CEDH · CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG — 4 avril 2024

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s2EF17D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:2pt } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s34DFC730 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s10950C61 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sB9D5CABB { width:28.35pt; display:inline-block } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s3AAE10DF { margin-top:14pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s3CA22BA { font-family:Arial; text-transform:uppercase } .sA1D3DA2E { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:justify } .s2D9C6089 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s84651E4E { margin-top:14pt; margin-left:14.2pt; margin-bottom:3pt; text-align:justify } .s69DCC830 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sC986E16F { font-family:Arial; color:#ffffff } .sC646A315 { width:14.54pt; display:inline-block } .s459D9084 { width:131.09pt; display:inline-block } .s9852CA4C { width:7.54pt; display:inline-block } .s9E436411 { width:138.09pt; display:inline-block } .s4ACA9207 { page-break-before:always; clear:both; mso-break-type:section-break } .sF28C8B01 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s23860FF7 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:center } .sFF075836 { margin-right:7.05pt; margin-left:7.05pt; border-collapse:collapse; } .s3695F815 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .sDF237D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:8pt } .sEECE831 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .sE8934522 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .s8C4ED782 { border-top:0.75pt solid #949494; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-left:0.75pt solid #949494; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sFE10DC93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center }   SECOND SECTION DECISION Application no. 9804/19 Hüsnü ŞENYAYLA against Türkiye and 10 other applications (see appended table) The European Court of Human Rights (Second Section), sitting on 4 April 2024 as a Committee composed of:   Frédéric Krenc , President ,   Diana Sârcu,   Davor Derenčinović , judges , and Viktoriya Maradudina, Acting Deputy Section Registrar, Having regard to the above applications lodged on the various dates indicated in the appended table, Having deliberated, decides as follows: FACTS AND PROCEDURE The list of the applicants is set out in the appendix. The applicant’s complaints under Article 8 of the Convention concerning the electronic recording and storage of their private correspondence in the National Judicial Network System (UYAP) by the authorities during their detention, were communicated to the Turkish Government (“the Government”), who submitted observations on the admissibility and merits. The observations were forwarded to the applicants, who were invited to submit their own observations. No reply was received to the Registry’s letters. By letters dated 6 October 2023, sent by registered post, the applicants were notified that the period allowed for submission of their observations   had expired on 8 March 2023 and that no extension of time had been requested. The applicants’ attention was drawn to Article   37   §   1   (a) of the Convention, which provides that the Court may strike an application out of its list of cases where the circumstances lead to the conclusion that the applicant does not intend to pursue the application. The applicants received these letters on the various dates, indicated in the appended table. However, no response has followed. THE LAW Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single decision. In the light of the foregoing, and in the absence of any special circumstances regarding respect for the rights guaranteed by the Convention and the Protocols thereto, the Court, in accordance with Article   37   §   1   (a) of the Convention, considers that it is no longer justified to continue the examination of the applications. Accordingly, the applications should be struck out of the list. For these reasons, the Court, unanimously, Decides to join the applications; Decides to strike the applications out of its list of cases. Done in English and notified in writing on 25 April 2024.     Viktoriya Maradudina   Frédéric Krenc   Acting Deputy Registrar   President   APPENDIX     No. Application no. Case name Lodged on Applicant Year of Birth Represented by Date on which the registered letter was delivered to the applicant 1. 9804/19 Şenyayla v. Türkiye 31/01/2019 Hüsnü ŞENYAYLA 1974 Mehmet ÜNLÜ 30/10/2023 2. 6476/20 Mart v. Türkiye 03/01/2020 Ufuk MART 1987   02/11/2023 3. 8058/20 Köksalan v. Türkiye 22/01/2020 Mustafa KÖKSALAN 1972 Mehmet Fatih ARSLAN 27/10/2023 4. 13485/20 Kocayılmaz v. Türkiye 25/02/2020 Ömer Faruk KOCAYILMAZ 1991 Mehmet Fatih ARSLAN 27/10/2023 5. 38025/20 Bulut v. Türkiye 04/08/2020 Ahmet BULUT 1980   30/10/2023 6. 53031/20 Kazıcı v. Türkiye 16/11/2020 Cemil KAZICI 1989 Mehmet Fatih ARSLAN 27/10/2023 7. 746/21 Tuştaş v. Türkiye 08/12/2020 Veysel TUŞTAŞ 1981 Bayram KAYA 27/10/2023 8. 12180/21 Koç v. Türkiye 10/02/2021 Asef KOÇ 1986 Eyyup KOÇ 26/10/2023 9. 17959/21 Dağ v. Türkiye 25/03/2021 Murat DAĞ 1986 Semra KISA 26/10/2023 10. 28488/21 Günerigök v. Türkiye 24/05/2021 Hamza GÜNERİGÖK 1987 Arafat SAV 01/11/2023 11. 28937/21 Hoşca v. Türkiye 27/05/2021 Fikret HOŞCA 1987 Erol Cağatay DEMİRTAŞ 25/10/2023