CEDH · CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG — 16 octobre 2025

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .sFE10DC93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s665E407E { margin-top:66pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .s34DFC730 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s2E932ED2 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:11pt } .s82B4DA5F { page-break-before:right; clear:both; mso-break-type:section-break } .s10950C61 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sB9D5CABB { width:28.35pt; display:inline-block } .s3AAE10DF { margin-top:14pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s3CA22BA { font-family:Arial; text-transform:uppercase } .s6B505E72 { margin:0pt; padding-left:0pt } .sDECD9755 { margin-left:11.67pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; padding-left:6.78pt; font-family:Arial; text-transform:uppercase } .sDA7B489D { margin-top:14pt; margin-left:15pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; padding-left:3.45pt; font-family:Arial; text-transform:uppercase } .s5C5C410E { margin-top:14pt; margin-left:18.34pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; padding-left:0.11pt; font-family:Arial; text-transform:uppercase } .s67CAFE05 { margin-top:14pt; margin-left:18.45pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-family:Arial; text-transform:uppercase } .s7C22C014 { margin-top:14pt; margin-left:16.34pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; padding-left:2.11pt; font-family:Arial; text-transform:uppercase } .sD11CFAB7 { margin-top:14pt; margin-left:15.01pt; margin-bottom:3pt; text-align:justify; padding-left:1.99pt; font-family:Arial } .sFBC99493 { font-style:italic } .sD58C010 { margin-top:14pt; margin-left:15.01pt; margin-bottom:3pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; padding-left:1.99pt; font-family:Arial } .sBB6E85D0 { margin-top:0pt; margin-left:34pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:-17pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .sE5BF05B1 { width:2.33pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } .s51DFF5CF { margin-top:0pt; margin-left:34pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:-17pt; text-align:justify } .s2D9C6089 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s69DCC830 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sC986E16F { font-family:Arial; color:#ffffff } .sC646A315 { width:14.54pt; display:inline-block } .s6EC6BA2A { width:121.74pt; display:inline-block } .s9852CA4C { width:7.54pt; display:inline-block } .s9E436411 { width:138.09pt; display:inline-block } .s4ACA9207 { page-break-before:always; clear:both; mso-break-type:section-break } .sCC22C24E { font-family:Arial; color:#3e3e3e } .s6DB91820 { text-align:center } .s8BB62139 { margin-right:auto; margin-left:auto; border-collapse:collapse } .s2F3EB0E4 { border:0.75pt solid #838383; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .sDF237D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:8pt } .sE1A7A04C { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#424242 } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .sAB95A5CB { font-family:Arial; font-size:5.33pt; font-weight:bold; vertical-align:super; color:#424242 } .sBAADFE8C { border:0.75pt solid #838383; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s4F2ADFDB { text-align:center; font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; list-style-position:inside } .sBB6163A7 { width:2.48pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } .s5FFF0A7E { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:8pt } .sF6A12959 { width:33%; height:1px; text-align:left } .sA4BC3E2E { font-family:Arial; font-size:5.33pt; vertical-align:super; color:#000000 }       THIRD SECTION CASE OF KANEVSKIY AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA (Applications nos. 43258/21 and 38 others – see appended list)             JUDGMENT   STRASBOURG 16 October 2025   This judgment is final but it may be subject to editorial revision. In the case of Kanevskiy and Others v. Russia, The European Court of Human Rights (Third Section), sitting as a Committee composed of:   Diana Kovatcheva , President ,   Canòlic Mingorance Cairat,   Vasilka Sancin , judges , and Viktoriya Maradudina, Acting Deputy Section Registrar, Having deliberated in private on 25 September 2025, Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on that date: PROCEDURE 1.     The case originated in applications against Russia lodged with the Court under Article   34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) on the various dates indicated in the appended table. 2.     The Russian Government (“the   Government”) were given notice of the applications. THE FACTS 3.     The list of applicants and the relevant details of the applications are set out in the appended table. 4.     The applicants complained of the disproportionate measures taken against them as organisers or participants of public assemblies. They also raised other complaints under the provisions of the Convention. THE LAW JOINDER OF THE APPLICATIONS 5.     Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single judgment. JURISDICTION 6.     The Court observes that the facts giving rise to the alleged violations of the Convention occurred prior to 16 September 2022, the date on which the Russian Federation ceased to be a party to the Convention. The Court therefore decides that it has jurisdiction to examine the present applications (see Fedotova and Others v. Russia [GC], nos.   40792/10 and 2   others, §§   68 ‑ 73, 17   January 2023). ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE   11 OF THE CONVENTION 7.     The applicants complained principally of disproportionate measures taken against them as organisers or participants of public assemblies in connection with their participation in various public events in breach of COVID-19-related restrictions, namely their arrest in relation to the dispersal of these assemblies and their conviction for administrative offences. They relied, expressly or in substance, on Article   11 of the Convention. 8.     The Court refers to the principles established in its case-law regarding freedom of assembly (see Kudrevičius and Others v.   Lithuania [GC], no.   37553/05, ECHR 2015, with further references) and proportionality of interference with it (see Oya Ataman v.   Turkey , no.   74552/01, ECHR 2006 ‑ XIV, and Hyde Park and Others v.   Moldova , no.   33482/06, 31   March 2009). It further refers to Nemytov and Others v. Russia, no. 1257/21 and 2   others, 27   May   2025, in so far as the application by the authorities of the COVID ‑ 19 ‑ related restrictions to assemblies are concerned. 9.     In the leading case of Nemytov and Others (cited above) the Court found a violation in respect of issues similar to those in the present case (see further Frumkin v. Russia , no. 74568/12, ECHR 2016 (extracts), Navalnyy and Yashin v. Russia , no. 76204/11, 4 December 2014, and Kasparov and Others v. Russia , no. 21613/07, 3 October 2013). 10.     Having examined all the material submitted to it, the Court has not found any fact or argument capable of persuading it to reach a different conclusion as to the admissibility and merits of these complaints. Having regard to its case-law on the subject, the Court considers that in the instant case the interferences with the applicants’ freedom of assembly were not “necessary in a democratic society”. 11 .     These complaints are therefore admissible and disclose a breach of Article 11 of the Convention. OTHER ALLEGED VIOLATIONS UNDER WELL-ESTABLISHED CASE-LAW 12.     The applicants submitted other complaints which also raised issues under the Convention and its Protocols, given the relevant well-established case-law of the Court (see appended table). These complaints are not manifestly ill-founded within the meaning of Article 35 § 3 (a) of the Convention, nor are they inadmissible on any other ground. Accordingly, they must be declared admissible. 13 .     Having examined all the material before it, the Court concludes that these complaints also disclose violations of the Convention and its Protocols in the light of its findings in Butkevich v. Russia , no.   5865/07, §§   63-65, 13   February 2018, Tsvetkova and Others v. Russia , nos.   54381/08 and 5   others, §§   115-31, 10   April 2018, and Korneyeva v.   Russia , no.   72051/17, §§   34-36, 8   October 2019, as to various aspects of unlawful deprivation of liberty of organisers or participants of public assemblies; Karelin v.   Russia , no.   926/08, §§ 58-85, 20   September 2016, concerning the absence of a prosecuting party in the proceedings under the Code of Administrative Offences (the CAO); and Martynyuk v.   Russia , no.   13764/15, §§   38-42, 8   October 2019, relating to the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal against the sentence of administrative detention. REMAINING COMPLAINTS 14.     Some applicants raised further additional complaints under Article 6 of the Convention concerning various aspects of fairness of the administrative ‑ offence proceedings. In view of the findings in paragraphs 11 and 13 above, the Court considers that there is no need to deal separately with these remaining complaints. APPLICATION OF ARTICLE 41 OF THE CONVENTION 15.     Regard being had to the documents in its possession and to its case ‑ law (see in particular Navalnyy and Others v. Russia [Committee], nos.   25809/17 and 14 others, §   22, 4   October 2022), the Court finds it reasonable to award the sums indicated in the appended table. FOR THESE REASONS, THE COURT, UNANIMOUSLY, Decides to join the applications; Holds that it has jurisdiction to deal with these applications as they relate to facts that took place before 16   September 2022; Declares the complaints under Article 11 of the Convention and the other complaints under the well-established case-law of the Court, as set out in the appended table, admissible, and finds that there is no need to examine separately the remaining complaints under Article 6 of the Convention; Holds that these applications disclose a breach of Article   11 of the Convention; Holds that there has been a violation of the Convention and the Protocols thereto as regards the other complaints raised under the well-established case-law of the Court (see appended table); Holds (a)   that the respondent State is to pay the applicants, within three months, the amounts indicated in the appended table, to be converted into the currency of the respondent State at the rate applicable at the date of settlement; (b)   that from the expiry of the above-mentioned three months until settlement simple interest shall be payable on the above amounts at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points. Done in English, and notified in writing on 16 October 2025, pursuant to Rule   77   §§   2 and   3 of the Rules of Court.     Viktoriya Maradudina   Diana Kovatcheva   Acting Deputy Registrar   President     APPENDIX List of applications raising complaints under Article 11 of the Convention (disproportionate measures against organisers and participants of public assemblies) No. Application no. Date of introduction Applicant’s name Year of birth   Representative’s name and location Name of the public event Location Date Administrative / criminal offence Penalty Final domestic decision Court Name Date Other complaints under well-established case-law Amount awarded for pecuniary and non ‑ pecuniary damage and costs and expenses per applicant (in euros) [1]     43258/21 04/08/2021 Igor Lvovich KANEVSKIY 1977   Zhdanov Ivan Yuryevich Vilnius Rally “Free Navalnyy”   St Petersburg   31/01/2021 article 20.2.2 § 1 of CAO Fine of RUB   15,000 St Petersburg City Court 02/03/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence report from 4.00 p.m. on 31/01/2021 until 01/02/2021,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. 4,000     43823/21 26/08/2021 Aleksandra Mikhaylovna ROMANENKO 1990   Memorial Human Rights Centre Moscow Rally “Free Navalnyy”   St Petersburg   31/01/2021 article 20.2.2 § 1 of CAO fine of RUB   10,000 St Petersburg City Court 25/03/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence report from 1.00 p.m. until 11.30 p.m. on 31/01/2021,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. 4,000     44210/21 24/08/2021 Vladimir Aleksandrovich KUZNETSOV 1995   Mikhaylova Varvara Dmitriyevna St Petersburg Rally “Free Navalnyy”   St Petersburg   31/01/2021 article 20.2.2 § 1 of CAO detention for 8 days St Petersburg City Court 25/02/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence report from 1.40 p.m. on 31/01/2021 until 01/02/2021,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. 5,000     46580/21 07/09/2021 Ivan Sergeyevich TROFIMENKO 1995   Cherkasov Vitaliy Viktorovich St Petersburg Rally “Free Navalnyy”   St Petersburg   02/02/2021 article 20.2.2 § 1 of CAO fine of RUB   20,000 St Petersburg City Court 25/03/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence report from 11.35 p.m. on 02/02/2021 until 4.00 p.m. on 03/02/2021,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. 4,000     47145/21 15/09/2021 Danila Sergeyevich VOLKOV 1986   Kamakin Maksim Ivanovich St Petersburg Rally “Free Navalnyy”   St Petersburg   31/01/2021 article 20.2.2 § 1 of CAO fine of RUB   10,000 St Petersburg City Court 16/03/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence report from 5.00 p.m. until 8.48 p.m. on 31/01/2021,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. 4,000     49769/21 22/09/2021 Yevgeniy Igorevich BULAVIN 1993   Memorial Human Rights Centre Moscow Rally “Free Navalnyy”   St Petersburg   31/01/2021 article 20.2.2 § 1 of CAO detention for 7 days St Petersburg City Court 25/03/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence report from 2.20 p.m. on 31/01/2021 until 10.00 a.m. on 01/02/2021,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings,   Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - the sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO. 5,000     4324/22 22/12/2021 Viktor Anatolyevich GORBOKON 1968   Karagodina Veronika Yuryevna St Petersburg Rally “Free Navalnyy”   St Petersburg   23/01/2021 article 8.6.1 § 2 of St Petersburg Administrative Offences Act fine of RUB   4,000 Oktyabrskiy District Court in St Petersburg 01/07/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence report from 2.20 p.m. until 10.00 p.m. on 23/01/2021,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. 4,000     7769/22 13/01/2022 Sergey Olegovich LEBEDEV 1988   Memorial Human Rights Centre Moscow Rally “Free Navalnyy”   St Petersburg   31/01/2021 article 20.2.2 § 1 of CAO fine of RUB   10,000 St Petersburg City Court 20/07/2021 Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. 3,500     35544/22 01/07/2022 Pavel Nikolayevich GORBUSHIN 1988   Vasilchenko Olesya Anatolyevna Minyar Protest against war in Ukraine   St Petersburg   27/02/2022 article 20.2.2 § 1 of CAO detention for 6 days St Petersburg City Court 04/03/2022 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence report from 8.00 p.m. on 27/02/2022 until 7.30 p.m. on 28/02/2022,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. 5,000   35790/22 04/07/2022 Sergey Valentinovich TOKAREV 1965   Sirinova Olga Vladimirovna St Petersburg Protest against war in Ukraine   St Petersburg   06/03/2022 article 20.2.2 § 1 of CAO fine of RUB   10,000 St Petersburg City Court 19/04/2022 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence report from 4.10 p.m. on 06/03/2022 until 4.35 a.m. on 07/03/2022. 4,000   36749/22 15/07/2022 Yana Valeryevna KRISYUK 1994   Mikhaylova Varvara Dmitriyevna St Petersburg Protest against war in Ukraine   St Petersburg   27/02/2022 article 20.2.2 § 1 of CAO fine of RUB   10,000 St Petersburg 29/03/2022 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence report from 8.30 p.m. on 27/02/2022 until evening of 28/02/2022,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.   4,000   38698/22 28/07/2022 Aleksandr Ivanovich SHVEMLER 1991   Mikhaylova Varvara Dmitriyevna St Petersburg Protest against war in Ukraine   St Petersburg   27/02/2022 article 20.2.2 § 1 of CAO fine of RUB   15,000 St Petersburg City Court 05/04/2022 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence report from 5.15 p.m. on 27/02/2022 until court hearing in the evening of 28/02/2022,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. 4,000   38777/22 28/07/2022 Ayaal Vasilyevich NIKIFOROV 1995   Mikhaylova Varvara Dmitriyevna St Petersburg Protest against war in Ukraine   St Petersburg   25/02/2022 article 20.2.2 § 1 of CAO fine of RUB   10,000 St Petersburg City Court 29/03/2022 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence report from 7.15 p.m. on 25/02/2022 until the first-instance court hearing on 26/02/2022,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. 4,000   39207/22 27/07/2022 Alena Levonovna VALKO 1997   Sirinova Olga Vladimirovna St Petersburg Protest against war in Ukraine   St Petersburg   02/03/2022 article 20.2.2 § 1 of CAO detention for 7 days St Petersburg City Court 29/03/2022 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence report from 8.10 p.m. until 11.00 p.m. on 02/03/2022. 5,000   39551/22 30/07/2022 Alena Vasilyevna RYABCHIKOVA 2001   Podolskiy Sergey Viktorovich St Petersburg Protest against war in Ukraine   St Petersburg City Court   06/03/2022 article 20.2.2 § 1 of CAO detention for 10 days St Petersburg City Court 31/03/2022 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence report from 5.10 p.m. on 06/03/2022 until 1.40 p.m. on 07/03/2022,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings,   Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - the sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO. 5,000   39979/22 05/08/2022 Andrey Alekseyevich BOLDYREV 1987   Nepovinnova Yana Andreyevna St Petersburg Protest against war in Ukraine   St Petersburg   27/02/2022 article 20.2.2 § 1 of CAO fine of RUB   10,000 St Petersburg City Court 05/04/2022 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence report from 5.16 p.m. on 27/02/2022 until the first-instance court hearing on 28/02/2022,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. 4,000   39983/22 02/08/2022 Dinislam Damirovich NURTDINOV 1995   Nepovinnova Yana Andreyevna St Petersburg Protest against war in Ukraine   St Petersburg   27/02/2022 article 20.2.2 § 1 of CAO fine of RUB   10,000 St Petersburg City Court 05/04/2022 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence report from 8.25 p.m. on 27/02/2022 until the first-instance court hearing on 28/02/2022,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. 4,000   39985/22 02/08/2022 Andrey Igorevich NESTERUK 1984   Nepovinnova Yana Andreyevna St Petersburg Protest against war in Ukraine   St Petersburg   27/02/2022 article 20.2.2 § 1 of CAO fine of RUB   10,000 St Petersburg City Court 05/04/2022 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence report from 4.20 p.m. on 27/02/2022 until the hearing in the first-instance court on 28/02/2022,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.   4,000   40194/22 08/08/2022 Veronika Mikhaylovna KAMENTSEVA 1996   Vasilchenko Olesya Anatolyevna Minyar Protest against war in Ukraine   St Petersburg   27/02/2022 article 20.2.2 § 1 of CAO fine of RUB   12,000 St Petersburg City Court 12/04/2022 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence report from 4.15 p.m. on 27/02/2022 until 9.30 p.m. on 28/02/2022,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. 4,000   40256/22 05/08/2022 Ivan Vasilyevich VORONOV 2003   Nepovinnova Yana Andreyevna St Petersburg Protest against war in Ukraine   St Petersburg   26/02/2022 article 20.2.2 § 1 of CAO detention for 8 days St Petersburg City Court 21/04/2022 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence report from 8.50 p.m. on 26/02/2022 until the hearing in the first-instance court on 28/02/2022,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. 5,000   40280/22 05/08/2022 Aglaya Aleksandrovna GAFAROVA 1994   Nepovinnova Yana Andreyevna St Petersburg Protest against war in Ukraine   St Petersburg   27/02/2022 article 20.2.2 § 1 of CAO fine of RUB   10,000 St Petersburg City Court 05/04/2022 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence report from 8.25 p.m. on 27/02/2022 until the hearing in the first-instance court on 28/02/2022,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. 4,000   40504/22 14/08/2022 Mariya Andreyevna MATUSEVICH 2002   Mikhaylova Varvara Dmitriyevna St Petersburg Protest against war in Ukraine   St Petersburg   06/03/2022 article 20.2.2 § 1 of CAO fine of RUB   15,000 St Petersburg City Court 19/04/2022 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence report from 5.10 p.m. on 06/03/2022 until the hearing in the first-instance court on 07/03/2022,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. 4,000   40509/22 14/08/2022 Alena Andreyevna SOKOLOVA 1993   Mikhaylova Varvara Dmitriyevna St Petersburg Protest against war in Ukraine   St Petersburg   01/03/2022 article 20.2.2 § 1 of CAO fine of RUB   10,000 St Petersburg City Court 14/04/2022 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence report from 7.30 p.m. on 01/03/2022 until the hearing in the first-instance court on 02/02/2022,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. 4,000   40521/22 08/08/2022 Timofey Aleksadnrovich DANILOV 1995   Nepovinnova Yana Andreyevna St Petersburg Protest against war in Ukraine   St Petersburg   27/02/2022 article 20.2.2 § 1 of CAO fine of RUB   10,000 St Petersburg City Court 12/04/2022 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence report from 5.15 p.m. on 27/02/2022 until the hearing in the first-instance court on 28/02/2022,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. 4,000   40525/22 08/08/2022 Ivan Pavlovich ZHDANOV 1998   Nepovinnova Yana Andreyevna St Petersburg Protest against war in Ukraine   St Petersburg   26/02/2022 article 20.2.2 § 1 of CAO detention for 8 days St Petersburg City Court 21/04/2022 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence report from 8.50 p.m. on 26/02/2022 until the hearing in the first-instance court on 28/02/2022,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. 5,000   41418/22 13/08/2022 Polina Dmitriyevna DAVYDOVA 1999   Zyryanova Mariya Sergeyevna St Petersburg Protest against war in Ukraine   St Petersburg   08/03/2022 article 20.2.2 § 1 of CAO fine of RUB   20,000 St Petersburg City Court 28/06/2022 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence report from 3.15 p.m. on 08/03/2022 until the hearing in the first-instance court on 09/03/2022,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. 4,000   41435/22 18/08/2022 Yekaterina Leonidovna RYCHKOVA 1984   Mikhaylova Varvara Dmitriyevna St Petersburg Protest against war in Ukraine   St Petersburg   13/03/2022 article 20.2.2 § 1 of CAO fine of RUB   20,000 St Petersburg City Court 31/05/2022 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence report from 3.30 p.m. on 13/03/2022 until the hearing in the first-instance court on 14/03/2022,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. 4,000   41436/22 18/08/2022 Vitaliy Georgiyevich NEMTSEV 1971   Mikhaylova Varvara Dmitriyevna St Petersburg Protest against war in Ukraine   St Petersburg   02/03/2022 article 20.2.2 § 1 of CAO fine of RUB   15,000 St Petersburg City Court 07/06/2022 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence report from 8.10 p.m. on 02/03/2022 until 1.19 a.m. on 03/03/2022,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. 4,000   41438/22 18/08/2022 Vera Yevgenyevna UDALOVA 1995   Mikhaylova Varvara Dmitriyevna St Petersburg Protest against war in Ukraine   St Petersburg   06/03/2022 article 20.2.2 § 1 of CAO fine of RUB   15,000 St Petersburg City Court 19/04/2022 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence report from 5.10 p.m. on 06/03/2022 until 7.30 a.m. on 07/03/2022,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. 4,000   41731/22 11/08/2022 Maksim Sergeyevich GUSTOV 1998   Zyryanova Mariya Sergeyevna St Petersburg Protest against war in Ukraine   St Petersburg   06/03/2022 article 20.2.2 § 1 of CAO detention for 10 days St Petersburg City Court 12/04/2022 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence report from 2.00 p.m. on 06/03/2022 until the hearing in the first-instance court on 07/03/2022,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. 5,000   41738/22 10/08/2022 Mariya Mikhaylovna FIRULEVA 1996   Gerasimov Dmitriy Georgiyevich St Petersburg Protest against war in Ukraine   St Petersburg   26/02/2022 article 20.2.2 § 1 of CAO fine of RUB   10,000 St Petersburg City Court 12/04/2022 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence report from 7.20 p.m. on 26/02/2022 until the hearing in the first-instance court on 27/02/2022,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. 4,000   41745/22 10/08/2022 Yeva Adolfovna BLAUBERG 1996   Gerasimov Dmitriy Georgiyevich St Petersburg Protest against war in Ukraine   St Petersburg   26/02/2022 article 20.2.2 § 1 of CAO fine of RUB   10,000 St Petersburg City Court 12/04/2022 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence report from 6.30 p.m. on 26/02/2022 until the hearing in the first-instance court on 27/02/2022,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. 4,000   41746/22 10/08/2022 Aleksandra Igorevna TSOY 1999   Gerasimov Dmitriy Georgiyevich St Petersburg Protest against war in Ukraine   St Petersburg   01/03/2022 article 20.2.2 § 1 of CAO fine of RUB   10,000 St Petersburg City Court 21/04/2022 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence report from 8.15 p.m. on 01/03/2022 until the hearing in the first-instance court on 02/03/2022,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. 4,000   42806/22 19/08/2022 Aleksey Vladimirovich GILL 1989   Sorokin Daniil Vadimovich St Petersburg Protest against war in Ukraine   St Petersburg   27/02/2022 article 20.2.2 § 1 of CAO detention for 3 days St Petersburg City Court 19/04/2022 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence report from 8.10 p.m. on 27/02/2022 until 4.00 p.m. on 01/03/2022,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings,   Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - the sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO. 5,000   46205/22 10/09/2022 Mikhail Sergeyevich NIKOLAICHEV 1997   Loktev Sergey Aleksandrovich St Petersburg Protest against war in Ukraine   St Petersburg   13/03/2022 article 20.2.2 § 1 of CAO fine of RUB   10,000 St Petersburg City Court 21/06/2022 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence report from 3.30 p.m. on 13/03/2022 until 14/03/2022,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. 4,000   46212/22 10/09/2022 Azamat Ilshatovich MUKHAMEDYAROV 1999   Yermilova Natalya Pavlovna Yekaterinburg Protest against war in Ukraine   Yekaterinburg   06/03/2022 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO 32 hours of community work Sverdlovsk Regional Court 27/07/2022 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence report from 2.35 p.m. until 8.10 p.m. on 06/03/2022,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. 4,000   46503/22 15/09/2022 Aleksandr Nikolayevich POPKOV 1994       Protest against war in Ukraine   St Petersburg   06/03/2022 article 20.2.2 § 1 of CAO fine of RUB   19,000 St Petersburg City Court 14/06/2022 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence report from 5.30 p.m. on 06/03/2022 until 12.30 a.m. on 07/03/2022,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. 4,000   47813/22 17/09/2022 Yevgeniy Aleksandrovich SHEVTSOV 1986       Protest against war in Ukraine   St Petersburg   27/02/2022 article 20.2.2. § 1 of CAO fine of RUB   10,070 St Petersburg City Court 19/05/2022 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence report from 6.00 p.m. on 27/02/2022 until 1.00 p.m. on 28/02/2022,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. 4,000   9556/23 01/02/2023 Lolita Sergeyevna DUBOVIK 1998   Vasilchenko Olesya Anatolyevna Minyar Protest against war in Ukraine   St Petersburg   06/03/2022 article 20.2.2 § 1 of CAO fine of RUB   10,000 St Petersburg City Court 04/10/2022 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 4.50 p.m. on 06/03/2022 until 4.00 p.m. on 07/03/2022 4,000     [1] Plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicants.