CEDH · CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG — 28 novembre 2024

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .sFE10DC93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s665E407E { margin-top:66pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .s34DFC730 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s2E932ED2 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:11pt } .s82B4DA5F { page-break-before:right; clear:both; mso-break-type:section-break } .s10950C61 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sB9D5CABB { width:28.35pt; display:inline-block } .s3AAE10DF { margin-top:14pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s3CA22BA { font-family:Arial; text-transform:uppercase } .s6B505E72 { margin:0pt; padding-left:0pt } .sDECD9755 { margin-left:11.67pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; padding-left:6.78pt; font-family:Arial; text-transform:uppercase } .sDA7B489D { margin-top:14pt; margin-left:15pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; padding-left:3.45pt; font-family:Arial; text-transform:uppercase } .s5C5C410E { margin-top:14pt; margin-left:18.34pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; padding-left:0.11pt; font-family:Arial; text-transform:uppercase } .s67CAFE05 { margin-top:14pt; margin-left:18.45pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-family:Arial; text-transform:uppercase } .s7C22C014 { margin-top:14pt; margin-left:16.34pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; padding-left:2.11pt; font-family:Arial; text-transform:uppercase } .s74818F78 { margin-top:14pt; margin-bottom:3pt; text-align:justify; font-family:Arial; list-style-position:inside } .sE7B3A78A { width:1.99pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } .sFBC99493 { font-style:italic } .sD11CFAB7 { margin-top:14pt; margin-left:15.01pt; margin-bottom:3pt; text-align:justify; padding-left:1.99pt; font-family:Arial } .s51DFF5CF { margin-top:0pt; margin-left:34pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:-17pt; text-align:justify } .sE5BF05B1 { width:2.33pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } .s2D9C6089 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s69DCC830 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sC646A315 { width:14.54pt; display:inline-block } .sE55E11EC { width:137.42pt; display:inline-block } .s9852CA4C { width:7.54pt; display:inline-block } .s9E436411 { width:138.09pt; display:inline-block } .s4ACA9207 { page-break-before:always; clear:both; mso-break-type:section-break } .sCC22C24E { font-family:Arial; color:#3e3e3e } .s59272B2C { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:6pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s6DB91820 { text-align:center } .s8BB62139 { margin-right:auto; margin-left:auto; border-collapse:collapse } .s3695F815 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .sDF237D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:8pt } .sEECE831 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .sC39F4804 { font-family:Arial; font-size:5.33pt; font-weight:bold; vertical-align:super; color:#474747 } .sE8934522 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s4F2ADFDB { text-align:center; font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; list-style-position:inside } .sBB6163A7 { width:2.48pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } .s5C017BDB { font-family:Arial; font-size:7pt; font-weight:bold } .s70A7D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:7pt } .s40876BAE { font-family:Arial; font-size:6pt; font-weight:bold } .s5FFF0A78 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:2pt } .sF6A12959 { width:33%; height:1px; text-align:left } .s5FFF0A7E { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:8pt } .sA4BC3E2E { font-family:Arial; font-size:5.33pt; vertical-align:super; color:#000000 }     FIFTH SECTION CASE OF ANTONYUK AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE (Applications nos. 54812/22 and 13 others – see appended list)             JUDGMENT   STRASBOURG 28 November 2024   This judgment is final but it may be subject to editorial revision. In the case of Antonyuk and Others v. Ukraine, The European Court of Human Rights (Fifth Section), sitting as a Committee composed of:   Diana Sârcu , President ,   Kateřina Šimáčková,   Mykola Gnatovskyy , judges , and Viktoriya Maradudina, Acting Deputy Section Registrar, Having deliberated in private on 7 November 2024, Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on that date: PROCEDURE 1.     The case originated in applications against Ukraine lodged with the   Court under Article   34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) on the various dates indicated in the appended table. 2.     The Ukrainian Government (“the   Government”) were given notice of the applications. THE FACTS 3.     The list of applicants and the relevant details of the applications are set out in the appended table. 4.     The applicants complained of the inadequate conditions of their detention and of the lack of any effective remedy in domestic law. Some applicants also raised other complaints under the provisions of the Convention. THE LAW JOINDER OF THE APPLICATIONS 5.     Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single judgment. ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLES   3 AND   13 OF THE   CONVENTION 6.     The applicants complained principally of the inadequate conditions of their detention and that they had no effective remedy in this connection. They relied on Articles   3 and   13 of the Convention. 7.     The Court notes that the applicants were kept in detention in poor conditions. The details of the applicants’ detention are indicated in the appended table. The Court refers to the principles established in its case ‑ law regarding inadequate conditions of detention (see, for instance, Muršić v.   Croatia [GC], no.   7334/13, §§   96 ‑ 101, ECHR 2016). It reiterates in particular that a serious lack of space in a prison cell weighs heavily as a   factor to be taken into account for the purpose of establishing whether the   detention conditions described are “degrading” from the point of view of Article   3 and may disclose a violation, both alone or taken together with other shortcomings (see Muršić , cited above, §§   122-41, and Ananyev and Others v. Russia , nos.   42525/07 and 60800/08, §§   149 ‑ 59, 10   January 2012). 8.     In the leading cases of Melnik v. Ukraine (no. 72286/01, 28 March 2006) and Sukachov v. Ukraine (no. 14057/17, 30 January 2020), the Court already found a violation in respect of issues similar to those in the present case. 9.     The Court further observes in the present case that, in reply to a prima facie complaint of inadequate conditions of detention, no primary evidence showing cell floor plans and the actual number of inmates during the entire period of the applicants’ detention have been provided (see Ananyev and Others , cited above, § 123, and Sparysh and Kutsmand v. Ukraine [Committee], nos. 49709/18 and 49870/18, 12 September 2024). Moreover, on numerous occasions, the Court has found violations in regard of overcrowding in Kyiv Pre-Trial Detention Facility (see, for example, Chupryna and Others v. Ukraine [Committee], no. 22896/22 and 4 others, 25   April 2024; and Brygynets and Others v. Ukraine [Committee], no.   17492/23 and 2 others, 16 May 2024). 10.     Having examined all the material submitted to it, the Court has not found any fact or argument capable of persuading it to reach a different conclusion on the admissibility and merits of these complaints. Having regard to its case-law on the subject, the Court considers that in the instant case the applicants’ conditions of detention were inadequate. 11.     The Court further notes that the applicants did not have at their disposal an effective remedy in respect of these complaints. 12.     These complaints are therefore admissible and disclose a breach of Articles 3 and 13 of the Convention. OTHER ALLEGED VIOLATIONS UNDER WELL-ESTABLISHED CASE-LAW 13.     Some applicants submitted other complaints which also raised issues under the Convention, given the relevant well-established case-law of the Court (see appended table). These complaints are not manifestly ill-founded within the meaning of Article   35   §   3   (a) of the Convention, nor are they inadmissible on any other ground. Accordingly, they must be declared admissible. Having examined all the material before it, the Court concludes that they also disclose violations of the Convention in the light of its findings in the cases set out in the appended table. REMAINING COMPLAINTS 14.     In application no.   37306/23, the applicant also raised other complaints under Articles 6 and 13 of the Convention. 15.     The Court has examined these complaints and considers that, in the light of all the material in its possession and in so far as the matters complained of are within its competence, these complaints either do not meet the admissibility criteria set out in Articles   34 and   35 of the Convention or do not disclose any appearance of a violation of the rights and freedoms enshrined in the Convention or the Protocols thereto. It follows that this part of the application must be rejected in accordance with Article   35   §   4 of the Convention. APPLICATION OF ARTICLE   41 OF THE CONVENTION 16.     Regard being had to the documents in its possession and to its case ‑ law (see, in particular, Sukachov , cited above, §§ 165 and 167), the Court considers it reasonable to award the sums indicated in the appended table. FOR THESE REASONS, THE COURT, UNANIMOUSLY, Decides to join the applications; Declares the complaints concerning the inadequate conditions of detention during the periods indicated in the appended table, the lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in that regard and the other complaints under the well-established case-law of the Court, as set out in the appended table, admissible,   and the remainder of application no.   37306/23 inadmissible; Holds that these applications disclose a breach of Articles   3 and 13 of the Convention concerning the inadequate conditions of detention and the lack of any effective remedy in domestic law; Holds that there has been a violation of the Convention as regards the other complaints raised under the well-established case-law of the Court (see appended table); Holds (a)   that the respondent State is to pay the applicants, within three months, the amounts indicated in the appended table, to be converted into the currency of the respondent State at the rate applicable at the date of settlement; (b)   that from the expiry of the above-mentioned three months until settlement simple interest shall be payable on the above amounts at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points Done in English, and notified in writing on 28 November 2024, pursuant to Rule   77   §§   2 and   3 of the Rules of Court.   Viktoriya Maradudina   Diana Sârcu   Acting Deputy Registrar   President       APPENDIX List of applications raising complaints under Articles 3 and 13 of the Convention (inadequate conditions of detention and lack of any effective remedy in domestic law) No. Application no. Date of introduction Applicant’s name Year of birth Representative’s name and location Facility Start and end date Duration Sq. m per inmate Specific grievances Other complaints under well-established case-law Amount awarded for pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage per applicant (in euros) [1] Amount awarded for costs and expenses per application (in euros) [2]     54812/22 23/11/2022 Sergiy Sergiyovych ANTONYUK 1981   Kulbach Sergiy Oleksandrovych Limoges Kyiv Pre-Trial Detention Facility 08/04/2020 pending More than 4 year(s) and 4 month(s) and 29 day(s) 2.5-2.9 m² Overcrowding, passive smoking, poor quality of food, mouldy or dirty cell, lack of toiletries, poor quality of potable water, lack of or insufficient physical exercise in fresh air, lack of fresh air, lack of or poor quality of bedding and bed linen Art. 5 (3) - excessive length of pre-trial detention - 08/04/2020 - 06/03/2023, fragility of the reasons employed by the court (see Kharchenko v. Ukraine , no.   40107/02, §§ 77-81, 10 February 2011, Ignatov v. Ukraine , 40583/15, §§   38-42, 15   December 2016) 9,800 250     57760/22 23/11/2022 Oleksandr Volodymyrovych LINYOV 1981   Kulbach Sergiy Oleksandrovych Limoges Kyiv Pre-Trial Detention Facility 08/04/2020 pending More than 4 year(s) and 4 month(s) and 29 day(s) 2.1-2.9 m² Overcrowding, mouldy or dirty cell, poor quality of potable water, lack of or poor quality of bedding and bed linen, lack of toiletries, lack of or insufficient physical exercise in fresh air, passive smoking, poor quality of food Art. 5 (3) - excessive length of pre-trial detention - 08/04/2020 - 06/03/2023, fragility of the reasons employed by the court (see Kharchenko v. Ukraine , no.   40107/02, §§ 77-81, 10 February 2011, Ignatov v. Ukraine , 40583/15, §§   38-42, 15   December 2016) 9,800 250     1516/23 06/12/2022 Valentyn Volodymyrovych GLUSHCHENKO 1988   Kulbach Sergiy Oleksandrovych Limoges Kyiv Pre-Trial Detention Facility 02/07/2019 to 17/05/2023 3 year(s) and 10   months and 16   day(s) 2.5-4.3 m² Overcrowding, passive smoking, poor quality of potable water, no or restricted access to shower, lack of fresh air, lack of or insufficient physical exercise in fresh air   7,500 250     6112/23 05/12/2022 Andriy Mykolayovych POLYAKOV 1994   Kulbach Sergiy Oleksandrovych Limoges Kyiv Pre-Trial Detention Facility 02/07/2019 to 05/06/2023 3 year(s) and 11   months and 4   day(s) 2.5 m² Overcrowding, lack of or inadequate hygienic facilities, lack of fresh air, mouldy or dirty cell, lack of or insufficient physical exercise in fresh air   7,500 250     17565/23 30/03/2023 Igor Sergiyovych KARPUS 1994   Kulbach Sergiy Oleksandrovych Limoges Kyiv Pre-Trial Detention Facility 23/07/2021 pending More than 3 year(s) and 2 month(s) and 1 day(s) 2.5-2.7 m² Lack of fresh air, lack of or inadequate hygienic facilities, lack of or insufficient physical exercise in fresh air, lack of or insufficient quantity of food, lack of or poor quality of bedding and bed linen, lack of privacy for toilet, mouldy or dirty cell, overcrowding, passive smoking, poor quality of food, poor quality of potable water Art. 5 (3) - excessive length of pre-trial detention - 22/07/2021 - 30/10/2023, failure to conduct the proceedings with due diligence during the period of detention, fragility and repetitiveness of the reasoning employed by the court (see Kharchenko v. Ukraine , no.   40107/02, §§ 77-81, 10 February 2011, Ignatov v. Ukraine, 40583/15, §§   38-42, 15   December 2016) 9,300 250     20612/23 15/05/2023 Igor Georgiyovych GURGENASHVILI 1985   Kulbach Sergiy Oleksandrovych Limoges Kyiv Pre-Trial Detention Facility 14/01/2022 to 24/02/2023 1 year(s) and 1 month(s) and 11 day(s) 2.5-2.7 m² Overcrowding, no or restricted access to shower, lack of or inadequate hygienic facilities, mouldy or dirty cell, lack of fresh air, poor quality of potable water, lack of toiletries, lack of or poor quality of bedding and bed linen, passive smoking, lack of or insufficient physical exercise in fresh air, no or restricted access to warm water, lack of privacy for toilet   3,400 250     25061/23 09/05/2023 Yevgen Viktorovych PRODANCHUK 1976   Kulbach Sergiy Oleksandrovych Limoges Kyiv Pre-Trial Detention Facility 23/05/2022 pending More than 2 year(s) and 4 month(s) and 8 day(s) 2.5-3 m² Overcrowding, passive smoking, lack of fresh air, mouldy or dirty cell, lack of privacy for toilet, lack of toiletries, lack of or poor quality of bedding and bed linen, no or restricted access to shower, lack of or insufficient physical exercise in fresh air, poor quality of potable water Art. 5 (3) - excessive length of pre-trial detention - 23/05/2022 – pending; failure to conduct the proceedings with due diligence during the period of detention, fragility and repetitiveness of the reasoning employed by the court, as the case progressed (see Kharchenko v.   Ukraine , no. 40107/02, §§ 77-81, 10   February 2011, Ignatov v. Ukraine , 40583/15, §§ 38-42, 15 December 2016) 7,300 250     26752/23 19/06/2023 Eduard Valeriyovych ALEKSANDROV 1977   Yolkin Andriy Valeriyovych Kryvyy Rig Kyiv Pre-Trial Detention Facility 05/09/2016 to 21/02/2023 6 year(s) and 5 month(s) and 17 day(s) 2.5-2.8 m² Overcrowding, mouldy or dirty cell, lack of fresh air, passive smoking, inadequate temperature, lack of or insufficient electric light, lack of or insufficient natural light, poor quality of potable water, no or restricted access to warm water, no or restricted access to running water, no or restricted access to shower, lack of toiletries, lack of or poor quality of bedding and bed linen, infestation of cell with insects/rodents, poor quality of food, lack of or insufficient quantity of food, lack of privacy for toilet, lack of or inadequate hygienic facilities, lack of or insufficient physical exercise in fresh air   7,500 250     29680/23 25/07/2023 Vasyl Petrovych OCHKALENKO 1982   Kulbach Sergiy Oleksandrovych Limoges Kyiv Pre-Trial Detention Facility 21/12/2020 to 13/12/2023 2 year(s) and 11 month(s) and 23 day(s) 2.5-2.7 m² Overcrowding, mouldy or dirty cell, lack of fresh air, poor quality of potable water, lack of toiletries, lack of or poor quality of bedding and bed linen, lack of or insufficient physical exercise in fresh air, passive smoking, poor quality of food, lack of or insufficient quantity of food, lack of privacy for toilet   6,700 250   37306/23 25/09/2023 Sergiy Valeriyovych PAVLENKO 1975   Yolkin Andriy Valeriyovych Kryvyy Rig Kyiv Pre-Trial Detention Facility 15/10/2019 to 15/08/2023 3 year(s) and 10   months and 1 day(s) 2.5-3.2 m² Overcrowding, mouldy or dirty cell, lack of fresh air, passive smoking, inadequate temperature, lack of or insufficient electric light, lack of or insufficient natural light, poor quality of potable water, no or restricted access to potable water, no or restricted access to warm water, lack of or inadequate hygienic facilities, no or restricted access to shower, lack of toiletries, lack of or poor quality of bedding and bed linen, infestation of cell with insects/rodents, lack of requisite medical assistance, poor quality of food, lack of or insufficient quantity of food, lack of or insufficient physical exercise in fresh air, lack of privacy for toilet, no or restricted access to running water   7,500 250   37646/23 25/09/2023 Sergiy Volodymyrovych NOVIKOV 1970   Yolkin Andriy Valeriyovych Kryvyy Rig Kyiv Pre-Trial Detention Facility 05/08/2019 pending More than 5 year(s) and 1 month(s) and 26 day(s) 2.5-3.5 m² Overcrowding, lack of fresh air, lack of or inadequate hygienic facilities, lack of privacy for toilet, no or restricted access to warm water, lack of or poor quality of bedding and bed linen, infestation of cell with insects/rodents, lack of requisite medical assistance, mouldy or dirty cell, passive smoking, inadequate temperature, lack of or insufficient electric light, lack of or insufficient natural light, poor quality of potable water, no or restricted access to running water, no or restricted access to shower, lack of toiletries, poor quality of food, lack of or insufficient quantity of food, lack of or insufficient physical exercise in fresh air Art. 6 (1) - excessive length of criminal proceedings - from 13/04/2019 - pending before 1 instance (see Nechay v.   Ukraine , no.   15360/10, §§ 67-79, 1 July 2021);   Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of excessive length of criminal proceedings - (see Nechay v. Ukraine , no. 15360/10, §§   67 ‑ 79, 1 July 2021) 9,800 250   38036/23 30/09/2023 Oleksiy Grygorovych GORDIYENKO 1981   Yolkin Andriy Valeriyovych Kryvyy Rig Kyiv Pre-Trial Detention Facility 23/03/2020 to 15/06/2023 3 year(s) and 2 month(s) and 24 day(s) 2.5-3.6 m² Overcrowding, mouldy or dirty cell, lack of fresh air, passive smoking, inadequate temperature, lack of or insufficient electric light, lack of or insufficient natural light, poor quality of potable water, no or restricted access to running water, no or restricted access to potable water, no or restricted access to shower, no or restricted access to warm water, lack of or inadequate hygienic facilities, lack of toiletries, lack of or poor quality of bedding and bed linen, infestation of cell with insects/rodents, poor quality of food, lack of or insufficient quantity of food, lack of or insufficient physical exercise in fresh air, lack of privacy for toilet   7,100 250   4075/24 22/01/2024 Alyona Leonidivna NIKOLASHVILI 1988   Yolkin Andriy Valeriyovych Kryvyy Rig Kyiv Pre-Trial Detention Facility 11/10/2019 to 30/04/2024 4 year(s) and 6 month(s) and 20 day(s) 2.5-2.7 m² Overcrowding, lack of fresh air, lack of privacy for toilet, no or restricted access to warm water, lack of or poor quality of bedding and bed linen, mouldy or dirty cell, inadequate temperature, lack of or insufficient natural light, lack of or insufficient electric light, no or restricted access to running water, poor quality of potable water, no or restricted access to shower, lack of toiletries, infestation of cell with insects/rodents, lack of requisite medical assistance, poor quality of food, lack of or insufficient quantity of food, lack of or insufficient physical exercise in fresh air, lack of or inadequate hygienic facilities Art. 6 (1) - excessive length of criminal proceedings - 17/11/2015 - 07/08/2024, 3 levels of jurisdiction (see Nechay v.   Ukraine , no. 15360/10, §§ 67-79, 1 July 2021);   Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of excessive length of criminal proceedings - (see Nechay v. Ukraine , no. 15360/10, §§ 67-79, 1 July 2021) 9,800 250   4625/24 24/01/2024 Anatoliy Vasylyovych DMYTRENKO 1982   Kushnir Valeriy Volodymyrovych Dnipro Kyiv Pre-Trial Detention Facility 19/08/2019 pending More than 4 year(s) and 6 month(s) and 4 day(s) 2.5-3.5 m² overcrowding, mouldy or dirty cell, lack of fresh air, poor quality of potable water, lack of toiletries, lack of or poor quality of bedding and bed linen, lack of or inadequate hygienic facilities, lack of or insufficient physical exercise in fresh air, poor quality of food, lack of or insufficient quantity of food Art. 5 (3) - excessive length of pre-trial detention - 29/07/2019 - pending, fragility of the reasons employed by the courts, use of assumptions, in the absence of any evidentiary basis, of the risks of absconding or obstructing justice (see Kharchenko v. Ukraine , no. 40107/02, §§ 77-81, 10 February 2011, Ignatov v. Ukraine, 40583/15, §§ 38-42, 15 December 2016);   Art. 6 (1) - excessive length of criminal proceedings - 29/07/2019-pending, 1 level of jurisdiction (see Nechay v.   Ukraine , no. 15360/10, §§ 67-79, 1   July 2021);   Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of excessive length of criminal proceedings - (see Nechay v. Ukraine , no. 15360/10, §§ 67-79, 1 July 2021). 9,800 250   [1] Plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicants. [2] Plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicants.