CEDH · CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG — 2 octobre 2025

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s2EF17D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:2pt } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s34DFC730 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s10950C61 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sB9D5CABB { width:28.35pt; display:inline-block } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s3AAE10DF { margin-top:14pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s3CA22BA { font-family:Arial; text-transform:uppercase } .s2D9C6089 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s84651E4E { margin-top:14pt; margin-left:14.2pt; margin-bottom:3pt; text-align:justify } .s69DCC830 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sC986E16F { font-family:Arial; color:#ffffff } .sC646A315 { width:14.54pt; display:inline-block } .s7FB0030E { width:111.07pt; display:inline-block } .s9852CA4C { width:7.54pt; display:inline-block } .s9E436411 { width:138.09pt; display:inline-block } .s4ACA9207 { page-break-before:always; clear:both; mso-break-type:section-break } .s6DB91820 { text-align:center } .s8BB62139 { margin-right:auto; margin-left:auto; border-collapse:collapse } .s3695F815 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .sDF237D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:8pt } .sEECE831 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .sE8934522 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s6B505E72 { margin:0pt; padding-left:0pt } .s4F2ADFDB { text-align:center; font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; list-style-position:inside } .sBB6163A7 { width:2.48pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold }   FOURTH SECTION DECISION Application no. 3870/21 Mihai DANCI against Romania and 12 other applications (see appended table) The European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section), sitting on 2   October 2025 as a Committee composed of:   Anne Louise Bormann , President ,   Sebastian Răduleţu,   András Jakab , judges , and Viktoriya Maradudina, Acting Deputy Section Registrar, Having regard to the above applications lodged on the various dates indicated in the appended table, Having deliberated, decides as follows: FACTS AND PROCEDURE The list of the applicants is set out in the appendix. The applicants’ complaints under Article 3 of the Convention concerning the inadequate conditions of detention, and in application no. 30874/21 an additional complaint under Article 13 concerning the lack of any effective remedy in domestic law, were communicated to the Romanian Government, who submitted observations on the admissibility and merits. The observations were forwarded to the applicants, who were invited to submit their own observations (see the appended table for the relevant dates). No reply was received by the Court. By letters sent by registered post, the applicants were notified that the time allowed for the submission of their observations had expired (see the appended table for the relevant dates). The applicants’ attention was further drawn to Article 37 § 1 (a) of the Convention, which provides that the Court may strike an application out of its list of cases where the circumstances lead to the conclusion that the applicant does not intend to pursue the application. No reply to these letters has been received by the Court. The registered letters were either received by the applicants/their relatives or were returned to the Court (see details in the appended table). THE LAW Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single decision. In the light of the foregoing, the Court concludes that the applicants may be regarded as no longer wishing to pursue the applications (Article 37 §   1   (a) of the Convention). Furthermore, in accordance with Article 37 § 1 in   fine , the Court finds no special circumstances regarding respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and the Protocols thereto which require the continued examination of the applications. In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the cases out of the list. For these reasons, the Court, unanimously, Decides to join the applications; Decides to strike the applications out of its list of cases. Done in English and notified in writing on 23 October 2025.     Viktoriya Maradudina   Anne Louise Bormann   Acting Deputy Registrar   President   APPENDIX List of applications raising complaints under Article   3 of the Convention (inadequate conditions of detention) No. Application no. Date of introduction Applicant’s name Year of birth Other complaints under well-established case-law   Date of the applicant’s last letter to the Court Date of sending Government’s observations to the applicant Time-limit for submission of response by the applicant Date of the Court’s registered letter Date of receipt/return of the registered letter     3870/21 05/01/2021 Mihai DANCI 1984     05/03/2024 01/10/2024 12/11/2024 03/02/2025 Received on 12/02/2025 by the prison’s representative     6376/21 03/03/2021 Constantin-Ştefan IURAŞCU 1998     26/05/2021 04/09/2024 16/10/2024 22/11/2024 Received by the applicant on 14/12/2024     7240/21 04/03/2021 Mihai FOTA 1983     11/05/2021 04/09/2024 16/10/2024 22/11/2024 Received by the applicant on 09/12/2024     8838/21 18/03/2021 Narcis ZADEA 1996     12/05/2021 01/10/2024 12/11/2024 03/02/2025 Received by the applicant’s grandmother on 13/02/2025     13328/21 31/03/2021 Sorinel MIHAI 1988     08/06/2021 01/10/2024 12/11/2024 03/02/2025 Received by the applicant’s sister on 13/02/2025     20198/21 24/05/2021 Florin AMZA 1992     15/11/2021 04/09/2024 16/10/2024 22/11/2024   12/02/2025 The letter sent to the applicant’s home address was returned by the Romanian Post as unclaimed and the letter sent to the prison was returned as “addressee unknown”     20725/21 11/05/2021 Ion PAVEN 1962     13/07/2021 04/09/2024 16/10/2024 22/11/2024 Received by the applicant on 03/12/2024     26088/21 16/07/2021 Mihai-Gheorghiţă BRUSCHI 1993     01/09/2021 01/10/2024 12/11/2024 03/02/2025 Received on 13/02/2025 by the prison’s representative     30874/21 25/08/2021 Dundy ROSTAŞ 1979   Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law - 08/11/2021 01/10/2024 12/11/2024 03/02/2025 Returned by the Romanian Post on 10/03/2025 as unclaimed.   39273/21 26/08/2021 Dumitru BOBA 1989     22/06/2022 01/10/2024 12/11/2024 03/02/2025 Received on 13/02/2025 by the prison’s representative   20263/22 12/07/2022 Daniel LUNGU 1988     16/09/2024 01/10/2024 12/11/2024 03/02/2025 Received by the applicant on 11/02/2025   22567/22 12/07/2022 Adrian LARIONESI 1977     30/09/2022 01/10/2024 12/11/2024 03/02/2025 Received on 13/02/2025 by the prison’s representative   23673/22 05/05/2022 Cristinel SÎRBEA 1967     27/06/2022 01/10/2024 12/11/2024 03/02/2025 Received by the applicant on 11/02/2025