CEDH · CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG — 25 avril 2024

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .sFE10DC93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s665E407E { margin-top:66pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .s34DFC730 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s82B4DA5F { page-break-before:right; clear:both; mso-break-type:section-break } .s10950C61 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .sB9D5CABB { width:28.35pt; display:inline-block } .s3AAE10DF { margin-top:14pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s3CA22BA { font-family:Arial; text-transform:uppercase } .s6B505E72 { margin:0pt; padding-left:0pt } .sDECD9755 { margin-left:11.67pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; padding-left:6.78pt; font-family:Arial; text-transform:uppercase } .sDA7B489D { margin-top:14pt; margin-left:15pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; padding-left:3.45pt; font-family:Arial; text-transform:uppercase } .s5C5C410E { margin-top:14pt; margin-left:18.34pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; padding-left:0.11pt; font-family:Arial; text-transform:uppercase } .s67CAFE05 { margin-top:14pt; margin-left:18.45pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-family:Arial; text-transform:uppercase } .s7C22C014 { margin-top:14pt; margin-left:16.34pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; padding-left:2.11pt; font-family:Arial; text-transform:uppercase } .sD11CFAB7 { margin-top:14pt; margin-left:15.01pt; margin-bottom:3pt; text-align:justify; padding-left:1.99pt; font-family:Arial } .sFBC99493 { font-style:italic } .sD58C010 { margin-top:14pt; margin-left:15.01pt; margin-bottom:3pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; padding-left:1.99pt; font-family:Arial } .sBB6E85D0 { margin-top:0pt; margin-left:34pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:-17pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .sE5BF05B1 { width:2.33pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } .s2D9C6089 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s69DCC830 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sC986E16F { font-family:Arial; color:#ffffff } .sC646A315 { width:14.54pt; display:inline-block } .s3DF5EF88 { width:128.75pt; display:inline-block } .s9852CA4C { width:7.54pt; display:inline-block } .s9E436411 { width:138.09pt; display:inline-block } .s4ACA9207 { page-break-before:always; clear:both; mso-break-type:section-break } .sCC22C24E { font-family:Arial; color:#3e3e3e } .s6DB91820 { text-align:center } .s8BB62139 { margin-right:auto; margin-left:auto; border-collapse:collapse } .s3695F815 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .sDF237D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:8pt } .sEECE831 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .sC39F4804 { font-family:Arial; font-size:5.33pt; font-weight:bold; vertical-align:super; color:#474747 } .sE8934522 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s4F2ADFDB { text-align:center; font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; list-style-position:inside } .sBB6163A7 { width:2.48pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } .sF6A12959 { width:33%; height:1px; text-align:left } .s5FFF0A7E { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:8pt } .sA4BC3E2E { font-family:Arial; font-size:5.33pt; vertical-align:super; color:#000000 }       THIRD SECTION CASE OF KUZNETSOVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA (Applications nos. 33552/21 and 36 others – see appended list)             JUDGMENT   STRASBOURG 25 April 2024   This judgment is final but it may be subject to editorial revision. In the case of Kuznetsova and Others v. Russia, The European Court of Human Rights (Third Section), sitting as a Committee composed of:   Peeter Roosma , President ,   Ioannis Ktistakis,   Andreas Zünd , judges , and Viktoriya Maradudina, Acting Deputy Section Registrar, Having deliberated in private on 4 April 2024, Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on that date: PROCEDURE 1.     The case originated in applications against Russia lodged with the Court under Article   34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) on the various dates indicated in the appended table. 2.     The Russian Government (“the   Government”) were given notice of the applications. THE FACTS 3.     The list of applicants and the relevant details of the applications are set out in the appended table. 4.     The applicants complained of the disproportionate measures taken against them as organisers or participants of public assemblies. Some applicants also raised other complaints under the provisions of the Convention. THE LAW JOINDER OF THE APPLICATIONS 5.     Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single judgment. JURISDICTION 6.     The Court observes that the facts giving rise to the alleged violations of the Convention occurred prior to 16 September 2022, the date on which the Russian Federation ceased to be a party to the Convention. The Court therefore decides that it has jurisdiction to examine the present applications (see Fedotova and Others v. Russia [GC], nos.   40792/10 and 2 others, §§   68 ‑ 73, 17   January 2023). ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE   11 OF THE CONVENTION 7.     The applicants complained principally of disproportionate measures taken against them as organisers or participants of public assemblies, namely their arrest in relation to the dispersal of these assemblies and their conviction for administrative offences. They relied, expressly or in substance, on Article   11 of the Convention. 8.     The Court refers to the principles established in its case-law regarding freedom of assembly (see Kudrevičius and Others v.   Lithuania [GC], no.   37553/05, ECHR 2015, with further references) and proportionality of interference with it (see Oya Ataman v.   Turkey , no.   74552/01, ECHR   2006 ‑ XIV, and Hyde Park and Others v.   Moldova , no.   33482/06, 31   March 2009). 9.     In the leading cases of Frumkin v. Russia, no. 74568/12, ECHR 2016 (extracts), Navalnyy and Yashin v. Russia, no. 76204/11, 4 December 2014, and Kasparov and Others v. Russia, no. 21613/07, 3 October 2013, the Court already found a violation in respect of issues similar to those in the present case. 10.     Having examined all the material submitted to it, the Court has not found any fact or argument capable of persuading it to reach a different conclusion as to the admissibility and merits of these complaints. Having regard to its case-law on the subject, the Court considers that in the instant case the interferences with the applicants’ freedom of assembly were not “necessary in a democratic society”. 11 .     These complaints are therefore admissible and disclose a breach of Article 11 of the Convention. OTHER ALLEGED VIOLATIONS UNDER WELL-ESTABLISHED CASE-LAW 12.     Some applicants submitted other complaints which also raised issues under the Convention and its Protocols, given the relevant well-established case-law of the Court (see appended table). These complaints are not manifestly ill-founded within the meaning of Article 35 § 3 (a) of the Convention, nor are they inadmissible on any other ground. Accordingly, they must be declared admissible. 13 .     Having examined all the material before it, the Court concludes that these complaints also disclose violations of the Convention and its Protocols in the light of its findings in Butkevich v. Russia , no.   5865/07, §§   63-65, 13   February 2018, Tsvetkova and Others v. Russia , nos.   54381/08 and 5   others, §§ 115-31, 10   April 2018, and Korneyeva v.   Russia , no.   72051/17, §§ 34-36, 8   October 2019, as to various aspects of unlawful deprivation of liberty of organisers or participants of public assemblies; Karelin v. Russia , no. 926/08, §§ 58-85, 20   September 2016, concerning the absence of a prosecuting party in the proceedings under the Code of Administrative Offences; Tomov and Others v. Russia , nos. 18255/10 and 5 others, §§   114 ‑ 42, 9 April 2019, as regards the conditions of transport of detainees; and Martynyuk v.   Russia , no.   13764/15, §§ 38-42, 8 October 2019, relating to the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal against the sentence of administrative detention. REMAINING COMPLAINTS 14.     Some applicants raised further additional complaints under Article 6 of the Convention concerning other aspects of fairness of the administrative ‑ offence proceedings. In view of the findings in paragraphs 11 and 13 above, the Court considers that there is no need to deal separately with these remaining complaints. 15.     The Court has further examined the rest of the complaints raised by the applicants and considers that, in the light of all the material in its possession and in so far as the matters complained of are within its competence, these complaints either do not meet the admissibility criteria set out in Articles 34 and 35 of the Convention or do not disclose any appearance of a violation of the rights and freedoms enshrined in the Convention or the Protocols thereto. It follows that this part of the applications must be rejected in accordance with Article 35 § 4 of the Convention. APPLICATION OF ARTICLE 41 OF THE CONVENTION 16.     Regard being had to the documents in its possession and to its case ‑ law (see in particular Navalnyy and Others v. Russia [Committee], nos.   25809/17 and 14 others, §   22, 4   October 2022), the Court finds it reasonable to award the sums indicated in the appended table. FOR THESE REASONS, THE COURT, UNANIMOUSLY, Decides to join the applications; Holds that it has jurisdiction to deal with these applications as they relate to facts that took place before 16   September 2022; Declares the complaints under Article 11 of the Convention and the other complaints under the well-established case-law of the Court, as set out in the appended table, admissible, finds that there is no need to examine separately the remaining complaints under Article 6 of the Convention, and declares the remainder of the applications inadmissible; Holds that these complaints disclose a breach of Article   11 of the Convention; Holds that there has been a violation of the Convention and the Protocols thereto as regards the other complaints raised under the well-established case-law of the Court (see appended table); Holds (a)   that the respondent State is to pay the applicants, within three months, the amounts indicated in the appended table, to be converted into the currency of the respondent State at the rate applicable at the date of settlement; (b)   that from the expiry of the above-mentioned three months until settlement simple interest shall be payable on the above amounts at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points. Done in English, and notified in writing on 25 April 2024, pursuant to Rule   77   §§   2 and   3 of the Rules of Court.     Viktoriya Maradudina   Peeter Roosma   Acting Deputy Registrar   President     APPENDIX List of applications raising complaints under Article 11 of the Convention (disproportionate measures against organisers and participants of public assemblies) No. Application no. Date of introduction Applicant’s name Year of birth   Representative’s name and location Name of the public event Location Date Administrative / criminal offence Penalty Final domestic decision Court Name Date Other complaints under well-established case-law Amount awarded for pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage and costs and expenses per applicant (in euros) [1]     33552/21 09/06/2021 Natalya Sergeyevna KUZNETSOVA 1995 Shagiyeva Regina Ilgizovna Leninigorsk Rally “Free Navalnyy”   Naberezhnye Chelny   31/01/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB   10,000 Supreme Court of the Tatarstan Republic 10/03/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 1.10   p.m. on 31/01/2021 until 2.55 p.m. on 01/02/2021. 4,000     34362/21 03/06/2021 Ivan Yevgenyevich TIMESHKOV 2002 Glukhov Aleksey Vladimirovich Novocheboksarsk Rally “Free Navalnyy”   Cheboksary   23/01/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB   10,000 Supreme Court of the Chuvashia Republic 05/03/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to the police station for compiling an offence report on 23/01/2021;   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. 4,000     34364/21 03/06/2021 Aleksandr Andreyevich ALEKSEYEV 1999 Glukhov Aleksey Vladimirovich Novocheboksarsk Rally “Free Navalnyy”   Cheboksary   23/01/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB   12,000 the Supreme Court of the Chuvashia Republic 16/03/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to the police station for compiling an offence report on 23/01/2021;   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.     4,000     40680/21 25/07/2021 Yelena Igorevna KONDRAKHINA 1987 Mikhaylova Varvara Dmitriyevna St Petersburg Rally to support convicted activists from a group known as Set (Network)   St Petersburg   22/06/2020 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB   10,000 St Petersburg City Court 27/04/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to the police station for compiling an offence report from around 1 p.m. until 7.25   p.m. on 22/06/2020;   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. 4,000     40942/21 23/07/2021 Andrey Vladimirovich NOVIKOV 1996 Tevosov Georgiy Eduardovich Moscow Rally “Free Navalnyy”   Moscow   02/02/2021 article 20.2 §   6.1 of CAO detention for 10 days Moscow City Court 10/02/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 2 a.m. on 03/02/2021 until 3 p.m. on 04/02/2021;   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. 5,000     41050/21 30/07/2021 Olga Aleksandrovna POPOVA 1995 Memorial Human Rights Centre Moscow Rally “Free Navalnyy”   Moscow   31/01/2021 article 20.2 §   6.1 of CAO detention for 8 days Moscow City Court 05/02/2021 Art. 3 - inadequate conditions of detention during transport - poor conditions of transfer in a police van on 31/01/2021: the applicant was transferred with 18 other demonstrators in a police van equipped to accommodate 8 persons, without ventilation;   Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 3   p.m. on 31/01/2021 until 4.40 p.m. on 01/02/2021;   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings;   Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - the sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO. 6,000     41119/21 24/07/2021 Aleksandr Nikolayevich LYSENKO 1975 Tregubova Yuliya Mikhaylovna Balashikha Forum "Municipal Russia"   Moscow   13/03/2021 article 20.33 of CAO fine of RUB   15,000 Izmaylovskiy District Court of Moscow 18/05/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence report from 10.30   a.m. until 4.30 p.m. on 13/03/2021. 4,000     41123/21 24/07/2021 Roman Aleksandrovich YUDAKOV 1983 Tregubova Yuliya Mikhaylovna Balashikha Forum "Municipal Russia"   Moscow   13/03/2021 article 20.33 of CAO fine of RUB   15,000 Izmaylovskiy District Court of Moscow 18/05/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence report from 10.30   a.m. until 4.30 p.m. on 13/03/2021. 4,000     41126/21 24/07/2021 Vasiliy Viktorovich BALASHOV 1992 Tregubova Yuliya Mikhaylovna Balashikha Forum "Municipal Russia"   Moscow   13/03/2021     article 20.33 of CAO fine of RUB   15,000 Izmaylovskiy District Court of Moscow 24/05/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence report from 10.30   a.m. until 6.30 p.m. on 13/03/2021. 4,000   41128/21 24/07/2021 Irina Sergeyevna ILDERYAKOVA 1995 Tregubova Yuliya Mikhaylovna Balashikha Forum "Municipal Russia"   Moscow   13/03/2021 article 20.33 of CAO fine of RUB   15,000 Izmaylovskiy District Court of Moscow 18/05/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence report from 10.30   a.m. until 2.30 p.m. on 13/03/2021. 4,000   41178/21 05/08/2021 Ilya Alekseyevich KORGUN 1991 Sidorkina Svetlana Ivanovna Moscow Rally “Free Navalnyy”   Moscow   23/01/2021 article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO detention for 10 days Moscow City Court 11/02/2021 Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. 5,000   41648/21 06/08/2021 Anna Vladimirovna BYKOVA 1975 Pershakova Yelena Yuryevna Moscow Rally “Free Navalnyy”   Moscow   31/01/2021 article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO fine of RUB   15,000 Moscow City Court 10/03/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 12.45   p.m. on 31/01/2021 until 12 a.m. on 01/02/2021;   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. 4,000   54530/21 11/10/2021 Vladislav Olegovich KULAMOV 1986 Sharafutdinov Eldar Ramilyevich Orenburg Rally “Free Navalnyy”   Orenburg   23/01/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB   10,000 Orenburg Regional Court 14/04/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to the police station for compiling an offence report from 4 p.m. until 10.30 p.m. on 23/01/2021;   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.     4,000   54543/21 14/10/2021 Viktor Sergeyevich MINYASHEV 1989     Rally “Free Navalnyy”   Samara   31/01/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB   10,000 Samara Regional Court 15/04/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to the police station for compiling an offence report on 31/01/2021. 4,000   54832/21 27/10/2021 Aleksandr Semenovich BIBIKOV 1995 Nazarov Ilya Yulyevich Moscow Rally “Free Navalnyy”   Moscow   02/02/2021 article 20.2 §   6.1 of CAO detention for 7 days Moscow City Court 11/05/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 11.50   p.m. on 02/02/2021 until 4 p.m. on 03/02/2021;   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. 5,000   54939/21 28/10/2021 Vasiliy Viktorovich OLEYNIKOV 1987 Balog Natalya Andreyevna Krasnoyarsk Rally “Free Navalnyy”   Krasnoyarsk   23/01/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB   10,000 Krasnoyarsk Regional Court 29/04/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence report from 4.15   p.m. until 8.50 p.m. on 23/01/2021;   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.   4,000   55061/21 25/10/2021 Georgiy Konstantinovich CHUVILO 1998     Rally “Free Navalnyy”   Kaluga   31/01/2021   article 20.2.2 §   1 of CAO fine of RUB   16,000 Kaluga Regional Court 29/04/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 2.20   p.m. on 31/01/2021 until 3.56 p.m. on 02/02/2021. 4,000   56119/21 16/11/2021 Timur Zinatulloyevich RAKHMATULIN 1981 Valiyeva Elza Albertovna Nizhniy Novgorod Rally “Free Navalnyy”   Orenburg   31/01/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB   10,000 Orenburg Regional Court 18/05/2021 Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. 3,500   56131/21 25/10/2021 Yegor Sergeyevich MYAKINNIKOV 1996 Tseytlina Olga Pavlovna St Petersburg Rally to support Belarusians participating in mass protests   St Petersburg   24/01/2021 article 20.2 § 2 of CAO detention for 2 days St Petersburg City Court 27/04/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 12   p.m. on 23/03/2021 until 3 p.m. on 25/03/2021;   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. 5,000   56573/21 26/10/2021 Alena Andreyevna DYRTSEVA 1999 Rusnakov Pavel Vladimirovich Tyumen Rally “Free Navalnyy”   Tyumen   21/04/2021 article 20.2 § 8 of CAO detention for 15 days Tyumen Regional Court 30/04/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 8.05   p.m. on 21/04/2021 until 2   p.m. on 23/04/2021;   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings;   Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - the sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO.   5,000   56681/21 28/10/2021 Yuriy Sergeyevich SERGEYCHIK 1976     Rally “Free Navalnyy”   Moscow   31/01/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB   20,000 Moscow City Court 21/07/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 12.02   p.m. until 9.30 p.m. on 31/01/2021;   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. 4,000   56927/21 28/10/2021 Sergey Vladimirovich RYABTSEV 1973 Yakupova Anna Vladimirovna Izhevsk Rally “Free Navalnyy”   Izhevsk   31/01/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB   10,000 Supreme Court of the Udmurtia Republic 28/04/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to the police station for compiling an offence report on 31/01/2021;   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.   4,000   57308/21 19/11/2021 Andrey Gennadyevich ARTYUSHIN 1982     Rally “Free Navalnyy”   Irkutsk   31/01/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB   10,000 Irkutsk Regional Court 17/08/2021 Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. 3,500   57392/21 26/10/2021 Emir Isabekovich ISABEKOV 2000 Anosova Lidiya Sergeyevna Orekhovo-Zuyevo Rally “Free Navalnyy”   Moscow   23/01/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB   10,000 Moscow City Court 26/04/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence report from 2 p.m. until 11 p.m. on 23/01/2021;   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.   4,000   57407/21 16/11/2021 Georgiy Georgiyevich LUTSKEVICH 1975     Rally “Free Navalnyy”   Voronezh   31/01/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB   10,000 Voronezh Regional Court 04/06/2021   3,500   58326/21 19/11/2021 Maksim Romanovich ZARKOV 2001     Rally “Free Navalnyy”   Nizhniy Novgorod   31/01/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB   10,000 Nizhniy Novgorod Regional Court 19/05/2021 Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. 3,500   58521/21 25/10/2021 Aleksandr Andreyevich KUZMENKO 1995     Rally “Free Navalnyy”   Moscow   31/01/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB   10,000 Moscow City Court 28/04/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence report from 2.30   p.m. until 10.30 p.m. on 31/01/2021;   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. 4,000   58639/21 12/11/2021 Yevgeniy Viktorovich KOBAK 1986     Rally “Free Navalnyy”   Kazan   23/01/2021     article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB   10,000 Supreme Court of the Tatarstan Republic 12/05/2021   3,500   58761/21 17/11/2021 Zakir Alikerimovich ABDULKERIMOV 1994     Rally “Free Navalnyy”   Moscow   23/01/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB   10,000 Moscow City Court 17/05/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to the police station for compiling an offence report on 23/01/2021;   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.   4,000   59073/21 22/11/2021 Ilya Mikhaylovich PONOMAREV 1994     Rally “Free Navalnyy”   Voronezh   31/01/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB   15,000 Voronezh Regional Court 25/05/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence report from 1.55   p.m. on 31/01/2021 until 1.05 a.m. on 01/02/2021;   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. 4,000   59270/21 15/11/2021 Alina Rustemovna BAYKEY 1993 Bayeva Aleksandra Nikolayevna Moscow Rally “Free Navalnyy”   Moscow   02/02/2021 article 20.2 §   6.1 of CAO detention for 3 days Moscow City Court 17/05/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 11   p.m. on 02/02/2021 until 2 p.m. on 03/02/2021;   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings;   Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - the sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO.       5,000   59441/21 20/11/2021 Nikolay Aleksandrovich MOSKVICHEV 1995     Rally “Free Navalnyy”   Moscow   23/01/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB   5,000 Moscow City Court 21/05/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence report from 4 p.m. until 10.30 p.m. on 23/01/2021;   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. 4,000   60092/21 21/11/2021 Aleksandr Sergeyevich YEFIMOV 1998     Rally “Free Navalnyy”   Moscow   23/01/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB   10,000 Moscow City Court 21/05/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to the police station for compiling an offence report from 4.30 p.m. until 8.30 p.m. on 23/01/2021;   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. 4,000   60179/21 24/10/2021 Yakov Valeryevich BARVASHOV 1970     Rally “Free Navalnyy”   Moscow   23/01/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB   10,000 Moscow City Court 01/07/2021   3,500   60620/21 08/12/2021 Yegor Yuryevich LITVINOV 1999 Yermolayeva Nadezhda Viktorovna Moscow Rally “Free Navalnyy”   Moscow   02/02/2021 article 20.2 §   6.1 of CAO fine of RUB   15,000 Moscow City Court 09/06/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 12.10   a.m. until 8 p.m. on 03/02/2021;   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.   4,000   60640/21 27/11/2021 Mikhail Makarovich MUKHOYAN 1964 Yatsenko Irina Aleksandrovna Moscow Rally “Free Navalnyy”   Korolev   21/04/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB   10,000 Moscow Regional Court 27/05/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to the police station for compiling an offence report from 7.30 p.m. until 10.30   p.m. on 21/04/2021;   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. 4,000   60650/21 20/11/2021 David Igorevich BOGATYREV 2002 Savin Aleksandr Vasilyevich Stavropol Rally “Free Navalnyy”   Stavropol   21/04/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB   10,000 Stavropol Regional Court 22/09/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to the police station for compiling an offence report on 21/04/2021;   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. 4,000     [1] Plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicants.