 Tagir Rovshanovich ALIYEV 1999 Pershakova Yelena Yuryevna Moscow Rally "Free Navalnyy"   St Petersburg   31/01/2021 article 20.2 §   6.1 of CAO fine of RUB   10,000 St Petersburg City Court 11/05/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to the police station on 31/01/2021 for compiling an offence report 4,000   55580/21 20/10/2021 Anna Dmitriyevna SHARONOVA 1999 Nurgaleyev Danil Ilnurovich Kazan Rally "Free Navalnyy"   Kazan   21/04/2021 article 20.2 § 2 of CAO fine of RUB   10,000 Supreme Court of the Tatarstan Republic 02/06/2021   3,500   57073/21 11/10/2021 Yelizaveta Aleksandrovna REMESLOVA 1996 Pershakova Yelena Yuryevna Moscow Rally "Free Navalnyy"   Krasnoyarsk   31/01/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB   10,000 Krasnoyarsk Regional Court 13/05/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 1.20 p.m. until 7.00 p.m. on 31/01/2021;   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings 4,000   57087/21 11/11/2021 Daniil Anatolyevich DUMANSKIY 1992 Memorial Human Rights Centre Moscow Rally "Free Navalnyy"   Bryansk   31/01/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB   10,000 Bryansk Regional Court 11/05/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 2.25 p.m. on 31/01/2021 until 4.00   p.m. on 02/02/2021;     Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings 4,000   57100/21 29/10/2021 Anastasiya Ivanovna KORSHUNOVA 1984 Memorial Human Rights Centre Moscow Rally "Free Navalnyy"   Kursk   23/01/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB   10,000 Kursk Regional Court 29/04/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 2.42 p.m. until 7.30 p.m. on 23/01/2021;   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings 4,000   57121/21 29/10/2021 Nikita Olegovich PORTNOV 2001 Memorial Human Rights Centre Moscow Rally "Free Navalnyy"   Samara   23/01/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB   10,000 Samara Regional Court 29/04/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 3.30 p.m. until 9.00 p.m. on 23/01/2021 4,000   57317/21 10/11/2021 Mariya Vadimovna DRACHEVA 1994 Memorial Human Rights Centre Moscow Rally "Free Navalnyy"   Tomsk   21/04/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB   18,000 Tomsk Regional Court 21/05/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 8.00 p.m. on 21/04/2021 until 00.30   a.m. on 22/04/2021;   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings 4,000   57552/21 18/11/2021 Georgiy Pavlovich KRYUCHKOV 2000 Memorial Human Rights Centre Moscow Rally "Free Navalnyy"   Moscow   02/02/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB   10,000 Moscow City Court 19/05/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 11.47 p.m. on 02/02/2021 until 05.30   a.m. on 03/02/2021;   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings 4,000   57558/21 18/11/2021 Aleksandr Igorevich ANDROSOV 1981 Memorial Human Rights Centre Moscow Rally "Free Navalnyy"   Moscow   31/01/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB   10,000 Moscow City Court 21/05/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 3.30 p.m. on 31/01/2021 until 2.00 a.m. on 01/02/2021;     Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings 4,000   57561/21 18/11/2021 Irina Gennadyevna TUGOLUKOVA 1975 Memorial Human Rights Centre Moscow Rally "Free Navalnyy"   Moscow   31/01/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB   10,000 Moscow City Court 19/05/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 11.55. a.m. to 8.20 p.m. on 31/01/2021     4,000   57570/21 18/11/2021 Sergey Viktorovich FILATOV 1975 Memorial Human Rights Centre Moscow Rally "Free Navalnyy"   Moscow   23/01/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB   20,000 Moscow City Court 19/05/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 5.30 p.m. on 23/01/2021 until 01.45   a.m. on 24/01/2021;     Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings 4,000   57573/21 10/11/2021 Yelena Igorevna NAUMOVA 1991 Memorial Human Rights Centre Moscow Rally "Free Navalnyy"   Vladivostok   31/01/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO 30 hours of community work Primorye Regional Court 11/05/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 3.36 p.m. until 9.45 p.m. on 31/01/2021;     Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings 4,000   57720/21 26/10/2021 Aleksey Romanovich CHIZHIKOV 2001 Memorial Human Rights Centre Moscow Rally "Free Navalnyy"   Vladivostok   31/01/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB   7,500 Primorskiy Regional Court 27/04/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 2.05 p.m. until 9.30 p.m. on 31/01/2021;   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings 4,000   57740/21 18/11/2021 Aleksandr Alkeseyevich KOSTYUKHIN 1958 Memorial Human Rights Centre Moscow Rally "Free Navalnyy"   Moscow   02/02/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB   10,000 Moscow City Court 19/05/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 1.30 p.m. until 7.40 p.m. on 02/02/2021;     Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings 4,000   57745/21 18/11/2021 Margarita Aleksandrovna MALTSEVA 2002 Memorial Human Rights Centre Moscow Rally "Free Navalnyy"   Vladivostok   31/01/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB   15,000 Primorskiy Regional Court 25/05/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 2.05 p.m. until 9.30 p.m. on 31/01/2021;     Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings 4,000     [1] Plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicants.