CEDH · CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG — 11 juillet 2024

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s2EF17D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:2pt } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s34DFC730 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s10950C61 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sB9D5CABB { width:28.35pt; display:inline-block } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s3AAE10DF { margin-top:14pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s3CA22BA { font-family:Arial; text-transform:uppercase } .s2D9C6089 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s84651E4E { margin-top:14pt; margin-left:14.2pt; margin-bottom:3pt; text-align:justify } .s69DCC830 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sC986E16F { font-family:Arial; color:#ffffff } .sC646A315 { width:14.54pt; display:inline-block } .sC60B69EF { width:127.74pt; display:inline-block } .s9852CA4C { width:7.54pt; display:inline-block } .s9E436411 { width:138.09pt; display:inline-block } .s4ACA9207 { page-break-before:always; clear:both; mso-break-type:section-break } .s6DB91820 { text-align:center } .s8BB62139 { margin-right:auto; margin-left:auto; border-collapse:collapse } .s3695F815 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .sDF237D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:8pt } .sEECE831 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .sE8934522 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s6B505E72 { margin:0pt; padding-left:0pt } .s4F2ADFDB { text-align:center; font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; list-style-position:inside } .sBB6163A7 { width:2.48pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .s5FFF0A7E { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:8pt } .s60AF0776 { height:54.3pt } .s3D37346F { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; line-height:200%; font-size:8pt }   FOURTH SECTION DECISION Application no. 7016/20 Ion PATAR against Romania and 15 other applications (see appended table) The European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section), sitting on 11   July 2024 as a Committee composed of:   Branko Lubarda , President ,   Anne Louise Bormann,   Sebastian Răduleţu , judges , and Viktoriya Maradudina, Acting Deputy Section Registrar, Having regard to the above applications lodged on the various dates indicated in the appended table, Having deliberated, decides as follows: FACTS AND PROCEDURE The list of the applicants is set out in the appendix. The applicants’ complaints under Article 3 of the Convention concerning the inadequate conditions of detention were communicated to the Romanian Government, who submitted observations on the admissibility and merits. The observations were forwarded to the applicants, who were invited to submit their own observations (see the appended table for the relevant dates). No reply was received by the Court. By letters sent by registered post, the applicants were notified that the time allowed for the submission of their observations had expired (see the appended table for the relevant dates). The applicants’ attention was further drawn to Article 37 § 1 (a) of the Convention, which provides that the Court may strike an application out of its list of cases where the circumstances lead to the conclusion that the applicant does not intend to pursue the application. No reply to these letters has been received by the Court. The registered letters either were received by the applicants or were returned to the Court (see details in the appended table). There are no previous letters from the applicants informing the Court about a change of address. THE LAW Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single decision. In the light of the foregoing, the Court concludes that the applicants may be regarded as no longer wishing to pursue the applications (Article 37 §   1   (a) of the Convention). Furthermore, in accordance with Article 37 § 1 in   fine , the Court finds no special circumstances regarding respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and the Protocols thereto which require the continued examination of the applications. In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the cases out of the list. For these reasons, the Court, unanimously, Decides to join the applications; Decides to strike the applications out of its list of cases. Done in English and notified in writing on 5 September 2024.     Viktoriya Maradudina   Branko Lubarda   Acting Deputy Registrar   President   APPENDIX List of applications raising complaints under Article   3 of the Convention (inadequate conditions of detention) No. Application no. Date of introduction Applicant’s name Year of birth Representative’s name and location Date of the applicant’s last letter to the Court Date of sending Government’s observations to the applicant Time-limit for submission of response by the applicant Date of the Court’s registered letter Date of receipt/return of the registered letter     7016/20 09/03/2020 Ion PATAR 1976     13/06/2023 16/10/2023 27/11/2023 14/12/2023 27/12/2023 Signed for receipt by the applicant     11774/20 08/04/2020 Artur COTRUȚĂ 1987     23/08/2023 16/10/2023 27/11/2023 14/12/2023 29/12/2023 Illegible signature     21852/20 01/07/2020 Ioan-Aurel ILEA 1982     28/02/2022 23/10/2023 04/12/2023 29/02/2024 Returned to sender on 26/03/2024 as “moved from address”     7069/21 02/03/2021 Vlad-Eusebiu ROBU 1997     23/04/2021 24/10/2023 21/11/2023 13/02/2024 21/02/2024 Illegible signature       10031/21 09/03/2021 Marian BĂDOI 1970     20/04/2021 24/10/2023 21/11/2023 13/02/2024 27/02/2024 Illegible signature       416457/21 28/05/2021 Marius-Daniel POPA 1985     09/08/2021 29/09/2023 10/11/2023 07/12/2023 28/12/2023 Signed for receipt by the applicant’s father     17520/21 28/07/2021 Raul ADAM 1995     22/09/2021 29/09/2023 10/11/2023 07/12/2023 Returned to sender on 26/02/2024 as “recipient released on 15/02/2022”   17807/21 18/05/2021 Ana-Maria KOVACS 1986     28/07/2021 29/09/2023 10/11/2023 07/12/2023 Returned to sender on 26/02/2024 as “unknown”     23356/21 26/08/2021 Zoltan BOGDAN 1987 Mihaly Bogdan Sovata 09/12/2021 29/09/2023 10/11/2023 07/12/2023 Returned to sender on 11/01/2024 as unclaimed (according to information on the website of the Romanian Post)   26655/21 19/07/2021 Ciprian-Dorel VÎNTU 1983     02/08/2021 29/09/2023 10/11/2023 07/12/2023 Returned to sender on 26/02/2024 as “recipient released on 28/12/2022”   30105/21 12/07/2021 Petruţa-Luminiţa MAGHERU 1975     03/09/2021 29/09/2023 10/11/2023 07/12/2023 28/12/2023 Signed for receipt by the applicant   33441/21 27/07/2021 Sandu NASTIUC 1984     12/12/2022 29/09/2023 10/11/2023 07/12/2023 04/01/2024 Signed for receipt by the applicant   42762/21 13/10/2021 Sandor HUSZA 1987     18/10/2023 24/10/2023 21/11/2023 13/02/2024 21/02/2024 Signed for receipt by the Arad prison’s representative   51454/21 13/12/2021 Ioan ALEXE 1992     22/02/2022 24/10/2023 21/11/2023 13/02/2024 23/02/2024 Illegible signature   54378/21 28/10/2021 Vasile-Marian PIROJEC 1988     03/01/2022 24/10/2023 21/11/2023 13/02/2024 20/02/2024 Signed for receipt by the applicant’s father   56587/21 23/05/2022 Gheorghiţă GOGU 1975     11/10/2022 26/09/2023 24/10/2023 29/02/2024 08/03/2024 Illegible signature