CEDH · CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG — 19 septembre 2024

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s2EF17D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:2pt } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s34DFC730 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s10950C61 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sB9D5CABB { width:28.35pt; display:inline-block } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s3AAE10DF { margin-top:14pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s3CA22BA { font-family:Arial; text-transform:uppercase } .s2D9C6089 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s84651E4E { margin-top:14pt; margin-left:14.2pt; margin-bottom:3pt; text-align:justify } .s69DCC830 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sC986E16F { font-family:Arial; color:#ffffff } .s8E0918A8 { width:37.55pt; display:inline-block } .sF64F4F6C { width:139.77pt; display:inline-block } .s9852CA4C { width:7.54pt; display:inline-block } .s9E436411 { width:138.09pt; display:inline-block } .s4ACA9207 { page-break-before:always; clear:both; mso-break-type:section-break } .s6DB91820 { text-align:center } .s8BB62139 { margin-right:auto; margin-left:auto; border-collapse:collapse } .s3695F815 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .sDF237D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:8pt } .sEECE831 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .sE3DA80B3 { font-family:Arial; font-size:6pt; font-weight:bold; vertical-align:super; color:#474747 } .sC39F4804 { font-family:Arial; font-size:5.33pt; font-weight:bold; vertical-align:super; color:#474747 } .sE8934522 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s6B505E72 { margin:0pt; padding-left:0pt } .s4F2ADFDB { text-align:center; font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; list-style-position:inside } .sBB6163A7 { width:2.48pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .sF6A12959 { width:33%; height:1px; text-align:left } .s5FFF0A7E { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:8pt } .sA4BC3E2E { font-family:Arial; font-size:5.33pt; vertical-align:super; color:#000000 }   FIRST SECTION DECISION Application no. 35352/23 Csaba László DANYI against Hungary and 9 other applications (see appended table) The European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting on 19   September 2024 as a Committee composed of:   Krzysztof Wojtyczek , President ,   Lətif Hüseynov,   Erik Wennerström , judges and Attila Teplán, Acting Deputy Section Registrar, Having regard to the above applications lodged on the various dates indicated in the appended table, Having regard to the formal declarations accepting a friendly settlement of the cases, Having deliberated, decides as follows: FACTS AND PROCEDURE The list of applicants and their representatives is set out in the appended table. The applicants’ complaints under Article 5 § 3 of the Convention concerning the excessive length of pre-trial detention were communicated to the Hungarian Government (“the Government”). In some of the applications, complaints based on the same facts were also communicated under other provisions of the Convention. The Court received friendly-settlement declarations, signed by the parties, under which the applicants agreed to waive any further claims against Hungary in respect of the facts giving rise to these applications, subject to an undertaking by the Government to pay them the amounts detailed in the appended table. These amounts will be converted into the currency of the respondent State at the rate applicable on the date of payment, and will be payable within three months from the date of notification of the Court’s decision. In the event of failure to pay these amounts within the above ‑ mentioned three-month period, the Government undertake to pay simple interest on them, from the expiry of that period until settlement, at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points. The payment will constitute the final resolution of the cases. THE LAW Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single decision. The Court takes note of the friendly settlement reached between the parties. It is satisfied that the settlement is based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and the Protocols thereto and finds no reasons to justify a continued examination of the applications. In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the cases out of the list. For these reasons, the Court, unanimously, Decides to join the applications; Decides to strike the applications out of its list of cases in accordance with Article   39 of the Convention. Done in English and notified in writing on 10 October 2024.     Attila Teplán   Krzysztof Wojtyczek   Acting Deputy Registrar   President   APPENDIX List of applications raising complaints under Article   5   §   3 of the Convention (excessive length of pre-trial detention) No. Application no. Date of introduction Applicant’s name Year of birth Representative’s name and location Other complaints under well-established case-law   Date of receipt of Government’s declaration Date of receipt of Applicant’s declaration Amount awarded for pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage and costs and expenses per applicant (in euros) [1]     35352/23 11/09/2023 Csaba László DANYI 1980   Frank Evelyn Budapest Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of excessive length of criminal proceedings. Art. 6 (1) - excessive length of criminal proceedings - Criminal proceedings have been ongoing since 26/11/2020, at one level of jurisdiction. 04/07/2024 27/03/2024 5,200     37975/23 03/10/2023 Levente JANCSÓ 1995   Kiss Dániel Bálint Budapest Art. 5 (4) - deficiencies in proceedings for review of the lawfulness of detention - Significant delays or irregularities in the judicial review of his pre-trial detention, as his detention was last subject to judicial review on 22/02/2023 acting as a second instance court and upholding the first instance decision on his detention’s prolongation. 21/06/2024 29/04/2024 4,900     37976/23 05/10/2023 László ERDÉLYI 1975   Frank Evelyn Budapest   07/05/2024 21/06/2024 4,600     40724/23 07/11/2023 Ferenc József LIKAVCSÁN 1954   Kiss Dániel Bálint Budapest   04/07/2024 27/03/2024 5,100     42770/23 21/11/2023 Milán Balázs BUDAI 1983   Kiss Dániel Bálint Budapest   19/06/2024 03/04/2024 3,800     1282/24 08/12/2023 Róbert LAKATOS 1976   Frank Evelyn Budapest   04/07/2024 18/04/2024 3,900     3305/24 24/01/2024 Veronika LAKATOS 1997   Kiss Dániel Bálint Budapest   04/07/2024 09/04/2024 4,000     4403/24 01/02/2024 Tarek ZAGDOUDI 1982   Kiss Dániel Bálint Budapest Art. 5 (4) - deficiencies in proceedings for review of the lawfulness of detention - The Budapest Court of Appeal failed to carry out the ex officio judicial review of the grounds of the applicant’s continued arrest after 1 year. 25/07/2024 10/07/2024 4,000     4853/24 01/02/2024 László HORVÁTH 1955   Frank Evelyn Budapest   29/07/2024 18/07/2024 3,900   4868/24 01/02/2024 Elfitouri DBIRA 1978   Kiss Dániel Bálint Budapest Art. 5 (4) - deficiencies in proceedings for review of the lawfulness of detention - The Budapest Court of Appeal failed to carry out the ex officio judicial review of the grounds of the applicant’s continued arrest after 1 year. 25/07/2024 03/05/2024 4,000   [1] Plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicants.