CEDHCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG28
CEDH · CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG — 27 juin 2024
- ECLI
- ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0627DEC002197622
- Date
- 27 juin 2024
- Publication
- 27 juin 2024
droits fondamentauxCEDH
Source : DILA / Judilibre · open data
Mes notes
privées · visibles par vous seulRésumé structuré
version préliminaireFaits
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Procédure
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Question juridique
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Solution
source officielleStruck out of the list
Résumé généré automatiquement — à vérifier avec la décision originale.
Analyse IA non disponible
Générez un résumé intelligent de cette décision
Texte intégral
.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s34DFC730 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s10950C61 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sB9D5CABB { width:28.35pt; display:inline-block } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s3AAE10DF { margin-top:14pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s3CA22BA { font-family:Arial; text-transform:uppercase } .s2D9C6089 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s84651E4E { margin-top:14pt; margin-left:14.2pt; margin-bottom:3pt; text-align:justify } .s69DCC830 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sC986E16F { font-family:Arial; color:#ffffff } .sC646A315 { width:14.54pt; display:inline-block } .sC60B69EF { width:127.74pt; display:inline-block } .s9852CA4C { width:7.54pt; display:inline-block } .s9E436411 { width:138.09pt; display:inline-block } .s4ACA9207 { page-break-before:always; clear:both; mso-break-type:section-break } .s6DB91820 { text-align:center } .s85869E73 { width:101.92%; margin-right:auto; margin-left:auto; border-collapse:collapse } .s1B22484F { width:3.62%; border:0.75pt solid #838383; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .sDF237D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:8pt } .sE1A7A04C { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#424242 } .s5BF490E2 { width:11.08%; border:0.75pt solid #838383; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .s80327006 { width:21.5%; border:0.75pt solid #838383; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .s833526D9 { width:19.28%; border:0.75pt solid #838383; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .sDA7C0C68 { width:10.2%; border:0.75pt solid #838383; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .s4DF5C625 { width:10.18%; border:0.75pt solid #838383; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .s7A5B02EC { width:13.22%; border:0.75pt solid #838383; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .s598389F9 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:12pt } .sF314C99F { font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; font-weight:bold; color:#424242 } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .sAB95A5CB { font-family:Arial; font-size:5.33pt; font-weight:bold; vertical-align:super; color:#424242 } .sBB8C798C { font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; font-weight:bold; vertical-align:super; color:#424242 } .s77282EAE { width:10.92%; border:0.75pt solid #838383; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .sB57FC579 { width:3.62%; border:0.75pt solid #838383; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s6B505E72 { margin:0pt; padding-left:0pt } .s4F2ADFDB { text-align:center; font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; list-style-position:inside } .sBB6163A7 { width:2.48pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } .s606667B5 { width:11.08%; border:0.75pt solid #838383; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s54165D50 { width:21.5%; border:0.75pt solid #838383; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .sEF16A40D { width:19.28%; border:0.75pt solid #838383; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s24B17F2 { width:10.2%; border:0.75pt solid #838383; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s9EE90E25 { width:10.18%; border:0.75pt solid #838383; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sD09125E4 { width:13.22%; border:0.75pt solid #838383; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s5A67F4 { width:10.92%; border:0.75pt solid #838383; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sF6A12959 { width:33%; height:1px; text-align:left } .s5FFF0A7E { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:8pt } .sA4BC3E2E { font-family:Arial; font-size:5.33pt; vertical-align:super; color:#000000 } FOURTH SECTION DECISION Application no. 21976/22 Lídio LOURENÇO GOMES against Portugal and 12 other applications (see appended table) The European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section), sitting on 27   June   2024 as a Committee composed of:   Branko Lubarda , President ,   Anne Louise Bormann,   Sebastian Răduleţu , judges , and Viktoriya Maradudina, Acting Deputy Section Registrar, Having regard to the above applications lodged on the various dates indicated in the appended table, Having regard to the declarations submitted by the respondent Government requesting the Court to strike the applications out of the list of cases, and the applicants’ replies to these declarations, Having deliberated, decides as follows: FACTS AND PROCEDURE The list of applicants is set out in the appended table. The applicants were represented by Mr. R. Mendes Martins, a lawyer practising in Lisbon. The applicants’ complaints under Article 3 of the Convention concerning the inadequate conditions of detention were communicated to the Portuguese Government (“the Government”). The Government submitted declarations with a view to resolving the issues raised by these complaints. They further requested the Court to strike out the applications. The Government acknowledged the inadequate conditions of detention. They offered to pay the applicants the amounts detailed in the appended table and invited the Court to strike the applications out of the list of cases in accordance with Article   37 §   1   (c) of the Convention. The amounts would be payable within three months from the date of notification of the Court’s decision. In the event of failure to pay these amounts within the above-mentioned three-month period, the Government undertook to pay simple interest on them, from the expiry of that period until settlement, at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points. The payment will constitute the final resolution of the cases. The applicants informed the Court that they agreed to the terms of the declarations. THE LAW Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single decision. The Court finds that, following the applicants’ express agreement to the terms of the declaration made by the Government, the cases should be treated as a friendly settlement between the parties. It therefore takes note of the friendly settlement reached between the parties. It is satisfied that the settlement is based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and the Protocols thereto and finds no reasons to justify the continued examination of the applications. In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the cases out of the list. For these reasons, the Court, unanimously, Decides to join the applications; Decides to strike the applications out of its list of cases in accordance with Article   39 of the Convention. Done in English and notified in writing on 18 July 2024.     Viktoriya Maradudina   Branko Lubarda   Acting Deputy Registrar   President     APPENDIX List of applications raising complaints under Article   3 of the Convention (inadequate conditions of detention) No. Application no. Date of introduction Applicant’s name Year of birth   Representative’s name and location Date of receipt of Government’s declaration Date of receipt of applicant’s acceptance Amount awarded for non-pecuniary damage per applicant (in euros) [1] Amount awarded for costs and expenses per application (in euros) [2]     21976/22 27/04/2022 Lídio LOURENÇO GOMES 1973 Rodrigo Mendes Martins Lisbon 14/02/2024 22/05/2024 27,000 250     25234/22 12/05/2022 Diogo Filipe GONÇALVES PIRES 1990 Rodrigo Mendes Martins Lisbon 14/02/2024 20/05/2024 16,200 250     25237/22 12/05/2022 Luís Filipe ROSADO GRILO 1979 Rodrigo Mendes Martins Lisbon 14/02/2024 20/05/2024 6,900 250     25239/22 12/05/2022 António João VICENTE MAIA SANTOS 1982 Rodrigo Mendes Martins Lisbon 14/02/2024 22/05/2024 7,500 250     28895/22 06/06/2022 Carlos Alberto DIAS MORAIS 1977 Rodrigo Mendes Martins Lisbon 14/02/2024 20/05/2024 6,700 250     29226/22 06/06/2022 Jorge Henrique DE SOUSA COIMBRA E CRUZ 1963 Rodrigo Mendes Martins Lisbon 14/02/2024 22/05/2024 8,400 250     29235/22 06/06/2022 Mário VAZ FERNANDES 1979 Rodrigo Mendes Martins Lisbon 14/02/2024 22/05/2024 13,000 250     29409/22 06/06/2022 Manuel Duarte DA SILVA LOPES 1955 Rodrigo Mendes Martins Lisbon 14/02/2024 20/05/2024 10,000 250     29411/22 06/06/2022 Tiago Manuel SOUSA GONÇALVES 1995 Rodrigo Mendes Martins Lisbon 14/02/2024 20/05/2024 15,800 250   29412/22 06/06/2022 Rúben REIS COSTA 1999 Rodrigo Mendes Martins Lisbon 14/02/2024 20/05/2024 9,400 250   29414/22 07/06/2022 Fábio Edgar VICENTE DA SILVA 1989 Rodrigo Mendes Martins Lisbon 14/02/2024 20/05/2024 20,500 250   29419/22 07/06/2022 Germano MAURITO 1956 Rodrigo Mendes Martins Lisbon 14/02/2024 20/05/2024 6,900 250   29422/22 07/06/2022 Daniel LOPES DA PONTE 1972 Rodrigo Mendes Martins Lisbon 14/02/2024 20/05/2024 10,500 250   [1] Plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicants. [2] Plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicants.Citations
Aucune citation répertoriée pour cette décision.
Décisions connexes
Aucune décision similaire identifiée pour le moment.
Synthèse
- Juridiction
- CEDH
- Chambre
- CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
- Formation
- 28
- Date
- 27 juin 2024
- Matière
- droits fondamentaux
Référence
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0627DEC002197622
Données disponibles
- Texte intégral