CEDH · CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG — 13 juin 2024

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .sFE10DC93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s665E407E { margin-top:66pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .s34DFC730 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s82B4DA5F { page-break-before:right; clear:both; mso-break-type:section-break } .s10950C61 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .sB9D5CABB { width:28.35pt; display:inline-block } .s3AAE10DF { margin-top:14pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s3CA22BA { font-family:Arial; text-transform:uppercase } .s6B505E72 { margin:0pt; padding-left:0pt } .sDECD9755 { margin-left:11.67pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; padding-left:6.78pt; font-family:Arial; text-transform:uppercase } .sDA7B489D { margin-top:14pt; margin-left:15pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; padding-left:3.45pt; font-family:Arial; text-transform:uppercase } .s5C5C410E { margin-top:14pt; margin-left:18.34pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; padding-left:0.11pt; font-family:Arial; text-transform:uppercase } .s67CAFE05 { margin-top:14pt; margin-left:18.45pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-family:Arial; text-transform:uppercase } .s7C22C014 { margin-top:14pt; margin-left:16.34pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; padding-left:2.11pt; font-family:Arial; text-transform:uppercase } .sD11CFAB7 { margin-top:14pt; margin-left:15.01pt; margin-bottom:3pt; text-align:justify; padding-left:1.99pt; font-family:Arial } .sFBC99493 { font-style:italic } .sD58C010 { margin-top:14pt; margin-left:15.01pt; margin-bottom:3pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; padding-left:1.99pt; font-family:Arial } .sBB6E85D0 { margin-top:0pt; margin-left:34pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:-17pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .sE5BF05B1 { width:2.33pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } .s2D9C6089 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s69DCC830 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sC986E16F { font-family:Arial; color:#ffffff } .sC646A315 { width:14.54pt; display:inline-block } .sD046859D { width:101.74pt; display:inline-block } .sAA8E4CBE { width:145.63pt; display:inline-block } .s4ACA9207 { page-break-before:always; clear:both; mso-break-type:section-break } .sCC22C24E { font-family:Arial; color:#3e3e3e } .s6DB91820 { text-align:center } .s8BB62139 { margin-right:auto; margin-left:auto; border-collapse:collapse } .s3695F815 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .s5FFF0A7E { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:8pt } .sEECE831 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .sDF237D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:8pt } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .sC39F4804 { font-family:Arial; font-size:5.33pt; font-weight:bold; vertical-align:super; color:#474747 } .sE8934522 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s4F2ADFDB { text-align:center; font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; list-style-position:inside } .sBB6163A7 { width:2.48pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } .sCBEC756B { height:51.15pt } .sF6A12959 { width:33%; height:1px; text-align:left } .s2EB42ED2 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:10pt } .sB343B0AA { font-family:Arial; font-size:6.67pt; vertical-align:super; color:#000000 } .sB853CD26 { font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt }       SECOND SECTION CASE OF TUGANBAYEV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA (Applications nos. 8254/18 and 34 others – see appended list)             JUDGMENT   STRASBOURG 13 June 2024   This judgment is final but it may be subject to editorial revision. In the case of Tuganbayev and Others v. Russia, The European Court of Human Rights (Second Section), sitting as a Committee composed of:   Lorraine Schembri Orland , President ,   Frédéric Krenc,   Davor Derenčinović , judges , and Viktoriya Maradudina, Acting Deputy Section Registrar, Having deliberated in private on 23 May 2024, Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on that date: PROCEDURE 1.     The case originated in applications against Russia lodged with the Court under Article   34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) on the various dates indicated in the appended table. 2.     The Russian Government (“the   Government”) were given notice of the applications. THE FACTS 3.     The list of applicants and the relevant details of the applications are set out in the appended table. 4.     The applicants complained of the disproportionate measures taken against them as organisers or participants of various public assemblies. Some applicants also raised other complaints under the provisions of the Convention. THE LAW JOINDER OF THE APPLICATIONS 5.     Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single judgment. JURISDICTION 6.     The Court observes that the facts giving rise to the alleged violations of the Convention occurred prior to 16 September 2022, the date on which the Russian Federation ceased to be a party to the Convention. The Court therefore decides that it has jurisdiction to examine the present applications (see Fedotova and Others v. Russia [GC], nos.   40792/10 and 2   others, §§   68 ‑ 73, 17   January 2023). ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE   11 OF THE CONVENTION 7.     The applicants complained principally of disproportionate measures taken against them as organisers or participants of public assemblies, namely their arrest in relation to the dispersal of these assemblies and their conviction for administrative offences. They relied, expressly or in substance, on Article   11 of the Convention. 8.     The Court refers to the principles established in its case-law regarding freedom of assembly (see Kudrevičius and Others v.   Lithuania [GC], no.   37553/05, ECHR 2015, with further references) and proportionality of interference with it (see Oya Ataman v.   Turkey , no.   74552/01, ECHR 2006 ‑ XIV, and Hyde Park and Others v.   Moldova , no.   33482/06, 31   March 2009). 9.     In the leading cases of Frumkin v. Russia, no. 74568/12, ECHR 2016 (extracts), Navalnyy and Yashin v. Russia, no. 76204/11, 4 December 2014 and Kasparov and Others v. Russia, no. 21613/07, 3 October 2013, the Court already found a violation in respect of issues similar to those in the present case. 10 .     Having examined all the material submitted to it, the Court has not found any fact or argument capable of persuading it to reach a different conclusion as to the admissibility and merits of these complaints. Having regard to its case-law on the subject, the Court considers that in the instant case the interferences with the applicants’ freedom of assembly were not “necessary in a democratic society”. 11.     These complaints are therefore admissible and disclose a breach of Article 11 of the Convention. OTHER ALLEGED VIOLATIONS UNDER WELL-ESTABLISHED CASE-LAW 12.     Some applicants submitted other complaints which also raised issues under the Convention, given the relevant well-established case-law of the Court (see appended table). These complaints are not manifestly ill-founded within the meaning of Article 35 § 3 (a) of the Convention, nor are they inadmissible on any other ground. Accordingly, they must be declared admissible. 13 .     Having examined all the material before it, the Court concludes that these complaints also disclose violations of the Convention in the light of its findings in Butkevich v. Russia , no.   5865/07, §§   63-65, 13   February 2018, Tsvetkova and Others v. Russia , nos.   54381/08 and 5 others, §§ 115-31, 10   April 2018, and Korneyeva v.   Russia , no.   72051/17, §§ 34-36, 8   October 2019, as to various aspects of unlawful deprivation of liberty of organisers or participants of public assemblies; and Karelin v. Russia , no. 926/08, §§   58 ‑ 85, 20   September 2016, concerning the absence of a prosecuting party in the proceedings under the Code of Administrative Offences (the CAO). REMAINING COMPLAINTS 14.     Some applicants raised further additional complaints under Article 6 of the Convention concerning other aspects of fairness of the administrative ‑ offence proceedings. In view of the findings in paragraphs 10 and 13 above, the Court considers that there is no need to deal separately with these remaining complaints. 15.     The Court has further examined the rest of the complaints raised by the applicants and considers that, in the light of all the material in its possession and in so far as the matters complained of are within its competence, these complaints either do not meet the admissibility criteria set out in Articles 34 and 35 of the Convention or do not disclose any appearance of a violation of the rights and freedoms enshrined in the Convention or the Protocols thereto. It follows that this part of the applications must be rejected in accordance with Article 35 § 4 of the Convention. APPLICATION OF ARTICLE 41 OF THE CONVENTION 16.     Regard being had to the documents in its possession and to its case ‑ law (see in particular Navalnyy and Others v. Russia [Committee], nos.   25809/17 and 14 others, §   22, 4   October 2022), the Court finds it reasonable to award the sums indicated in the appended table. FOR THESE REASONS, THE COURT, UNANIMOUSLY, Decides to join the applications; Holds that it has jurisdiction to deal with the applicants’ complaints as they relate to facts that took place before 16 September 2022; Declares the complaints under Article 11 of the Convention and the other complaints under the well-established case-law of the Court, as set out in the appended table, admissible, finds that there is no need to examine separately the remaining complaints under Article 6 of the Convention, and declares the remainder of the applications inadmissible; Holds that these applications disclose a breach of Article   11 of the Convention; Holds that there has been a violation of the Convention as regards the other complaints raised under the well-established case-law of the Court (see appended table); Holds (a)   that the respondent State is to pay the applicants, within three months, the amounts indicated in the appended table, to be converted into the currency of the respondent State at the rate applicable at the date of settlement; (b)   that from the expiry of the above-mentioned three months until settlement simple interest shall be payable on the above amounts at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points. Done in English, and notified in writing on 13 June 2024, pursuant to Rule   77   §§   2 and   3 of the Rules of Court.     Viktoriya Maradudina   Lorraine Schembri Orland Acting Deputy Registrar   President   APPENDIX List of applications raising complaints under Article 11 of the Convention (disproportionate measures against organisers and participants of public assemblies) No. Application no. Date of introduction Applicant’s name Year of birth   Representative’s name and location Name of the public event Location Date Administrative charges Penalty Final domestic decision Court Name Date Other complaints under well-established case-law Amount awarded for pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage and costs and expenses per applicant (in euros) [1]     8254/18 05/02/2018       and     62360/19 18/11/2019 Arman Askarovich TUGANBAYEV 1998 Preobrazhenskaya Oksana Vladimirovna Strasbourg;         Memorial Human Rights Centre Moscow Anti-corruption rally   Moscow   26/03/2017     Opposition rally   Moscow   05/05/2018 Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO             Article 20.2 § 8 of CAO fine of RUB 15,000           fine of RUB 150,000 Moscow City Court 14/08/2017           Moscow City Court 18/06/2019     Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention – escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 3 p.m. on 26//03/2017 until 8 a.m. on 27/03/2017, and from 6.30 p.m. on 05/05/2018 until 1.40 p.m. on 06/05/2018;   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in both sets of administrative-offence proceedings.   6,000       14963/18 12/03/2018       and     6955/19 21/01/2019 Aleksey Nikolayevich YEFREMOV 1974 Terekhov Konstantin Ilyich Moscow;           Zhdanov Ivan Yuryevich Vilnius Anti-corruption rally   Vladimir   12/06/2017     Opposition rally   Vladimir   05/05/2018   Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO             Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO community work for 30 hours           fine of RUB 10,000 Vladimir Regional Court 27/09/2017         Vladimir Regional Court 06/09/2018   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in both sets of administrative-offence proceedings.   3,500     44634/18 03/09/2018                 and     50509/18 10/10/2018 Sergey Leonidovich GRIVKO 1986 Zhdanov Ivan Yuryevich Vilnius Rally in support of A.   Navalnyy’s candidacy for the 2018 presidential elections   Rostov-on-Don   24/12/2017     Opposition rally   Rostov-on-Don   05/05/2018   Protest against retirement age hike   Rostov-on-Don   09/09/2018     Article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO                       Article 20.2 § 8 of CAO           Article 20.2 § 8 of CAO       fine of RUB 10,000                     detention for 6 days           detention for 2 days   Rostov Regional Court 13/03/2018                   Rostov Regional Court 11/05/2018       Rostov Regional Court 26/10/2018     Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention – escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 5.30 p.m. on 05/05/2018 until 10 a.m. on 06/05/2018, and from 3.26 p.m. on 09/09/2018 until 3.30 p.m. on 10/09/2018;   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in all sets of administrative-offence proceedings.   6,000     50128/18 10/10/2018 Aleksandr Vladimirovich SMIRNOV 1990 Zhdanov Ivan Yuryevich Vilnius Opposition rally   Yaroslavl   05/05/2018     Political rally   Yaroslavl   20/05/2018     Protest against retirement age hike   Yaroslavl   01/07/2018     Protest against retirement age hike   Yaroslavl   09/09/2018 Article 20.2 § 1 of CAO             Article 20.2 § 1 of CAO           Article 20.2 § 1 of CAO               Article 20.2 § 8 of CAO fine of RUB 10,000           fine of RUB 10,000         fine of RUB 10,000             150 hours of community work Yaroslavl Regional Court 27/08/2018         Yaroslavl Regional Court 06/08/2018       Yaroslavl Regional Court 04/09/2018           Yaroslavl Regional Court 13/11/2018 Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in all sets of administrative-offence proceedings.   4,000     5247/19 20/12/2018     and     42571/21 12/08/2021   Mikhail Vyacheslavovich DOLIYEV 1976 Zhdanov Ivan Yuryevich Vilnius Opposition rally   Astrakhan   05/05/2018     Rally “Free Navalnyy”   Astrakhan   23/01/2021     Article 20.2 § 1 of CAO             Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB 10,000           fine of RUB 10,000   Astrakhan Regional Court 29/06/2018         Astrakhan Regional Court 26/02/2021       Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to the police station for compiling an offence report on 05/05/2018 and 23/01/2021;   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in both sets of administrative-offence proceedings. 4,000     5266/19 21/12/2018 Anatoliy Grigoryevich NOGOVITSYN 1987 Zhdanov Ivan Yuryevich Vilnius Opposition rally   Yakutsk   05/05/2018   Protest against retirement age hike   Yakutsk   09/09/2018 Article 20.2 § 3 of CAO           Article 20.2 § 8 of CAO fine of RUB 30,000         detention for 20 days Supreme Court of the Republic of Sakha (Yakutia) 28/06/2018   Supreme Court of the Republic of Sakha (Yakutia) 14/09/2018 Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in both sets of administrative-offence proceedings.     5,000     6012/19 14/01/2019 Ivan Denisovich FINOGEYEV 1996     Opposition march   Penza   05/05/2018     Protest against retirement age hike   Penza   09/09/2018 Article 20.2 § 1 of CAO             Article 20.2 § 8 of CAO fine of RUB 10,000           detention for 10 days Penza Regional Court 19/07/2018         Penza Regional Court 06/02/2019 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention – (1) escorting to the police station for compiling an offence report on 05/05/2018; (2) escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 6.47 p.m. on 13/09/2018 until 2 p.m. on 14/09/2018.         5,000     8000/19 23/01/2019 Lyudmila Ivanovna FILATOVA 1954 Zhdanov Ivan Yuryevich Vilnius Opposition rally   Smolensk   05/05/2018   Protest against retirement age hike   Smolensk   09/09/2018 Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO           Article 20.2 § 8 of CAO fine of RUB 5,000           community work for 60 hours Smolensk Regional Court 15/08/2018       Smolensk Regional Court 31/10/2018 Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.     3,500     13141/19 22/02/2019       and     49803/19 13/09/2019 Artem Aleksandrovich AGEYEV 1995 Zhdanov Ivan Yuryevich Vilnius           Pomazuyev Aleksandr Yevgenyevich Vilnius Opposition rally   Krasnoyarsk   05/05/2018     Protest against retirement age hike   Krasnoyarsk   09/09/2018 Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO             Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB 15,000           fine of RUB 10,000   Krasnoyarsk Regional Court 11/10/2018         Krasnoyarsk Regional Court 21/03/2019 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention – escorting to the police station for compiling an offence report from 3.15 p.m. until 6.05 p.m. on 05/05/2018;   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in all sets of administrative-offence proceedings. 4,000   13193/19 13/02/2019       and     47643/19 28/08/2019   Alina Sergeyevna IVANOVA 1996   Gayazova Regina Fargatovna Kazan           Zboroshenko Nikolay Sergeyevich Mytishchi Opposition rally   Moscow   05/05/2018     Political rally   Moscow   13/05/2019     Protest against retirement age hike   Moscow   09/09/2018     Rally to call for fair elections to Mosgorduma   Moscow   27/07/2019     Rally to call for fair elections to Mosgorduma   Moscow   10/08/2019 Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO             Article 20.2 § 8 of CAO           Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO               Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO               Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB 15,000           detention for 5 days           fine of RUB 10,000             fine of RUB 15,000             fine of RUB 20,000 Moscow City Court 20/11/2018           Moscow City Court 30/05/2019         Moscow City Court 28/02/2019             Moscow City Court 18/10/2019             Moscow City Court 22/10/2019   Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention – (1) escorting to and detention at the police station from 9.20 p.m. on 13/05/2019 until 3.05 p.m. on 15/05/2018; (2) escorting to the police station for compiling an offence report on 27/07/2019 and 10/08/2019;   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in all sets of administrative-offence proceedings.       6,000   13509/19 25/02/2019                     Andrey Sergeyevich CHVANOV 1976 Akhtyamova Chulpan Salavatovna Kazan Protest against retirement age hike   Naberezhnyye Chelny   09/09/2018 Article 20.2 § 1 of CAO fine of RUB 15,000 Supreme Court of the Tatarstan Republic 07/11/2018 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention – (1) escorting to the police station for compiling an offence report on 09/09/2018; (2) escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 4.05 p.m. on 12/09/2018 until 9.15 a.m. on 13/09/2018;   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in all sets of administrative-offence proceedings.   4,000   14207/19 25/02/2019 Ilmir Rafaelevich SHAKUROV 1986     Akhtyamova Chulpan Salavatovna Kazan Protest against retirement age hike   Naberezhnye Chelny   09/09/2018       Article 20.2 § 1 of CAO                   fine of RUB 10,000                 Supreme Court of the Tatarstan Republic 07/11/2018             Art. 5 (1) – unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence report from 2.30 p.m. until 6.30 p.m. on 09/09/2018 and from 4.10 p.m. on 12/09/2018 until 2.40 p.m. to 13/09/2018;   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. 4,000   17922/19 18/03/2019 Sergey Aleksandrovich SEMENOV 1988 Sholokhov Igor Nikolayevich Kazan Protest against retirement age hike   Omsk   09/09/2018 Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB 10,000 Omsk Regional Court 11/12/2018 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention – escorting to the police station for compiling an offence report on 09/09/2018;   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. 4,000   19080/19 25/03/2019 Irina Evertovna SAYKONEN 1956 Mezak Ernest Aleksandrovich Saint-Barthélemy d’Anjou Political rally   St Petersburg   01/05/2018 Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB 10,000 St Petersburg City Court 25/09/2018 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention – escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence report from 12.30 p.m. until 9.25 p.m. on 01/05/2018;   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in the administrative-offence proceedings. 4,000   19897/19 01/04/2019 Aleksey Anatolyevich FEFELOV 1985 Zhdanov Ivan Yuryevich Vilnius Protest against retirement age hike   St Petersburg   09/09/2018 Article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO fine of RUB 10,000 St Petersburg City Court 25/10/2018 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention – escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 5 p.m. on 09/09/2018 until 8 a.m. on 10/09/2018;   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. 4,000   19901/19 01/04/2019 Aleksandr Aleksandrovich REMIZOV 1985 Zhdanov Ivan Yuryevich Vilnius Protest against retirement age hike   Lipetsk   09/09/2018 Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB 10,000 Lipetsk Regional Court 08/11/2018 Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. 3,500   20057/19 01/04/2019         and   9581/20 12/02/2020 Nikita Igorevich IVANOV 1990 Pomazuyev Aleksandr Yevgenyevich Vilnius         Memorial Human Rights Centre Moscow Protest against retirement age hike   Krasnoyarsk   09/09/2018   Rally to call for fair elections to Mosgorduma   Moscow   27/07/2019 Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO             Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB 10,000           fine of RUB 15,000 Krasnoyarsk Regional Court 17/01/2019         Moscow City Court 28/11/2019 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to the police station for compiling an offence report on 27/07/2019;   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in all sets of administrative-offence proceedings. 4,000   20286/19 02/04/2019 Ayrat Sergeyevich PANTELEYEV 1991 Pomazuyev Aleksandr Yevgenyevich Vilnius Opposition rally   Moscow   05/05/2018     Protest against pension reform   Naberezhnye Chelny   18/11/2018 Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO           Article 20.2 § 2 of CAO fine of RUB 10,000         fine of RUB 20,000 Moscow City Court 16/11/2018         Supreme Court of the Tatarstan Republic 30/01/2019 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention – escorting to the police station for compiling an offence report on 05/05/2018;   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in all sets of administrative-offence proceedings. 4,000   21039/19 03/04/2019 Valentin Sergeyevich YAAKSON 1988 Sholokhov Igor Nikolayevich Kazan Protest against retirement age hike   Omsk   09/09/2018 Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB 10,000 Omsk Regional Court 22/01/2019 Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. 3,500   21041/19 03/04/2019 Aleksandr Anatolyevich TYULENEV 1984 Sholokhov Igor Nikolayevich Kazan Protest against retirement age hike   Omsk   09/09/2018 Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB 10,000 Omsk Regional Court 15/01/2019 Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. 3,500   21176/19 01/04/2019 Aleksandr Sergeyevich GOLOVENKO 1971 Zhdanov Ivan Yuryevich Vilnius Protest against retirement age hike   Belgorod   09/09/2018 Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO community work for 40 hours Belgorod Regional Court 29/10/2018 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention – escorting to the police station for compiling an offence report on 09/09/2018;   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. 4,000   21183/19 01/04/2019 Artem Alekseyevich KRYLTSOV 1997 Zhdanov Ivan Yuryevich Vilnius Protest against retirement age hike   St Petersburg   09/09/2018 Article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO fine of RUB 10,000 St Petersburg City Court 25/10/2018 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention – escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence report from 12.10 a.m. until 8 a.m. on 10/09/2018;   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. 4,000   24447/19 08/04/2019 Violetta Andreyevna GRUDINA 1990 Pomazuyev Aleksandr Yevgenyevich Vilnius Protest against retirement age hike   Murmansk   09/09/2018 Article 20.2 § 8 of CAO fine of RUB 150,000 Murmansk Regional Court 21/11/2018 Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. 5,500   28600/19 14/05/2019 Vera Aleksandrovna OLEYNIKOVA 2000 Yelanchik Oleg Aleksandrovich Moscow Protest against retirement age hike   Moscow   10/09/2018 Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB 10,000 Moscow City Court 14/11/2018 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention – escorting to the police station for compiling an offence report on 10/09/2018;   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. 4,000   30092/19 29/05/2019 Vadim Vladimirovich YERMAKOV 1985 Pomazuyev Aleksandr Yevgenyevich Vilnius Opposition rally   Smolensk   05/05/2018   Protest against retirement age hike   Smolensk   09/09/2018 Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO           Article 20.2 § 1 of CAO fine of RUB 10,000         fine of RUB 10,000 Smolensk Regional Court 16/01/2019       Smolensk Regional Court 06/02/2019 Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in all sets of administrative-offence proceedings. 3,500   49305/19 12/09/2019       and     44234/21 23/08/2021   Gerasim Dmitriyevich ARTEMYEV 1987 Pomazuyev Aleksandr Yevgenyevich Vilnius         Galeyeva Tatyana Olegovna Krasnoyarsk   Protest against retirement age hike   Krasnoyarsk   09/09/2018   Rally "Free Navalnyy"   Krasnoyarsk   31/01/2021   Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO             Article 20.2 § 8 of CAO   fine of RUB 15,000           fine of RUB 150,000   Krasnoyarsk Regional Court 21/03/2019         Krasnoyarsk Regional Court   25/03/2021   Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to the police station for compiling an offence report on 02/02/2021;   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings under Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO.       5,500   51193/19 18/09/2019 Alena Gennadyevna VODOLAGINA 1978 Peredruk Aleksandr Dmitriyevich St Petersburg Political rally   St Petersburg   01/05/2019 Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB 10,000 St Petersburg City Court 28/05/2019 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention – escorting to the police station for compiling an offence report on 01/05/2019;   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. 4,000     [1] Plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicants.