CEDH · CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG — 6 juin 2024

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .sFE10DC93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s665E407E { margin-top:66pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .s34DFC730 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s10950C61 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s82B4DA5F { page-break-before:right; clear:both; mso-break-type:section-break } .sB9D5CABB { width:28.35pt; display:inline-block } .s3AAE10DF { margin-top:14pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s3CA22BA { font-family:Arial; text-transform:uppercase } .s58699FB5 { margin-top:14pt; margin-bottom:12pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s6B505E72 { margin:0pt; padding-left:0pt } .s29A3AC47 { margin-left:11.67pt; margin-bottom:12pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; padding-left:6.18pt; font-family:Arial; text-transform:uppercase } .s37072F3C { margin-top:14pt; margin-left:15pt; margin-bottom:12pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; padding-left:2.85pt; font-family:Arial; text-transform:uppercase } .s9A177BD5 { margin-top:14pt; margin-left:17.85pt; margin-bottom:12pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-family:Arial; text-transform:uppercase } .s7C22C014 { margin-top:14pt; margin-left:16.34pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; padding-left:2.11pt; font-family:Arial; text-transform:uppercase } .sD58C010 { margin-top:14pt; margin-left:15.01pt; margin-bottom:3pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; padding-left:1.99pt; font-family:Arial } .sFBC99493 { font-style:italic } .s3A97705A { margin-top:14pt; margin-left:14.2pt; margin-bottom:3pt; text-align:justify; font-family:Arial } .sD11CFAB7 { margin-top:14pt; margin-left:15.01pt; margin-bottom:3pt; text-align:justify; padding-left:1.99pt; font-family:Arial } .s74818F78 { margin-top:14pt; margin-bottom:3pt; text-align:justify; font-family:Arial; list-style-position:inside } .sE7B3A78A { width:1.99pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } .s51DFF5CF { margin-top:0pt; margin-left:34pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:-17pt; text-align:justify } .sE5BF05B1 { width:2.33pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } .s2D9C6089 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s69DCC830 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sC986E16F { font-family:Arial; color:#ffffff } .sC646A315 { width:14.54pt; display:inline-block } .sF5B27E79 { width:130.75pt; display:inline-block } .s9852CA4C { width:7.54pt; display:inline-block } .s9E436411 { width:138.09pt; display:inline-block } .s4ACA9207 { page-break-before:always; clear:both; mso-break-type:section-break } .sCC22C24E { font-family:Arial; color:#3e3e3e } .s6DB91820 { text-align:center } .s8BB62139 { margin-right:auto; margin-left:auto; border-collapse:collapse } .s3695F815 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .sDF237D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:8pt } .sEECE831 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .sC39F4804 { font-family:Arial; font-size:5.33pt; font-weight:bold; vertical-align:super; color:#474747 } .sE8934522 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s4F2ADFDB { text-align:center; font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; list-style-position:inside } .sBB6163A7 { width:2.48pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } .s5FFF0A7E { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:8pt } .sF6A12959 { width:33%; height:1px; text-align:left } .sA4BC3E2E { font-family:Arial; font-size:5.33pt; vertical-align:super; color:#000000 }       FIRST SECTION CASE OF MOCHALOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA (Applications nos. 73383/17 and 17 others – see appended list)           JUDGMENT   STRASBOURG 6 June 2024       This judgment is final but it may be subject to editorial revision.   In the case of Mochalov and Others v. Russia, The European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting as a Committee composed of:   Lətif Hüseynov , President ,   Ivana Jelić,   Erik Wennerström , judges , and Viktoriya Maradudina, Acting Deputy Section Registrar, Having deliberated in private on 16 May 2024, Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on that date: PROCEDURE 1.     The case originated in applications against Russia lodged with the Court under Article   34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) on the various dates indicated in the appended table 2.     The Russian Government (“the Government”) were given notice of the applications. THE FACTS 3.     The list of applicants and the relevant details of the applications are set out in the appended table. 4.     The applicants complained of the lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of the prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. They also raised other complaints under the provisions of the Convention. THE LAW JOINDER OF THE APPLICATIONS 5.     Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single judgment. Jurisdiction 6.     The Court observes that the facts giving rise to the alleged violations of the Convention occurred prior to 16 September 2022, the date on which the Russian Federation ceased to be a party to the Convention. The Court therefore decides that it has jurisdiction to examine the present applications (see Fedotova and Others v. Russia [GC], nos. 40792/10 and 2 others, §§   68 ‑ 73, 17 January 2023). ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 6 § 1 of the Convention 7.     The applicants complained of the lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of the prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. They relied, expressly or in substance, on Article 6 § 1 of the Convention. 8.     The relevant principles of the Court’s case-law concerning the requirement of impartiality under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention can be found in the leading case of Karelin v. Russia (no. 926/08, §§ 51-57, 20   September 2016, with further references). In that case the Court assessed the national rules of administrative procedure and concluded that the statutory requirement allowing for the national judicial authorities to consider an administrative offence which falls within the ambit of Article 6 of the Convention under its criminal limb, in the absence of a prosecuting authority, was incompatible with the principle of objective impartiality set out in Article   6 of the Convention. 9.     Having examined all the material submitted to it, the Court has not found any fact or argument capable of persuading it to reach a different conclusion on the admissibility and merits of these complaints. 10 .     These complaints are therefore admissible and disclose a breach of Article   6 § 1 of the Convention. OTHER ALLEGED VIOLATIONS UNDER WELL-ESTABLISHED CASE-LAW 11.     Some applicants submitted other complaints which also raised issues under the Convention, given the relevant well-established case-law of the Court (see appended table). These complaints are not manifestly ill-founded within the meaning of Article   35   §   3   (a) of the Convention, nor are they inadmissible on any other ground. Accordingly, they must be declared admissible. Having examined all the material before it, the Court concludes that they also disclose violations of the Convention in the light of its findings in Elvira Dmitriyeva v. Russia , nos. 60921/17 and 7202/18, §§   77-90, 30   April 2019, as to administrative conviction for making calls to participate in public assemblies; Bouton v.   France , no. 22636/19, §§   42-68, 13 October 2022 and Tatár and Fáber v.   Hungary , nos. 26005/08 and 26160/08, §§   36 ‑ 42, 12 June 2012, concerning restrictions on public performance as an avenue for political expression; and Martynyuk v.   Russia , no.   13764/15, §§   38-42, 8   October 2019, relating to the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal against the sentence of administrative detention. REMAINING COMPLAINTS 12.     Some applicants raised further additional complaints under Article 6 of the Convention concerning other aspects of fairness of the administrative ‑ offence proceedings. In view of the findings in paragraph 10 above, the Court considers that there is no need to deal separately with these remaining complaints. APPLICATION OF ARTICLE   41 OF THE CONVENTION 13.     Regard being had to the documents in its possession and to its case ‑ law (see, in particular, Kuratov and Others v. Russia [Committee], nos.   24377/15 and 2 others, 22 October 2019, and, mutatis mutandis , Navalnyy and Others v. Russia [Committee], nos.   25809/17 and 14 others, §   22, 4   October 2022), the Court considers it reasonable to award the sums indicated in the appended table. FOR THESE REASONS, THE COURT, UNANIMOUSLY, Decides to join the applications; Holds that it has jurisdiction to deal with these applications as they relate to facts that took place before 16   September 2022; Declares the complaints under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention concerning the absence of the prosecuting party from the administrative offence proceedings and the other complaints under the well-established case-law of the Court, as set out in the appended table, admissible, and finds that there is no need to examine separately the remaining complaints of the applicants under Article 6 of the Convention; Holds that these applications disclose a breach of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention concerning the lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of the prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings; Holds that there has been a violation of the Convention and its Protocols as regards the other complaints raised under the well-established case-law of the Court (see appended table); Holds (a)   that the respondent State is to pay the applicants, within three months, the amounts indicated in the appended table, to be converted into the currency of the respondent State at the rate applicable at the date of settlement; (b)   that from the expiry of the above-mentioned three months until settlement simple interest shall be payable on the above amounts at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points. Done in English, and notified in writing on 6 June 2024, pursuant to Rule   77   §§   2 and   3 of the Rules of Court.     Viktoriya Maradudina   Lətif Hüseynov   Acting Deputy Registrar   President   APPENDIX List of applications raising complaints under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention (lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of the prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings) No. Application no. Date of introduction Applicant’s name Year of birth   Representative’s name and location Penalty Date of final domestic decision Name of court Other complaints under well-established case-law Amount awarded for pecuniary and non ‑ pecuniary damage and costs and expenses per applicant (in euros) [1]     73383/17 05/10/2017 Pavel Valeryevich MOCHALOV 1998 Glukhov Aleksey Vladimirovich Novocheboksarsk administrative fine of RUB   10,000 20/07/2017, Supreme Court of the Chuvashia Republic Art. 10 (1) - various restrictions on the right to freedom of expression - the applicant together with three other persons was convicted under Article 20.2 § 2 of the CAO for publicly displaying a banner "You will not kill everyone, you will not imprison everyone" accompanied by lighting flares at the bridge in Cheboksary on 25/02/2017, fined RUB 10,000; final decision taken by the Supreme Court of Chuvashia Republic on 20/07/2017. 4,000     11807/20 13/02/2020 Anna Mikhaylovna BALTINA 1979 Ruchko Irina Yuryevna Yekaterinburg administrative fine of RUB   20,000 13/08/2019, Sverdlovsk Regional Court Art. 10 (1) - conviction for making calls to participate in public events - protest against construction of the cathedral on 13/05/2019 in Yekaterinburg, convicted under Article 20.2 § 2 of CAO, fined RUB 20,000, final decision taken by the Sverdlovsk Regional Court on 13/08/2019. 4,000     41802/21 05/08/2021 Sergey Andreyevich BOYKO 1983 Zhdanov Ivan Yuryevich Vilnius administrative detention for 28 days 09/02/2021, Novosibirsk Regional Court Art. 10 (1) - conviction for making calls to participate in public events - rally to support A.   Navalnyy on 23/01/2021 in Novosibirsk, convicted under Article 20.2 § 8 of CAO, sentenced to 28-day detention, final decision taken by the Novosibirsk Regional Court on 09/02/2021. 5,000     43010/21 09/08/2021 Eseniya Vladimirovna SHERSTOBAYEVA 2001 Zhdanov Ivan Yuryevich Vilnius community work for 30 hours 03/03/2021, Supreme Court of the Karelia Republic Art. 10 (1) - conviction for making calls to participate in public events - rally to support A.   Navalnyy on 31/01/2021 in various Russian cities, convicted under Article 20.2 § 2 of CAO, sentenced to community work for 30 hours, final decision taken by the Supreme Court of the Karelia Republic on 03/03/2021. 4,000     43762/21 23/08/2021 Vyacheslav Vladimirovich BURMISTROV 1960 Pomazuyev Aleksandr Yevgenyevich Vilnius administrative fine of RUB   25,000 10/03/2021, Nizhniy Novgorod Regional Court Art. 10 (1) - conviction for making calls to participate in public events - rally to support A.   Navalnyy on 23/01/2021 in Nizhniy Novgorod, convicted under Article 20.2 § 2 of CAO, fined RUB 25,000, final decision taken by the Nizhniy Novgorod Regional Court on 10/03/2021. 4,000     48304/21 09/09/2021 Anastasiya Yuryevna YEVDOKIMOVA 2001 Markin Konstantin Aleksandrovich Velikiy Novgorod community work for 30   hours 11/03/2021, Novgorod Regional Court Art. 10 (1) - conviction for making calls to participate in public events - rally to support A.   Navalnyy on 31/01/2021 in Velikiy Novgorod, convicted under Article 20.2 § 2 of CAO, sentenced to community work for 30 hours, final decision taken by the Novgorod Regional Court on 11/03/2021. 4,000     50155/21 23/09/2021 Anastasiya Pavlovna PANCHENKO 1994 Vertegel Feliks Yevgenyevich Krasnodar administrative detention for 10 days 24/03/2021, Krasnodar Regional Court Art. 10 (1) - conviction for making calls to participate in public events - rally to support A.   Navalnyy on 23/01/2021 in Krasnodar, convicted under Article 20.2 § 2 of CAO, sentenced to 10-days’ detention, final decision taken by the Krasnodar Regional Court on 24/03/2021;     Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - the sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO. 5,000     54544/21 13/10/2021 Vladimir Ivanovich TOLCHENNIKOV 1987 Mezak Ernest Aleksandrovich Saint-Barthélemy-d’Anjou administrative fine of RUB   10,000 14/04/2021, Supreme Court of the Komi Republic Art. 10 (1) - conviction for making calls to participate in public events - rally to support A.   Navalnyy on 23/01/2021 in Syktyvkar, convicted under Article 20.2 § 2 of CAO, fined RUB   10,000, final decision taken by the Supreme Court of the Komi Republic on 14/04/2021. 4,000     57954/21 15/11/2021 Fedor Yuryevich REGUZOV 1999 Miropoltsev Dmitriy Dmitriyevich Kaltan administrative fine of RUB   22,000 02/06/2021, Kemerovo Regional Court Art. 10 (1) - conviction for making calls to participate in public events - rally to support A.   Navalnyy on 23/01/2021 in Novokuznetsk, convicted under Article 20.2 § 2 of CAO, fine of RUB 22,000, final decision taken by the Kemerovo Regional Court on 02/06/2021. 4,000   58265/21 27/11/2021 Viktor Anatolyevich SHISHKIN 1987 Zhdanov Ivan Yuryevich Vilnius administrative fine of RUB   20,000 27/07/2021, Murmansk Regional Court Art. 10 (1) - conviction for making calls to participate in public events - rally to support A.   Navalnyy on 21/04/2021 in Polyarnyye Zori, convicted under Article 20.2 § 2 of CAO, fined RUB 20,000, final decision taken by the Murmansk Regional Court on 27/07/2021. 4,000   58858/21 27/11/2021 Oksana Vladimirovna MIKHAYLICHENKO 1986 Zhdanov Ivan Yuryevich Vilnius administrative fine of RUB   10,000 15/07/2021, Penza Regional Court Art. 10 (1) - conviction for making calls to participate in public events - rally to support A.   Navalnyy on 21/04/2021 in Penza, convicted under Article 20.2 § 2 of CAO, fined RUB   10,000, final decision taken by the Penza Regional Court on 15/07/2021. 4,000   58989/21 27/11/2021 Yuriy Valentinovich KUZNETSOV 1960 Zhdanov Ivan Yuryevich Vilnius administrative fine of RUB   20,000 10/06/2021, Supreme Court of the Mordovia Republic Art. 10 (1) - conviction for making calls to participate in public events - rally to support A.   Navalnyy on 21/04/2021 in Saransk, convicted under Article 20.2 § 2 of CAO, fined RUB   20,000, final decision taken by the Supreme Court of the Mordovia Republic on 10/06/2021. 4,000   59993/21 03/12/2021 Anton Yevgenyevich KOSTIN 1995 Zhdanov Ivan Yuryevich Vilnius administrative fine of RUB   20,000 16/06/2021, Nizhniy Novgorod Regional Court Art. 10 (1) - conviction for making calls to participate in public events - rally to support A.   Navalnyy on 31/01/2021 in Nizhniy Novgorod, convicted under Article 20.2 § 2 of CAO, fined RUB 20,000, final decision taken by the Nizhniy Novgorod Regional Court on 16/06/2021. 4,000   3546/22 22/12/2021 Anastasiya Vladimirovna YEMELYANOVA 1984 Memorial Human Rights Centre Moscow administrative fine of RUB   75,000 22/06/2021, Supreme Court of the Kabardino-Balkaria Republic Art. 10 (1) - conviction for making calls to participate in public events - rally to support A.   Navalnyy on 23/01/2021 in Prokhladnyy, convicted under Article 20.2 § 8 of CAO, fined RUB   75,000, final decision taken by the Supreme Court of the Kabardino-Balkaria Republic on 22/06/2021. 4,900   5288/22 25/12/2021 Yelena Leonidovna RUSAKOVA 1962 Rybin Aleksey Vladimirovich Moscow administrative fine of RUB   150,000 13/09/2021, Moscow City Court   2,700   7224/22 15/01/2022 Yelena Yuryevna LASHTABEGA 1988 Memorial Human Rights Centre Moscow administrative fine of RUB   20,000 16/07/2021, Novosibirsk Regional Court Art. 10 (1) - conviction for making calls to participate in public events - rally to support A.   Navalnyy on 21/04/2021 in Novosibirsk, convicted under Article 20.2 § 2 of CAO, fined RUB   20,000, final decision taken by the Novosibirsk Regional Court 16/07/2021. 4,000   8026/22 22/12/2021 Anton Eduardovich DOROFEYEV 1987     administrative detention for 10 days 22/06/2021, Kaliningrad Regional Court Art. 10 (1) - conviction for making calls to participate in public events - rally to support A.   Navalnyy on 21/04/2021 in Kaliningrad, convicted under Article 20.2 § 2 of the CAO, sentenced to 10-days’ detention, final decision taken by the Kaliningrad Regional Court on 22/06/2021.   5,000   8692/23 05/12/2022 Larisa Viktorovna PAREVA 1965     Administrative fine of RUB   20,000 11/08/2022, Moscow City Court Art. 10 (1) - conviction for making calls to participate in public events – (1) rally against Russia’s military attack on Ukraine on 24/02/2022 in various Russian cities, convicted under Article 20.2 § 2 of CAO, fined RUB 20,000, final decision taken by the Moscow City Court on 11/08/2022; (2) rally against Russia’s military attack on Ukraine on 09/05/2022 in Moscow, convicted under Article 20.2 § 2 of CAO, fined RUB 20,000, final decision taken by the Moscow City Court on 03/10/2022. 4,000     [1] Plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicants.