CEDH · CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG — 12 septembre 2024

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .sFE10DC93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s665E407E { margin-top:66pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .s34DFC730 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s2E932ED2 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:11pt } .s10950C61 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s82B4DA5F { page-break-before:right; clear:both; mso-break-type:section-break } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sB9D5CABB { width:28.35pt; display:inline-block } .s3AAE10DF { margin-top:14pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s3CA22BA { font-family:Arial; text-transform:uppercase } .s6B505E72 { margin:0pt; padding-left:0pt } .sDECD9755 { margin-left:11.67pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; padding-left:6.78pt; font-family:Arial; text-transform:uppercase } .sDA7B489D { margin-top:14pt; margin-left:15pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; padding-left:3.45pt; font-family:Arial; text-transform:uppercase } .s5C5C410E { margin-top:14pt; margin-left:18.34pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; padding-left:0.11pt; font-family:Arial; text-transform:uppercase } .s67CAFE05 { margin-top:14pt; margin-left:18.45pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-family:Arial; text-transform:uppercase } .s7C22C014 { margin-top:14pt; margin-left:16.34pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; padding-left:2.11pt; font-family:Arial; text-transform:uppercase } .sD11CFAB7 { margin-top:14pt; margin-left:15.01pt; margin-bottom:3pt; text-align:justify; padding-left:1.99pt; font-family:Arial } .sFBC99493 { font-style:italic } .sD58C010 { margin-top:14pt; margin-left:15.01pt; margin-bottom:3pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; padding-left:1.99pt; font-family:Arial } .sBB6E85D0 { margin-top:0pt; margin-left:34pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:-17pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .sE5BF05B1 { width:2.33pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } .s2D9C6089 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s69DCC830 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sC986E16F { font-family:Arial; color:#ffffff } .sC646A315 { width:14.54pt; display:inline-block } .s7E447BAE { width:130.42pt; display:inline-block } .s9852CA4C { width:7.54pt; display:inline-block } .s9E436411 { width:138.09pt; display:inline-block } .s4ACA9207 { page-break-before:always; clear:both; mso-break-type:section-break } .sCC22C24E { font-family:Arial; color:#3e3e3e } .s6DB91820 { text-align:center } .s8BB62139 { margin-right:auto; margin-left:auto; border-collapse:collapse } .s3695F815 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .sDF237D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:8pt } .sEECE831 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .sC39F4804 { font-family:Arial; font-size:5.33pt; font-weight:bold; vertical-align:super; color:#474747 } .sE8934522 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s4F2ADFDB { text-align:center; font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; list-style-position:inside } .sBB6163A7 { width:2.48pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } .s3A357E38 { text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; list-style-position:inside } .s1DE04BC { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:8pt } .sF6A12959 { width:33%; height:1px; text-align:left } .s5FFF0A7E { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:8pt } .sA4BC3E2E { font-family:Arial; font-size:5.33pt; vertical-align:super; color:#000000 }       FIFTH SECTION CASE OF YATSKIV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA (Applications nos. 36952/21 and 41 others – see appended list)           JUDGMENT   STRASBOURG 12 September 2024     This judgment is final but it may be subject to editorial revision.   In the case of Yatskiv and Others v. Russia, The European Court of Human Rights (Fifth Section), sitting as a Committee composed of:   María Elósegui , President ,   Kateřina Šimáčková,   Stéphane Pisani , judges , and Viktoriya Maradudina, Acting Deputy Section Registrar, Having deliberated in private on 11 July 2024, Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on that date: PROCEDURE 1.     The case originated in applications against Russia lodged with the Court under Article   34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) on the various dates indicated in the appended table. 2.     The Russian Government (“the   Government”) were given notice of the applications. THE FACTS 3.     The list of applicants and the relevant details of the applications are set out in the appended table. 4.     The applicants complained of the disproportionate measures taken against them as organisers or participants of public assemblies. They also raised other complaints under the Convention. THE LAW JOINDER OF THE APPLICATIONS 5.     Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single judgment. JURISDICTION 6.     The Court observes that the facts giving rise to the alleged violations of the Convention occurred prior to 16 September 2022, the date on which the Russian Federation ceased to be a party to the Convention. The Court therefore decides that it has jurisdiction to examine the present applications (see Fedotova and Others v. Russia [GC], nos.   40792/10 and 2   others, §§   68 ‑ 73, 17   January 2023). ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE   11 OF THE CONVENTION 7.     The applicants complained principally of disproportionate measures taken against them as organisers or participants of public assemblies, namely their arrest in relation to the dispersal of these assemblies and their conviction for administrative offences. They relied, expressly or in substance, on Article   11 of the Convention. 8.     The Court refers to the principles established in its case-law regarding freedom of assembly (see Kudrevičius and Others v.   Lithuania [GC], no.   37553/05, ECHR 2015, with further references) and proportionality of interference with it (see Oya Ataman v.   Turkey , no.   74552/01, ECHR 2006 ‑ XIV, and Hyde Park and Others v.   Moldova , no.   33482/06, 31   March 2009). 9.     In the leading cases of Frumkin v. Russia, no. 74568/12, ECHR 2016 (extracts), Navalnyy and Yashin v. Russia, no. 76204/11, 4 December 2014 and Kasparov and Others v. Russia, no. 21613/07, 3 October 2013, the Court already found a violation in respect of issues similar to those in the present case. 10.     Having examined all the material submitted to it, the Court has not found any fact or argument capable of persuading it to reach a different conclusion as to the admissibility and merits of these complaints. Having regard to its case-law on the subject, the Court considers that in the instant case the interferences with the applicants’ freedom of assembly were not “necessary in a democratic society”. 11 .     These complaints are therefore admissible and disclose a breach of Article 11 of the Convention. OTHER ALLEGED VIOLATIONS UNDER WELL-ESTABLISHED CASE-LAW 12.     The applicants submitted other complaints which also raised issues under the Convention and its Protocols, given the relevant well-established case-law of the Court (see appended table). These complaints are not manifestly ill-founded within the meaning of Article 35 § 3 (a) of the Convention, nor are they inadmissible on any other ground. Accordingly, they must be declared admissible. 13 .     Having examined all the material before it, the Court concludes that these complaints also disclose violations of the Convention and its Protocols in the light of its findings in Butkevich v. Russia , no.   5865/07, §§   63-65, 13   February 2018, Tsvetkova and Others v. Russia , nos.   54381/08 and 5   others, §§ 115-31, 10   April 2018, and Korneyeva v.   Russia , no.   72051/17, §§   34-36, 8   October 2019, as to various aspects of unlawful deprivation of liberty of organisers or participants of public assemblies; Karelin v. Russia , no. 926/08, §§ 58-85, 20   September 2016, concerning the absence of a prosecuting party in the proceedings under the Code of Administrative Offences (CAO); and Martynyuk v.   Russia , no.   13764/15, §§ 38-42, 8   October 2019, relating to the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal against the sentence of administrative detention. REMAINING COMPLAINTS 14.     Some applicants raised further additional complaints under Article 6 of the Convention concerning other aspects of fairness of the administrative ‑ offence proceedings. In view of the findings in paragraphs 11 and 13 above, the Court considers that there is no need to deal separately with these remaining complaints. 15.     The Court has further examined the rest of the complaints raised by the applicants and considers that, in the light of all the material in its possession and in so far as the matters complained of are within its competence, these complaints either do not meet the admissibility criteria set out in Articles 34 and 35 of the Convention or do not disclose any appearance of a violation of the rights and freedoms enshrined in the Convention or the Protocols thereto. It follows that this part of the applications must be rejected in accordance with Article 35 § 4 of the Convention. APPLICATION OF ARTICLE 41 OF THE CONVENTION 16.     Regard being had to the documents in its possession and to its case ‑ law (see in particular Navalnyy and Others v. Russia [Committee], nos.   25809/17 and 14 others, §   22, 4   October 2022), the Court finds it reasonable to award the sums indicated in the appended table. FOR THESE REASONS, THE COURT, UNANIMOUSLY, Decides to join the applications; Holds that it has jurisdiction to deal with these applications as they relate to facts that took place before 16   September 2022; Declares the complaints under Article 11 of the Convention and the other complaints under the well-established case-law of the Court, as set out in the appended table, admissible, finds that there is no need to examine separately the remaining complaints under Article 6 of the Convention, and declares the remainder of the applications inadmissible; Holds that these applications disclose a breach of Article   11 of the Convention; Holds that there has been a violation of the Convention and the Protocols thereto as regards the other complaints raised under the well-established case-law of the Court (see appended table); Holds (a)   that the respondent State is to pay the applicants, within three months, the amounts indicated in the appended table, to be converted into the currency of the respondent State at the rate applicable at the date of settlement; (b)   that from the expiry of the above-mentioned three months until settlement simple interest shall be payable on the above amounts at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points. Done in English, and notified in writing on 12 September 2024, pursuant to Rule   77   §§   2 and   3 of the Rules of Court.     Viktoriya Maradudina   María Elósegui   Acting Deputy Registrar   President     APPENDIX List of applications raising complaints under Article 11 of the Convention (disproportionate measures against organisers and participants of public assemblies) No. Application no. Date of introduction Applicant’s name Year of birth   Representative’s name and location Name of the public event Location Date Administrative / criminal offence Penalty Final domestic decision Court Name Date Other complaints under well-established case-law Amount awarded for pecuniary and non ‑ pecuniary damage and costs and expenses per applicant (in euros) [1]     36952/21 30/06/2021 Oleg Dmitriyevich YATSKIV 1994 Bochilo Anna Yevgenyevna Barnaul Rally “Free Navalnyy”   Syktyvkar 23/01/2021     Anti-war rally   Syktyvkar 24/02/2022     Anti-war rally   Syktyvkar 27/02/2022 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO           article 20.2 § 8 of CAO         article 20.2 § 8 of CAO fine of RUB   5,000           detention for 7 days         detention for 5 days Supreme Court of the Komi Republic 10/03/2021       Supreme Court of the Komi Republic 20/04/2022     Supreme Court of the Komi Republic 11/05/2022 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis – escorting to the police station for compiling offence records on 23/01/2021, 24/02/2022 and 27/02/2022;   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in all sets of administrative-offence proceedings.     5,000     41847/21 02/08/2021 Olga Alekseyevna KORSHIKOVA 1997 Memorial Human Rights Centre Moscow Rally “Free Navalnyy”   Moscow 02/02/2021 article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO detention for 6 days Moscow City Court 02/03/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis – escorting to the police station and detention there after compiling an offence record between 11.55 p.m. on 02/02/2021 and 5.30 p.m. on 03/02/2021;   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings;   Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - the sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO. 5,000     45911/21 30/08/2021 Andrey Yevgenyevich SHCHUKIN 1994     Rally “Free Navalnyy”   Moscow 31/01/2021 article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO detention for 5 days Moscow City Court 22/03/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis – escorting to the police station and detention there after compiling an offence record between 1.30 p.m. on 31/01/2021 and the afternoon of 01/02/2021;   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. 5,000     48219/21 24/09/2021 Georgiy Georgiyevich TEROGONYANTS 1984 Memorial Human Rights Centre Moscow Rally “Free Navalnyy”   Moscow 23/01/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB   15,000 Moscow City Court 21/05/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis – escorting to the police station for compiling an offence report between 6 p.m. and 11.45 p.m. on 23/01/2021;     Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.     4,000     48221/21 24/09/2021 Nikolay Aleksandrovich MADAYEV 1987 Memorial Human Rights Centre Moscow Rally “Free Navalnyy”   Moscow 02/02/2021 article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO fine of RUB   10,000 Moscow City Court 02/04/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - escorting to the police station and detention there after compiling an offence record between 10.30 p.m. on 02/02/2021 and 9 p.m. on 03/02/2021;   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. 4,000     60227/21 24/11/2021 Nikita Andreyevich BUGROV 1985 Memorial Human Rights Centre Moscow Rally “Free Navalnyy”   Moscow 23/01/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB   19,000 Moscow City Court 29/06/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - escorting to the police station for compiling an offence record between 4 p.m. and 10.40 p.m. on 23/01/2021;   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. 4,000     60230/21 24/11/2021 Aliya Shamilevna GALINA 1994 Memorial Human Rights Centre Moscow Rally “Free Navalnyy”   Kazan 21/04/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB   10,000 Supreme Court of the Tatarstan Republic 02/06/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - escorting to the police station and detention there after compiling an offence record between 7.30 p.m. on 21/04/2021 and 2.30 p.m. on 22/04/2021. 4,000     60486/21 24/11/2021 Yuliya Vladimirovna NOVGORODOVA 1993 Memorial Human Rights Centre Moscow Rally “Free Navalnyy”   Moscow 23/01/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB   10,000 Moscow City Court 25/05/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - escorting to the police station for compiling an offence record between 8.25 p.m. on 23/01/2021 and 12.27 a.m. on 24/01/2021;   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings 4,000     60883/21 29/11/2021 Robert Floritovich GABDRAKIPOV 1996 Memorial Human Rights Centre Moscow Rally “Free Navalnyy”   Kazan 31/01/2021 article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO fine of RUB   10,000 Supreme Court of the Tatarstan Republic 02/06/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - escorting to the police station and detention there after compiling an offence record between 1.50 p.m. on 31/01/2021 and 5 p.m. on 01/02/2021. 4,000   60907/21 29/11/2021 Viktor Ivanovich SOSHNIKOV 1957 Memorial Human Rights Centre Moscow Rally “Free Navalnyy”   Kursk 31/01/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB   10,000 Kursk Regional Court 02/06/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - escorting to the police station for compiling an offence record between 12.30 p.m. and 6.40 p.m. on 31/01/2021;   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. 4,000   61024/21 30/11/2021 Irina Vladimirovna BOGANTSEVA 1952 Memorial Human Rights Centre Moscow Rally “Free Navalnyy”   Moscow 23/01/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB   10,000 Moscow City Court 11/05/2021   The final judgment was served on the applicant on 16/08/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - escorting to the police station for compiling an offence record between 3.50 p.m. and 10.05 p.m. on 31/01/2021;   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.     4,000   61026/21 30/11/2021 Mikhail Anatolyevich GAYVORONSKIY 1982 Memorial Human Rights Centre Moscow Rally “Free Navalnyy”   Stavropol 31/01/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB   15,000 Stavropol Regional Court 02/06/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - escorting to the police station for compiling an offence record between 1.30 p.m. and 6.30 p.m. on 31/01/2021;     Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. 4,000   61032/21 30/11/2021 Anastasiya Kirillovna YEDAPINA 2002 Memorial Human Rights Centre Moscow Rally “Free Navalnyy”   Tambov 23/01/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB   10,000 Tambov Regional Court 31/05/2021 Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. 3,500   61118/21 06/12/2021 Diana Antonovna KAZARINA 1997 Memorial Human Rights Centre Moscow Rally “Free Navalnyy”   Kazan 21/04/2021 article 20.2 § 2 of CAO fine of RUB   10,000 Supreme Court of the Tatarstan Republic 09/06/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - escorting to the police station and detention there after compiling an offence record between 7.50 p.m. on 21/04/2021 and 6.30 p.m. on 22/04/2021. 4,000   61305/21 19/11/2021 Daniil Andreyevich ZALUYEV 1991 Memorial Human Rights Centre Moscow Rally “Free Navalnyy”   Moscow 02/02/2021 article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO detention for 10 days Moscow City Court 21/05/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - escorting to the police station and detention there after compiling an offence record between 10.40 p.m. on 02/02/2021 and 5.30 p.m. on 03/02/2021;   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. 5,000   61328/21 03/12/2021 Olga Valeryevna STEPANYANTS 1988 Memorial Human Rights Centre Moscow Rally “Free Navalnyy”   Moscow 23/01/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB   15,000 Moscow City Court 07/06/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - escorting to the police station for compiling an offence record between 4 p.m. and 7.30 p.m. on 23/01/2021;   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. 4,000   61335/21 03/12/2021 Dina Viktorovna LITVINA 1984 Memorial Human Rights Centre Moscow Rally “Free Navalnyy”   Moscow 31/01/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB   10,000 Moscow City Court 21/06/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - escorting to the police station for compiling an offence record between 5.20 p.m. and 9.30 p.m. on 31/01/2021;   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.   4,000   61362/21 03/12/2021 Aleksey Mikhaylovich MOZOLEV 1988 Memorial Human Rights Centre Moscow Rally “Free Navalnyy”   Moscow 31/01/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB   10,000 Moscow City Court 21/06/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - escorting to the police station for compiling an offence record between 5.20 p.m. and 11.55 p.m. on 31/01/2021;   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.     4,000   61368/21 26/11/2021 Valeriy Dmitriyevich SENOTOV 1996 Memorial Human Rights Centre Moscow Rally “Free Navalnyy”   Moscow 23/01/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB   15,000 Moscow City Court 27/05/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - escorting to the police station for compiling an offence record between 4.30 p.m. on 23/01/2021 and 1 a.m. on 24/01/2021;   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. 4,000   61371/21 26/11/2021 Kristina Mikhaylovna PANFILOVA 2002 Memorial Human Rights Centre Moscow Rally in support of A. Navalnyy   Kazan 21/04/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB   10,000 Supreme Court of the Tatarstan Republic 26/05/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - escorting to the police station and detention there after compiling an offence record between 7.45 p.m. on 21/04/2021 and 5 p.m. on 22/04/2021. 4,000   61476/21 06/12/2021 Tigran Grachyayevich OGANNISYAN 2001 Memorial Human Rights Centre Moscow Rally “Free Navalnyy”   Moscow 23/01/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB   15,000 Moscow City Court 23/06/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - escorting to the police station for compiling an offence record between 6.15 p.m. and 11.20 p.m. on 23/01/2021;   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. 4,000   61681/21 10/12/2021 Anton Nikolayevich DULEPOV 1982 Memorial Human Rights Centre Moscow Rally “Free Navalnyy”   Nizhniy Novgorod 31/01/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB   10,000 Nizhniy Novgorod Regional Court 28/07/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - escorting to the police station for compiling an offence record between 1.45 p.m. and 7.30 p.m. on 31/01/2021;   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. 4,000   61687/21 10/12/2021 Mariya Vladimirovna SAVOSINA 1994 Memorial Human Rights Centre Moscow Rally “Free Navalnyy”   Moscow 31/01/2021 article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO fine of RUB   10,000 Moscow City Court 25/06/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - escorting to the police station and detention there after compiling an offence record between 2.45 p.m. on 31/01/2021 and 4.30 p.m. on 01/02/2021;   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. 4,000   61742/21 10/12/2021 Dmitriy Sergeyevich CHERNAVIN 1995 Memorial Human Rights Centre Moscow Rally “Free Navalnyy”   Moscow 31/01/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB   15,000 Moscow City Court 21/06/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - escorting to the police station for compiling an offence record between 4.20 p.m. on 31/01/2021 and 12.10 a.m. on 01/02/2021;   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. 4,000   67/22 05/12/2021 Artem Vladimirovich KHUKHOREV 1989 Memorial Human Rights Centre Moscow Rally “Free Navalnyy”   Moscow 31/01/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB   20,000 Moscow City Court 07/06/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - escorting to the police station for compiling an offence record between 2.30 p.m. and 11.30 p.m. on 31/01/2021;   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. 4,000   842/22 25/11/2021 Ivan Sergeyevich VEREVKIN 1991 Memorial Human Rights Centre Moscow Rally “Free Navalnyy”   Moscow 31/01/2021 article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO fine of RUB   10,000 Moscow City Court 25/05/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - escorting to the police station and detention there after compiling an offence record between 1 p.m. on 31/01/2021 and 2   p.m. on 01/02/2021;   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. 4,000   874/22 25/11/2021 Oleg Yevgenyevich MOSHKOV 1986 Memorial Human Rights Centre Moscow Rally “Free Navalnyy”   St Petersburg 31/01/2021 article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO fine of RUB   20,000 St Petersburg City Court 25/05/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - escorting to the police station for compiling an offence record between 1.35 p.m. and 11.30 p.m. on 31/01/2021;   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. 4,000   1143/22 17/12/2021 Viktor Pavlovich ITSKOVICH 1995 Memorial Human Rights Centre Moscow Rally “Free Navalnyy”   Moscow 31/01/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB   15,000 Moscow City Court 17/06/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - escorting to the police station for compiling an offence record between 3.35 p.m. on 31/01/2021 and 12.15 a.m. on 01/02/2021;   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.   4,000   1148/22 17/12/2021 Deniel Vlalimirovich BARBAKADZE 1998 Memorial Human Rights Centre Moscow Rally “Free Navalnyy”   Moscow 31/01/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB   20,000 Moscow City Court 17/06/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - escorting to the police station for compiling an offence record between 4 p.m. on 31/01/2021 and 1   a.m. on 01/02/2021;   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. 4,000   2030/22 22/12/2021 Vasiliy Markovich MARKOVICH 1975 Memorial Human Rights Centre Moscow Rally “Free Navalnyy”   Moscow 31/01/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB   15,000 Moscow City Court 23/06/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - escorting to the police station for compiling an offence record between 5.20 p.m. and 9.15 p.m. on 31/01/2021;   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. 4,000   2034/22 22/12/2021 Ivan Nikolayevich GAVVA 1985 Memorial Human Rights Centre Moscow Rally “Free Navalnyy”   Moscow 31/01/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB   10,000 Moscow City Court 07/07/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - escorting to the police station for compiling an offence record between 4.25 p.m. and 10.10 p.m. on 31/01/2021;   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.     4,000   2037/22 22/12/2021 Andrey Vladimirovich BRYLOV 1997 Memorial Human Rights Centre Moscow Rally “Free Navalnyy”   Moscow 31/01/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB   10,000 Moscow City Court 25/06/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - escorting to the police station for compiling an offence record between 5.20 p.m. and 11.30 p.m. on 31/01/2021;   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. 4,000   2044/22 15/12/2021 Ilya Mikhaylovich PARTANSKIY 2002 Memorial Human Rights Centre Moscow Rally to support A. Navalnyy   Moscow 21/04/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB   10,000 Moscow City Court 23/08/2021 Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. 3,500   10042/23 09/02/2023 Bogdan Olegovich PECHERSKIY 1999     Anti-war rally   Moscow 06/03/2022 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine RUB   20,000 Moscow City Court 11/10/2022 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - escorting to the police station for compiling an offence record between 2.30 p.m. and 9.30 p.m. on 06/03/2022. 4,000   11077/23 20/02/2023 Farkhad Alikhanovich ISRAFILLI-GELMAN 1988 Ryzhova Ekaterina Nikolaevna Dolgoprudnyy Anti-war rally   Moscow 24/02/2022 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine RUB   20,000 Moscow City Court 19/10/2022 (decision served on the applicant on the following days) Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - escorting to the police station for compiling an offence record between 8.50 p.m. on 24/02/2022 and 5.40 a.m. on 25/02/2022.           4,000   11767/23 21/02/2023 Oleg Vladimirovich GOLUBEV 1994     Anti-war rally   Moscow 27/02/2022 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB   10,000 Moscow City Court 25/10/2022 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - escorting to the police station for compiling an offence record between 5 p.m. on 27/02/2022 and 12.30 a.m. on 28/02/2022. 4,000   12163/23 09/03/2023 Vasiliy Vasilyevich KOLESOV 1992     Anti-war rally   Moscow 24/02/2022 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB   20,000 Moscow City Court 15/11/2022 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - escorting to the police station for compiling an offence record between 7.30   p.m. on 24/02/2022 and 4 a.m. on 25/02/2022. 4,000   12472/23 25/02/2023 Vladimir Viktorovich PRIVALOV 1957     Anti-war rally   Moscow 06/03/2022 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB   20,000 Moscow City Court 27/10/2022 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - escorting to the police station for compiling an offence record between 3 p.m. and 11.50 p.m. on 06/03/2022. 4,000   12723/23 10/03/2023 Aleksandr Sergeyevich FINIAREL 1994     Assembly in connection with the sentencing of the Doxa journalists   Moscow 12/04/2022 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB   15,000 Moscow City Court 23/11/2022 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - escorting to the police station for compiling an offence record between 5.22 p.m. and 9.30 p.m. on 12/04/2022. 4,000   13660/23 15/03/2023 Aleksandr Sergeyevich SHULGIN 1986     Anti-war rally   Moscow 06/03/2022 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB   10,000 Moscow City Court 17/11/2022 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - escorting to the police station for compiling an offence record between 2.40 p.m. on 06/03/2022 and 1 a.m. on 07/03/2022. 4,000   13664/23 09/03/2023 Bogdan Vyacheslavovich BOCHKAREV 2002     Anti-war rally   Moscow 27/02/2022 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB   10,000 Moscow City Court 09/11/2022   Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - escorting to the police station for compiling an offence record between 4.45 p.m. and 9 p.m. on 27/02/2022. 4,000   14330/23 20/03/2023 Anton Vyacheslavovich KRASILNIKOV 1998     Anti-war rally   Moscow 27/02/2022 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB   15,000 Moscow City Court 21/11/2022   Art. 5 (1) unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - escorting to the police station for compiling an offence record between 8.55 p.m. on 27/02/2022 and 3.30 a.m. on 28/02/2022. 4,000     [1] Plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicants.