CEDH · CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG — 18 septembre 2025

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .sFE10DC93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s665E407E { margin-top:66pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .s34DFC730 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s2E932ED2 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:11pt } .s82B4DA5F { page-break-before:right; clear:both; mso-break-type:section-break } .s10950C61 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sB9D5CABB { width:28.35pt; display:inline-block } .s3AAE10DF { margin-top:14pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s3CA22BA { font-family:Arial; text-transform:uppercase } .s6B505E72 { margin:0pt; padding-left:0pt } .sDECD9755 { margin-left:11.67pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; padding-left:6.78pt; font-family:Arial; text-transform:uppercase } .sDA7B489D { margin-top:14pt; margin-left:15pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; padding-left:3.45pt; font-family:Arial; text-transform:uppercase } .s5C5C410E { margin-top:14pt; margin-left:18.34pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; padding-left:0.11pt; font-family:Arial; text-transform:uppercase } .s67CAFE05 { margin-top:14pt; margin-left:18.45pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-family:Arial; text-transform:uppercase } .s7C22C014 { margin-top:14pt; margin-left:16.34pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; padding-left:2.11pt; font-family:Arial; text-transform:uppercase } .sD11CFAB7 { margin-top:14pt; margin-left:15.01pt; margin-bottom:3pt; text-align:justify; padding-left:1.99pt; font-family:Arial } .sFBC99493 { font-style:italic } .sD58C010 { margin-top:14pt; margin-left:15.01pt; margin-bottom:3pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; padding-left:1.99pt; font-family:Arial } .s51DFF5CF { margin-top:0pt; margin-left:34pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:-17pt; text-align:justify } .sE5BF05B1 { width:2.33pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } .s2D9C6089 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s69DCC830 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sC986E16F { font-family:Arial; color:#ffffff } .sC646A315 { width:14.54pt; display:inline-block } .s6EC6BA2A { width:121.74pt; display:inline-block } .s9852CA4C { width:7.54pt; display:inline-block } .s9E436411 { width:138.09pt; display:inline-block } .s4ACA9207 { page-break-before:always; clear:both; mso-break-type:section-break } .sCC22C24E { font-family:Arial; color:#3e3e3e } .s6DB91820 { text-align:center } .s8BB62139 { margin-right:auto; margin-left:auto; border-collapse:collapse } .s2F3EB0E4 { border:0.75pt solid #838383; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .sDF237D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:8pt } .sE1A7A04C { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#424242 } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .sAB95A5CB { font-family:Arial; font-size:5.33pt; font-weight:bold; vertical-align:super; color:#424242 } .sBAADFE8C { border:0.75pt solid #838383; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s4F2ADFDB { text-align:center; font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; list-style-position:inside } .sBB6163A7 { width:2.48pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } .s4D98C120 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:6pt; text-align:center; font-size:8pt } .sF6A12959 { width:33%; height:1px; text-align:left } .s5FFF0A7E { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:8pt } .sA4BC3E2E { font-family:Arial; font-size:5.33pt; vertical-align:super; color:#000000 }       THIRD SECTION CASE OF KOBLIKOVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA (Applications nos. 32183/21 and 36 others – see appended list)             JUDGMENT   STRASBOURG 18 September 2025   This judgment is final but it may be subject to editorial revision. In the case of Koblikova and Others v. Russia, The European Court of Human Rights (Third Section), sitting as a Committee composed of:   Diana Kovatcheva , President ,   Canòlic Mingorance Cairat,   Vasilka Sancin , judges , and Viktoriya Maradudina, Acting Deputy Section Registrar, Having deliberated in private on 28 August 2025, Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on that date: PROCEDURE 1.     The case originated in applications against Russia lodged with the Court under Article   34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) on the various dates indicated in the appended table. 2.     The Russian Government (“the   Government”) were given notice of the applications. THE FACTS 3.     The list of applicants and the relevant details of the applications are set out in the appended table. 4.     The applicants complained of the disproportionate measures taken against them as organisers or participants of public assemblies in connection with their participation in various public events in St Petersburg in breach of COVID-19-related restrictions. They also raised other complaints under the provisions of the Convention. THE LAW JOINDER OF THE APPLICATIONS 5.     Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single judgment. JURISDICTION 6.     The Court observes that the facts giving rise to the alleged violations of the Convention occurred prior to 16 September 2022, the date on which the Russian Federation ceased to be a party to the Convention. The Court therefore decides that it has jurisdiction to examine the present applications (see Fedotova and Others v. Russia [GC], nos.   40792/10 and 2   others, §§   68 ‑ 73, 17   January 2023). ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE   11 OF THE CONVENTION 7.     The applicants complained principally of disproportionate measures taken against them as organisers or participants of public assemblies in connection with their participation in various public events in breach of COVID-19-related restrictions, namely their arrest in relation to the dispersal of these assemblies and their conviction for administrative offences. They relied, expressly or in substance, on Article 11 of the Convention. 8.     The Court refers to the principles established in its case-law regarding freedom of assembly (see Kudrevičius and Others v.   Lithuania [GC], no.   37553/05, ECHR 2015, with further references) and proportionality of interference with it (see Oya Ataman v.   Turkey , no.   74552/01, ECHR 2006‑XIV, and Hyde Park and Others v. Moldova , no.   33482/06, 31   March 2009). It further refers to Nemytov and Others, no.   1257/21 and 2   Others, 27   May 2025, in so far as the application by the authorities of the COVID ‑ 19 ‑ related restrictions to assemblies are concerned. 9.     In the leading case of Nemytov and Others ( cited above, §§   136-151) the Court found a violation in respect of issues similar to those in the present case (see further Frumkin v. Russia , no. 74568/12, ECHR 2016 (extracts), Navalnyy and Yashin v. Russia , no. 76204/11, 4 December 2014, and Kasparov and Others v. Russia , no. 21613/07, 3 October 2013). 10.     Having examined all the material submitted to it, the Court has not found any fact or argument capable of persuading it to reach a different conclusion as to the admissibility and merits of these complaints. Having regard to its case-law on the subject, the Court considers that in the instant case the interferences with the applicants’ freedom of assembly were not “necessary in a democratic society”. 11.     These complaints are therefore admissible and disclose a breach of Article 11 of the Convention. OTHER ALLEGED VIOLATIONS UNDER WELL-ESTABLISHED CASE-LAW 12.     Some applicants submitted other complaints which also raised issues under the Convention and its Protocols, given the relevant well-established case-law of the Court (see appended table). These complaints are not manifestly ill-founded within the meaning of Article 35 § 3 (a) of the Convention, nor are they inadmissible on any other ground. Accordingly, they must be declared admissible. 13.     Having examined all the material before it, the Court concludes that these complaints also disclose violations of the Convention and its Protocols in the light of its findings in Butkevich v. Russia , no.   5865/07, §§   63-65, 13   February 2018, Tsvetkova and Others v. Russia , nos.   54381/08 and 5   others, §§ 115-31, 10   April 2018, and Korneyeva v.   Russia , no.   72051/17, §§   34-36, 8   October 2019, as to various aspects of unlawful deprivation of liberty of organisers or participants of public assemblies; Karelin v.   Russia , no. 926/08, §§ 58-85, 20   September 2016, concerning the absence of a prosecuting party in the proceedings under the Code of Administrative Offences (the CAO); Novaya Gazeta and Others v. Russia , nos. 11884/22 and 161 others, §   111-19 and 125-27, 11   February 2025, relating to administrative conviction for public actions aimed at discrediting Russian military; and Martynyuk v.   Russia , no.   13764/15, §§ 38-42, 8 October 2019, relating to the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal against the sentence of administrative detention. REMAINING COMPLAINTS 14.     Some applicants raised further additional complaints under Article 6 of the Convention concerning various aspects of fairness of the administrative-offence proceedings. In view of the findings in paragraphs   9 ‑ 13 above, the Court considers that there is no need to deal separately with these remaining complaints. APPLICATION OF ARTICLE 41 OF THE CONVENTION 15.     Regard being had to the documents in its possession and to its case ‑ law (see in particular Navalnyy and Others v. Russia [Committee], nos.   25809/17 and 14 others, §   22, 4   October 2022), the Court finds it reasonable to award the sums indicated in the appended table. FOR THESE REASONS, THE COURT, UNANIMOUSLY, Decides to join the applications; Holds that it has jurisdiction to deal with these applications as they relate to facts that took place before 16   September 2022; Declares the complaints under Article 11 of the Convention and the other complaints under the well-established case-law of the Court, as set out in the appended table, admissible, and finds that there is no need to examine separately the remaining complaints under Article 6 of the Convention; Holds that these applications disclose a breach of Article   11 of the Convention; Holds that there has been a violation of the Convention and the Protocols thereto as regards the other complaints raised under the well-established case-law of the Court (see appended table); Holds (a)   that the respondent State is to pay the applicants, within three months, the amounts indicated in the appended table, to be converted into the currency of the respondent State at the rate applicable at the date of settlement; (b)   that from the expiry of the above-mentioned three months until settlement simple interest shall be payable on the above amounts at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points. Done in English, and notified in writing on 18 September 2025, pursuant to Rule   77   §§   2 and   3 of the Rules of Court.     Viktoriya Maradudina   Diana Kovatcheva   Acting Deputy Registrar   President     APPENDIX List of applications raising complaints under Article 11 of the Convention (disproportionate measures against organisers and participants of public assemblies) No. Application no. Date of introduction Applicant’s name Year of birth   Representative’s name and location Name of the public event Location Date Administrative / criminal offence Penalty Final domestic decision Court Name Date Other complaints under well-established case-law Amount awarded for pecuniary and non ‑ pecuniary damage and costs and expenses per applicant (in euros) [1]     32183/21 11/06/2021 Mariya Dmitriyevna KOBLIKOVA 1993   Memorial Human Rights Centre Moscow Rally in support of A. Navalnyy   St Petersburg   31/01/2021   Rally in support of A. Navalnyy   St Petersburg   21/04/2021 article 20.2.2 § 1 of CAO           article 20.2.2. § 4 of CAO fine of RUB   10,000             administrative detention of 10 days St Petersburg City Court 09/03/2021         St Petersburg City Court 28/04/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - arrest, escorting to a police station, detention (i) between 31/01/2021 and 01/02/2021   and (ii) between 21/04/2021 and 22/04/2021 as administrative suspect, pending trial, after the offence report had been compiled,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - both sets of proceedings,   Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - the sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant on 22/04/2021 was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO. 5,000     36968/21 16/07/2021 Mikhail Vladimirovich IVANOV 1991   Memorial Human Rights Centre Moscow Rally in support of A. Navalnyy   St Petersburg   23/01/2021 article 20.2.2 § 1 of CAO fine of RUB   10,000 St Petersburg City Court 23/03/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - arrest, escorting to a police station, detention between 23/01/2021and 24/01/2021 for and after the offence record had been compiled,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. 4,000     38673/21 15/07/2021 Alena Viktorovna GRIGORYEVA 2000   Memorial Human Rights Centre Moscow Rally in support of A. Navalnyy   St Petersburg   31/01/2021 article 20.2.2. § 1 of CAO fine of RUB   15,000 St Petersburg City Court 08/04/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - arrest, escorting to a police station, detention between 31/01/2021and 01/02/2021 as administrative suspect, pending trial, after the offence record had been compiled,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. 4,000     39227/21 22/07/2021 Ruslan Rustamovich ULDANOV 1994   Loktev Sergey Aleksandrovich St Petersburg Rally in support of A. Navalnyy   St Petersburg   31/01/2021 article 20.2.2 § 1 of CAO administrative detention of 10 days St Petersburg City Court 02/03/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - arrest, escorting to a police station, detention between 31/01/2021and 01/02/2021 as administrative suspect, pending trial, after the offence record had been compiled,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings,   Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - the sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant on 01/02/2021 was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO. 5,000     39891/21 27/07/2021 Mariya Valeryevna MAYOROVA 1998   Memorial Human Rights Centre Moscow Rally in support of A. Navalnyy   St Petersburg   02/02/2021 article 20.2.2 § 1 of CAO administrative detention of 4 days St Petersburg City Court 09/03/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - arrest, escorting to a police station, detention on 03/02/2021 for the sole purpose of drawing up an administrative offence record, and after such record was compiled, pending the first-instance court hearing,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings   Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - the sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant on 03/02/2021 was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO. 5,000     40061/21 27/07/2021 Ilya Maksimovich GUSEV 1995   Memorial Human Rights Centre Moscow Rally in support of A. Navalnyy   St Petersburg   31/01/2021 article 20.2.2 § 1 of CAO fine of RUB   10,000 St Petersburg City Court 25/03/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - arrest, escorting to a police station, detention between 31/01/2021 and 01/02/2021 as administrative suspect, pending trial, after the offence record had been compiled,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. 4,000     47102/21 15/09/2021 Ilgiz Shamilevich TAKTASHOV 1970   Zhdanov Ivan Yuryevich Vilnius Rally in support of A. Navalnyy   St Petersburg   31/01/2021 article 20.2.2 § 1 of CAO fine of RUB   10,000 St Petersburg City Court 25/03/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - arrest and detention from 1.20 p.m. on 31/01/2021 to 2 a.m. on 01/02/2021 for and after drawing up an administrative offence record,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. 4,000     48204/21 24/09/2021 Mariyem Shakhidovna SAYEDA 2001   Memorial Human Rights Centre Moscow Rally in support of A. Navalnyy   St Petersburg   31/01/2021 article 20.2.2 § 1 of CAO fine of RUB   10,000 St Petersburg City Court 20/04/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station between 2:00 p.m. on 31/01/2021 and 03:45 a.m. on 01/02/2021for and after compiling an offence record,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. 4,000     50389/21 30/09/2021 Elmira Ravilyevna DEYNIKOVA 1999   Zyryanova Mariya Sergeyevna St Petersburg Rally in support of A. Navalnyy   St Petersburg   31/01/2021 article 20.2.2 § 1 of CAO fine of RUB   20,000 St Petersburg City Court 01/04/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - arrest, escorting to a police station, detention between 31/01/2021 and 01/02/2021 as administrative suspect, pending trial, after the offence record had been compiled,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings was based. 4,000   51395/21 30/09/2021 Artur Yuryevich KARPUKHIN 1994   Memorial Human Rights Centre Moscow Rally in support of A. Navalnyy   St Petersburg   31/01/2021 article 20.2.2 § 1 of CAO fine of RUB   10,000 St Petersburg City Court 06/04/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation detention - arrest, escorting to a police station, detention between 31/01/2021 and 01/02/2021 as administrative suspect, pending trial, and after the offence record had been compiled,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. 4,000   4558/22 17/12/2021 Aleksey Alekseyevich SEDOV 2002   Memorial Human Rights Centre Moscow Rally in support of A. Navalnyy   St Petersburg   31/01/2021     Anti-war rally   St Petersburg   13/03/2022 article 20.2.2. § 1 of CAO             article 20.2.2. § 4 of CAO fine of RUB   10,000               fine of RUB   150,000 St Petersburg City Court 27/07/2021           St Petersburg City Court 12/07/2022 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - arrest, escorting to a police station, detention between 13/03/2022 and 14/03/2022 as administrative suspect, pending trial and after the offence record had been compiled,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - both sets of proceedings. 4,000   13988/22 17/02/2022 Anastasiya Vasilyevna KAZANOVA 1997   Podolskiy Sergey Viktorovich St Petersburg Rally in support of A. Navalnyy   St Petersburg   21/04/2021 article 20.2.2. § 1 of CAO detention for 4 days St Peterburg City Court 24/08/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station between 21/04/2021 and 22/04/2021 as administrative suspect, pending trial and after compiling an offence report,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings,   Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - the sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO. 5,000   28654/22 27/05/2022 Yakov Andreyevich VARNAYEV 2001   Sirinova Olga Vladimirovna St Petersburg Anti-war rally   St Petersburg   02/03/2022 article 20.2.2. § 1 of CAO fine of RUB   10,000 St Petersburg City Court 07/04/2022 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence record between 02/03/2022 and 03/03/2022   4,000   28667/22 27/05/2022 Dmitriy Vladimirovich GAVRIKOV 1999   Sirinova Olga Vladimirovna St Petersburg Anti-war rally   St Petersburg   02/03/2022 article 20.2.2. § 1 of CAO fine of RUB   10,000 St Petersburg City Court 07/04/2022 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence record between 8:30 p.m. on 02/03/2022 and 2:00 p.m. on 03/03/2022. 4,000   30219/22 31/05/2022 Valeriya Aleksandrovna KOTOVA 1988   Baranova Natalya Andreyevna Moscow Anti-war rally   St Petersburg   27/02/2022 article 20.2.2 § 1 of CAO administrative detention of 8 days St Petersburg City Court 22/03/2022 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - arrest, escorting to the police station, detention between 27/02/2022 and 28/02/2022 as administrative suspect, pending trial, after the offence record had been compiled,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings,   Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - the sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant on 28/02/2022 was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO. 5,000   33204/22 16/06/2022 Ariadna Yevgenyevna SAPOZHINSKAYA 1994   Baranova Natalya Andreyevna Moscow Anti-war rally   St Petersburg   28/02/2022 article 20.2.2 § 1 of CAO fine of RUB   10,000 St Petersburg City Court 22/03/2022 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - arrest, escorting to and detention at the police station from 28/02/2022 to 01/03/2022 as administrative suspect, pending trial and after the offence record had been compiled,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. 4,000   33259/22 07/06/2022 Darya Nikolayevna PANOVA 1996   Baranova Natalya Andreyevna Moscow Anti-war rally   St Petersburg   06/03/2022 article 20.2.2 § 1 of CAO administrative detention of 10 days St Petersburg City Court 29/03/2022 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - arrest, escorting to the police station, detention between 06/03/2022 and 07/03/2022 as administrative suspect, pending trial and after the offence record had been compiled,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings,   Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - the sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO. 5,000   33301/22 18/06/2022 Yekaterina Romanovna TSAREGORODTSEVA 1988   Baranova Natalya Andreyevna Moscow Anti-war rally   St Petersburg   06/03/2022 article 20.2.2 § 1 of CAO administrative detention of 3 days St Petersburg City Court 05/04/2022 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - arrest, escorting to a police station and detention between 06/03/2022 and 07/03/2022 as administrative suspect, pending trial, after the offence record had been compiled,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings,   Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - the sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant on 07/03/2022 was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO. 5,000   35392/22 08/07/2022 Yuliya Vadimovna ZABOLOTSKIKH 2001       Rally in support of A. Navalnyy   St Petersburg   21/04/2021 article 20.2.2 § 1 of CAO By the judgment of the first- instance court of 22/04/2021 the applicant was convicted as charged and sentenced to administrative detention of 8   days (served in full),   after one round of quashing and a fresh examination of the case, the proceedings were discontinued by the appeal court for the expiry of the prosecution period. St   Petersburg City Court 13/03/2022   proceedings discontinued on account of the expiry of the prosecution period   Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - arrest, escorting to a police station, detention between 21/04/2021 and 22/04/2021 as administrative suspect, pending trial and after the offence record had been compiled,   Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - the sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant on 22/04/2021 was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO.   5,000   36412/22 10/07/2022 Yana Sergeyevna SOSNOVSKIKH 1994   Baranova Natalya Andreyevna Moscow Anti-war rally   St Petersburg   03/03/2022 article 20.2.2. § 1 of CAO administrative detention of 15 days St Petersburg City Court 11/03/2022 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - arrest, escorting to a police station, detention between 03/03/2022 and 04/03/2022 as administrative suspect, for the sole purpose of drawing up the offence record,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings,   Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - the sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant on 04/03/2022 was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO. 5,000   43627/22 19/08/2022 Aleksandr Sergeyevich LENKEVICH 1989       Anti-war rally   St Petersburg   06/03/2022 article 20.2.2 § 1 of CAO fine of RUB   20,000 St Petersburg City Court 21/04/2022 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - arrest, escorting to the police station and detention between 06/03/2022 and 07/03/2022 as administrative suspect, pending trial and after the offence record had been compiled,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. 4,000   46909/22 09/09/2022 Yekaterina Igorevna BRAZHNIK 2001   Podolskiy Sergey Viktorovich St Petersburg Anti-war rally   St Petersburg   06/03/2022 article 20.2.2. § 1 of CAO fine of RUB   10,000 St Petersburg City Court 19/05/2022 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for and after compiling an offence report from 4.45 p.m. on 06/03/2022 until 00.48 a.m. on 07/03/2022,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. 4,000   47040/22 14/09/2022 Vitaliy Igorevich SOROKIN 1987       Anti-war rally   St Petersburg   26/02/2022 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB   10,000 St Petersburg City Court 17/05/2022 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station between 7.30 p.m. on 26/02/2022 and 6 p.m. on 27/02/2022 as administrative suspect, pending trial and after the offence record was compiled,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. 4,000   50650/22 14/09/2022 Aleksandra Vladimirovna GOLUBEVA 1992   Sozonov Ruslan Vladimirovich Nizhniy Novgorod Anti-war rally   St Petersburg   27/02/2022 article 20.2.2. § 1 of CAO fine of RUB   10,000 St Petersburg City Court 17/05/2022 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention –arrest, escorting to and detention at the police station between 27/02/2022 and 28/02/2022 as administrative suspect, pending trial and after the record of the offence had been compiled,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. 4,000   55620/22 12/10/2022 Olga Mikhaylovna ARKHIPOVA 1993       Anti-war rally   St Petersburg   27/02/2022 article 20.2.2 § 1 of CAO fine of RUB   10,000 St Petersburg City Court 16/06/2022 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - arrest, escorting to a police station, detention between 27/02/2022 and 28/02/2022 as administrative suspect, pending trial, after the offence record had been compiled,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. 4,000   1212/23 02/12/2022 Yekaterina Igorevna ILYINA 2001       Anti-war rally   St Petersburg   04/08/2022 article 20.2.2 § 1 of CAO community service of 60 hours St Petersburg City Court 04/08/2022 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - arrest and detention from 8.10 p.m. on 27/02/2022 to 1.57 a.m. on 28/02/2022 for the sole purpose of drawing up an administrative offence record, raised on appeal,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. 4,000   3740/23 31/12/2022 Varvara Maksimovna SERGEYEVA 2001       Anti-war rally   St Petersburg   27/02/2022 article 20.2.2 § 1 of CAO fine of RUB   10,000 St Petersburg City Court 20/10/2022 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - arrest, escorting to a police station, detention between 27/02/2022 and 28/02/2022 as administrative suspect, pending trial, the applicant remained in detention after the offence record had been compiled. 4,000   4706/23 05/01/2023 Angelina Alekseyevna KUTUZOVA 2000   Shiolashvili Mikhail Germanovich St Petersburg Anti-war rally   St Petersburg   27/02/2022 article 20.2.2 § 1 of CAO fine of RUB   15,000 St Petersburg City Court 06/10/2022 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - arrest, escorting to a police station, detention between 5.40 p.m. on 27/02/2022 and 5 a.m. on 28/02/2022 for the sole purpose of drawing up an offence record. 4,000   4708/23 05/01/2023 Tatyana Vladimirovna VOLKOVA 1995   Shiolashvili Mikhail Germanovich St Petersburg Anti-war rally   St Petersburg   27/02/2022 article 20.2.2 § 1 of CAO fine of RUB   15,000 St Petersburg City Court 13/10/2022 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - arrest, escorting to a police station and detention between 5.40 p.m. on 27/02/2022 and 5.40 a.m. on 28/02/2022 for drawing a record of administrative offence. 4,000   4986/23 08/01/2023 Irina Sergeyevna ZUBKO 1996   Shiolashvili Mikhail Germanovich St Petersburg Anti-war rally   St Petersburg   27/02/2022 article 20.2.2 § 1 of CAO fine of RUB   15,000 St Petersburg City Court 13/10/2022 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - arrest, escorting to a police station, detention between 5.40 p.m. on 27/02/2022 and 6.30 a.m. on 28/02/2022 for drawing up a record of administrative offence. 4,000   4987/23 08/01/2023 Dmitriy Aleksandrovich PAVLOV 1996   Shiolashvili Mikhail Germanovich St Petersburg Anti-war rally   St Petersburg   27/02/2022 article 20.2.2 § 1 of CAO fine of RUB   15,000 St Petersburg City Court 29/09/2022 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - arrest, escorting to a police station, detention between 5.40 p.m. on 27/02/2022 to 2.05 a.m. on 28/02/2022 for drawing up a record of administrative offence. 4,000   4991/23 08/01/2023 Yekaterina Vladimirovna ASANOVA 1991   Shiolashvili Mikhail Germanovich St Petersburg Anti-war rally   St Petersburg   27/02/2022 article 20.2.2 § 1 of CAO fine of RUB   15,000 St Petersburg City Court 20/10/2022 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention- arrest, escorting to a police station, detention between 5.40 p.m. on 27/02/2022 and 3.23 a.m. on 28/02/2022 for drawing up a record of administrative offence. 4,000   5984/23 17/01/2023 Mikhail Aleksandrovich IGNATENKO 2003   Gerasimova Yekaterina Viktorovna St Petersburg Anti-war rally   St Petersburg   06/03/2022 article 20.2.2 § 1 of CAO fine of RUB   20,000 St Petersburg City Court 26/09/2022 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - arrest, escorting to a police station and detention on 06/03/2022 the sole purpose of drawing a record of administrative offence. 4,000   5986/23 17/01/2023 Karina Yuryevna AVERCHENKO 2003   Gerasimova Yekaterina Viktorovna St Petersburg Anti-war rally   St Petersburg   06/03/2022 article 20.2.2 § 1 of CAO fine of RUB   20,000 St Petersburg City Court 12/10/2022 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - arrest, escorting to a police station, detention between 6.05 p.m. on 06/03/2022 to 0.50 a.m. 07/03/2022 for the sole purpose of drawing up an administrative offence record. 4,000   7820/23 20/01/2023 Maksim Sergeyevich RASSKAZOV 1990       Anti-war rally   St Petersburg   03/03/2022 article 20.2.2 § 1 of CAO fine of RUB   20,000 St Petersburg City Court 20/09/2022 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention- arrest, escorting to a police station, detention between 03/03/2022 and 04/03/2022 as administrative suspect, pending the examination of the case by the first-instance court and after the offence record had been compiled. 4,000   9562/23 01/02/2023 Darya Olegovna SIDOROVA 1998   Vasilchenko Olesya Anatolyevna Minyar Anti-war rally   St Petersburg   06/03/2022 article 20.2.2. § 1 of CAO fine of RUB   12,000 St Petersburg City Court 04/10/2022 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station between 5:00 p.m. on 06/03/2022 and noon on 07/03/2022 as administrative suspect, after the offence record had been compiled. 4,000   26031/23 07/06/2023 Anton Robertovich LUKHT 1976   Semenov Daniil Aleksandrovich St Petersburg Anti-war rally   St Petersburg   27/02/2022 article 20.2.2. § 1 of CAO administrative detention for 10 days St Petersburg City Court 08/02/2023 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station between 27/02/2022 and 28/02/2022 as administrative suspect, pending trial, after the offence record had been compiled. 5,000   [1] Plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicants.