CEDH · CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG — 18 septembre 2025

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .sFE10DC93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s665E407E { margin-top:66pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .s34DFC730 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s2E932ED2 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:11pt } .s10950C61 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s82B4DA5F { page-break-before:right; clear:both; mso-break-type:section-break } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sB9D5CABB { width:28.35pt; display:inline-block } .s3AAE10DF { margin-top:14pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s3CA22BA { font-family:Arial; text-transform:uppercase } .s6B505E72 { margin:0pt; padding-left:0pt } .sDECD9755 { margin-left:11.67pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; padding-left:6.78pt; font-family:Arial; text-transform:uppercase } .sDA7B489D { margin-top:14pt; margin-left:15pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; padding-left:3.45pt; font-family:Arial; text-transform:uppercase } .s5C5C410E { margin-top:14pt; margin-left:18.34pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; padding-left:0.11pt; font-family:Arial; text-transform:uppercase } .s67CAFE05 { margin-top:14pt; margin-left:18.45pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-family:Arial; text-transform:uppercase } .s7C22C014 { margin-top:14pt; margin-left:16.34pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; padding-left:2.11pt; font-family:Arial; text-transform:uppercase } .sD11CFAB7 { margin-top:14pt; margin-left:15.01pt; margin-bottom:3pt; text-align:justify; padding-left:1.99pt; font-family:Arial } .sFBC99493 { font-style:italic } .sD58C010 { margin-top:14pt; margin-left:15.01pt; margin-bottom:3pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; padding-left:1.99pt; font-family:Arial } .s51DFF5CF { margin-top:0pt; margin-left:34pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:-17pt; text-align:justify } .sE5BF05B1 { width:2.33pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } .s2D9C6089 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s69DCC830 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sC986E16F { font-family:Arial; color:#ffffff } .sC646A315 { width:14.54pt; display:inline-block } .s6EC6BA2A { width:121.74pt; display:inline-block } .s9852CA4C { width:7.54pt; display:inline-block } .s9E436411 { width:138.09pt; display:inline-block } .s4ACA9207 { page-break-before:always; clear:both; mso-break-type:section-break } .sCC22C24E { font-family:Arial; color:#3e3e3e } .s6DB91820 { text-align:center } .s8BB62139 { margin-right:auto; margin-left:auto; border-collapse:collapse } .s3695F815 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .sDF237D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:8pt } .sEECE831 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .sC39F4804 { font-family:Arial; font-size:5.33pt; font-weight:bold; vertical-align:super; color:#474747 } .sE8934522 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s4F2ADFDB { text-align:center; font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; list-style-position:inside } .sBB6163A7 { width:2.48pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } .s9DF6E884 { height:81.55pt } .sF6A12959 { width:33%; height:1px; text-align:left } .s5FFF0A7E { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:8pt } .sA4BC3E2E { font-family:Arial; font-size:5.33pt; vertical-align:super; color:#000000 }       THIRD SECTION CASE OF KRYLOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA (Applications nos. 31688/21 and 35 others – see appended list)           JUDGMENT   STRASBOURG 18 September 2025       This judgment is final but it may be subject to editorial revision.   In the case of Krylov and Others v. Russia, The European Court of Human Rights (Third Section), sitting as a Committee composed of:   Diana Kovatcheva , President ,   Canòlic Mingorance Cairat,   Vasilka Sancin , judges , and Viktoriya Maradudina, Acting Deputy Section Registrar, Having deliberated in private on 28 August 2025, Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on that date: PROCEDURE 1.     The case originated in applications against Russia lodged with the Court under Article   34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) on the various dates indicated in the appended table. 2.     The Russian Government (“the   Government”) were given notice of the applications. THE FACTS 3.     The list of applicants and the relevant details of the applications are set out in the appended table. 4.     The applicants complained of the disproportionate measures taken against them as organisers or participants of public assemblies in connection with their participation in various public events in breach of COVID ‑ 19 ‑ related restrictions. They also raised other complaints under the provisions of the Convention. THE LAW JOINDER OF THE APPLICATIONS 5.     Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single judgment. JURISDICTION 6.     The Court observes that the facts giving rise to the alleged violations of the Convention occurred prior to 16 September 2022, the date on which the Russian Federation ceased to be a party to the Convention. The Court therefore decides that it has jurisdiction to examine the present applications (see Fedotova and Others v. Russia [GC], nos.   40792/10 and 2   others, §§   68 ‑ 73, 17   January 2023). ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE   11 OF THE CONVENTION 7.     The applicants complained principally of disproportionate measures taken against them as organisers or participants of public assemblies in connection with their participation in various public events in breach of COVID-19-related restrictions, namely their arrest in relation to the dispersal of these assemblies and their conviction for administrative offences. They relied, expressly or in substance, on Article 11 of the Convention. 8.     The Court refers to the principles established in its case-law regarding freedom of assembly (see Kudrevičius and Others v.   Lithuania [GC], no.   37553/05, ECHR 2015, with further references) and proportionality of interference with it (see Oya Ataman v.   Turkey , no.   74552/01, ECHR 2006‑XIV, and Hyde Park and Others v. Moldova , no.   33482/06, 31   March 2009). It further refers to Nemytov and Others, no.   1257/21 and 2   Others, 27   May 2025, in so far as the application by the authorities of the COVID ‑ 19 ‑ related restrictions to assemblies are concerned. 9.     In the leading case of Nemytov and Others ( cited above, §§   136-51) the Court found a violation in respect of issues similar to those in the present case (see further Frumkin v. Russia , no. 74568/12, ECHR 2016 (extracts), Navalnyy and Yashin v. Russia , no. 76204/11, 4 December 2014, and Kasparov and Others v. Russia , no. 21613/07, 3 October 2013). 10.     Having examined all the material submitted to it, the Court has not found any fact or argument capable of persuading it to reach a different conclusion as to the admissibility and merits of these complaints. Having regard to its case-law on the subject, the Court considers that in the instant case the interferences with the applicants’ freedom of assembly were not “necessary in a democratic society”. 11.     These complaints are therefore admissible and disclose a breach of Article 11 of the Convention. OTHER ALLEGED VIOLATIONS UNDER WELL-ESTABLISHED CASE-LAW 12.     Some applicants submitted other complaints which also raised issues under the Convention and its Protocols, given the relevant well-established case-law of the Court (see appended table). These complaints are not manifestly ill-founded within the meaning of Article   35   §   3 (a) of the Convention, nor are they inadmissible on any other ground. Accordingly, they must be declared admissible. 13.     Having examined all the material before it, the Court concludes that these complaints also disclose violations of the Convention and its Protocols in the light of its findings in Butkevich v. Russia , no.   5865/07, §§   63-65, 13   February 2018, Tsvetkova and Others v. Russia , nos.   54381/08 and 5   others, §§ 115-31, 10   April 2018, and Korneyeva v.   Russia , no.   72051/17, §§   34-36, 8   October 2019, as to various aspects of unlawful deprivation of liberty of organisers or participants of public assemblies; Karelin v.   Russia , no. 926/08, §§ 58-85, 20   September 2016, concerning the absence of a prosecuting party in the proceedings under the Code of Administrative Offences (the CAO); Novaya Gazeta and Others v. Russia , nos. 11884/22 and 161 others, §   111-19 and 125-127, 11   February 2025, relating to administrative conviction for public actions aimed at discrediting Russian military; and Martynyuk v.   Russia , no.   13764/15, §§ 38-42, 8 October 2019, relating to the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal against the sentence of administrative detention. REMAINING COMPLAINTS 14.     Some applicants raised further additional complaints under Article 6 of the Convention concerning other aspects of fairness of the administrative-offence proceedings. In view of the findings in paragraphs 9-13 above, the Court considers that there is no need to deal separately with these remaining complaints. APPLICATION OF ARTICLE 41 OF THE CONVENTION 15.     Regard being had to the documents in its possession and to its case ‑ law (see in particular Navalnyy and Others v. Russia [Committee], nos.   25809/17 and 14 others, §   22, 4   October 2022), the Court finds it reasonable to award the sums indicated in the appended table. FOR THESE REASONS, THE COURT, UNANIMOUSLY, Decides to join the applications; Holds that it has jurisdiction to deal with these applications as they relate to facts that took place before 16   September 2022; Declares the complaints under Article 11 of the Convention and the other complaints under the well-established case-law of the Court, as set out in the appended table, admissible, and finds that there is no need to examine separately the remaining complaints under Article 6 of the Convention; Holds that these applicants disclose a breach of Article   11 of the Convention; Holds that there has been a violation of the Convention and the Protocols thereto as regards the other complaints raised under the well-established case-law of the Court (see appended table); Holds (a)   that the respondent State is to pay the applicants, within three months, the amounts indicated in the appended table, to be converted into the currency of the respondent State at the rate applicable at the date of settlement; (b)   that from the expiry of the above-mentioned three months until settlement simple interest shall be payable on the above amounts at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points. Done in English, and notified in writing on 18 September 2025, pursuant to Rule   77   §§   2 and   3 of the Rules of Court.     Viktoriya Maradudina   Diana Kovatcheva   Acting Deputy Registrar   President     APPENDIX List of applications raising complaints under Article 11 of the Convention (disproportionate measures against organisers and participants of public assemblies) No. Application no. Date of introduction Applicant’s name Year of birth   Representative’s name and location Name of the public event Location Date Administrative / criminal offence Penalty Final domestic decision Court Name Date Other complaints under well-established case ‑ law Amount awarded for pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage and costs and expenses per applicant (in euros) [1]     31688/21 12/05/2021 Aleksandr Aleksandrovich KRYLOV 1961   Peredruk Aleksandr Dmitriyevich St Petersburg Rally is support of A. Navalnyy   St Petersburg   31/01/2021 article 20.2.2 § 1 of CAO administrative detention of 13 days St Petersburg City Court 10/02/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - arrest, escorting to a police station, detention between 31/01/2021 and 01/02/2021 as administrative suspect,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings,   Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - the sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant on 01/02/2021 was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO. 5,000     31695/21 12/05/2021 Aleksey Anatolyevich KARIKH 1991   Peredruk Aleksandr Dmitriyevich St Petersburg Rally is support of A. Navalnyy   St Petersburg   02/02/2021 article 20.2.2 § 1 of CAO administrative detention of 14 days St Petersburg City Court 11/02/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention in a police station between 02/02/2021 and 03/02/2021, for and after compiling an offence report,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings,   Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - the sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant on 03/02/2021 was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO. 5,000     37833/21 15/07/2021 Yuliya Leonidovna LYAPINA 1998   Voronov Sergey Sergeyevich St Petersburg Rally in support of A. Navalnyy   St Petersburg   31/01/2021 article 20.2.2 § 1 of CAO administrative detention of 10 days St Petersburg City Court 09/02/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - arrest, escorting to a police station and detention from 31/01/2021 until the court hearing on 02/02/2021 as administrative suspect, for and after compiling an offence report,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings,   Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - the sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant on 02/02/2021 was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO. 5,000     40678/21 25/07/2021 Denis Aleksandrovich MIKHAYLOV 1996   Mikhaylova Varvara Dmitriyevna St Petersburg Rally to support A. Navalnyy   St Petersburg   31/01/2021 article 20.2.2 § 1 of CAO administrative detention of 7 days St Petersburg City Court 21/04/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - arrest, escorting to a police station 19/04/2021 for compiling an offence report in relation to the rally on 31/01/2021,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings,   Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - the sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant on 19/04/2021 was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO. 5,000     43279/21 09/08/2021 Alina Alekseyevna PUTILOVSKAYA 1997   Semenov Daniil Aleksandrovich St Petersburg Rally in support of A. Navalnyy   St Petersburg   31/01/2021 article 20.2.2 § 1 of CAO administrative detention of 10 days St Petersburg City Court 10/02/2021 Art. 5 (1) – unlawful detention - arrest, escorting and detention between 31/01/2021 to 02/02/2021 as administrative suspect, pending trial, after the offence record had been compiled,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings,   Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - the sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant on 02/02/2021 was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO. 5,000     45804/21 03/09/2021 Aleksandr Mikhaylovich IVANOV 1999   Zyryanova Mariya Sergeyevna St Petersburg Rally in support of A. Navalnyy   St Petersburg   31/01/2021 article 20.2.2. § 1 of CAO administrative detention of 8 days St Petersburg City Court 04/03/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention- arrest, escorting to a police station, detention between 31/01/2021 and 01/02/2021 as administrative suspect, pending trial, after the offence record had been compiled,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings   Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - the sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant on 01/02/2021 was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO. 5,000     46230/21 01/09/2021 Ilya Alekseyevich NOVOSELOV 1987   Peredruk Aleksandr Dmitriyevich St Petersburg Rally to support A. Navalnyy   St Petersburg   31/01/2021 article 20.2.2 § 1 of CAO administrative detention of 10 days St Petersburg City Court 23/03/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention- arrest, escorting to a police station, detention between 31/01/2021 and 02/02/2021 as administrative suspect, pending trial, after the offence record had been compiled,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings   Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - the sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant on 02/02/2021 was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO. 5,000     47709/21 15/09/2021 Gavriil Igorevich BYUTNER 2000   Mikhaylova Varvara Dmitriyevna St Petersburg Rally in support of A. Navalnyy   St Petersburg   31/01/2021 article 20.2.2. § 1 of CAO fine of RUB   10,000 St Petersburg City Court 16/03/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention – arrest, escorting to a police station, detention from 31/01/2021 to 01/02/2021 for and after drawing up an administrative offence record,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. 4,000     48242/21 15/09/2021 Viktor Vladimirovich SKALSKIY 1983   Nepovinnova Yana Andreyevna St Petersburg Rally in support of A. Navalnyy   St Petersburg   21/04/2021 article 20.2.2 § 1 of CAO fine of RUB   15,000 St Petersburg City Court 22/06/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - arrest, escorting to a police station, detention between 21/04/2021 and 22/04/2021 as administrative suspect, pending trial, after the offence record had been compiled,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. 4,000   48244/21 15/09/2021 Aleksandr Sergeyevich AKHNEVSKIY 1996   Nepovinnova Yana Andreyevna St Petersburg Rally in support of A. Navalnyy   St Petersburg   21/04/2021 article 20.2.2. § 1 of CAO administrative detention of 3 days St Petersburg City Court 22/06/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - arrest, escorting to a police station, detention between 21/04/2021 and 22/04/2021 as administrative suspect, pending trial, after the offence record had been compiled,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. 5,000   48897/21 14/09/2021 Nikita Nikolayevich DEMIDOV 1991   Shiolashvili Mikhail Germanovich St Petersburg Rally in support of A. Navalnyy   St Petersburg, Sennaya square   31/01/2021 article 20.2.2 § 1 of CAO administrative detention of 8 days St Petersburg City Court 18/03/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - arrest, escorting to a police station, detention between 31/01/2021 to 01/02/2021 as administrative suspect, pending trial, after the offence record had been compiled,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings,   Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - the sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant on 01/02/2021 was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO. 5,000   59473/21 02/12/2021 Artem Aleksandrovich IVANOV 1995   Kamakin Maksim Ivanovich St Petersburg Rally in support of A. Navalnyy   St Petersburg   31/01/2021 article 20.2.2. § 1 of CAO fine of RUB   13,000 St Petersburg City Court 08/06/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention- arrest, escorting to a police station, detention between 31/01/2021 and 01/02/2021 as administrative suspect, pending trial, after the offence record had been compiled,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. 4,000   60878/21 03/12/2021 Darya Aleksandrovna DENISOVA 1992   Kamakin Maksim Ivanovich St Petersburg Rally in support of A. Navalnyy ”   St Petersburg   31/01/2021 article 20.2.2. § 1 of CAO fine of RUB   13,000 St Petersburg City Court 08/06/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention- arrest, escorting to a police station, detention between 31/01/2021 and 01/02/2021 as administrative suspect, pending trial, after the offence record had been compiled,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. 4,000   6342/22 24/12/2021 Chingizkhan Azizbayevich RAKHMATULLAYEV 1996   Memorial Human Rights Centre Moscow Rally in support of A. Navalnyy   St Petersburg   21/04/2021 article 20.2.2 § 1 of CAO administrative detention of 1 day St Petersburg City Court 24/06/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - arrest, escorting to and detention at the police station between 21/04/2021 and 23/04/2021 after compiling an offence report,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. 5,000   13915/22 08/02/2022 Stanislav Vasilyevich TANANUSHKO 1994   Mikhaylova Varvara Dmitriyevna St Petersburg Rally in support of A. Navalnyy   St Petersburg   31/01/2021 article 20.2 § 2 of CAO administrative detention for 10 days St Petersburg City Court 10/08/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention – arrest, escorting to a police station, detention between 31/01/2021 and 01/02/2021 as administrative suspect, pending trial and after the offence record had been compiled,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. 5,000   36805/22 16/07/2022 Viktor Viktorovich SABLUK 1997   Zyryanova Mariya Sergeyevna St Petersburg Anti-war rally   St Petersburg   06/03/2022 article 20.2.2 § 1 of CAO administrative detention of 10 days St Petersburg City Court 16/03/2022 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - arrest, escorting to the police station and detention between 06/03/2022 and 07/03/2022 as administrative suspect, pending trial and after the offence record had been compiled,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. 5,000   36811/22 14/07/2022 Karina Romanovna KIM 2002   Loktev Sergey Aleksandrovich St Petersburg Anti-war rally   St Petersburg   25/02/2022     Anti-war rally   St Petersburg   28/02/2022 article 20.2.2. § 1 of CAO             article 20.2.2. § 1 of CAO fine of RUB   20,000             fine of RUB   10,000 St Petersburg City Court 26/04/2022           St Petersburg City Court 12/04/2022 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence record (i) between 25/02/2022 and 26/02/2022 as administrative suspect, pending trial and after the offence record was compiled, and (ii) between 28/02/2022 and 01/03/2022 as administrative suspect, pending trial and after the offence record was compiled,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - both sets of proceedings. 4,000   36855/22 16/07/2022 Sergey Valeryevich DOGAYEV 2000   Zyryanova Mariya Sergeyevna St Petersburg Anti-war rally   St Petersburg   06/03/2022 article 20.2.2 § 1 of CAO administrative detention of 1 day St Petersburg City Court 16/03/2022 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - arrest, escorting to a police station, detention between 06/03/2022 and 07/03/2022 as administrative suspect, pending trial and after the offence record had been compiled,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. 5,000   37062/22 15/07/2022 Kirill Yevgenyevich ZHIGALIN 1995   Zyryanova Mariya Sergeyevna St Petersburg Anti-war rally   St Petersburg   06/03/2022 article 20.2.2 § 1 of CAO administrative detention of 10 days St Petersburg City Court 15/03/2022 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - arrest, escorting to the police station and detention between 06/03/2022 and 07/03/2022 as administrative suspect, pending trial and after the offence record had been compiled,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. 5,000   38779/22 28/07/2022 Aleksandra Yuryevna SKOCHILENKO 1990   Mikhaylova Varvara Dmitriyevna St Petersburg Anti-war rally   Saint-Petersburg   03/03/2022 article 20.2.2. § 1 of CAO fine of RUB   10,000 St-Petersburg City Court 12/04/2022 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - arrest, escorting to a police station, detention between 03/03/2022 and 04/03/2022 as administrative suspect, pending trial and after the offence record had been drawn up,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. 4,000   40967/22 11/08/2022 Samat Liantovich KHAMIDULIN 1992   Zyryanova Mariya Sergeyevna St Petersburg Anti-war rally   St Petersburg   06/03/2022 article 20.2.2 § 1 of CAO administrative detention of 5 days St Petersburg City Court 12/04/2022 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - arrest, escorting to the police station and detention between 06/03/2022 and 07/03/2022 as administrative suspect, pending trial and after the offence record had been compiled,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings,   Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - the sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant on 07/03/2022 was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of appeal under the CAO. 5,000   41019/22 11/08/2022 Ilya Mikhaylovich DOLNIKOV 1999   Zyryanova Mariya Sergeyevna St Petersburg Anti-war rally   St Petersburg   06/03/2022 article 20.2.2 § 1 of CAO administrative detention of 12 days St Petersburg City Court 12/04/2022 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - arrest, escorting to the police station and detention between 06/03/2022 and 07/03/2022 as administrative suspect, pending trial and after the offence record had been compiled,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings,   Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - the sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant on 07/03/2022 was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO. 5,000   41067/22 11/08/2022 Kirill Yuryevich KUCHKOV 1998   Zyryanova Mariya Sergeyevna St Petersburg Anti-war rally   St Petersburg   06/03/2022 article 20.2.2 § 1 of CAO administrative detention for 10 days St Petersburg City Court 12/04/2022 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - arrest, escorting to the police station and detention between 06/03/2022 and 07/03/2022 as administrative suspect, pending trial and after the offence record had been compiled,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings,   Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - the sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant on 07/03/2022 was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO. 5,000   41299/22 11/08/2022 Aleksandra Olegovna DREVAL 1999   Zyryanova Mariya Sergeyevna St Petersburg Anti-war rally   St Petersburg   06/03/2022 article 20.2.2 § 1 of CAO administrative detention of 10 days St Petersburg City Court 12/04/2022 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - arrest, escorting to a police station, detention between 06/03/2022 and 07/03/2022 as administrative suspect, pending trial and after the offence record had been compiled,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings,   Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - the sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant on 07/03/2022 was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO. 5,000   41303/22 11/08/2022 Kirill Aleksandrovich OREKHOV 1997   Bochilo Anna Yevgenyevna Barnaul Anti-war protest   St Petersburg   24/02/2022 article 20.2.2 § 1 of CAO fine of RUB   10,000 St Petersburg City Court 12/04/2022 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - arrest, escorting to the police station and detention between 24/02/2022 and 25/02/2022 as administrative suspect, pending trial and after the offence record had been compiled,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. 4,000   41304/22 11/08/2022 Viktoriya Sergeyevna MATSKEVICH 1993   Bochilo Anna Yevgenyevna Barnaul Anti-war rally   St Petersburg   26/02/2022 article 20.2.2 § 1 of CAO fine of RUB   10,000 St Petersburg City Court 21/04/2022 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - arrest, escorting to the police station and detention between 26/02/2022 and 28/02/2022 as administrative suspect, pending trial and after the offence record had been compiled,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. 4,000   41307/22 12/08/2022 Matvey Alekseyevich GOMON 2000   Zyryanova Mariya Sergeyevna St Petersburg Anti-war rally   St Peterburg   06/03/2022 article 20.2.2 § 1 of CAO administrative detention 10 days St Petersburg City Court 12/04/2022 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - arrest, escorting to the police station and detention between 06/03/2022 and 07/03/2022 as administrative suspect, pending trial and after the offence record had been compiled,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings,   Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - The sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant on 07/03/2022 was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO. 5,000   41309/22 11/08/2022 Anna Vasilyevna VORONCHIKHINA 1999   Zyryanova Mariya Sergeyevna St Petersburg Anti-war rally   St Petersburg   06/03/2022 article 20.2.2 § 1 of CAO administrative detention of 8 days St Petersburg City Court 12/04/2022 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - arrest, escorting to the police station and detention between 06/03/2022 and 07/03/2022 as administrative suspect, pending trial and after the offence record had been compiled,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings,   Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - the sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant on 07/03/2022 was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO. 5,000   41310/22 11/08/2022 Stanislav Maksimovich BAKLANOV 1996   Zyryanova Mariya Sergeyevna St Petersburg Anti-war rally   St Petersburg   06/03/2022 article 20.2.2 § 1 of CAO administrative detention of 7 days St Petersburg City Court 12/04/2022 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - arrest, escorting to the police station and detention between 06/03/2022 and 07/03/2022 as administrative suspect, pending trial and after the offence record had been compiled,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings,   Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - the sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant on 07/03/2022 was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO. 5,000   41730/22 11/08/2022 Darya Igorevna DRESVYANSKAYA 1989   Zyryanova Mariya Sergeyevna St Petersburg Anti-war rally   St Petersburg   06/03/2022 article 20.2.2 § 1 of CAO fine of RUB   10,000 St Petersburg City Court 12/04/2022 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - arrest, escorting to the police station and detention between 06/03/2022 and 07/03/2022 as administrative suspect, pending trial and after the offence record had been compiled,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. 4,000   41822/22 11/08/2022 Alina Aleksandrovna GREBINA 2000   Zyryanova Mariya Sergeyevna St Petersburg Anti-war rally   St Petersburg   06/03/2022 article 20.2.2 § 1 of CAO fine of RUB   15,000 St Petersburg City Court 12/04/2022 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - arrest, escorting to the police station and detention between 06/03/2022 and 07/03/2022 as administrative suspect, pending trial and after the offence record had been compiled,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. 4,000   44417/22 19/08/2022 Oleg Sergeyevich KADNIKOV 1991   Ivanov Nikifor Yuryevich St Petersburg Anti-war rally   St Petersburg   06/03/2022 article 20.2.2. § 1 of CAO administrative detention of 3 days St Petersburg City Court 19/04/2022 Art. 5 (1) - arrest, escorting to the police station and detention between 06/03/2022 and 07/03/2022 as administrative suspect, pending trial and after the offence record had been compiled,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings,   Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - the sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant on 07/03/2022 was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO. 5,000   44422/22 19/08/2022 Maksim Igorevich MAKSIMOV 1999   Ivanov Nikifor Yuryevich St Petersburg Anti-war rally   St Petersburg   24/02/2022 article 20.2.2 § 1 of CAO fine of RUB   10,000 St Petersburg City Court 19/04/2022 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - arrest, escorting to the police station and detention between 24/02/2022 and 25/02/2022 as administrative suspect, pending trial and after the offence record had been compiled,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. 4,000   44552/22 19/08/2022 Olga Vyacheslavovna PALCHIKOVA 1968   Krikun Leonid Leonidovich St Petersburg Anti-war rally   St Petersburg   24/02/2022 article 20.2.2. § 1 of CAO fine of RUB   10,000 St Petersburg City Court 19/04/2022 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - arrest, escorting to a police station, detention between 24/02/2022 and 25/02/2022 as administrative suspect, pending trial, and after the offence record had been compiled,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. 4,000   46151/22 15/09/2022 Daniil Vladislavovich BAYGOZIN 1992   Mikhaylova Varvara Dmitriyevna St Petersburg Anti-war rally   St Petersburg   27/02/2022 article 20.2.2. § 1 of CAO fine of RUB   10,000 St Petersburg City Court 17/05/2022 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - arrest, escorting to a police station, detention from 27/02/2022 to the evening of 28/02/2022, for and after compiling the offence record;   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. 4,000   922/23 02/12/2022 Natalya Viktorovna VAKUTINA 1969   Dadayeva Yekaterina Viktorovna St Petersburg Anti-war rally   St Petersburg   06/03/2022 article 20.2.2 § 1 of CAO   and   article 20.3.3 § 1 of the CAO administrative detention of 5 days St Petersburg City Court 02/08/2022   Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - arrest, escorting to a police station, detention between 06/03/2022 and 07/03/2022 as administrative suspect, pending trial and after the offence record had been compiled,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings,   Art. 10 (1) - various restrictions on the right to freedom of expression - conviction under article 20.3.3 § 1 of the CAO for displaying a placard "No to War" which authorities deemed to discredit the Russian Armed Forces. 5,000     [1] Plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicants.