CEDHCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG26
CEDH · CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG — 13 mars 2025
- ECLI
- ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0313DEC002447524
- Date
- 13 mars 2025
- Publication
- 13 mars 2025
droits fondamentauxCEDH
Source : DILA / Judilibre · open data
Mes notes
privées · visibles par vous seulRésumé structuré
version préliminaireFaits
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Procédure
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Question juridique
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Solution
source officielleStruck out of the list
Résumé généré automatiquement — à vérifier avec la décision originale.
Analyse IA non disponible
Générez un résumé intelligent de cette décision
Texte intégral
.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s2EF17D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:2pt } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s34DFC730 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s10950C61 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sB9D5CABB { width:28.35pt; display:inline-block } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s3AAE10DF { margin-top:14pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s3CA22BA { font-family:Arial; text-transform:uppercase } .s2D9C6089 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s84651E4E { margin-top:14pt; margin-left:14.2pt; margin-bottom:3pt; text-align:justify } .s69DCC830 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sC986E16F { font-family:Arial; color:#ffffff } .s8E0918A8 { width:37.55pt; display:inline-block } .sB81C5FD1 { width:141.42pt; display:inline-block } .s9852CA4C { width:7.54pt; display:inline-block } .s9E436411 { width:138.09pt; display:inline-block } .s4ACA9207 { page-break-before:always; clear:both; mso-break-type:section-break } .s523616E0 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; font-size:14pt } .sFE10DC93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .s39E5096F { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center } .s6DB91820 { text-align:center } .s8BB62139 { margin-right:auto; margin-left:auto; border-collapse:collapse } .s2F3EB0E4 { border:0.75pt solid #838383; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .sDF237D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:8pt } .sE1A7A04C { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#424242 } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .sAB95A5CB { font-family:Arial; font-size:5.33pt; font-weight:bold; vertical-align:super; color:#424242 } .s9A0D9959 { height:499.1pt } .sBAADFE8C { border:0.75pt solid #838383; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .sF6A12959 { width:33%; height:1px; text-align:left } .s2EB42ED2 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:10pt } .sB343B0AA { font-family:Arial; font-size:6.67pt; vertical-align:super; color:#000000 } .sB853CD26 { font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt }   SECOND SECTION DECISION Application no. 24475/24 Györgyné ÁDÁM and Others against Hungary (see appended table) The European Court of Human Rights (Second Section), sitting on 13   March 2025 as a Committee composed of:   Gediminas Sagatys , President ,   Stéphane Pisani,   Juha Lavapuro , judges , and Attila Teplán, Acting Deputy Section Registrar, Having regard to the above application lodged on 16   August 2024, Having regard to the formal declarations accepting a friendly settlement of the case, Having deliberated, decides as follows: FACTS AND PROCEDURE The list of applicants is set out in the appended table. The applicants were represented by Ms E. Bárdy, a lawyer practising in Érd. The applicants’ complaints under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention concerning the excessive length of civil proceedings were communicated to the Hungarian Government (“the Government”). The Court received friendly-settlement declarations, signed by the parties, under which the applicants agreed to waive any further claims against Hungary in respect of the facts giving rise to this application, subject to an undertaking by the Government to pay them the amount detailed in the appended table. This amount will be converted into the currency of the respondent State at the rate applicable on the date of payment, and will be payable within three months from the date of notification of the Court’s decision. In the event of failure to pay this amount within the above ‑ mentioned three-month period, the Government undertake to pay simple interest on it, from the expiry of that period until settlement, at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points. The payment will constitute the final resolution of the case. THE LAW The Court takes note of the friendly settlement reached between the parties. It is satisfied that the settlement is based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and the Protocols thereto and finds no reasons to justify a continued examination of the application. In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the case out of the list. For these reasons, the Court, unanimously, Decides to strike the application out of its list of cases in accordance with Article   39 of the Convention. Done in English and notified in writing on 3 April 2025.     Attila Teplán   Gediminas Sagatys   Acting Deputy Registrar   President   APPENDIX Application raising complaints under Article   6 § 1 of the Convention (excessive length of civil proceedings) Application no. Date of introduction Applicant’s name Year of birth/ registration Representative’s name and location Date of receipt of Government’s declaration Date of receipt of Applicant’s declaration Amount awarded for pecuniary and non ‑ pecuniary damage and costs and expenses per applicant (in euros) [1] 24475/24 16/08/2024 (79 applicants) Györgyné ÁDÁM 1954 Mártonné ÁGICS 1947 Attila Józsefné ALTORJAI 1944   AQVATOR INGATLANFEJLESZTŐ KFT 2002   ATVA BELVÁROSI INGATLAN CENTRUM KFT 1991 Hajnalka BAGÁNÉ CSIPKÉS 1977 Zsolt BAJUSZ 1976 Gábor Antal BAK 1961 Zsuzsanna BAKA 1950 Enikő BALASSÁNÉ RÁCZ 1986 Miklós BÁLINTI 1951 Zsolt BALOGH 1980 Ágnes BÁNFALVI 1977 Jánosné BARANYAI 1958 Jánosné BARANYI 1949 Erika BÉKEI 1980 Antalné BENKOVICS 1962 Barna BERCSÉNYI 1961 Péter BILLEGE 1983 Jánosné BLUM 1958 Enikő BÓDIS 1964 Gábor Ferenc BÖDŐ 1969 Görgy BOGDÁN 1959 Zoltán BOLTUZITS 1962 József BOROS 1967 Renáta Erzsébet BOZORÁDI 1981   Lászlóné BUKOVINSZKY 1965   COOP CENTER VAGYONKEZELŐ ÉS BEFEKTETÉSI ZRT 1994 Antal Gézáné CSÉCSEI 1960 István Simon CSEPERKÁLÓ 1949 Gergő CSIKÓS 1984 István László CSORDÁS 1963 Levente CSÖRGŐ 1976 Miklósné CSVÓRICS 1956 Tamás DANCS 1974 Marianna DÁVID 1987 Albert DIÓSZEGI 1974   DOCUSTORE IRATRENDEZŐ ÉS TÁROLÓ KFT 1997 Ildikó DOMBÓVÁRI 1966 Imre DOMJÁN 1956 Béláné DÖMSÖDI 1964 Zsuzsanna DÓSÁNÉ ÓVÁRY 1973 Pálné DRAGOVICS 1960 Szabolcs DURKÓ 1979 Zoltán DÜRR 1954 Gábor DUTTYÁN 1950 Gyula EGRESI 1973 János ELEK 1974 Ferencné FÁBIÁN 1944 Brigitta FÁBIÁNNÉ NÁGL 1977 András FARAGÓ 1967 Antal Tamásné FARKAS 1967 János FARKAS 1977 Magdolna Mária FEHÉR 1968 András FEJES 1948 Edit FEJES 1967 József Tiborné FEKETE 1960 Loránd Lajosné FELHÁZI 1959 Andrásné FERKÓ 1957 Ferencné FODOR 1947 Zoltán FÖLHŐSY 1964 Zsuzsanna Mária FORGÁCSNÉ NAGY 1965 Gábor FORRÓ 1955 Béláné FÜREDI 1952 Jánosné GAÁL 1955 Judit GALAMBOS 1983 Lajos GALAMBOS 1981 János GÄNGL 1970 Lászlóné GAVALDI 1964 Ferenc ILLÉS 1965 Gábor INCZE 1954 Rudolfné KÁRÁSZ 1950 Mária KISS 1955 János József MISKOLCZI 1954 Judit Ágnes SOMOGYI 1955 Andrásné SZABÓ-SZEPESI 1953   SZONDY-TEL TÁVKÖZLÉSTECHNIKAI SZOLGÁLTATÓ ÉS KERESKEDELMI BT 2000 Zoltán TYEKLÁR 1971   ZSIGRAI BANKBIZTONSÁGI ÉS VAGYONVÉDELMI KFT 2003   Bárdy Emese Érd 15/01/2025 07/02/2025 1,000   [1] Plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicants.Citations
Aucune citation répertoriée pour cette décision.
Décisions connexes
Aucune décision similaire identifiée pour le moment.
Synthèse
- Juridiction
- CEDH
- Chambre
- CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
- Formation
- 26
- Date
- 13 mars 2025
- Matière
- droits fondamentaux
Référence
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0313DEC002447524
Données disponibles
- Texte intégral