CEDH · CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG — 7 mai 2025

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s2EF17D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:2pt } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s34DFC730 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s10950C61 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sB9D5CABB { width:28.35pt; display:inline-block } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s3AAE10DF { margin-top:14pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s3CA22BA { font-family:Arial; text-transform:uppercase } .s2D9C6089 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s46DB5BA6 { margin-top:14pt; margin-left:14.2pt; margin-bottom:3pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s84651E4E { margin-top:14pt; margin-left:14.2pt; margin-bottom:3pt; text-align:justify } .s69DCC830 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sC986E16F { font-family:Arial; color:#ffffff } .sC646A315 { width:14.54pt; display:inline-block } .sE55E11EC { width:137.42pt; display:inline-block } .s9852CA4C { width:7.54pt; display:inline-block } .s9E436411 { width:138.09pt; display:inline-block } .s4ACA9207 { page-break-before:always; clear:both; mso-break-type:section-break } .s6DB91820 { text-align:center } .s8BB62139 { margin-right:auto; margin-left:auto; border-collapse:collapse } .s2F3EB0E4 { border:0.75pt solid #838383; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .sDF237D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:8pt } .sE1A7A04C { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#424242 } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .sBAADFE8C { border:0.75pt solid #838383; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s901B945D { margin-top:0pt; margin-right:1.25pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:19.85pt; font-size:8pt } .s5FFF0A7E { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:8pt }   FIFTH SECTION DECISION Application no. 60591/17 Nikolay Nikolayevich SEDOV against Ukraine and 5 other applications (see appended table) The European Court of Human Rights (Fifth Section), sitting on 7 May 2025 as a Committee composed of:   Diana Sârcu , President ,   Kateřina Šimáčková,   Mykola Gnatovskyy , judges , and Viktoriya Maradudina, Acting Deputy Section Registrar, Having regard to the above applications lodged on the various dates indicated in the appended table, Having deliberated, decides as follows: FACTS AND PROCEDURE The list of the applicants is set out in the appendix. The applicants’ complaints under the Convention were communicated to the Ukrainian Government (“the Government”), who submitted observations on the admissibility and merits. The applicants were required to submit their observations in reply, however, the contact with the applicants has been lost (see appended table for details). By letters sent via the Court’s Electronic Communication Service (eComms) and by registered post, the applicants were notified that the period allowed for submission of their observations had expired and that no extension of time had been requested (see appended table for dates and details). The applicants’ attention was drawn to Article   37   §   1   (a) of the Convention, which provides that the Court may strike an application out of its list of cases where the circumstances lead to the conclusion that the applicant does not intend to pursue the application. No reply followed. THE LAW Having regard to the similar procedural conduct of the applicants, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single decision. In the light of the foregoing, and in the absence of any special circumstances regarding respect for the rights guaranteed by the Convention and the Protocols thereto, the Court, in accordance with Article   37   §   1   (a) of the Convention, considers that it is no longer justified to continue the examination of the applications. Accordingly, the applications should be struck out of the list of cases. For these reasons, the Court, unanimously, Decides to join the applications; Decides to strike the applications out of its list of cases. Done in English and notified in writing on 28 May 2025.     Viktoriya Maradudina   Diana Sârcu   Acting Deputy Registrar   President   APPENDIX List of applications No. Application no. Date of introduction Applicant’s name Year of birth Representative’s name   Main complaints raised Date of sending Government’s observations to the applicant Date of the Court strike-out warning letter 1. 60591/17 28/06/2017 Nikolay Nikolayevich SEDOV 1924   Article 6 (1) of the Convention and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 - concerning investigation into a robbery committed against the applicant     29/10/2021 (by regular post) 21/10/2024 (by registered post, returned undelivered) 2. 50774/18 18/10/2018 Andriy Igorovych PALYUKH 1968   Art. 6 (1) - excessive length of civil proceedings;   Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of excessive length of civil proceedings 26/09/2024 (by regular post) 13/12/2024 (by registered post, delivered on 05/02/2025) 3. 31877/19 10/06/2019 Olga Dmytrivna KHILCHENKO 1969   Art. 6 (1) - arbitrary or clearly unlawful refusal to examine the applicant’s appeal 26/09/2024 (by eComms - not downloaded) 13/12/2024 (by registered post, delivered on 30/12/2024) 4. 5175/23 30/12/2022 Sergiy Mykolayovych TSYMBAL 1978 Iryna Stanislavivna KLYUYEVA Art. 6 (1) - lack of access to a court. 26/09/2024 (by eComms – downloaded on 26/09/2024) 13/12/2024 (by eComms – downloaded on 17/12/2024) 5. 36340/23 20/09/2023 Vusal Chingiz ogly BAYRAMOV 1981 Oleksandr Viktorovych STAROVOYTOV Article 3 - lack of requisite medical treatment in detention. 04/11/2024 (by eComms – downloaded on 18/09/2024 and 16/01/2025) 13/12/2024 (by registered post, returned undelivered) 6. 2691/24 30/12/2023   Oleksandr Vyacheslavovych SVYSTUN 1982   Art. 6 (1) - excessive length of civil proceedings;   Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of excessive length of civil proceedings 26/09/2024 (by eComms – downloaded on 26/09/2024) 13/12/2024 (by eComms – downloaded on 16/12/2024)