CEDH · CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG — 16 mai 2024

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .sFE10DC93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s665E407E { margin-top:66pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .s34DFC730 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s82B4DA5F { page-break-before:right; clear:both; mso-break-type:section-break } .s10950C61 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .sB9D5CABB { width:28.35pt; display:inline-block } .s3AAE10DF { margin-top:14pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s3CA22BA { font-family:Arial; text-transform:uppercase } .s6B505E72 { margin:0pt; padding-left:0pt } .sDECD9755 { margin-left:11.67pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; padding-left:6.78pt; font-family:Arial; text-transform:uppercase } .sDA7B489D { margin-top:14pt; margin-left:15pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; padding-left:3.45pt; font-family:Arial; text-transform:uppercase } .s5C5C410E { margin-top:14pt; margin-left:18.34pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; padding-left:0.11pt; font-family:Arial; text-transform:uppercase } .s67CAFE05 { margin-top:14pt; margin-left:18.45pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-family:Arial; text-transform:uppercase } .s7C22C014 { margin-top:14pt; margin-left:16.34pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; padding-left:2.11pt; font-family:Arial; text-transform:uppercase } .sD11CFAB7 { margin-top:14pt; margin-left:15.01pt; margin-bottom:3pt; text-align:justify; padding-left:1.99pt; font-family:Arial } .sFBC99493 { font-style:italic } .sD58C010 { margin-top:14pt; margin-left:15.01pt; margin-bottom:3pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; padding-left:1.99pt; font-family:Arial } .sBB6E85D0 { margin-top:0pt; margin-left:34pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:-17pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .sE5BF05B1 { width:2.33pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } .s2D9C6089 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s69DCC830 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sC646A315 { width:14.54pt; display:inline-block } .s7E447BAE { width:130.42pt; display:inline-block } .s9852CA4C { width:7.54pt; display:inline-block } .s9E436411 { width:138.09pt; display:inline-block } .s4ACA9207 { page-break-before:always; clear:both; mso-break-type:section-break } .sCC22C24E { font-family:Arial; color:#3e3e3e } .s6DB91820 { text-align:center } .s8BB62139 { margin-right:auto; margin-left:auto; border-collapse:collapse } .s3695F815 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .sDF237D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:8pt } .sEECE831 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .sC39F4804 { font-family:Arial; font-size:5.33pt; font-weight:bold; vertical-align:super; color:#474747 } .sE8934522 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s4F2ADFDB { text-align:center; font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; list-style-position:inside } .sBB6163A7 { width:2.48pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } .sF6A12959 { width:33%; height:1px; text-align:left } .s5FFF0A7E { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:8pt } .sA4BC3E2E { font-family:Arial; font-size:5.33pt; vertical-align:super; color:#000000 }     FIFTH SECTION CASE OF SAFRONOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA (Applications nos. 32592/22 and 38 others – see appended list)             JUDGMENT   STRASBOURG 16 May 2024   This judgment is final but it may be subject to editorial revision. In the case of Safronov and Others v. Russia, The European Court of Human Rights (Fifth Section), sitting as a Committee composed of:   María Elósegui , President ,   Mattias Guyomar,   Kateřina Šimáčková , judges , and Viktoriya Maradudina, Acting Deputy Section Registrar, Having deliberated in private on 18 April 2024, Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on that date: PROCEDURE 1.     The case originated in applications against Russia lodged with the Court under Article   34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) on the various dates indicated in the appended table. 2.     The Russian Government (“the   Government”) were given notice of the applications. THE FACTS 3.     The list of applicants and the relevant details of the applications are set out in the appended table. 4.     The applicants complained of the disproportionate measures taken against them as organisers or participants of nationwide protests against the Russian military attack on Ukraine. The applicants also raised other complaints under the provisions of the Convention. THE LAW JOINDER OF THE APPLICATIONS 5.     Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single judgment. JURISDICTION 6.     The Court observes that the facts giving rise to the alleged violations of the Convention occurred prior to 16 September 2022, the date on which the Russian Federation ceased to be a party to the Convention. The Court therefore decides that it has jurisdiction to examine the present applications (see Fedotova and Others v. Russia [GC], nos.   40792/10 and 2   others, §§   68 ‑ 73, 17   January 2023). ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE   11 OF THE CONVENTION 7.     The applicants complained principally of disproportionate measures taken against them as organisers or participants of public assemblies, namely their arrest in relation to the dispersal of these assemblies and their conviction for administrative offences. They relied, expressly or in substance, on Article   11 of the Convention. 8.     The Court refers to the principles established in its case-law regarding freedom of assembly (see Kudrevičius and Others v.   Lithuania [GC], no.   37553/05, ECHR 2015, with further references) and proportionality of interference with it (see Oya Ataman v.   Turkey , no.   74552/01, ECHR   2006 ‑ XIV, and Hyde Park and Others v.   Moldova , no.   33482/06, 31   March 2009). 9.     In the leading cases of Frumkin v. Russia, no. 74568/12, ECHR 2016 (extracts), Navalnyy and Yashin v. Russia, no. 76204/11, 4 December 2014, and Kasparov and Others v. Russia, no. 21613/07, 3 October 2013, the Court already found a violation in respect of issues similar to those in the present case. 10.     Having examined all the material submitted to it, the Court has not found any fact or argument capable of persuading it to reach a different conclusion as to the admissibility and merits of these complaints. Having regard to its case-law on the subject, the Court considers that in the instant case the interferences with the applicants’ freedom of assembly were not “necessary in a democratic society”. 11 .     These complaints are therefore admissible and disclose a breach of Article 11 of the Convention. OTHER ALLEGED VIOLATIONS UNDER WELL-ESTABLISHED CASE-LAW 12.     The applicants submitted other complaints which also raised issues under the Convention and its Protocols, given the relevant well-established case-law of the Court (see appended table). These complaints are not manifestly ill-founded within the meaning of Article 35 § 3 (a) of the Convention, nor are they inadmissible on any other ground. Accordingly, they must be declared admissible. 13 .     Having examined all the material before it, the Court concludes that these complaints also disclose violations of the Convention and its Protocols in the light of its findings in Butkevich v. Russia , no.   5865/07, §§   63-65, 13   February 2018, Tsvetkova and Others v. Russia , nos.   54381/08 and 5   others, §§ 115-31, 10   April 2018, and Korneyeva v.   Russia , no.   72051/17, §§ 34-36, 8   October 2019, as to various aspects of unlawful deprivation of liberty of organisers or participants of public assemblies; Karelin v. Russia , no. 926/08, §§ 58-85, 20   September 2016, concerning the absence of a prosecuting party in the proceedings under the Code of Administrative Offences (the CAO); Tomov and Others v. Russia , nos. 18255/10 and 5   others, §§ 114-42, 9 April 2019, as regards the conditions of transport of detainees; Glukhin v. Russia, no. 11519/20, §§ 64-91, 4 July 2023, concerning unjustified processing of the applicant’s personal biometric data by using highly intrusive facial recognition technology in the proceedings under the Code of Administrative Offences, in order to identify, locate and arrest the applicant; and Martynyuk v.   Russia , no.   13764/15, §§ 38-42, 8 October 2019, relating to the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal against the sentence of administrative detention. REMAINING COMPLAINTS 14.     Some applicants raised further additional complaints under Article 6 of the Convention concerning other aspects of fairness of the administrative ‑ offence proceedings. In view of the findings in paragraphs 11 and 13 above, the Court considers that there is no need to deal separately with these remaining complaints. APPLICATION OF ARTICLE 41 OF THE CONVENTION 15.     Regard being had to the documents in its possession and to its case ‑ law (see in particular Navalnyy and Others v. Russia [Committee], nos.   25809/17 and 14 others, §   22, 4   October 2022), the Court finds it reasonable to award the sums indicated in the appended table. FOR THESE REASONS, THE COURT, UNANIMOUSLY, Decides to join the applications; Holds that it has jurisdiction to deal with these applications as they relate to facts that took place before 16   September 2022; Declares the complaints under Article 11 of the Convention and the other complaints under the well-established case-law of the Court, as set out in the appended table, admissible, and finds that there is no need to examine separately the remaining complaints under Article 6 of the Convention; Holds that these applications disclose a breach of Article   11 of the Convention; Holds that there has been a violation of the Convention and the Protocols thereto as regards the other complaints raised under the well-established case-law of the Court (see appended table); Holds (a)   that the respondent State is to pay the applicants, within three months, the amounts indicated in the appended table, to be converted into the currency of the respondent State at the rate applicable at the date of settlement; (b)   that from the expiry of the above-mentioned three months until settlement simple interest shall be payable on the above amounts at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points. Done in English, and notified in writing on 16 May 2024, pursuant to Rule   77   §§   2 and   3 of the Rules of Court.   Viktoriya Maradudina   María Elósegui   Acting Deputy Registrar   President     APPENDIX List of applications raising complaints under Article 11 of the Convention (disproportionate measures against organisers and participants of public assemblies) No. Application no. Date of introduction Applicant’s name Year of birth   Representative’s name and location Name of the public event Location Date Administrative / criminal offence Penalty Final domestic decision Court Name Date Other complaints under well-established case-law Amount awarded for pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage and costs and expenses per applicant (in euros) [1]     32592/22 02/06/2022 Artem Konstantinovich SAFRONOV 1998 Baranova Natalya Andreyevna Moscow Anti-war protest   Rostov-on-Don   06/03/2022 article 19.3 § 1 of CAO detention for 15 days Rostov Regional Court 18/03/2022 Art. 3 - inadequate conditions of detention during transport - poor conditions of transfer in a police van on 06/03/2022 for 2.5 hours: no individual place in the van, overcrowding (more than 20 people were transferred together with the applicant);   Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 2.30 p.m. on 06/03/2022 until 8 a.m. on 07/03/2022;   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings;   Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - the sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO. 6,000     37808/22 20/07/2022 Sofya Aleksandrovna MAKARENKO 2001 Podolskiy Sergey Viktorovich St Petersburg Anti-war protest   St Petersburg   27/02/2022 article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO fine of RUB   10,000 St Petersburg City Court 26/04/2022 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 7.12 p.m. on 27/02/2022 until 11.30 a.m. on 28/02/2022;   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. 4,000     45573/22 03/09/2022 Lyudmila Vasilyevna BUTAKOVA 1968 Khaziyev Artur Valeryevich Yekaterinburg Anti-war protest   Yekaterinburg   24/02/2022 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO 30 hours of community work Sverdlovsk Regional Court 04/05/2022 Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. 3,500     45924/22 02/09/2022 Dmitriy Maksimovich ZELENSKIY 1997 Baranova Natalya Andreyevna Moscow Anti-war protest   Moscow   24/02/2022 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB   20,000 Moscow City Court 07/06/2022 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 7.33 p.m. on 24/02/2022 until 12.40 a.m. on 25/02/2022;   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. 4,000     46145/22 11/09/2022 Yekaterina Anatolyevna IVANOVA 1998 Vasin Vladimir Valeryevich Krasnoyarsk Anti-war protest   Krasnoyarsk   06/03/2022 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB   10,000 Krasnoyarsk Regional Court 11/05/2022 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to the police station for compiling an offence report on 06/03/2022;   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. 4,000     46916/22 14/09/2022 Dmitriy Olegovich SOLOVYEV 1974     Anti-war protest   Moscow   06/03/2022 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB   18,000 Moscow City Court 03/06/2022 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to the police station for compiling an offence report on 06/03/2022; Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. 4,000     48863/22 21/08/2022 Valentina Anatolyevna PANYUKOVA 1956     Anti-war protest   Krasnoyarsk   06/03/2022     article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB   10,000 Krasnoyarsk Regional Court 04/05/2022 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to the police station for compiling an offence report on 06/03/2022;   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. 4,000     51230/22 29/10/2022 Darya Viktorovna BLAGAYA 1996 Baranova Natalya Andreyevna Moscow Anti-war protest   Moscow   27/02/2022 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB   10,000 Moscow City Court 29/06/2022 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an office report from 4.55 p.m. on 27/02/2022 until 12.30 a.m. on 28/02/2022;   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. 4,000     52383/22 29/10/2022 Lyudmila Andreyevna ZVEREVA 1994     Anti-war protest   Moscow   26/02/2022 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB   10,000 Moscow City Court 29/06/2022 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence report from 9.05 p.m. on 26/02/2022 until 2.08 a.m. on 27/02/2022;   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. 4,000   52411/22 31/10/2022 Bakhtiyarzhon Bakhadirovich BALTABAYEV 1997 Bochilo Anna Yevgenyevna Barnaul Anti-war protest   Moscow   24/02/2022 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB   20,000 Moscow City Court 29/07/2022 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to the police station for compiling an offence report on 24/02/2022;   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. 4,000   52416/22 31/10/2022 Anatoliy Alekseyevich ASHCHEKIN 1984 Bochilo Anna Yevgenyevna Barnaul Anti-war protest   Moscow   24/02/2022 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB   15,000 Moscow City Court 21/07/2022 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence report from 7.35 p.m. on 24/02/2022 until 5.30 a.m. on 25/02/2022;   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. 4,000   53145/22 01/11/2022 Anastasiya Romanovna LOGUNOVA 2003     Anti-war protest   Moscow   06/03/2022 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB   20,000 Moscow City Court 05/07/2022 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence report from 5.05 p.m. on 06/03/2022 until 12.10 a.m. on 07/03/2022;   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. 4,000   55566/22 12/11/2022 Mariya Dmitriyevna SHEREMETYEVA   Arshinova Valeriya Aleksandrovna Moscow Anti-war protest   Moscow   06/03/2022 article 20.2 §   6.1 of CAO fine of RUB   15,000 Moscow City Court 15/07/2022 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence report from 6.30 p.m. on 06/03/2022 until 07/03/2022;   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. 4,000   55594/22 15/11/2022 Irina Aleksandrovna ZHUMATIY 2002     Anti-war protest   Moscow   06/03/2022 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB   20,000 Moscow City Court 15/07/2022 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence report from 3.30 p.m. until 8.30 p.m. on 06/03/2022;   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. 4,000   55615/22 13/11/2022 Nikolay ILYIN 1978 Petrova Polina Artemovna Moscow Anti-war protest   Moscow   13/03/2022 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB   20,000 Moscow City Court 13/07/2022 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence report from 5 p.m. until 11.30 p.m. on 13/03/2022;   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. 4,000   55617/22 11/11/2022 Anfisa Sergeyevna OSTASHKO 1992     Anti-war protest   Moscow   27/02/2022 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB   10,000 Moscow City Court 11/07/2022 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence report from 7.50 p.m. on 27/02/2022 until 3 a.m. on 28/02/2022. 4,000   55764/22 14/11/2022 Yelena Alekseyevna NEKRYLOVA 1992 Markin Konstantin Aleksandrovich Velikiy Novgorod Anti-war protest   Moscow   06/03/2022 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB   20,000 Moscow City Court 21/07/2022 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence report from 2 p.m. until 6.40   p.m. on 06/03/2022;   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. 4,000   55956/22 16/11/2022 Irina Vasilyevna SURKICHANOVA 1988 Arshinova Valeriya Aleksandrovna Moscow Anti-war protest   Moscow   06/03/2022 article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO fine of RUB   15,000 Moscow City Court 15/08/2022 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station from 6.30 p.m. on 06/03/2022 until 8.50 a.m. on 07/03/2022;   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. 4,000   55962/22 19/11/2022 Lyudmila Aleksandrovna UMAROVA 1968 Baranova Natalya Andreyevna Moscow Anti-war protest   Moscow   26/02/2022 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB   20,000 Moscow City Court 21/07/2022 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence report from 5.30 p.m. until 11.50 p.m. on 26/02/2022;   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. 4,000   55967/22 10/11/2022 Vladislav Aleksandrovich KALININ 1996 Baranova Natalya Andreyevna Moscow Anti-war protest   Moscow   26/02/2022 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB   15,000 Moscow City Court 23/08/2022 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence report from 7.20 p.m. on 26/02/2022 until midnight on 27/02/2022;   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. 4,000   55999/22 28/11/2022 Ivan Yevgenyevich GUDYREV 1987 Bochilo Anna Yevgenyevna Barnaul Anti-war protest   Moscow   06/03/2022 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB   10,000 Moscow City Court 07/09/2022 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence report from 2.30 p.m. on 06/03/2022 until midnight on 07/03/2022;   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. 4,000   56091/22 08/11/2022 Regina Aleksandrovna PETROCHENKO 1986 Baranova Natalya Andreyevna Moscow Anti-war protest   Novosibirsk   06/03/2022 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB   5,000 Novosibirsk Regional Court 08/07/2022 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence report from 2.15 p.m. until 7.45 p.m. on 06/03/2022;   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings;   Art. 8 (2) - restrictions on the right to private life of participants in public assemblies - use of facial recognition technology for the identification of the applicant as a participant of a rally and her subsequent conviction (raised on appeal). 4,000   56120/22 26/11/2022 Vasilisa Vukolovna PECHERSKAYA 1991     Anti-war protest   Moscow   13/03/2022 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB   10,000 Moscow City Court 29/07/2022 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to the police station for compiling an offence report from 3.20 p.m. until 7.30 p.m. on 13/03/2022; Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. 4,000   56125/22 21/11/2022 Natalya Aleksandrovna GUROVA 1970     Anti-war protest   Moscow   27/02/2022 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB   15,000 Moscow City Court 21/07/2022 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station from 7.30   p.m. on 27/02/2022 until 1.50 a.m. on 28/02/2022;   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. 4,000   56382/22 24/11/2022 Olga Aleksandrovna REGER 1977     Anti-war protest   Moscow   27/02/2022 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB   20,000 Moscow City Court 25/07/2022 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence report from 4.30 p.m. on 27/02/2022 until 1 a.m. on 28/02/2022;   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. 4,000   56614/22 21/11/2022 Natalya Konstantinovna FOKINA 1986     Anti-war protest   Moscow   02/03/2022 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB   20,000 Moscow City Court 21/07/2022 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station from 7.40   p.m. until 11.48 p.m. on 02/03/2022;   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. 4,000   56908/22 24/11/2022 Svetlana Olegovna ARALOVA 1999     Anti-war protest   Moscow   27/02/2022 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB   20,000 Moscow City Court 25/07/2022 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence report from 4.30 p.m. on 27/02/2022 until 1 a.m. on 28/02/2022,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. 4,000   56930/22 24/11/2022 Darya Viktorovna SHEREGESHEVA 1996 Baranova Natalya Andreyevna Moscow Anti-war protest   Moscow   06/03/2022 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB   15,000 Moscow City Court 27/07/2022 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station from 2.45   p.m. on 06/03/2022 until 12.30 a.m. on 07/03/2022;   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. 4,000   56935/22 18/11/2022 Sergey Gennadyevich ORLOV 1986     Anti-war protest   Moscow   02/03/2022 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB   10,000 Moscow City Court 19/07/2022 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence report from 7.40 p.m. on 02/03/2022 until 3 a.m. on 03/03/2022;   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. 4,000   57394/22 03/12/2022 Anatoliy Igorevich YADROVSKIY 1991     Anti-war protest   Moscow   25/02/2022 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB   20,000 Moscow City Court 03/08/2022 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence report from 8 p.m. on 25/02/2022 until 1.40 a.m. on 26/02/2022;   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. 4,000   57585/22 19/11/2022 Alisa Vladimirovna TSURKAN 2001     Anti-war protest   Moscow   03/03/2022 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB   15,000 Moscow City Court 19/07/2022 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence report from 8.10 p.m. on 03/03/2022 until 4.15 a.m. on 04/03/2022;   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. 4,000   57732/22 08/12/2022 Dmitriy Dmitriyevich GOLTSOV 1997 Ushakov Timofey Borisovich Kokoshkino Anti-war protest   Moscow   27/02/2022 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB   15,000 Moscow City Court 11/08/2022 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence report from 4 p.m. on 27/02/2022 until 12.55 a.m. on 28/02/2022; Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. 4,000   57734/22 08/12/2022 Nikita Antonovich DERYABIN 1995 Ushakov Timofey Borisovich Kokoshkino Anti-war protest   Moscow   27/02/2022 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB   15,000 Moscow City Court 15/08/2022 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence report from 4.15 p.m. on 27/02/2022 until 12.35 a.m. on 28/02/2022;   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. 4,000   795/23 23/11/2022 Yekaterina Sergeyevna BOLSHAKOVA 1984     Anti-war protest   Moscow   24/02/2022 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB   20,000 Moscow City Court 25/07/2022 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to the police station for compiling an offence report from 7.30 p.m. until 11.30 p.m. on 24/02/2022;   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. 4,000   2247/23 19/12/2022 Vadim Yuryevich UKRAINTSEV 1994     Anti-war protest   Moscow   27/02/2022 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB   20,000 Moscow City Court 23/08/2022 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence report from 6.20 p.m. on 27/02/2022 until 3.30 a.m. on 28/02/2022,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. 4,000   2251/23 29/12/2022 Valentina Petrovna MERKULOVA 1960     Anti-war protest   Moscow   24/02/2022 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB   10,000 Moscow City Court 09/09/2022 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence report from 7.15 p.m. on 24/02/2022 until 2 a.m. on 25/02/2022;   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. 4,000   2253/23 23/12/2022 Ramin Rasim Ogly KURBANOV 2002     Anti-war protest   Moscow   24/02/2022 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB   10,000 Moscow City Court 23/08/2022 Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. 3,500   6000/23 09/01/2023 Mikhail Yuryevich ORLOV 1991     Anti-war protest   Moscow   27/02/2022 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB   20,000 Moscow City Court 09/09/2022 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence report from 4.15 p.m. on 27/02/2022 until 6.36 a.m. on 28/02/2022;   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. 4,000   8420/23 21/01/2023 Vyacheslav Konstantinovich IONKIN 2001     Anti-war protest   Moscow   24/02/2022 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB   20,000 Moscow City Court 21/09/2022 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to the police station for compiling an offence report from 11.50 p.m. on 24/02/2022 until 3.30 a.m. on 25/02/2022. 4,000     [1] Plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicants.