CEDH · CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG — 14 mai 2024

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .sFE10DC93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s665E407E { margin-top:66pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .s34DFC730 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s10950C61 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s82B4DA5F { page-break-before:right; clear:both; mso-break-type:section-break } .sB9D5CABB { width:28.35pt; display:inline-block } .s3AAE10DF { margin-top:14pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s3CA22BA { font-family:Arial; text-transform:uppercase } .s6B505E72 { margin:0pt; padding-left:0pt } .sDECD9755 { margin-left:11.67pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; padding-left:6.78pt; font-family:Arial; text-transform:uppercase } .sDA7B489D { margin-top:14pt; margin-left:15pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; padding-left:3.45pt; font-family:Arial; text-transform:uppercase } .s5C5C410E { margin-top:14pt; margin-left:18.34pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; padding-left:0.11pt; font-family:Arial; text-transform:uppercase } .s67CAFE05 { margin-top:14pt; margin-left:18.45pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-family:Arial; text-transform:uppercase } .s7C22C014 { margin-top:14pt; margin-left:16.34pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; padding-left:2.11pt; font-family:Arial; text-transform:uppercase } .sD11CFAB7 { margin-top:14pt; margin-left:15.01pt; margin-bottom:3pt; text-align:justify; padding-left:1.99pt; font-family:Arial } .sFBC99493 { font-style:italic } .sD58C010 { margin-top:14pt; margin-left:15.01pt; margin-bottom:3pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; padding-left:1.99pt; font-family:Arial } .sBB6E85D0 { margin-top:0pt; margin-left:34pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:-17pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .sE5BF05B1 { width:2.33pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } .s2D9C6089 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s69DCC830 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sC986E16F { font-family:Arial; color:#ffffff } .sC646A315 { width:14.54pt; display:inline-block } .sC60B69EF { width:127.74pt; display:inline-block } .s9852CA4C { width:7.54pt; display:inline-block } .s9E436411 { width:138.09pt; display:inline-block } .s4ACA9207 { page-break-before:always; clear:both; mso-break-type:section-break } .sCC22C24E { font-family:Arial; color:#3e3e3e } .s6DB91820 { text-align:center } .s8BB62139 { margin-right:auto; margin-left:auto; border-collapse:collapse } .s3695F815 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .sDF237D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:8pt } .sEECE831 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .sC39F4804 { font-family:Arial; font-size:5.33pt; font-weight:bold; vertical-align:super; color:#474747 } .sE8934522 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s4F2ADFDB { text-align:center; font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; list-style-position:inside } .sBB6163A7 { width:2.48pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } .s5FFF0A7E { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:8pt } .s3A60991B { height:150.3pt } .s9D4D820B { height:136.1pt } .sF6A12959 { width:33%; height:1px; text-align:left } .sA4BC3E2E { font-family:Arial; font-size:5.33pt; vertical-align:super; color:#000000 }       FOURTH SECTION CASE OF GORODILOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA (Applications nos. 75194/17 and 39 others – see appended list)             JUDGMENT   STRASBOURG 14 May 2024     This judgment is final but it may be subject to editorial revision.   In the case of Gorodilov and Others v. Russia, The European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section), sitting as a Committee composed of:   Branko Lubarda , President ,   Armen Harutyunyan,   Ana Maria Guerra Martins , judges , and Viktoriya Maradudina, Acting Deputy Section Registrar, Having deliberated in private on 11 April 2024, Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on that date: PROCEDURE 1.     The case originated in applications against Russia lodged with the Court under Article   34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) on the various dates indicated in the appended table. 2.     The Russian Government (“the   Government”) were given notice of the applications. THE FACTS 3.     The list of applicants and the relevant details of the applications are set out in the appended table. 4.     The applicants complained of the disproportionate measures taken against them as organisers or participants of public assemblies. Some applicants also raised other complaints under the provisions of the Convention. THE LAW JOINDER OF THE APPLICATIONS 5.     Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single judgment. JURISDICTION 6.     The Court observes that the facts giving rise to the alleged violations of the Convention occurred prior to 16 September 2022, the date on which the Russian Federation ceased to be a party to the Convention. The Court therefore decides that it has jurisdiction to examine the present applications (see Fedotova and Others v. Russia [GC], nos.   40792/10 and 2   others, §§   68 ‑ 73, 17   January 2023). ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE   11 OF THE CONVENTION 7.     The applicants complained principally of disproportionate measures taken against them as organisers or participants of public assemblies, namely their arrest in relation to the dispersal of these assemblies and their conviction for administrative offences. They relied, expressly or in substance, on Article   11 of the Convention. 8.     The Court refers to the principles established in its case-law regarding freedom of assembly (see Kudrevičius and Others v.   Lithuania [GC], no.   37553/05, ECHR 2015, with further references) and proportionality of interference with it (see Oya Ataman v.   Turkey , no.   74552/01, ECHR 2006 ‑ XIV, and Hyde Park and Others v.   Moldova , no.   33482/06, 31   March 2009). 9.     In the leading cases of Frumkin v. Russia, no. 74568/12, ECHR 2016 (extracts), Navalnyy and Yashin v. Russia, no. 76204/11, 4 December 2014 and Kasparov and Others v. Russia, no. 21613/07, 3 October 2013, the Court already found a violation in respect of issues similar to those in the present case. 10.     Having examined all the material submitted to it, and having taken into account the issue of compliance with the six-month time-limit under Article 35 § 1 of the Convention (see Saakashvili v.   Georgia (dec.), nos.   6232/20 and 22394/20, §§ 46-59, 1 March 2022, in which the Court addressed the COVID-19-related extension of the period in question), the Court has not found any fact or argument capable of persuading it to reach a different conclusion as to the admissibility and merits of these complaints. Having regard to its case-law on the subject, the Court considers that in the instant case the interferences with the applicants’ freedom of assembly were not “necessary in a democratic society”. 11 .     These complaints are therefore admissible and disclose a breach of Article 11 of the Convention. OTHER ALLEGED VIOLATIONS UNDER WELL-ESTABLISHED CASE-LAW 12.     Some applicants submitted other complaints which also raised issues under the Convention and its Protocols, given the relevant well-established case-law of the Court (see appended table). These complaints are not manifestly ill-founded within the meaning of Article 35 § 3 (a) of the Convention, nor are they inadmissible on any other ground. Accordingly, they must be declared admissible. 13 .     Having examined all the material before it, the Court concludes that these complaints also disclose violations of the Convention and its Protocols in the light of its findings in Butkevich v. Russia , no.   5865/07, §§   63-65, 13   February 2018, Tsvetkova and Others v. Russia , nos.   54381/08 and 5   others, §§ 115-31, 10   April 2018, and Korneyeva v.   Russia , no.   72051/17, §§ 34-36, 8   October 2019, as to various aspects of unlawful deprivation of liberty of organisers or participants of public assemblies; Karelin v. Russia , no. 926/08, §§ 58-85, 20   September 2016, concerning the absence of a prosecuting party in the proceedings under the Code of Administrative Offences (CAO); Novikova and Others v. Russia , nos. 25501/07 and 4   others, §§   106-225, 26 April 2016, relating to disproportionate measures taken by the authorities against participants of solo demonstrations; Elvira Dmitriyeva v. Russia , nos. 60921/17 and 7202/18, §§ 77-90, 30 April 2019, as to administrative conviction for making calls to participate in public assemblies; Martynyuk v.   Russia , no.   13764/15, §§ 38-42, 8 October 2019, relating to the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal against the sentence of administrative detention; and Korneyeva , cited above, §§ 62-65, as to the right of the organisers or participants of public assemblies not to be tried and punished twice for the same offence. REMAINING COMPLAINTS 14.     Some applicants raised further additional complaints under Article 6 of the Convention concerning other aspects of fairness of the administrative ‑ offence proceedings. In view of the findings in paragraphs 11 and 13 above, the Court considers that there is no need to deal separately with these remaining complaints. APPLICATION OF ARTICLE 41 OF THE CONVENTION 15.     Regard being had to the documents in its possession and to its case ‑ law (see in particular Navalnyy and Others v. Russia [Committee], nos.   25809/17 and 14 others, §   22, 4   October 2022), the Court finds it reasonable to award the sums indicated in the appended table. FOR THESE REASONS, THE COURT, UNANIMOUSLY, Decides to join the applications; Holds that it has jurisdiction to deal with these applications as they relate to facts that took place before 16   September 2022; Declares the complaints under Article 11 of the Convention and the other complaints under the well-established case-law of the Court, as set out in the appended table, admissible and finds that there is no need to examine separately the remaining complaints under Article 6 of the Convention; Holds that these applications disclose a breach of Article   11 of the Convention; Holds that there has been a violation of the Convention and the Protocols thereto as regards the other complaints raised under the well-established case-law of the Court (see appended table); Holds (a)   that the respondent State is to pay the applicants, within three months, the amounts indicated in the appended table, to be converted into the currency of the respondent State at the rate applicable at the date of settlement; (b)   that from the expiry of the above-mentioned three months until settlement simple interest shall be payable on the above amounts at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points. Done in English, and notified in writing on 14 May 2024, pursuant to Rule   77   §§   2 and   3 of the Rules of Court.     Viktoriya Maradudina   Branko Lubarda   Acting Deputy Registrar   President     APPENDIX List of applications raising complaints under Article 11 of the Convention (disproportionate measures against organisers and participants of public assemblies) No. Application no. Date of introduction Applicant’s name Year of birth   Representative’s name and location Name of the public event Location Date Administrative / criminal offence Penalty Final domestic decision Court Name Date Other complaints under well-established case-law Amount awarded for pecuniary and non ‑ pecuniary damage and costs and expenses per applicant (in euros) [1]     75194/17 19/10/2017 Timofey Yevgenyevich GORODILOV 1994 Peredruk Aleksandr Dmitriyevich St Petersburg Anti-corruption rally   St Petersburg 12/06/2017         Rally against increase of prices for public transport   St Petersburg 10/11/2019 article 19.3 § 1 of CAO     article 20.2 § 5 of CAO       article 20.2 § 2 of CAO detention for 8 days     fine of RUB 12,000     fine of RUB 20,000 St   Petersburg City Court 16/06/2017   St Petersburg City Court 06/07/2017     St Petersburg City Court 06/10/2020 Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in all sets of administrative ‑ offence proceedings;     Prot. 7 Art. 4 - right not to be tried or punished twice in criminal proceedings - overlap of the facts constituting the basis for the applicant’s prosecution in the second set of proceedings (Art. 20.2 § 5 of CAO) with substantially the same facts underlying his conviction in the first set of proceedings, in relation to the rally on 12/06/2017 (Art. 19.3 § 1 of CAO). 5,000     2420/18 23/12/2017 Mark Daniilovich LYUBAROV 1994 Markin Konstantin Aleksandrovich Velikiy Novgorod Anti-corruption rally   St Petersburg 12/06/2017 article 19.3 § 1 of CAO     article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB 500   fine of RUB 10,000 St Petersburg City Court 27/06/2017   St Petersburg City Court 27/06/2017 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 3.55 p.m. on 12/06/2017 until the afternoon on 13/06/2017;   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in both sets of administrative ‑ offence proceedings;     Prot. 7 Art. 4 - right not to be tried or punished twice in criminal proceedings - overlap of the facts constituting the basis for the applicant’s prosecution in the second set of proceedings (Art. 20.2 § 5 of CAO) with substantially the same facts underlying his conviction in the first set of proceedings (Art. 19.3 § 1 of CAO). 4,000     2828/18 17/11/2017 Sergey Nikolayevich YEFREMOV 1995 Peredruk Aleksandr Dmitriyevich St Petersburg Anti-corruption rally   St Petersburg 12/06/2017 article 19.3 § 1 of CAO     article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB 1,000   fine of RUB 10,000 St Petersburg City Court 28/06/2017   St Petersburg City Court 28/06/2017 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 2.25 p.m. on 12/06/2017 until the evening on 13/06/2017;     Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in both sets of administrative ‑ offence proceedings;     Prot. 7 Art. 4 - right not to be tried or punished twice in criminal proceedings - overlap of the facts constituting the basis for the applicant’s prosecution in the second set of proceedings (Art. 20.2 § 5 CAO) with substantially the same facts underlying her conviction in the first set of proceedings (Art. 19.3 §   1 CAO). 4,000     3016/18 29/12/2017 Nikita Aleksandrovich SAMARIN 1994 Mezak Ernest Aleksandrovich Saint-Barthélemy-d’Anjou Anti-corruption rally   St Petersburg 12/06/2017 article 19.3 § 1 of CAO     article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB 500     fine of RUB 10,000 St Petersburg City Court 29/06/2017   St Petersburg City Court 29/06/2017 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 3 p.m. on 12/06/2017 until the evening on 13/06/2017;   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in both sets of administrative ‑ offence proceedings;     Prot. 7 Art. 4 - right not to be tried or punished twice in criminal proceedings - overlap of the facts constituting the basis for the applicant’s prosecution in the second set of proceedings (Art. 20.2 § 5 CAO) with substantially the same facts underlying his conviction in the first set of proceedings (Art. 19.3 §   1 CAO). 4,000     3149/18 27/12/2017 Vladimir Vyacheslavovich FEDOROV 1989 Pyshkin Valentin Valentinovich St Petersburg Anti-corruption rally   St Petersburg 12/06/2017 article 19.3 § 1 of CAO       article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB 1,000     fine of RUB 10,000 St Petersburg City Court 29/06/2017   St Petersburg City Court 29/06/2017 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 3   p.m. on 12/06/2017 until the evening on 13/06/2017;     Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in both sets of administrative ‑ offence proceedings;   Prot. 7 Art. 4 - right not to be tried or punished twice in criminal proceedings - overlap of the facts constituting the basis for the applicant’s prosecution in the second set of proceedings (Art. 19.3 § 1 of CAO) with substantially the same facts underlying his conviction in the first set of proceedings (Art. 20.2 § 5 of CAO). 4,000     3451/18 29/12/2017 Petr Andreyevich NECHAYEV 1975 Gromova Svetlana Viktorovna St Petersburg Anti-corruption rally   St Petersburg 12/06/2017 article 19.3 § 1 of CAO       article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB 700     fine of RUB 10,000 St Petersburg City Court 03/07/2017   St Petersburg City Court 03/07/2017 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 2.50 p.m. on 12/06/2017 until 11 p.m. on 13/06/2017;   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in both sets of administrative ‑ offence proceedings;     Prot. 7 Art. 4 - right not to be tried or punished twice in criminal proceedings - overlap of the facts constituting the basis for the applicant’s prosecution in the second set of proceedings (Art. 19.3 § 1 of CAO) with substantially the same facts underlying his conviction in the first set of proceedings (Art. 20.2 § 5 of CAO). 4,000     3498/18 26/12/2017 Maksim Konstantinovich RASCHUPKIN 1996 Markin Konstantin Aleksandrovich Velikiy Novgorod Anti-corruption rally   St Petersburg 12/06/2017 article 19.3 § 1 of CAO       article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB 500     fine of RUB 10,000 St Petersburg City Court 03/07/2017   St Petersburg City Court 03/07/2017 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 2.30 p.m. on 12/06/2017 until 11.34 p.m. on 13/06/2017;     Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in both sets of administrative ‑ offence proceedings;   Prot. 7 Art. 4 - right not to be tried or punished twice in criminal proceedings - overlap of the facts constituting the basis for the applicant’s prosecution in the second set of proceedings (Art. 19.3 § 1 of CAO) with substantially the same facts underlying his conviction in the first set of proceedings (Art. 20.2 § 5 of CAO). 4,000     4250/18 16/01/2018 Yuriy Eduardovich SHTENGEL 1968 Chertkov Andrey Veniaminovich St Petersburg Anti-corruption rally   St Petersburg 12/06/2017     article 19.3 § 1 of CAO       article 20.2 § 5 of CAO detention for 7 days       fine of RUB 15,000 St Petersburg City Court 25/07/2017     St Petersburg City Court 19/09/2017   Prot. 7 Art. 4 - right not to be tried or punished twice in criminal proceedings - overlap of the facts constituting the basis for the applicant’s prosecution in the second set of proceedings (Art. 20.2 § 5 CAO) with substantially the same facts underlying his conviction in the first set of proceedings (Art. 19.3 § 1 CAO). 5,000     4386/18 30/12/2017 Mikhail Gennadyevich KUNTSEVICH 1987 Peredruk Aleksandr Dmitriyevich St Petersburg Anti-corruption rally   St Petersburg 12/06/2017 article 19.3 § 1 of CAO     article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB 500     fine of RUB 10,000 St Petersburg City Court 04/07/2017   St Petersburg City Court 04/07/2017 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 2   p.m. on 12/06/2017 until 7 p.m. on 13/06/2017;   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in both sets of administrative ‑ offence proceedings;     Prot. 7 Art. 4 - right not to be tried or punished twice in criminal proceedings - overlap of the facts constituting the basis for the applicant’s prosecution in the second set of proceedings (Art. 19.3 § 1 of CAO) with substantially the same facts underlying his conviction in the first set of proceedings (Art. 20.2 § 5 of CAO). 4,000   7480/18 22/12/2017 Aleksandr Aleksandrovich KARMANOV 1988 Petrov Anton Viktorovich St Petersburg Anti-corruption rally   St Petersburg 12/06/2017 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO     article 19.3 § 1 of CAO fine of RUB 10,000   detention for 6 days St Petersburg City Court 27/07/2017   St Petersburg City Court 22/06/2017 Prot. 7 Art. 4 - right not to be tried or punished twice in criminal proceedings - overlap of the facts constituting the basis for the applicant’s prosecution in the second set of proceedings (Art. 19.3 § 1 CAO) with substantially the same facts underlying his conviction in the first set of proceedings (Art. 20.2 § 5 CAO). 5,000   30560/18 14/06/2018 Aleksandr Valeryevich BALASHOV 1993 Antokhin Yevgeniy Vyacheslavovich Moscow Political march   Moscow 04/11/2017 Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB 10,000 Moscow City Court 26/01/2018 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to the police station for compiling an offence report on 04/11/2017;   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.   4,000   30832/18 07/06/2018 Viktor Lvovich CHERKASSKIY 1993 Peredruk Aleksandr Dmitriyevich St Petersburg Rally "Voters’ strike"   St Petersburg 28/01/2018 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO     article 19.3 § 1 of CAO fine of RUB 15,000   detention for 10 days St Petersburg City Court 10/05/2018   St Petersburg City Court 29/03/2018   Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 7.20 p.m. on 12/03/2018 until 13/03/2018, when the applicant was taken to the court;     Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in both sets of administrative ‑ offence proceedings;     Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - the sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant on 13/03/2018 was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO;   Prot. 7 Art. 4 - right not to be tried or punished twice in criminal proceedings - overlap of the facts constituting the basis for the applicant’s prosecution in the second set of proceedings (Art. 19.3 § 1 of CAO) with substantially the same facts underlying his conviction in the first set of proceedings (Art. 20.2 § 5 of CAO). 5,000   47190/18 28/09/2018 Yevgeniy Viktorovich TIKHENKO 1979 Bayeva Aleksandra Nikolayevna Moscow Political rally   Moscow 05/11/2017     Rally "Free Navalnyy"   Moscow 31/01/2021 article 19.3 § 1 of CAO         article 20.2 § 8 of CAO fine of RUB 1,000         detention for 20 days Moscow City Court 28/03/2018       Moscow City Court 09/02/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 12 p.m. on 05/11/2017 until 2.30 p.m. on 07/11/2017 and from 3 p.m. on 31/01/2021 until 5 p.m. on 02/02/2021;     Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in both sets of administrative ‑ offence proceedings;     Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - the sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO. 5,000   47513/18 27/09/2018 Yelena Vladimirovna NOSKOVETS 1984 Chernyavskaya Andzhelika Viktorovna Oktyabrskiy Rally to support A. Navalnyy and L. Volkov   Novosibirsk 30/09/2017 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB 5,000 Novosibirsk Regional Court 27/03/2018 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 1.05 p.m. on 22/01/2021 until 23/01/2021, when the applicant was taken to the court;     Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in all sets of administrative ‑ offence proceedings;     Art. 10 (1) - conviction for making calls to participate in public events - rally to support A. Navalnyy on 23/01/2021 in Novosibirsk, Article 20.2 § 2 of CAO, detention for 8 days, final decision by the Novosibirsk Regional Court on 18/03/2021. 5,000   20840/19 02/04/2019 Tatyana Sergeyevna SICHKAREVA 1998 Mikhaylova Kseniya Andreyevna St Petersburg Rally in support of LGBTI community   St Petersburg 04/08/2018 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB 10,000 St Petersburg City Court 02/10/2018 Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.     3,500   20843/19 02/04/2019 Aleksandr Sergeyevich AKSHENTSEV 1986 Mikhaylova Kseniya Andreyevna St Petersburg Rally in support of LGBTI community   St Petersburg 04/08/2018 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB 10,000 St Petersburg City Court 16/10/2018 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to the police station for compiling an offence report on 04/08/2018;     Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. 4,000   22093/19 16/04/2019 Mariya Nikolayevna CHUPRINSKAYA 1980 Kiselyov Roman Denisovich Moscow Rally to support O. Sentsov   Moscow 18/06/2018 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB 20,000 Moscow City Court 16/10/2018 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence report from 5.20 p.m. until 8.20 p.m. on 18/06/2018;     Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. 4,000   25176/19 23/04/2019 Yan Aleksandrovich KSENZHEPOLSKIY 2000 Sidorkina Svetlana Ivanovna Moscow “Monstration” manifestation   Tver 01/05/2018 Article 20.2 § 1 of CAO fine of RUB 10,000 Tver Regional Court 30/01/2019   3,500   49639/19 04/09/2019 Bulat Rifkatovich KHASANOV 1998 Belozerov Aleksey Sergeyevich St Petersburg Rally to support the accused in “Novoye Velichiye” and “Set” criminal cases   St Petersburg 28/10/2018 article 20.2.2   § 1 of CAO fine of RUB 10,000 St Petersburg City Court 09/04/2019 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 3.30 p.m. on 28/10/2018 until the afternoon on 29/10/2018;     Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.   4,000   53406/19 04/10/2019 Yevgeniy Yevgenyevich YEKATERININ 1981 Dubinin Nikolay Anatolyevich Moscow Rally to support “political prisoners”   Moscow 13/05/2019 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB 10,000 Moscow City Court 12/08/2019 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence report from 9.20   p.m. on 13/05/2019 until 14/05/2019;     Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. 4,000   55228/19 07/10/2019 Artem Igorevich UKHOV 1989 Glukhov Aleksey Vladimirovich Novocheboksarsk Rally for fair elections to Mosgorduma   Moscow 10/08/2019 article 20.2 § 8 of CAO detention for 10 days Moscow City Court 15/08/2019 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 8   p.m. on 10/08/2019 until 4.50 p.m. on 12/08/2019;     Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings;     Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - the sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO.   5,000   56943/19 22/10/2019 Sergey Vladimirovich URBAN 1986 Borisova Alena Sergeyevna Moscow Political rally   Izhevsk 24/02/2019 article 20.2 § 8 of CAO 40 hours of community work Supreme Court of the Udmurtia Republic 22/04/2019 Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. 3,500   63851/19 20/11/2019 Yakov Borisovich TSYGANKOV 1967 Kachanov Roman Yevgenyevich Yekaterinburg Protest against construction of the cathedral   Yekaterinburg 14/05/2019 article 20.2 § 8 of CAO detention for 10 days Sverdlovsk Regional Court 21/05/2019 Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - the sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO 5,000   64319/19 04/12/2019 Ivan Pavlovich VOLKOV 1978 Kachanov Roman Yevgenyevich Yekaterinburg Protest against construction of the cathedral   Yekaterinburg 04/06/2019 article 20.2 § 2 of CAO detention for 9 days Sverdlovsk Regional Court 07/06/2019 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 7   p.m. on 04/06/2019 until 1.45 p.m. on 05/06/2019;     Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - the sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO. 5,000   9177/20 07/02/2020 Yuriy Vladimirovich BREDELEV 1993 Ryzhov Anton Igorevich Moscow Rally in support of LGBTI community in Chechnya   Moscow 11/10/2019 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB 10,000 Moscow City Court 04/12/2019 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence report from 4.40   p.m. until 10.50 p.m. on 11/10/2019;     Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.     4,000   11316/20 12/02/2020 Marina Vitalyevna SHAPOSHNIKOVA 1963 Bontsler Mariya Vladimirovna Kaliningrad Rally to support doctor Sushkevich   Kaliningrad 06/07/2019 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB 10,000   Kaliningrad Regional Court 15/08/2019   3,500   38040/20 25/09/2020 Rostislav SMOLENSKIY 1978 Pryanishnikov Aleksey Aleksandrovich Tomsk Rally to support S.   Furgal   Khabarovsk 25/07/2020     Rally to support S.   Furgal   Khabarovsk 29/08/2020 article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO           article 20.2 § 8 of CAO detention for 8 days           detention for 15 days Khabarovsk Regional Court 30/07/2020       Khabarovsk Regional Court 10/09/2020 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 12.30 p.m. on 30/08/2020 until 11.30 a.m. on 31/08/2020 and on 03/09/2020;   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings under Article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO.     5,000   43262/20 25/09/2020 Samariddin Sadridinovich RADZHABOV 1998 Lazareva Yekaterina Yevgenyevna Moscow Rally to support I.   Azar   Moscow 05/06/2020     Rally "Free Navalnyy"   Moscow 03/02/2021 article 20.2 § 8 of CAO           article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO detention for 18 days           detention for 10 days Moscow City Court 18/06/2020         Moscow City Court 08/02/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence report from 6 p.m. on 09/06/2020 until 1   p.m. on 10/06/2020 and from 2   a.m. until 8 a.m. on 03/02/2021;     Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in all sets of administrative-offence proceedings;     Art. 10 (1) - disproportionate measures against solo demonstrators - the applicant was fined RUB 300,000 under article 20.2 § 8 of CAO for staging a solo demonstration on 05/06/2020 in Moscow (convicted under Article 20.2 § 8 of CAO for repeated breach of rules on public events, final decision by the Moscow City Court on 02/03/2021). 8,000   44743/20 04/09/2020 Marlen Emirovich DZHEMILEV 1963 Kogan Vanessa Moscow Rally to support Crimean Tatars and members of Hizb ut-Tahrir   Moscow 11/07/2019 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB 20,000 Moscow City Court 04/12/2019 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence report from 12.20   p.m. until 4.20 p.m. on 11/07/2019;     Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. 4,000   48440/20 02/11/2020 Aleksey Veniaminovich ROMANOV 1971 Pryanishnikov Aleksey Aleksandrovich Tomsk Rally to support S.   Furgal   Khabarovsk 11/07/2020 article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO detention for 7 days Khabarovsk Regional Court 05/08/2020 Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. 5,000   52879/20 13/11/2020 Larisa Gennadyevna KUCHEROVA 1961 Peredruk Aleksandr Dmitriyevich St Petersburg Boris Nemtsov commemoration event   St Petersburg 29/02/2020 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB 10,000 St Petersburg City Court 11/08/2020 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to the police station for compiling an offence report on 12/03/2020;   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. 4,000   55370/20 21/11/2020 Svetlana Nikolayevna KOVALETS 1973 Peredruk Aleksandr Dmitriyevich St Petersburg Protest against amendments to the Constitution   St Petersburg 15/03/2020 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB 10,000 St Petersburg City Court 01/09/2020   Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence report from 3.20 p.m. until 8.48 p.m. on 15/03/2020;   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.     4,000   1864/21 07/12/2020 Matvey Alekseyevich ALEKSANDROV 2000 Eysmont Mariya Olegovna Moscow Rally to support Ilya Azar   Moscow 05/06/2020 article 20.2 § 8 of CAO detention for 18 days Moscow City Court 11/06/2020 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence report on 05/06/2020 and from 5.50 p.m. on 08/06/2020 until 1.25   p.m. on 09/06/2020;     Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in all sets of administrative ‑ offence proceedings;     Art. 10 (1) - disproportionate measures against solo demonstrators - the applicant was fined RUB 300,000 for staging a solo demonstration by participating in a “picketing line” in the evening on 05/06/2020 in Moscow, after the rally on the same day (convicted under Article 20.2 § 8 of CAO for repeated breach of rules on public events, final decision by the Moscow City Court on 30/10/2020). 8,000   12567/21 15/02/2021 Oleg Dmitriyevich DZUTSEV 1991 Eysmont Mariya Olegovna Moscow Rally to support Ilya Azar   Moscow 05/06/2020 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB 20,000 Moscow City Court 08/09/2020 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to the police station for compiling an offence report on 05/06/2020 and on 08/06/2020;     Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in all sets of administrative ‑ offence proceedings;     Art. 10 (1) - disproportionate measures against solo demonstrators - the applicant was fined RUB 15,000 for staging a solo demonstration by participating in a “picketing line” in the evening on 05/06/2020 in Moscow, after the rally on the same day (convicted under Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO for participation in the unauthorised public event, final decision by the Moscow City Court on 30/10/2020). 4,000   19233/21 22/03/2021 Mikhail Vladimirovich KUMIN 1977 Lepekhin Andrey Gennadyevich Chelyabinsk Rally to support the governor of Khabarovsk Region S.   Furgal   Miass 25/07/2020     Rally "Free Navalnyy"   Miass 23/01/2021 article 20.2 § 2 of CAO               article 19.3 § 1 of CAO fine of RUB 20,000             detention for 6 days Chelyabinsk Regional Court 23/09/2020           Chelyabinsk Regional Court 29/01/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 3.10 p.m. on 23/01/2021 until 11.05 a.m. on 25/01/2021;     Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in both sets of administrative ‑ offence proceedings. 5,000   24401/21 17/04/2021 Nikita Aleksandrovich KARAYEV 1986 Cherkasov Vitaliy Viktorovich St Petersburg Rally to support S.   Furgal   Khabarovsk 02/09/202   Rally to support S.   Furgal   Khabarovsk 09/09/2020   Rally to support S.   Furgal   Khabarovsk 07/11/2020 article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO         article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO         article 20.2 § 8 of CAO fine of RUB 10,000       fine of RUB 10,000       detention for 7 days Khabarovsk Regional Court 10/11/2020     Khabarovsk Regional Court 01/03/2021     Khabarovsk Regional Court 18/11/2020 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 3   p.m. on 07/11/2020 until 12.20 p.m. on 09/11/2020 and from 9.45 p.m. on 12/01/2021 until 10.11 a.m. on 13/01/2021;     Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings under Article 20.2 § 6.1 (which ended with final decisions taken on 10/11/2020 and 01/03/2021 respectively);   Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - the sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO. 5,000   26614/21 21/04/2021 Madina Shirvanovna PETRENKO 1973 Bubon Konstantin Vladimirovich Khabarovsk Rally to support S.   Furgal   Khabarovsk 03/08/2020     Rally to support S.   Furgal   Khabarovsk 09/08/2020     Rally to support S.   Furgal   Khabarovsk 04/09/2020     Rally to support S.   Furgal   Khabarovsk 11/09/2020   Rally to support S.   Furgal   Khabarovsk 15/09/2020 article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO           article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO           article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO           article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO         article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO fine of RUB 10,000         fine of RUB 10,000         fine of RUB 10,000         fine of RUB 10,000       fine of RUB 10,000 Khabarovsk Regional Court 03/12/2020       Khabarovsk Regional Court 22/10/2020       Khabarovsk Regional Court 27/10/2020       Khabarovsk Regional Court 06/05/2021     Khabarovsk Regional Court 25/11/2020 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 12   p.m. on 24/03/2021 until 25/03/2021, when the applicant was taken to the court. 5,000   28576/21 02/06/2021 Denis Viktorovich KORZH 1999 Memorial Human Rights Centre Moscow Rally “Free Navalnyy”   Moscow 23/01/2021     Rally “Free Navalnyy”   Moscow 02/02/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO           article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB 20,000         fine of RUB 10,000 Moscow City Court 18/03/2021         Moscow City Court 16/04/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station from 1.09 p.m. until 8 p.m. on 23/01/2021 and from 10.45 p.m. on 02/02/2021 until 3.45 a.m. on 03/02/2021;     Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in both sets of administrative ‑ offence proceedings. 5,000     33575/21 22/06/2021 Pavel Gennadyevich OSIPOV 1998 Markin Konstantin Aleksandrovich Velikiy Novgorod Rally “Free Navalnyy”   Novgorod 23/01/2021 article 20.2 § 2 of CAO fine of RUB 20,000 Novgorod Regional Court 18/02/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station from 2.39 p.m. on 23/01/2021 until 4 p.m. on 24/01/2021;     Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. 4,000   36969/21 16/07/2021 Yegor Andreyevich GROL 1993 Memorial Human Rights Centre Moscow Rally “Free Navalnyy”   Saratov 23/01/2021     Rally “Free Navalnyy”   Saratov 31/01/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO           article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB 12,000         fine of RUB 12,000 Saratov Regional Court 04/06/2021       Saratov Regional Court 04/06/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence report from 4   p.m. until 7.30 p.m. on 31/01/2021;     Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in both sets of administrative ‑ offence proceedings. 4,000     [1] Plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicants.