CEDH · CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG — 2 octobre 2025

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s2EF17D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:2pt } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s34DFC730 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s10950C61 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sB9D5CABB { width:28.35pt; display:inline-block } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s3AAE10DF { margin-top:14pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s3CA22BA { font-family:Arial; text-transform:uppercase } .s2D9C6089 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s84651E4E { margin-top:14pt; margin-left:14.2pt; margin-bottom:3pt; text-align:justify } .s69DCC830 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sC986E16F { font-family:Arial; color:#ffffff } .sC646A315 { width:14.54pt; display:inline-block } .s6EC6BA2A { width:121.74pt; display:inline-block } .s9852CA4C { width:7.54pt; display:inline-block } .s9E436411 { width:138.09pt; display:inline-block } .s4ACA9207 { page-break-before:always; clear:both; mso-break-type:section-break } .s6DB91820 { text-align:center } .s8BB62139 { margin-right:auto; margin-left:auto; border-collapse:collapse } .s3695F815 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .sDF237D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:8pt } .sEECE831 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .sE3DA80B3 { font-family:Arial; font-size:6pt; font-weight:bold; vertical-align:super; color:#474747 } .sC39F4804 { font-family:Arial; font-size:5.33pt; font-weight:bold; vertical-align:super; color:#474747 } .sE8934522 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s6B505E72 { margin:0pt; padding-left:0pt } .s4F2ADFDB { text-align:center; font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; list-style-position:inside } .sBB6163A7 { width:2.48pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .s55C5D7A { height:25.75pt } .s3290EEE1 { height:119.15pt } .s22765D7A { height:23.35pt } .sA055E78A { height:17.9pt } .s2AD8B0A7 { height:19.95pt } .s3332E8B1 { height:40.2pt } .sF6A12959 { width:33%; height:1px; text-align:left } .s5FFF0A7E { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:8pt } .sA4BC3E2E { font-family:Arial; font-size:5.33pt; vertical-align:super; color:#000000 }   THIRD SECTION DECISION Application no. 10798/23 Marianna MITSOU against Greece and 24 other applications (see appended table) The European Court of Human Rights (Third Section), sitting on 2 October 2025 as a Committee composed of:   Diana Kovatcheva , President ,   Canòlic Mingorance Cairat,   Vasilka Sancin , judges , and Viktoriya Maradudina, Acting Deputy Section Registrar, Having regard to the above applications lodged on the various dates indicated in the appended table, Having regard to the formal declarations accepting a friendly settlement of the cases, Having deliberated, decides as follows: FACTS AND PROCEDURE The list of applicants is set out in the appended table. The applicants were represented by Mr Ch. Chaskis, a lawyer practising in Thessaloniki. The applicants’ complaints under Articles 6 and 13 of the Convention and Article   1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention concerning the non ‑ enforcement or delayed enforcement of domestic decisions and the lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in that regard were communicated to the Greek Government (“the Government”). In some of the applications, complaints based on the same facts were also communicated under other provisions of the Convention. The Court received the friendly-settlement declarations, signed by the parties, under which the applicants agreed to waive any further claims against Greece in respect of the facts giving rise to these applications, subject to an undertaking by the Government to pay them the amounts detailed in the appended table. These amounts will be payable within three months from the date of notification of the Court’s decision. In the event of failure to pay these amounts within the above-mentioned three-month period, the Government undertake to pay simple interest on them, from the expiry of that period until settlement, at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points. The payment will constitute the final resolution of the cases. THE LAW Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single decision. The Court takes note of the friendly settlement reached between the parties. It is satisfied that the settlement is based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and the Protocols thereto and finds no reasons to justify a continued examination of the applications. In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the cases out of the list. For these reasons, the Court, unanimously, Decides to join the applications; Decides to strike the applications out of its list of cases in accordance with Article   39 of the Convention. Done in English and notified in writing on 23 October 2025.     Viktoriya Maradudina   Diana Kovatcheva   Acting Deputy Registrar   President   APPENDIX List of applications raising complaints under Article   6 § 1 and   Article   13 of the Convention (non-enforcement or delayed enforcement of domestic decisions and lack of any effective remedy in domestic law) No. Application no. Date of introduction Applicant’s name Year of birth Other complaints under well-established case-law   Date of receipt of Government’s declaration Date of receipt of Applicant’s declaration Amount awarded for non-pecuniary damage per applicant (in euros) [1] Amount awarded for costs and expenses per application (in euros) [2]     10798/23 24/02/2023 Marianna MITSOU 1947 Prot. 1 Art. 1 - interference with peaceful enjoyment of possessions 10/07/2025 15/05/2025 6,000 250     10799/23 24/02/2023 Ioanna PLOUMI 1939 Prot. 1 Art. 1 - interference with peaceful enjoyment of possessions 10/07/2025 15/05/2025 6,000 250     10800/23 24/02/2023 Dimitrios SEBROS 1942 Prot. 1 Art. 1 - interference with peaceful enjoyment of possessions 10/07/2025 19/08/2025 6,000 250     10801/23 24/02/2023 Konstantinos STAVROULIS 1940 Prot. 1 Art. 1 - interference with peaceful enjoyment of possessions 10/07/2025 15/05/2025 6,000 250     13501/23 23/03/2023 Pafsanias VASILAKOS 1938 Prot. 1 Art. 1 - interference with peaceful enjoyment of possessions 10/07/2025 19/08/2025 6,000 250     13506/23 23/03/2023 Chrysoula KALOKASIDI 1947 Art. 6 (1) - excessive length of civil proceedings - the applicant complained that the length of the proceedings before the Court of Auditors was excessive, Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of excessive length of civil proceedings; Prot.   1 Art. 1 - interference with peaceful enjoyment of possessions   10/07/2025 19/08/2025 6,000 250     13507/23 23/03/2023 Asimina KARADIMA 1940 Art. 6 (1) - excessive length of civil proceedings - the applicant complained that the length of the proceedings before the Court of Auditors was excessive, Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of excessive length of civil proceedings; Prot.   1 Art. 1 - interference with peaceful enjoyment of possessions 10/07/2025 19/08/2025 2,500 250     13508/23 23/03/2023 Apostolos KARVELLAS 1938 Prot. 1 Art. 1 - interference with peaceful enjoyment of possessions 10/07/2025 19/08/2025 6,000 250     13562/23 23/03/2023 Georgios KATAKALIDIS 1934 Art. 6 (1) - excessive length of civil proceedings - the applicant complained that the length of the proceedings before the Court of Auditors was excessive, Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of excessive length of civil proceedings; Prot.   1 Art. 1 - interference with peaceful enjoyment of possessions 10/07/2025 15/05/2025 6,000 250   13568/23 23/03/2023 Stavroula KONSTANTINIDOU 1945 Prot. 1 Art. 1 - interference with peaceful enjoyment of possessions 10/07/2025 15/05/2025 6,000 250   13573/23 23/03/2023 Konstantinos FERTEKLIS 1945 Prot. 1 Art. 1 - interference with peaceful enjoyment of possessions 10/07/2025 15/05/2025 6,000 250   17414/23 13/04/2023 Panagiotis DOSOPOULOS 1949 Prot. 1 Art. 1 - interference with peaceful enjoyment of possessions 10/07/2025 15/05/2025 6,000 250   17423/23 13/04/2023 Maria DOUKA 1946 Art. 6 (1) - excessive length of civil proceedings - the applicant complained that the length of the proceedings before the Court of Auditors was excessive, Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of excessive length of civil proceedings; Prot.   1 Art. 1 - interference with peaceful enjoyment of possessions 10/07/2025 19/08/2025 6,000 250   17428/23 13/04/2023 Grigorios PAPANASTASIOU 1947 Prot. 1 Art. 1 - interference with peaceful enjoyment of possessions 10/07/2025 15/05/2025 6,000 250   26682/23 21/06/2023 Evaggelos DIMITRIOU 1942 Prot. 1 Art. 1 - interference with peaceful enjoyment of possessions 10/07/2025 15/05/2025 1,000 250         26684/23 21/06/2023 Nikolaos VOURNAZIS 1945 Art. 6 (1) - excessive length of civil proceedings - the applicant complained that the length of the proceedings before the Court of Auditors was excessive, Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of excessive length of civil proceedings; Prot.   1 Art. 1 - interference with peaceful enjoyment of possessions 10/07/2025 19/08/2025 6,000 250   26685/23 21/06/2023 Vasilia MAKROGIANNIDOU 1937 Prot. 1 Art. 1 - interference with peaceful enjoyment of possessions 10/07/2025 15/05/2025 6,000 250   26686/23 21/06/2023 Iraklis TSAKALIDIS 1951 Prot. 1 Art. 1 - interference with peaceful enjoyment of possessions 10/07/2025 19/08/2025 6,000 250   30009/23 14/07/2023 Styliani AGORAKI 1941 Prot. 1 Art. 1 - interference with peaceful enjoyment of possessions 10/07/2025 19/08/2025 6,000 250   30014/23 14/07/2023 Christos ADRIANOS 1945 Prot. 1 Art. 1 - interference with peaceful enjoyment of possessions 10/07/2025 19/08/2025 6,000 250   30017/23 14/07/2023 Maria ANTONOPOULOU 1940 Prot. 1 Art. 1 - interference with peaceful enjoyment of possessions 10/07/2025 19/08/2025 6,000 250   30018/23 14/07/2023 Theofanis STEFOS 1936 Prot. 1 Art. 1 - interference with peaceful enjoyment of possessions 10/07/2025 19/08/2025 6,000 250   30020/23 14/07/2023 Nikolaos CHARITAKIS 1948 Prot. 1 Art. 1 - interference with peaceful enjoyment of possessions 10/07/2025 15/05/2025 6,000 250   41775/23 22/11/2023 Stefanos TZOTZIS 1935 Prot. 1 Art. 1 - interference with peaceful enjoyment of possessions 10/07/2025 15/05/2025 6,000 250   1035/24 22/12/2023 Theodoros KINIS 1944 Art. 6 (1) - excessive length of civil proceedings - the applicant complained that the length of the proceedings before the Court of Auditors was excessive, Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of excessive length of civil proceedings; Prot.   1 Art. 1 - interference with peaceful enjoyment of possessions 10/07/2025 15/05/2025 6,000 250   [1] Plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicants. [2] Plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicants.