CEDH · CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG — 22 mai 2025

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s2EF17D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:2pt } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s34DFC730 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s10950C61 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sB9D5CABB { width:28.35pt; display:inline-block } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s3AAE10DF { margin-top:14pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s3CA22BA { font-family:Arial; text-transform:uppercase } .s2D9C6089 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s84651E4E { margin-top:14pt; margin-left:14.2pt; margin-bottom:3pt; text-align:justify } .s69DCC830 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sC986E16F { font-family:Arial; color:#ffffff } .sC646A315 { width:14.54pt; display:inline-block } .s7FB0030E { width:111.07pt; display:inline-block } .s9852CA4C { width:7.54pt; display:inline-block } .s9E436411 { width:138.09pt; display:inline-block } .s4ACA9207 { page-break-before:always; clear:both; mso-break-type:section-break } .s6DB91820 { text-align:center } .s8BB62139 { margin-right:auto; margin-left:auto; border-collapse:collapse } .s57395D7A { height:28.35pt } .s2F3EB0E4 { border:0.75pt solid #838383; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .sDF237D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:8pt } .sE1A7A04C { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#424242 } .sBAADFE8C { border:0.75pt solid #838383; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s6B505E72 { margin:0pt; padding-left:0pt } .s4F2ADFDB { text-align:center; font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; list-style-position:inside } .sBB6163A7 { width:2.48pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold }   FOURTH SECTION DECISION Application no. 40342/22 Daniel-Marius ANDREI against Romania and 10 other applications (see appended table) The European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section), sitting on 22   May 2025 as a Committee composed of:   Anne Louise Bormann , President ,   Sebastian Răduleţu,   András Jakab , judges , and Viktoriya Maradudina, Acting Deputy Section Registrar, Having regard to the above applications lodged on the various dates indicated in the appended table, Having deliberated, decides as follows: FACTS AND PROCEDURE The list of the applicants is set out in the appendix. The applicants’ complaints under Article 3 of the Convention concerning the inadequate conditions of detention were communicated to the Romanian Government, who submitted observations on the admissibility and merits. The observations were forwarded to the applicants, who were invited to submit their own observations (see the appended table for the relevant dates). No reply was received by the Court. By letters sent by registered post, the applicants were notified that the time allowed for the submission of their observations had expired (see the appended table for the relevant dates). The applicants’ attention was further drawn to Article 37 § 1 (a) of the Convention, which provides that the Court may strike an application out of its list of cases where the circumstances lead to the conclusion that the applicant does not intend to pursue the application. No reply to these letters has been received by the Court. The registered letters were received by the applicants (see details in the appended table). THE LAW Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single decision. In the light of the foregoing, the Court concludes that the applicants may be regarded as no longer wishing to pursue the applications (Article   37 §   1   (a) of the Convention). Furthermore, in accordance with Article 37 § 1 in   fine , the Court finds no special circumstances regarding respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and the Protocols thereto which require the continued examination of the applications. In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the cases out of the list. For these reasons, the Court, unanimously, Decides to join the applications; Decides to strike the applications out of its list of cases. Done in English and notified in writing on 12 June 2025.     Viktoriya Maradudina   Anne Louise Bormann   Acting Deputy Registrar   President   APPENDIX List of applications raising complaints under Article   3 of the Convention (inadequate conditions of detention) No. Application no. Date of introduction Applicant’s name Year of birth Representative’s name and location Date of the applicant’s last letter to the Court Date of sending Government’s observations to the applicant Time-limit for submission of response by the applicant Date of the Court’s registered letter Date of receipt of the registered letter     40342/22 30/09/2022 Daniel-Marius ANDREI 1979       20/06/2023 16/10/2024 27/11/2024 19/12/2024 Received by the applicant’s mother on 09/01/2025     40346/22 10/10/2022 Sorin CONSTANTIN 1967       24/10/2024 16/10/2024 27/11/2024 19/12/2024 Received by the applicant on 30/12/2024     40875/22 17/10/2022 Rudi-Mihai SPRÎNCEANĂ 2000   Ion Sprînceană Bucharest 14/11/2022 16/10/2024 27/11/2024 19/12/2024 Received by the applicant’s representative on 30/12/2024 (illegible signature)     41716/22 24/10/2022 Milan VLĂSCEANU 1994       02/11/2022 16/10/2024 27/11/2024 19/12/2024 Received by the applicant on 15/01/2025     42399/22 03/10/2022 Constantin IONAŞCU 1982       03/07/2024 16/10/2024 27/11/2024 19/12/2024 Received by the applicant on 08/01/2025 according to the official website of the Romania’s Postal Service (Track&Trace)     43115/22 24/10/2022 Petru TRUPCIC 1985       12/07/2024 16/10/2024 27/11/2024 19/12/2024 Received by the Iași prison’s representative on 08/01/2025     47840/22 25/01/2023 Ion HOJDA 1992       24/03/2023 16/10/2024 27/11/2024 19/12/2024 Received by the applicant on 16/01/2025     54255/22 05/01/2023 Răzvan-Mihail CONSTANTIN 1978 Constantin Daniel Ștefan Bucharest 14/03/2023 10/10/2024 21/11/2024 19/12/2024 Received by the applicant’s representative on 31/12/2024     55692/22 25/05/2023 Viorel COSTACHE 1980       10/08/2023 10/10/2024 21/11/2024 19/12/2024 Received by the applicant on 31/12/2024 (illegible signature)   56770/22 31/01/2023 Tiberiu-Tudorel MUȘAT 1980       07/02/2023 10/10/2024 21/11/2024 19/12/2024 Received by the applicant’s spouse on 03/01/2025   57785/22 20/01/2023 Attila BARABAŞ 1988       16/11/2023 10/10/2024 21/11/2024 19/12/2024 Received by the spouse of the contact person appointed by the applicant on 03/01/2025