CEDH · CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG — 13 mars 2025

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s2EF17D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:2pt } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s34DFC730 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s10950C61 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sB9D5CABB { width:28.35pt; display:inline-block } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s3AAE10DF { margin-top:14pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s3CA22BA { font-family:Arial; text-transform:uppercase } .s2D9C6089 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s46DB5BA6 { margin-top:14pt; margin-left:14.2pt; margin-bottom:3pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s84651E4E { margin-top:14pt; margin-left:14.2pt; margin-bottom:3pt; text-align:justify } .s69DCC830 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sC986E16F { font-family:Arial; color:#ffffff } .sC646A315 { width:14.54pt; display:inline-block } .sE55E11EC { width:137.42pt; display:inline-block } .s9852CA4C { width:7.54pt; display:inline-block } .s9E436411 { width:138.09pt; display:inline-block } .s4ACA9207 { page-break-before:always; clear:both; mso-break-type:section-break } .s6DB91820 { text-align:center } .s51305D0D { width:133.04%; margin-right:auto; margin-left:auto; border-collapse:collapse } .s4D3C0E3E { width:4.7%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .sDF237D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:8pt } .sEECE831 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .s20DD32B0 { width:10.96%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .s8C6DA246 { width:16.38%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .s8711280D { width:12.86%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .s2B283C67 { width:21.74%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .sF829F1AC { width:14.5%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .s66A02243 { width:18.84%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .sFF29C2A7 { width:4.7%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s6B505E72 { margin:0pt; padding-left:0pt } .s4F2ADFDB { text-align:center; font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; list-style-position:inside } .sBB6163A7 { width:2.48pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } .s97B049DE { width:10.96%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s5EA16826 { width:16.38%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s36A225A5 { width:12.86%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sAC38887 { width:21.74%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s1299F2BC { width:14.5%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s82B0FB4B { width:18.84%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s598389F9 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:12pt } .sB853CD26 { font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt }   FIFTH SECTION DECISION Application no. 20239/16 Dmytro Gennadiyovych TRISKA against Ukraine and 5 other applications (see appended table) The European Court of Human Rights (Fifth Section), sitting on 13   March   2025 as a Committee composed of:   Diana Sârcu , President ,   Kateřina Šimáčková,   Mykola Gnatovskyy , judges , and Viktoriya Maradudina, Acting Deputy Section Registrar, Having regard to the above applications lodged on the various dates indicated in the appended table, Having deliberated, decides as follows: FACTS AND PROCEDURE The list of the applicants is set out in the appendix. The applicants’ complaints under the Convention were communicated to the Ukrainian Government (“the Government”), who submitted observations on the admissibility and merits. The applicants were required to submit their observations in reply, however, the contact with the applicants has been lost (see appended table for details). By letters sent via the Court’s Electronic Communication Service (eComms) and by registered post, the applicants were notified that the period allowed for submission of their observations had expired and that no extension of time had been requested (see appended table for dates and details). The applicants’ attention was drawn to Article   37   §   1   (a) of the Convention, which provides that the Court may strike an application out of its list of cases where the circumstances lead to the conclusion that the applicant does not intend to pursue the application. No reply followed. THE LAW Having regard to the similar procedural conduct of the applicants, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single decision. In the light of the foregoing, and in the absence of any special circumstances regarding respect for the rights guaranteed by the Convention and the Protocols thereto, the Court, in accordance with Article   37   §   1   (a) of the Convention, considers that it is no longer justified to continue the examination of the applications. Accordingly, the cases should be struck out of the list. For these reasons, the Court, unanimously, Decides to join the applications; Decides to strike the applications out of its list of cases. Done in English and notified in writing on 3 April 2025.     Viktoriya Maradudina   Diana Sârcu   Acting Deputy Registrar   President     APPENDIX No. Application no. Date of introduction Applicant’s name Year of birth/registration   Representative’s name   Main complaints raised Date of sending Government’s observations to the applicant Date of the Court strike-out warning letter     20239/16 01/04/2016 Dmytro Gennadiyovych TRISKA 1995     Article 6 §§ 1 and 3 (d) of the Convention about a breach of the applicant’s right to a fair trial resulting from his conviction for an offence incited by a police informant. 01/08/2023 (by eComms - not downloaded) 07/11/2023 (sent by eComms - downloaded several times between November 2023 and January 2024)   03/10/2024 (by registered post - returned undelivered).     7421/17 21/12/2016 TRADE UNION OF THE CHERNOBYL NUCLEAR POWER PLANT 2000   Panchenko Andriy Mykhaylovych Article 1 of the Protocol No. 1 about the obligation of the applicant trade union to compensate the Pension Fund for the costs of pension payments to its employees 02/07/2024 (by eComms - not downloaded) 29/08/2024 (by eComms - not downloaded)   29/08/2024 (by registered post - delivered on 10/10/2024)     53582/17 10/07/2017 Igor Dmytrovych KAMINSKYY 1968     Art. 6 (1) - excessive length of civil proceedings;   Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of excessive length of civil proceedings 26/09/2024 (by regular post) 13/12/2024 (by registered post, returned undelivered)         66407/17 23/08/2017 Volodymyr Volodymyrovych SHABAN 1968   Polyak Petro Petrovych Article 6 § 1 of the Convention about a breach of applicant’s right to a fair trial resulting from his conviction for an offence incited by a police informant. 23/04/2024 (by eComms – downloaded on 23/04/2024) 07/08/2024 (by eComms - not downloaded)   26/09/2024 (by registered post - delivered on 16/10/2024)   04/11/2024 (by registered post, returned undelivered)       42183/23 18/11/2023 Vasyl Mykolayovych MARCHAK 1974 Kadochnikov Andriy Olegovych Art. 3 - inadequate conditions of detention;   Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of inadequate conditions of detention 03/07/2024 (by eComms – downloaded on 18/09/2024) 15/11/2024 (by eComms – downloaded on 28/11/2024 and 01/01/2025)     248/24 01/12/2023 Viktor Romanovych KHARATON 1984   Article 6 § 1 -excessive length of criminal proceedings;   Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of excessive length of criminal proceedings. 03/07/2024 (by eComms - not downloaded)   15/11/2024 (by registered post - delivered on 09/01/2025)