CEDH · CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG — 11 avril 2024

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .sFE10DC93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s2EF17D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:2pt } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s5FFF0A77 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:1pt } .s10950C61 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sB9D5CABB { width:28.35pt; display:inline-block } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s3AAE10DF { margin-top:14pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s3CA22BA { font-family:Arial; text-transform:uppercase } .s9F46BEC9 { margin-top:14pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify; font-size:14pt } .s84651E4E { margin-top:14pt; margin-left:14.2pt; margin-bottom:3pt; text-align:justify } .s2D9C6089 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s69DCC830 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sC986E16F { font-family:Arial; color:#ffffff } .sBD1BE8CC { width:33.89pt; display:inline-block } .s9AA0C774 { width:151.77pt; display:inline-block } .s5D826FD4 { width:25.88pt; display:inline-block } .s1B61D60 { width:156.43pt; display:inline-block }     FIFTH SECTION DECISION Application no. 44462/16 Vladyslav Vitaliyovych DYACHENKO against Ukraine   The European Court of Human Rights (Fifth Section), sitting on 11 April 2024 as a Committee composed of:   Carlo Ranzoni , President ,   Mattias Guyomar,   Mykola Gnatovskyy , judges , and Martina Keller, Deputy Section Registrar, Having regard to: the application (no.   44462/16) against Ukraine lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) on 19 July 2016 by a Ukrainian national, Mr Vladyslav Vitaliyovych Dyachenko (“the applicant”), who was born in 1970 and, according to the most recent information, lives in Energodar; Having deliberated, decides as follows: SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The application concerns the applicant’s dismissal from the post of deputy mayor of Energodar in 2010 and the related judicial proceedings terminated in 2016. The applicant complains that his dismissal resulted in a violation of Article 8 of the Convention and Article   1 of Protocol No.   1 and that the judicial proceedings were conducted unfairly and lasted too long, contrary to Articles   6   §   1 and 13 of the Convention. THE COURT’S ASSESSMENT The Court notes that the applicant’s known address is in Energodar, a town in the Zaporizhzhya Region that has been outside the Ukrainian Government’s control since March 2022. Since that time, no correspondence has been received from the applicant. The Registry’s attempts to contact him using the telephone number and email address he provided earlier have been futile. Having regard to the Court’s decisions striking out the applications against Ukraine in which there was a lack of communication with certain applicants since the full ‑ scale military attack launched by the Russian Federation against Ukraine on 24   February   2022 (see Bryska and Others v.   Ukraine (dec.) [Committee], nos. 11706/13 and 5 others, 2 November 2023) and Zhadan and Others v. Ukraine (dec.) [Committee], nos. 29283/13 and 26 others, 14   December 2023), the circumstances of the present case justify striking it out of its list. In accordance with Article   37   §   1   in fine , the Court finds no special circumstances regarding respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and its Protocols which require the continued examination of the application. The Court once again reiterates, as it did in Bryska and Others , and Zhadan and Others , cited above, that under Article 37 § 2 of the Convention it may decide to restore an application to its list of cases if it considers that the circumstances justify such a course. In view of the foregoing, it is appropriate to strike the application out of the list. For these reasons, the Court, unanimously, Decides to strike the application out of its list of cases. Done in English and notified in writing on 16 May 2024.     Martina Keller   Carlo Ranzoni   Deputy Registrar   President