CEDH · CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG — 4 juillet 2024

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .sFE10DC93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s665E407E { margin-top:66pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .s34DFC730 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s2E932ED2 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:11pt } .s82B4DA5F { page-break-before:right; clear:both; mso-break-type:section-break } .s10950C61 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sB9D5CABB { width:28.35pt; display:inline-block } .s3AAE10DF { margin-top:14pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s3CA22BA { font-family:Arial; text-transform:uppercase } .s6B505E72 { margin:0pt; padding-left:0pt } .sDECD9755 { margin-left:11.67pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; padding-left:6.78pt; font-family:Arial; text-transform:uppercase } .sDA7B489D { margin-top:14pt; margin-left:15pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; padding-left:3.45pt; font-family:Arial; text-transform:uppercase } .s5C5C410E { margin-top:14pt; margin-left:18.34pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; padding-left:0.11pt; font-family:Arial; text-transform:uppercase } .s67CAFE05 { margin-top:14pt; margin-left:18.45pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-family:Arial; text-transform:uppercase } .s7C22C014 { margin-top:14pt; margin-left:16.34pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; padding-left:2.11pt; font-family:Arial; text-transform:uppercase } .sD11CFAB7 { margin-top:14pt; margin-left:15.01pt; margin-bottom:3pt; text-align:justify; padding-left:1.99pt; font-family:Arial } .sFBC99493 { font-style:italic } .sD58C010 { margin-top:14pt; margin-left:15.01pt; margin-bottom:3pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; padding-left:1.99pt; font-family:Arial } .sBB6E85D0 { margin-top:0pt; margin-left:34pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:-17pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .sE5BF05B1 { width:2.33pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } .s2D9C6089 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s69DCC830 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sC986E16F { font-family:Arial; color:#ffffff } .sC646A315 { width:14.54pt; display:inline-block } .sF5B27E79 { width:130.75pt; display:inline-block } .s9852CA4C { width:7.54pt; display:inline-block } .s9E436411 { width:138.09pt; display:inline-block } .s4ACA9207 { page-break-before:always; clear:both; mso-break-type:section-break } .sCC22C24E { font-family:Arial; color:#3e3e3e } .s6DB91820 { text-align:center } .s8BB62139 { margin-right:auto; margin-left:auto; border-collapse:collapse } .s3695F815 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .sDF237D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:8pt } .sEECE831 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .sC39F4804 { font-family:Arial; font-size:5.33pt; font-weight:bold; vertical-align:super; color:#474747 } .sE8934522 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s4F2ADFDB { text-align:center; font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; list-style-position:inside } .sBB6163A7 { width:2.48pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } .sF6A12959 { width:33%; height:1px; text-align:left } .s5FFF0A7E { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:8pt } .sA4BC3E2E { font-family:Arial; font-size:5.33pt; vertical-align:super; color:#000000 }       FIRST SECTION CASE OF ZAKHAROVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA (Applications nos. 53194/16 and 34 others – see appended list)             JUDGMENT   STRASBOURG 4 July 2024   This judgment is final but it may be subject to editorial revision. In the case of Zakharova and Others v. Russia, The European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting as a Committee composed of:   Lətif Hüseynov , President ,   Ivana Jelić,   Erik Wennerström , judges , and Viktoriya Maradudina, Acting Deputy Section Registrar, Having deliberated in private on 13 June 2024, Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on that date: PROCEDURE 1.     The case originated in applications against Russia lodged with the Court under Article   34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) on the various dates indicated in the appended table. 2.     The Russian Government (“the   Government”) were given notice of the applications. THE FACTS 3.     The list of applicants and the relevant details of the applications are set out in the appended table. 4.     The applicants complained of the disproportionate measures taken against them as organisers or participants of public assemblies. They also raised other complaints under the provisions of the Convention. THE LAW JOINDER OF THE APPLICATIONS 5.     Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single judgment. JURISDICTION 6.     The Court observes that the facts giving rise to the alleged violations of the Convention occurred prior to 16 September 2022, the date on which the Russian Federation ceased to be a party to the Convention. The Court therefore decides that it has jurisdiction to examine the present applications (see Fedotova and Others v. Russia [GC], nos.   40792/10 and 2   others, §§   68 ‑ 73, 17   January 2023). ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE   11 OF THE CONVENTION 7.     The applicants complained principally of disproportionate measures taken against them as organisers or participants of public assemblies, namely their arrest in relation to the dispersal of these assemblies and their conviction for administrative offences. They relied, expressly or in substance, on Article   11 of the Convention. 8.     The Court refers to the principles established in its case-law regarding freedom of assembly (see Kudrevičius and Others v.   Lithuania [GC], no.   37553/05, ECHR 2015, with further references) and proportionality of interference with it (see Oya Ataman v.   Turkey , no.   74552/01, ECHR 2006 ‑ XIV, and Hyde Park and Others v.   Moldova , no.   33482/06, 31   March 2009). 9.     In the leading cases of Frumkin v. Russia, no. 74568/12, ECHR 2016 (extracts), Navalnyy and Yashin v. Russia, no. 76204/11, 4 December 2014, Kasparov and Others v. Russia, no. 21613/07, 3 October 2013, as well as Kasparov v. Russia , no. 53659/07, §§ 66-69, 11 October 2016, the Court has already found a violation in respect of issues similar to those in the present case. 10.     Having examined all the material submitted to it, the Court has not found any fact or argument capable of persuading it to reach a different conclusion as to the admissibility and merits of these complaints. Having regard to its case-law on the subject, the Court considers that in the instant case the interferences with the applicants’ freedom of assembly were not “necessary in a democratic society”. 11 .     These complaints are therefore admissible and disclose a breach of Article 11 of the Convention. OTHER ALLEGED VIOLATIONS UNDER WELL-ESTABLISHED CASE-LAW 12.     The applicants submitted other complaints which also raised issues under the Convention and its Protocols, given the relevant well-established case-law of the Court (see appended table). These complaints are not manifestly ill-founded within the meaning of Article 35 § 3 (a) of the Convention, nor are they inadmissible on any other ground. Accordingly, they must be declared admissible. 13 .     Having examined all the material before it, the Court concludes that these complaints also disclose violations of the Convention and its Protocols in the light of its findings in Butkevich v. Russia , no.   5865/07, §§   63-65, 13   February 2018, Tsvetkova and Others v. Russia , nos.   54381/08 and 5   others, §§ 115-31, 10   April 2018, and Korneyeva v.   Russia , no.   72051/17, §§ 34-36, 8   October 2019, as to various aspects of unlawful deprivation of liberty of organisers or participants of public assemblies; Karelin v.   Russia , no. 926/08, §§ 58-85, 20   September 2016, concerning the absence of a prosecuting party in the proceedings under the Code of Administrative Offences; Tomov and Others v.   Russia , nos.   18255/10 and 5   others, §§   114 ‑ 42, 9   April 2019, as regards the conditions of transport of detainees; Novikova and Others v. Russia , nos. 25501/07 and 4   others, §§   106-225, 26   April 2016, relating to disproportionate measures taken by the authorities against participants of solo demonstrations; Elvira Dmitriyeva v. Russia , nos.   60921/17 and 7202/18, §§   77-90, 30   April 2019, as to administrative conviction for making calls to participate in public assemblies; Lashmankin and Others v.   Russia , nos.   57818/09 and 14 others, §§ 402-78, 7   February 2017, regarding restrictions on location or time of public events; Martynyuk v.   Russia , no.   13764/15, §§ 38-42, 8 October 2019, relating to the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal against the sentence of administrative detention; Korneyeva , cited above, §§ 62-65 as to the right of the organisers or participants of public assemblies not to be tried and punished twice for the same offence. REMAINING COMPLAINTS 14.     Some applicants raised further additional complaints under Article 6 of the Convention concerning other aspects of fairness of the administrative ‑ offence proceedings. In view of the findings in paragraphs 11 and 13 above, the Court considers that there is no need to deal separately with these remaining complaints. APPLICATION OF ARTICLE 41 OF THE CONVENTION 15.     Regard being had to the documents in its possession and to its case ‑ law (see, in particular, Navalnyy and Others v. Russia [Committee], nos.   25809/17 and 14 others, §   22, 4   October 2022), the Court finds it reasonable to award the sums indicated in the appended table. FOR THESE REASONS, THE COURT, UNANIMOUSLY, Decides to join the applications; Holds that it has jurisdiction to deal with these applications as they relate to facts that took place before 16   September 2022; Declares the complaints under Article 11 of the Convention and the other complaints under the well-established case-law of the Court, as set out in the appended table, admissible, and finds that there is no need to examine separately the remaining complaints under Article 6 of the Convention; Holds that these applications disclose a breach of Article   11 of the Convention; Holds that there has been a violation of the Convention and the Protocols thereto as regards the other complaints raised under the well-established case-law of the Court (see appended table); Holds (a)   that the respondent State is to pay the applicants, within three months, the amounts indicated in the appended table, to be converted into the currency of the respondent State at the rate applicable at the date of settlement; (b)   that from the expiry of the above-mentioned three months until settlement simple interest shall be payable on the above amounts at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points. Done in English, and notified in writing on 4 July 2024, pursuant to Rule   77   §§   2 and   3 of the Rules of Court.     Viktoriya Maradudina   Lətif Hüseynov   Acting Deputy Registrar   President   APPENDIX List of applications raising complaints under Article 11 of the Convention (disproportionate measures against organisers and participants of public assemblies) No. Application no. Date of introduction Applicant’s name Year of birth   Representative’s name and location Name of the public event Location Date Administrative / criminal offence Penalty Final domestic decision Court Name Date Other complaints under well-established case-law Amount awarded for pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage per applicant (in euros) [1]     53194/16 03/09/2016       and         3447/19 16/10/2018 Yelena Georgiyevna ZAKHAROVA 1949 Zboroshenko Nikolay Sergeyevich Moscow Rally to support Nadezhda Savchenko   Moscow   08/03/2016     Rally to support Nadezhda Savchenko   Moscow   07/03/2016     Public constitutional readings   Moscow   12/03/2018 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO,     article   19.3 § 1 of CAO       article 20.2 § 5 of CAO               article 20.2 § 8 of CAO fine of RUB   20,000;     fine of RUB   1,000       fine of RUB   10,000               fine of RUB   150,000 Moscow City Court 06/07/2016   Moscow City Court 06/07/2016     Moscow City Court 20/06/2016             Moscow City Court 08/10/2018   Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention – (1) escorting to the police station for compiling an offence report on 07/03/2016 and 08/03/2016, (2) escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence report from 8.30 p.m. on 12/03/2018 until 12.10   a.m. on 13/03/2018;   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in the three sets of administrative-offence proceedings (with the final decisions taken by the Moscow City Court on 06/07/2016 and 08/10/2018 respectively);   Prot. 7 Art. 4 - right not to be tried or punished twice in criminal proceedings - overlap of the facts constituting the basis for the applicant’s prosecution in the second set of proceedings (Art. 19.3 § 1 of CAO) with substantially the same facts underlying her conviction in the first set of proceedings (Art. 20.2 § 5 of CAO), both of which ended with the final decision taken on 06/07/2016. 6,000     82271/17 23/11/2017       and       54185/18 06/11/2018 Sergey Vladimirovich NOVIKOV 1984 Glukhov Aleksey Vladimirovich Novocheboksarsk             Zinovyev Konstantin Mikhaylovich Nizhniy Novgorod   Anti-corruption rally   Nizhniy Novgorod   26/03/2017     Political rally     Nizhniy Novgorod   25/02/2018   article 20.2 § 5 of CAO               article 20.2 § 8 of CAO fine of RUB   10,000               detention for 20 days     Nizhniy Novgorod Regional Court 24/05/2017           Nizhniy Novgorod Regional Court 10/05/2018 Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in both sets of the administrative-offence proceedings.     5,000     14966/18 12/03/2018 Yekaterina Andreyevna OGNEVA 1995 Terekhov Konstantin Ilyich Moscow Protest against corruption   Petropavlovsk-Kamchatskiy   12/06/2017 article 20.2 § 2 of CAO fine of RUB   11,000 Kamchatka Regional Court 27/09/2017 Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative ‑ offence proceedings. 3,500     44809/18 07/09/2018 Artem Igorevich GONCHARENKO 1995 Olenichev Maksim Vladimirovich St Petersburg Voters’ strike   St Petersburg   28/01/2018 article 20.2 § 8 of CAO detention for 25 days St Petersburg City Court 07/03/2018 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 2.20 p.m. on 25/02/2018 until 26/02/2018, when the applicant was taken to the court;   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative ‑ offence proceedings;   Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - the sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO. 5,000     360/19 09/01/2018               and                                 11976/19 07/02/2019 Viktor Arkadyevich BALDIN 1961     Stroll in support of YouTube Channel “ArtPodgotovka”   Yekaterinburg   23/07/2017     Rally to support people with disabilities   Yekaterinburg   17/05/2018     Political rally   Yekaterinburg   07/07/2019     Rally against retirement age hike   Yekaterinburg   09/09/2018   Rally "Free Navalnyy"   Yekaterinburg   31/01/2021   article 19.3 § 1 of CAO,     article   20.2 § 5 of CAO         article 20.2 § 8 of CAO             article 20.2 § 8 of CAO           article 20.2 § 8 of CAO             article 20.2 § 5 of CAO detention for 12 days;     fine of RUB   10,000         detention for 15 days             detention for 5   days           detention for 25 days             30 hours of community work Sverdlovsk Regional Court 28/07/2017   Sverdlovsk Regional Court 15/11/2017       Sverdlovsk Regional Court 22/05/2018           Sverdlovsk Regional Court 16/07/2019         Sverdlovsk Regional Court 14/09/2018           Yekaterinburg Regional Court 30/06/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention – (1) escorting to and detention at the police station from 7 p.m. on 23/07/2017 until 9.30   a.m. on 25/07/2017 and from 2.35 p.m. on 07/07/2019 until 3.20   p.m. on 08/07/2019; (2) escorting to the police station on 17/05/2018, 05/04/2021 and 21/04/2021 for compiling an offence report;   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in all sets of the administrative-offence proceedings. 6,000           7493/19 22/01/2019       and       51751/21 15/10/2021 Andrey Dmitriyevich GERASYUK 1987 Sabinin Andrey Vasilyevich Stavropol             Zhdanov Ivan Yuryevich Vilnius Protest against retirement age hike   Stavropol   09/09/2018     Rally "Free Navalnyy"   Stavropol   31/01/2021   article 20.2 § 5 of CAO               article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB   10,000               fine of RUB   10,000 Stavropol Regional Court 24/10/2018             Stavropol Regional Court 21/04/2021 Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in both sets of the administrative-offence proceedings. 4,000     28837/19 20/05/2019 Gleb Vladimirovich KALINYCHEV 1983     Rally “Free Navalnyy”   Nizhniy Novgorod   31/01/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB   10,000 Nizhniy Novgorod Regional Court 11/08/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence report from 12.20 p.m. until 6.10 p.m. on 31/01/2021;   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in both sets of the administrative-offence proceedings;   Art. 10 (1) - disproportionate measures against solo demonstrators - solo demonstration in support of Ukrainian political prisoners on 03/06/2018 in Nizhniy Novgorod, conviction under article 20.2 § 5 of CAO, sentenced to 30 hours of community work, final decision taken by the Nizhniy Novgorod Regional Court on 22/11/2018. 4,000     65162/19 29/11/2019 Nikolay Andreyevich KRETOV 1990 Sergeyeva Irina Vadimovna Moscow Political rally   Moscow   19/01/2019 article 19.3 § 1 of CAO fine of RUB   10,000 Moscow City Court 24/07/2019 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 4 p.m. on 19/01/2019 until 11.40   a.m. on 21/01/2019;   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative ‑ offence proceedings. 4,000     7805/20 01/02/2020 Yelena Leonidovna RUSAKOVA 1962 Rybin Aleksey Vladimirovich Moscow Rally to support I. Azar   Moscow   29/05/2020 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB 10,000 Moscow City Court 04/09/2020 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to the police station for compiling an offence report on 29/05/2020;   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative ‑ offence proceedings;   Art. 11 (1) - restrictions on location, time or manner of conduct of public events - Moscow City Administration’s refusals to approve the locations and dates of several public events: (1) rally for fair elections on 31/08/2019 in the centre of Moscow, final decision was taken by the Second Cassation Court of General Jurisdiction on 04/12/2019; (2) rally to call for respect of citizen’s rights on 24/11/2019 in Sakharova avenue; final decision was taken on 07/12/2020 by the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation; (3) rally to call for respect of citizen’s rights on 01/12/2019 in Bolotnaya Square, final decision was taken on 30/09/2020 by the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation; (4) protest against housing renovation program on 15/12/2019 near the Moscow City Administration, final decision was taken on 24/11/2020 by the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation; (5) rally for the preservation of the environment on 15/03/2020 in Komsomolskiy Prospekt, final decision was taken on 15/03/2021 by the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation. 4,000   11552/20 18/02/2020 Valeriya Ibragimovna DZBOYEVA 1998 Pomazuyev Aleksandr Yevgenyevich Vilnius Rally in support of independent candidates running for election to Mosgorduma   Rostov-on-Don   10/08/2019 article 20.1 § 2 of CAO detention for 2   days Rostov Regional Court 19/09/2019 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to the police station for compiling an offence report on 10/08/2019;   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative ‑ offence proceedings. 5,000   34359/21 03/06/2021 Sergey Nikolayevich KOVYAZIN 1972 Glukhov Aleksey Vladimirovich Novocheboksarsk Rally "Free Navalnyy"   Cheboksary   23/01/2021     Rally "Free Navalnyy"   Cheboksary   21/04/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO             article 20.2 § 8 of CAO fine of RUB   10,000             40 hours of community work Supreme Court of the Chuvashia Republic 20/04/2021       Supreme Court of the Chuvashia Republic 26/08/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to the police station for compiling an offence report on 23/01/2021 and on 21/04/2021;   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in both sets of the administrative-offence proceedings. 4,000   35749/21 22/06/2021 Magomed Sultanovich ALAMOV 1977 Savin Aleksandr Vasilyevich Stavropol Rally "Free Navalnyy"   Pyatigorsk   31/01/2021 article 20.2.2 §   1 of CAO detention for 10 days Stavropol Regional Court 11/02/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 1.30 p.m. on 31/01/2021 until 01/02/2021, when the applicant was taken to the court;   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative ‑ offence proceedings;   Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - the sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO.     5,000   38644/21 15/07/2021 Vyacheslav Mikhaylovich RUDENKO 1972 Memorial Human Rights Centre Moscow Rally to support A. Navalnyy   Moscow   25/07/2020 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB   10,000 Moscow City Court 18/01/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence report from 2.30 p.m. until 6.40 p.m. on 25/07/2020;   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative ‑ offence proceedings.     4,000   41090/21 30/07/2021 Viktor Nikolayevich IOVENKO 1990 Memorial Human Rights Centre Moscow Rally "Free Navalnyy"   Moscow   31/01/2021 article 20.2 §   6.1 of CAO detention for 12 days Moscow City Court 05/02/2021 Art. 3 - inadequate conditions of detention during transport - poor conditions of transfer in a police van on 02/02/2021 for 8   hours: 7 persons for 4 cells, less than 0.5   sq. m. per person, the applicant had to sleep on the van floor;   Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 3 p.m. on 31/01/2021 until 8.40   a.m. on 01/02/2021;   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative ‑ offence proceedings;   Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - the sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO.     6,000   42517/21 05/08/2021 Maksim Aleksandrovich ZAKHAROV 1986 Memorial Human Rights Centre Moscow Rally "Free Navalnyy"   Moscow   31/01/2021 article 20.2 §   6.1 of CAO detention for 10 days Moscow City Court 09/02/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 5.15 p.m. on 31/01/2021 until 12.45 p.m. on 02/02/2021;   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative ‑ offence proceedings;   Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - the sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO. 5,000   42994/21 12/08/2021 Gleb Yevgenyevich MARYASOV 2000 Zakhvatov Dmitriy Igorevich Moscow Rally "Free Navalnyy"   Moscow   23/01/2021 article 19.3 § 1 of CAO,     article   20.2 § 8 of CAO detention for 15 days,     detention for 30 days Moscow City Court 12/02/2021   Moscow City Court 12/02/2021   Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 7.30 p.m. on 23/01/2021 until 25/01/2021, when the applicant was taken to the court;   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in both sets of the administrative-offence proceedings. 6,000   45300/21 03/09/2016 Olga Mikhaylovna MAZUROVA 1960 Zboroshenko Nikolay Sergeyevich Moscow Rally to support Nadezhda Savchenko   Moscow   08/03/2016 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO,       article   19.3 § 1 of CAO fine of RUB   15,000;     fine of RUB   1,000 Moscow City Court 08/07/2016   Moscow City Court 08/07/2016 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to the police station for compiling an offence report on 08/03/2016;   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in both sets of the administrative-offence proceedings;   Prot. 7 Art. 4 - right not to be tried or punished twice in criminal proceedings - overlap of the facts constituting the basis for the applicant’s prosecution in the second set of proceedings (Art. 19.3 § 1 of CAO) with substantially the same facts underlying her conviction in the first set of proceedings (Art. 20.2 § 5 of CAO). 4,000   45302/21 03/09/2016 Gersh Vadimovich CHERVINSKIY 1991 Zboroshenko Nikolay Sergeyevich Moscow Rally to support Nadezhda Savchenko   Moscow   08/03/2016 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO,     article   19.3 § 1 of CAO fine of RUB   10,000,       fine of RUB   500 Moscow City Court 08/07/2016   Moscow City Court 08/07/2016     Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to the police station for compiling an offence report on 08/03/2016;   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in both sets of the administrative-offence proceedings;   Prot. 7 Art. 4 - right not to be tried or punished twice in criminal proceedings - overlap of the facts constituting the basis for the applicant’s prosecution in the second set of proceedings (Art. 19.3 § 1 of CAO) with substantially the same facts underlying his conviction in the first set of proceedings (Art. 20.2 § 5 of CAO). 4,000   45493/21 12/08/2021 Irina Aleksandrovna PETROVA 1997 Shagiyeva Regina Ilgizovna Leninigorsk Rally "Free Navalnyy"   Naberezhnye Chelny   31/01/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB   10,000 Supreme Court of the Tatarstan Republic 24/03/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to the police station on 23/01/2021 and 31/01/2021 for compiling an offence report;   Art. 10 (1) - conviction for making calls to participate in public events - rally to support A. Navalnyy on 23/01/2021 in Naberezhnye Chelny, Article 20.2 § 2 of CAO, fine of RUB   25,000, final decision taken by the Supreme Court of the Tatarstan Republic on 24/03/2021.           4,000   49360/21 28/09/2021 Mikhail Aleksandrovich TOLSTOY 1999 Markin Konstantin Aleksandrovich Velikiy Novgorod Rally "Free Navalnyy"   Moscow   02/02/2021     Anti-war protest   Moscow   24/02/2022 article 20.2 §   6.1 of CAO             article 20.2 § 5 of CAO detention for 7   days             fine of RUB 10,000 Moscow City Court 30/03/2021           Moscow City Court 19/12/2022 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention – 1) escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 11.30 p.m. on 02/02/2021 until 5.20   p.m. on 03/02/2021; 2) escorting to the police station for compiling an offence report on 24/02/2022;   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings under Article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO,   Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - the sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant in administrative-offence proceedings under Article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO. 5,000   52305/21 07/10/2021 Polina Sergeyevna KORZHANOVSKAYA 2002 Dimitriyev Dmitriy Sergeyevich Orenburg Rally “Free Navalnyy”   Orenburg   31/01/2021 article 19.3 § 1 of CAO,     article   20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB   1,000;     fine of RUB   10,000 Orenburg Regional Court 12/04/2021   Orenburg Regional Court 07/04/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 12.55 p.m. on 31/01/2021 until 01/02/2021, when the applicant was taken to the court;   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative ‑ offence proceedings under Article 19.3 § 1 of CAO.         4,000   55414/21 26/10/2021 Aleksandr Sergeyevich NIKOLAICHEV 1996 Aksenova Darya Dmitriyevna Kolomna Rally “Free Navalnyy”   Moscow   31/01/2021 article 20.2 §   6.1 of CAO detention for 8   days Moscow City Court 11/05/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence report from 4.40 p.m. on 31/01/2021 until 9   a.m. on 02/02/2021;   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative ‑ offence proceedings. 5,000   55981/21 05/11/2021 Irina Mikhaylovna ROVENSKAYA 1983 Zhdanov Ivan Yuryevich Vilnius Rally “Free Navalnyy”   Kursk   23/01/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB   5,000 Kursk Regional Court 14/05/2021 Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative ‑ offence proceedings. 3,500   59799/21 01/12/2021 Anton Aleksandrovich MAKAROV 1980 Memorial Human Rights Centre Moscow Rally "Free Navalnyy"   Krasnoyarsk   31/01/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB   10,000 Krasnoyarsk Regional Court 17/06/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to the police station on 31/01/2021 for compiling an offence report;   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative ‑ offence proceedings. 4,000   59875/21 29/11/2021 Yelizaveta Sergeyevna SAMOYLOVA 1993 Memorial Human Rights Centre Moscow Rally "Free Navalnyy"   Moscow   31/01/2021     Anti-war protest   Moscow   24/02/2022 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO             article 20.2 § 8 of CAO fine of RUB   10,000             fine of RUB   200,000 Moscow City Court 25/06/2021           Moscow City Court 31/10/2022 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention – 1) escorting to the police station for compiling an offence report on 31/01/2021; 2) escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 11.30 p.m. on 24/02/2022 until 11.55   a.m. on 25/02/2022;   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative ‑ offence proceedings under Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO (final decision on 25/06/2021). 7,000   2411/22 06/12/2021 Sofya Sergeyevna YEFREMOVA 2000 Glukhov Aleksey Vladimirovich Novocheboksarsk Rally “Free Navalnyy”   Cheboksary   21/04/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB   10,000 Supreme Court of the Chuvashia Republic 01/07/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to the police station for compiling an offence report on 21/04/2021;   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative ‑ offence proceedings. 4,000   3953/22 30/12/2021 Roman Yevgenyevich KACHANOV 1982     Rally "Free Navalnyy"   Yekaterinburg   31/01/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO 30 hours of community work Sverdlovsk Regional Court 07/07/2021 Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative ‑ offence proceedings.   3,500   35426/22 11/07/2022 Margarita Valeryevna MIROSHNICHENKO 1995 Bochilo Anna Yevgenyevna Barnaul Rally against the closure of independent media outlets   Stavropol   06/03/2022 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB   15,000 Stavropol Regional Court 18/05/2022 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence report from 3.10 p.m. until 7.45 p.m. on 06/03/2022;   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative ‑ offence proceedings. 4,000   12161/23 07/03/2023 Yekaterina Aleksandrovna AVGUSTENYAK 1984     Anti-war protest   Moscow   27/02/2022 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB   20,000 Moscow City Court 09/11/2022 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence report from 5.05 p.m. until 11.40 p.m. on 27/02/2022. 4,000   12466/23 02/03/2023 Anna Pavlovna KHARITONOVA 1997     Anti-war protest   Moscow   06/03/2022 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB   20,000 Moscow City Court 03/11/2022 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence report from 3.15 p.m. on 06/03/2022 until 12.30 a.m. on 07/03/2022. 4,000   33679/23 19/08/2023 Alina Vladimirovna KHVOROSTOVA 1995 Vasilchenko Olesya St Petersburg Anti-war protest   St Petersburg   06/03/2022 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB   10,000 St Petersburg City Court 19/04/2023 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence report from 5.23 p.m. on 06/03/2022 until 4.50 p.m. on 07/03/2022. 4,000     [1] Plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicants.