CEDH · CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG — 6 février 2025

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s2EF17D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:2pt } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s10950C61 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sB9D5CABB { width:28.35pt; display:inline-block } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s3AAE10DF { margin-top:14pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s3CA22BA { font-family:Arial; text-transform:uppercase } .s2D9C6089 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s84651E4E { margin-top:14pt; margin-left:14.2pt; margin-bottom:3pt; text-align:justify } .s69DCC830 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sC986E16F { font-family:Arial; color:#ffffff } .sC646A315 { width:14.54pt; display:inline-block } .sFBB59CF6 { width:109.08pt; display:inline-block } .s9852CA4C { width:7.54pt; display:inline-block } .s9E436411 { width:138.09pt; display:inline-block } .s4ACA9207 { page-break-before:always; clear:both; mso-break-type:section-break } .s34DFC730 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s6DB91820 { text-align:center } .s8BB62139 { margin-right:auto; margin-left:auto; border-collapse:collapse } .s2F3EB0E4 { border:0.75pt solid #838383; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .sDF237D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:8pt } .sE1A7A04C { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#424242 } .s779875C9 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; letter-spacing:-0.2pt; color:#424242 } .s598389F9 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:12pt } .sF314C99F { font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; font-weight:bold; color:#424242 } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .sAB95A5CB { font-family:Arial; font-size:5.33pt; font-weight:bold; vertical-align:super; color:#424242 } .sBB8C798C { font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; font-weight:bold; vertical-align:super; color:#424242 } .sBAADFE8C { border:0.75pt solid #838383; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s6B505E72 { margin:0pt; padding-left:0pt } .s4F2ADFDB { text-align:center; font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; list-style-position:inside } .sBB6163A7 { width:2.48pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .sF6A12959 { width:33%; height:1px; text-align:left } .s5FFF0A7E { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:8pt } .sA4BC3E2E { font-family:Arial; font-size:5.33pt; vertical-align:super; color:#000000 }   THIRD SECTION DECISION Application no. 52080/20 Demis IVANIDIS against Greece and 11 other applications (see appended table) The European Court of Human Rights (Third Section), sitting on 6   February   2025 as a Committee composed of:   Oddný Mjöll Arnardóttir , President ,   Úna Ní Raifeartaigh,   Mateja Đurović , judges , and Viktoriya Maradudina, Acting Deputy Section Registrar, Having regard to the above applications lodged on the various dates indicated in the appended table, Having regard to the declarations submitted by the respondent Government requesting the Court to strike the applications out of the list of cases, and the applicants’ replies to these declarations, Having deliberated, decides as follows: FACTS AND PROCEDURE The list of applicants and their representatives is set out in the appended table. The applicants’ complaints under Article 3 of the Convention concerning the inadequate conditions of detention were communicated to the Greek Government (“the Government”). Complaints based on the same facts were also communicated under Article 13 of the Convention. The Government submitted declarations with a view to resolving the issues raised by these complaints. They further requested the Court to strike out the applications. The Government acknowledged the inadequate conditions of detention. They further acknowledged that there has been a violation of Article   13 of the Convention. They offered to pay the applicants the amounts detailed in the appended table and invited the Court to strike the applications out of the list of cases in accordance with Article   37 §   1   (c) of the Convention. The amounts would be payable within three months from the date of notification of the Court’s decision. In the event of failure to pay these amounts within the above-mentioned three-month period, the Government undertook to pay simple interest on them, from the expiry of that period until settlement, at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points. The payment will constitute the final resolution of the cases. The applicants informed the Court that they agreed to the terms of the declarations. THE LAW Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single decision. The Court finds that, following the applicants’ express agreement to the terms of the declaration made by the Government, the cases should be treated as a friendly settlement between the parties. It therefore takes note of the friendly settlement reached between the parties. It is satisfied that the settlement is based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and the Protocols thereto and finds no reasons to justify the continued examination of the applications. In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the cases out of the list. For these reasons, the Court, unanimously, Decides to join the applications; Decides to strike the applications out of its list of cases in accordance with Article   39 of the Convention. Done in English and notified in writing on 6 March 2025.     Viktoriya Maradudina   Oddný Mjöll Arnardóttir   Acting Deputy Registrar   President   APPENDIX List of applications raising complaints under Article   3 of the Convention (inadequate conditions of detention) No. Application no. Date of introduction Applicant’s name Year of birth   Representative’s name and location Other complaints under well-established case-law   Date of receipt of Government’s declaration Date of receipt of applicant’s acceptance Amount awarded for non-pecuniary damage and costs and expenses per applicant (in euros) [1]     52080/20 13/11/2020 Demis IVANIDIS 1985   Pipertzi Ioanna Thessaloniki Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of inadequate conditions of detention - 23/03/2023 08/05/2023 8,000     5340/22 09/10/2020 Alexandros SAPANAZIDIS 1966   Pipertzi Ioanna Thessaloniki Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of inadequate conditions of detention - 30/03/2023 15/05/2023 2,200     20569/22 30/06/2021 Anestis BAKOUSOGLOU 1985   Tsitselikis Konstantinos Thessaloniki Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of inadequate conditions of detention - 16/05/2024 23/05/2024 10,500     41873/22 22/02/2021 Christos KAKAVOULAS 1986   Tsitselikis Konstantinos Thessaloniki Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of inadequate conditions of detention - 16/09/2024 20/09/2024 4,000     41878/22 22/02/2021 Sampson KAZOURIS 1995   Tsitselikis Konstantinos Thessaloniki Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of inadequate conditions of detention - 16/09/2024 20/09/2024 4,700     41884/22 22/02/2021 Dimitrios LATHYRIS 1961   Tsitselikis Konstantinos Thessaloniki Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of inadequate conditions of detention - 23/09/2024 17/10/2024 3,600     41888/22 22/02/2021 Panagiotis LATHYRIS 1969   Tsitselikis Konstantinos Thessaloniki Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of inadequate conditions of detention - 23/09/2024 17/10/2024 3,600     41904/22 22/02/2021 Dimitrios PLEKSIDAS 1982   Tsitselikis Konstantinos Thessaloniki Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of inadequate conditions of detention - 23/09/2024 17/10/2024 7,400     41914/22 22/02/2021 Dimitrios TSARAS 1967   Tsitselikis Konstantinos Thessaloniki Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of inadequate conditions of detention - 23/09/2024 17/10/2024 800   41916/22 22/02/2021 Evaggelos VASILARIS 1994   Tsitselikis Konstantinos Thessaloniki Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of inadequate conditions of detention - 23/09/2024 17/10/2024 4,000   42465/22 17/03/2021 Georgios NTOUPIS 1977   Tsitselikis Konstantinos Thessaloniki Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of inadequate conditions of detention - 16/09/2024 20/09/2024 11,200   42467/22 17/03/2021 Ioannis PAPADAKIS 1981   Tsitselikis Konstantinos Thessaloniki Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of inadequate conditions of detention - 16/09/2024 20/09/2024 2,900   [1] Plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicants.