CEDHCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG29
CEDH · CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG — 16 octobre 2025
- ECLI
- ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:1016DEC001361220
- Date
- 16 octobre 2025
- Publication
- 16 octobre 2025
droits fondamentauxCEDH
Source : DILA / Judilibre · open data
Mes notes
privées · visibles par vous seulRésumé structuré
version préliminaireFaits
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Procédure
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Question juridique
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Solution
source officielleStruck out of the list
Résumé généré automatiquement — à vérifier avec la décision originale.
Analyse IA non disponible
Générez un résumé intelligent de cette décision
Texte intégral
.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s2EF17D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:2pt } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s9793A85B { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sB9D5CABB { width:28.35pt; display:inline-block } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s10950C61 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s3AAE10DF { margin-top:14pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s3CA22BA { font-family:Arial; text-transform:uppercase } .s434D37A9 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s84651E4E { margin-top:14pt; margin-left:14.2pt; margin-bottom:3pt; text-align:justify } .s2D9C6089 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s69DCC830 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s22DFA96B { width:28.86pt; display:inline-block } .sC986E16F { font-family:Arial; color:#ffffff } .sC5599237 { width:142.72pt; display:inline-block } .sC646A315 { width:14.54pt; display:inline-block } .s1720DE1F { width:132.75pt; display:inline-block } .s9852CA4C { width:7.54pt; display:inline-block } .s9E436411 { width:138.09pt; display:inline-block }   FIFTH SECTION DECISION Application no. 13612/20 Oleksandra Andriyivna KUZMENKO against Ukraine The European Court of Human Rights (Fifth Section), sitting on 16   October 2025 as a Committee composed of:   Andreas Zünd , President ,   Diana Sârcu,   Mykola Gnatovskyy , judges , and Viktoriya Maradudina, Acting Deputy Section Registrar, Having regard to the above application lodged on 3   March 2020, Having deliberated, decides as follows: FACTS AND PROCEDURE The applicant, Ms Oleksandra Andriyivna Kuzmenko, was born in 1990 and lives in Berdyansk, which is currently not controlled by Ukraine. The applicant was represented by Mr R.Y. Ozyumenko, a lawyer. The applicant’s complaints under Article   6   §   1 of the Convention concerning denial of access to a higher court in her civil case were communicated to the Ukrainian Government, who submitted their observations. By a letter sent on 26   September   2024 via the Court’s Electronic Communications Service (eComms), the applicant was invited to submit her comments in reply, but the letter was not downloaded. The Registry’s numerous attempts to reach her and her representative by phone were unsuccessful. Maintaining contact with the applicant or her representative by post is impossible as the postal services do not operate in the occupied territories of Ukraine. THE LAW The Court notes that all the available means to contact the applicant have been tried without success. The applicant did not provide the Court with any new contact information which could have allowed the Court to conduct further proceedings. In the light of the foregoing, and in the absence of any special circumstances regarding respect for the rights guaranteed by the Convention and the Protocols thereto, the Court, in accordance with Article   37   §   1   (a) of the Convention, considers that it is no longer justified to continue the examination of the application (see Bryska   and   Others v.   Ukraine [Committee] (dec.), no.   11706/13 and 5   others, 2   November   2023, and Zhadan   and   Others v.   Ukraine   [Committee]   (dec.), no.   29283/13 and 26   others, 14 December 2023). The Court, however, reiterates that under Article 37 § 2 of the Convention it may decide to restore the application to its list of cases if it considers that the circumstances justify such a course. Accordingly, it is appropriate to strike the case out of the list. For these reasons, the Court, unanimously, Decides to strike the application out of its list of cases. Done in English and notified in writing on 13 November 2025.   {signature_p_1}   {signature_p_2}   Viktoriya Maradudina   Andreas Zünd   Acting Deputy Registrar   President  Citations
Aucune citation répertoriée pour cette décision.
Décisions connexes
Aucune décision similaire identifiée pour le moment.
Synthèse
- Juridiction
- CEDH
- Chambre
- CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
- Formation
- 29
- Date
- 16 octobre 2025
- Matière
- droits fondamentaux
Référence
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:1016DEC001361220
Données disponibles
- Texte intégral