CEDH · CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG — 19 juin 2025

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s2EF17D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:2pt } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s34DFC730 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s10950C61 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sB9D5CABB { width:28.35pt; display:inline-block } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s3AAE10DF { margin-top:14pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s3CA22BA { font-family:Arial; text-transform:uppercase } .s2D9C6089 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s46DB5BA6 { margin-top:14pt; margin-left:14.2pt; margin-bottom:3pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s84651E4E { margin-top:14pt; margin-left:14.2pt; margin-bottom:3pt; text-align:justify } .s69DCC830 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sC986E16F { font-family:Arial; color:#ffffff } .sC646A315 { width:14.54pt; display:inline-block } .s1720DE1F { width:132.75pt; display:inline-block } .s9852CA4C { width:7.54pt; display:inline-block } .s9E436411 { width:138.09pt; display:inline-block } .s4ACA9207 { page-break-before:always; clear:both; mso-break-type:section-break } .s6DB91820 { text-align:center } .s8BB62139 { margin-right:auto; margin-left:auto; border-collapse:collapse } .s2F3EB0E4 { border:0.75pt solid #838383; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .sDF237D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:8pt } .sE1A7A04C { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#424242 } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .sBAADFE8C { border:0.75pt solid #838383; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top }   FIFTH SECTION DECISION Application no. 22357/18 Oleg Olegovych LOSIKHIN against Ukraine and 6 other applications (see appended table) The European Court of Human Rights (Fifth Section), sitting on 19 June 2025 as a Committee composed of:   Andreas Zünd , President ,   Diana Sârcu,   Mykola Gnatovskyy , judges , and Viktoriya Maradudina, Acting Deputy Section Registrar, Having regard to the above applications lodged on the various dates indicated in the appended table, Having deliberated, decides as follows: FACTS AND PROCEDURE The list of the applicants is set out in the appendix. The applicants’ complaints under the Convention were communicated to the Ukrainian Government (“the Government”), who submitted observations on the admissibility and merits. The applicants were required to submit their observations in reply, however, the contact with the applicants was lost (see appended table for details). By letters sent via the Court’s Electronic Communication Service (eComms) and by registered post, the applicants were notified that the period allowed for submission of their observations had expired and that no extension of time had been requested (see appended table for dates and details). The applicants’ attention was drawn to Article   37   §   1   (a) of the Convention, which provides that the Court may strike an application out of its list of cases where the circumstances lead to the conclusion that the applicant does not intend to pursue the application. No reply followed. THE LAW Having regard to the similar procedural conduct of the applicants, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single decision. In the light of the foregoing, and in the absence of any special circumstances regarding respect for the rights guaranteed by the Convention and the Protocols thereto, the Court, in accordance with Article   37   §   1   (a) of the Convention, considers that it is no longer justified to continue the examination of the applications. Accordingly, the cases should be struck out of the list. For these reasons, the Court, unanimously, Decides to join the applications; Decides to strike the applications out of its list of cases. Done in English and notified in writing on 10 July 2025.     Viktoriya Maradudina   Andreas Zünd   Acting Deputy Registrar   President   APPENDIX List of applications No. Application no. Date of introduction Applicant Year of Birth Representative’s name   Main complaints raised Date of sending Government’s observations to the applicant Date of the Court strike-out warning letter 1. 22357/18 03/05/2018 Oleg Olegovych LOSIKHIN 1975   Article 6 § 1 - limitations on access to a court. 19/11/2024 (by eComms - not downloaded) 21/02/2025 (by registered post - returned undelivered) 2. 2467/19 11/12/2018 Oleksandr Vitaliyovych KUSHNARYOV 1953 Nataliya Gennadiyivna KUSHNARYOVA 1954 Fatima Raveyevna PAPURA 1974 Andriy Volodymyrovych KARKISHCHENKO Art. 2 (1) - ineffective investigation into death, caused by private parties or in circumstances that exclude involvement of State agents;   Article 6 § 1 -excessive length of criminal proceedings;   Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of excessive length of criminal proceedings 06/06/2023 (by eComms - not downloaded) 14/09/2023 (by eComms - not downloaded)   02/02/2024 (by registered post - delivered on 20/03/2024 and 29/03/2024) 3. 32123/19 07/06/2019 Volodymyr Valeriyovych MARDAR 1990 Ganna Yuriyivna STYRKUL Article 6 § 1 - limitations on access to a court 04/07/2024 (by eComms - not downloaded) 25/10/2014 (by eComms - not downloaded) and (by registered post - delivered on 22/11/2024)     4. 43694/19 14/08/2019 P.Y.K. 1971   Art. 8 (1) - Protection of private life in publications. 08/08/2024 (by eComms – downloaded on 08/08/2024) 06/11/2024 (by eComms - not downloaded)   15/01/2025 (by registered post - delivered on 07/02/2025) 5. 29332/20 19/06/2020 Ahmad FARAH 1956   Art. 1 of Pr. No. 1 – interference with the property rights in view of the confiscation of money by customs authorities 19/11/2024 (by regular post) 21/02/2025 (by registered post - returned undelivered) 6. 5809/24 19/02/2024 Sergiy Volodymyrovych VOLKOV 1961 Vladyslav Volodymyrovych OPANASYK Art. 3 - Inadequate medical treatment in detention;     Art. 5 (3) - excessive length of pre-trial detention. 19/11/2024 (by eComms - not downloaded)     21/02/2025 (by registered post - delivered on 14/03/2025) 7. 7774/24 11/03/2024 Dmytro Dmytrovych LELYK 1978 Sergiy Oleksandrovych KULBACH Art. 3 - inadequate conditions of detention;   Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of inadequate conditions of detention. 17/10/2024 (by eComms – partially downloaded)   21/01/2025 (by eComms – downloaded on 21/01/2025)