CEDH · CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG — 27 juin 2024

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s2EF17D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:2pt } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s34DFC730 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s10950C61 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sB9D5CABB { width:28.35pt; display:inline-block } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s3AAE10DF { margin-top:14pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s3CA22BA { font-family:Arial; text-transform:uppercase } .s2D9C6089 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s84651E4E { margin-top:14pt; margin-left:14.2pt; margin-bottom:3pt; text-align:justify } .s69DCC830 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sC986E16F { font-family:Arial; color:#ffffff } .s8E0918A8 { width:37.55pt; display:inline-block } .s908C35FA { width:156.77pt; display:inline-block } .s9852CA4C { width:7.54pt; display:inline-block } .s9E436411 { width:138.09pt; display:inline-block } .s4ACA9207 { page-break-before:always; clear:both; mso-break-type:section-break } .s6DB91820 { text-align:center } .s8BB62139 { margin-right:auto; margin-left:auto; border-collapse:collapse } .s2F3EB0E4 { border:0.75pt solid #838383; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .sDF237D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:8pt } .sE1A7A04C { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#424242 } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .sCC7380B3 { font-family:Arial; font-size:6pt; font-weight:bold; vertical-align:super; color:#424242 } .sAB95A5CB { font-family:Arial; font-size:5.33pt; font-weight:bold; vertical-align:super; color:#424242 } .sBAADFE8C { border:0.75pt solid #838383; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s6B505E72 { margin:0pt; padding-left:0pt } .s4F2ADFDB { text-align:center; font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; list-style-position:inside } .sBB6163A7 { width:2.48pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .sADADF4A7 { font-family:Arial; text-decoration:underline } .sF6A12959 { width:33%; height:1px; text-align:left } .s5FFF0A7E { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:8pt } .sA4BC3E2E { font-family:Arial; font-size:5.33pt; vertical-align:super; color:#000000 }   FIRST SECTION DECISION Application no. 37855/23 AEB HUNGÁRIA KFT. AND OTHERS against Hungary and 4 other applications (see appended table) The European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting on 27   June   2024 as a Committee composed of:   Gilberto Felici , President ,   Péter Paczolay,   Raffaele Sabato , judges , and Attila Teplán, Acting Deputy Section Registrar, Having regard to the above applications lodged on the various dates indicated in the appended table, Having regard to the formal declarations accepting a friendly settlement of the cases, Having deliberated, decides as follows: FACTS AND PROCEDURE The list of applicants and their representatives is set out in the appended table. The applicants’ complaints under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention concerning the excessive length of civil proceedings were communicated to the Hungarian Government (“the Government”). In some of the applications, complaints based on the same facts were also communicated under other provisions of the Convention. The Court received friendly-settlement declarations, signed by the parties, under which the applicants agreed to waive any further claims against Hungary in respect of the facts giving rise to these applications, subject to an undertaking by the Government to pay them the amounts detailed in the appended table. These amounts will be converted into the currency of the respondent State at the rate applicable on the date of payment, and will be payable within three months from the date of notification of the Court’s decision. In the event of failure to pay these amounts within the above ‑ mentioned three-month period, the Government undertake to pay simple interest on them, from the expiry of that period until settlement, at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points. The payment will constitute the final resolution of the cases. THE LAW Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single decision. The Court takes note of the friendly settlement reached between the parties. It is satisfied that the settlement is based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and the Protocols thereto and finds no reasons to justify a continued examination of the applications. In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the cases out of the list. For these reasons, the Court, unanimously, Decides to join the applications; Decides to strike the applications out of its list of cases in accordance with Article   39 of the Convention. Done in English and notified in writing on 18 July 2024.     Attila Teplán   Gilberto Felici   Acting Deputy Registrar   President   APPENDIX List of applications raising complaints under Article   6 § 1 of the Convention (excessive length of civil proceedings) No. Application no. Date of introduction Applicant’s name Year of birth/ registration Representative’s name and location Other complaints under well-established case-law   Date of receipt of Government’s declaration Date of receipt of Applicant’s declaration Amount awarded for pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage and costs and expenses per applicant/household (in euros) [1]     37855/23 10/10/2023 (23 applicants) AEB HUNGÁRIA KFT. 1996 István BAGI 1953 László Jánosné BARCSIK 1964 Józsefné BERKI 1960 Ferencné BUZÁS 1949 Antal CSERGŐ 1942 Ágnes CSÖKÉNÉ KELEMEN 1967 Alfrédné EPERJESI 1959 Richárd EPERJESI 1965 Bertalanné FÜLÖP 1951 Lászlóné GÓLYA 1951 Zoltánné KAZAMÉR 1950 László Mihály KUCSERA 1970 Hedvig LENDÉR 1959 Istvánné LUKÁCS 1968   Ferencné PETES 1961 Árpádné ROSTÁS 1963 Béla SÁNDOR 1957 Mónika SZABÓ 1975 Gyula TÓTH 1950 István Jánosné TÓTH 1951 Mária TÓTHNÉ KUCSERA 1957 Piroska URBÁN 1958   Kodela Viktor Budapest   08/05/2024 25/01/2024 9,100     39969/23 02/08/2023 Péter HORVÁTH 1981 Kodela Viktor Budapest   15/05/2024 03/05/2024 2,000     42397/23 30/11/2023 (23 applicants) Zoltán SZEGŐ 1974 Krisztina Judit SZOLNOKI 1968 Tiborné TAKÁCS 1945 Beáta PÁKOZDYNÉ VÖRÖS 1950 Zsuzsanna Margit PORKOLÁB 1947 Gábor Attila KATÓ 1953   Zoltánné BÁNYI 1942   Józsefné VÁMOSI 1942 Ferenc Istvánné HOLZHAUSER 1951 Jenő HALMAY 1940 Károlyné SERDÜLT 1940 Péter SCHAFER 1942 Pálné SZEGŐ 1955 Lászlóné LAJER 1944 Endre KÖVES 1942 László KERTÉSZ 1941 József SÁNDOR 1943 Rezső SZTUCHLIK 1944 Béláné TARJÁNYI 1945   Household Ferencné ZÁMODICS 1938 Ferenc ZÁMODICS 1932   Household Jenő Ottó ÖLVEDY 1947 Jenő Ottóné ÖLVEDY 1940   Kiss Dániel Bálint Budapest Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of excessive length of civil proceedings 22/05/2024 17/04/2024 2,000     1727/24 28/12/2023 Zsolt András TIHANYI 1958 Szabó Gábor Göd Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of excessive length of civil proceedings 22/05/2024 18/03/2024 2,000     5154/24 08/02/2024 Tibor RASZLER 1982     Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of excessive length of civil proceedings 13/05/2024 29/04/2024 2,000   [1] Plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicants.