CEDH · CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG — 6 novembre 2025

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s2EF17D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:2pt } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s34DFC730 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s10950C61 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sB9D5CABB { width:28.35pt; display:inline-block } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s3AAE10DF { margin-top:14pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s3CA22BA { font-family:Arial; text-transform:uppercase } .s2D9C6089 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s84651E4E { margin-top:14pt; margin-left:14.2pt; margin-bottom:3pt; text-align:justify } .s69DCC830 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sC986E16F { font-family:Arial; color:#ffffff } .sC646A315 { width:14.54pt; display:inline-block } .s7FB0030E { width:111.07pt; display:inline-block } .s9852CA4C { width:7.54pt; display:inline-block } .s9E436411 { width:138.09pt; display:inline-block } .s4ACA9207 { page-break-before:always; clear:both; mso-break-type:section-break } .s6DB91820 { text-align:center } .s8BB62139 { margin-right:auto; margin-left:auto; border-collapse:collapse } .s3695F815 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .sDF237D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:8pt } .sEECE831 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .sE8934522 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s6B505E72 { margin:0pt; padding-left:0pt } .s4F2ADFDB { text-align:center; font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; list-style-position:inside } .sBB6163A7 { width:2.48pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .s4E056575 { height:38.95pt }   FOURTH SECTION DECISION Application no. 43697/21 Iosif MARIN against Romania and 10 other applications (see appended table) The European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section), sitting on 6   November 2025 as a Committee composed of:   Anne Louise Bormann , President ,   Sebastian Răduleţu,   András Jakab , judges , and Viktoriya Maradudina, Acting Deputy Section Registrar, Having regard to the above applications lodged on the various dates indicated in the appended table, Having deliberated, decides as follows: FACTS AND PROCEDURE The list of the applicants and the relevant details are set out in the appendix. The applicants’ complaints under Article 3 of the Convention concerning the inadequate conditions of detention and the lack of any effective remedy in domestic law, were communicated to the Romanian Government, who submitted observations on the admissibility and merits. The observations were forwarded to the applicants, who were invited to submit their own observations (see the appended table for the relevant dates). No reply was received by the Court. By letters sent by registered post, the applicants were notified that the time allowed for the submission of their observations had expired (see the appended table for the relevant dates). The applicants’ attention was further drawn to Article 37 § 1 (a) of the Convention, which provides that the Court may strike an application out of its list of cases where the circumstances lead to the conclusion that the applicant does not intend to pursue the application. No reply to these letters has been received by the Court. The registered letters were either received by the applicants or the applicants’ relatives or were returned to the Court (see details in the appended table). THE LAW Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single decision. In the light of the foregoing, and in the absence of any special circumstances regarding respect for the rights guaranteed by the Convention and the Protocols thereto, the Court, in accordance with Article   37   §   1   (a) of   the Convention, considers that it is no longer justified to continue the examination of the applications. Accordingly, the applications should be struck out of the list of the Court’s list of cases. For these reasons, the Court, unanimously, Decides to join the applications; Decides to strike the applications out of its list of cases. Done in English and notified in writing on 27 November 2025.     Viktoriya Maradudina   Anne Louise Bormann   Acting Deputy Registrar   President   APPENDIX List of applications raising complaints under Article   3 of the Convention (inadequate conditions of detention) No. Application no. Date of introduction Applicant’s name Year of birth Date of the applicant’s last letter to the Court Date of sending Government’s observations to the applicant Time-limit for submission of response by the applicant Date of the Court’s registered letter Date of receipt/return of the registered letter     43697/21 20/09/2021 Iosif MARIN 1976     29/09/2021 26/03/2025 07/05/2025 04/06/2025 Received by the applicant on 18/06/2025     56532/21 16/04/2022 Gheorghiță-Laurențiu GHERGHINA 1999     07/06/2022 26/03/2025 07/05/2025 04/06/2025 Received by the prison’s representative on 20/06/2025     56685/21 14/03/2022 Lucian-Nelu DASCĂLU 1974     22/03/2022 26/03/2025 07/05/2025 04/06/2025 Received by the applicant on 23/06/2025     7875/22 15/03/2022 Zoltan CRISTOREANU 1972     22/04/2022 03/03/2025 14/04/2025 02/06/2025 Received on 26/06/2025, illegible signature     22204/22 24/04/2022 Sorin IGNA 1971     02/05/2022 18/03/2025 29/04/2025 06/06/2025 Received on 24/06/2025, illegible signature     26377/22 19/07/2022 Tudor-Florin MOCĂNICI 1987     26/07/2022 03/03/2025 14/04/2025 02/06/2025 Received on 17/06/2025, illegible signature     31323/22 28/09/2022 Fănel DUMINICĂ 1982     09/11/2022 18/03/2025 29/04/2025 06/06/2025 Received on 18/06/2025, by a relative of the applicant     33850/22 09/08/2022 Adrian SFAIŢ 1991     17/04/2023 03/03/2025 14/04/2025 02/06/2025 Received on 19/06/2025, illegible signature     50186/22 17/01/2023 Florin DIOSZEGI 1987     15/05/2025 02/05/2025 13/06/2025 26/05/2025, letter sent to the applicant’s new address following his letter of 15/05/2025, with the strike-out warning Received by the prison’s representative on 18/06/2025   50543/22 21/11/2022 Szabolcs DELNE 1979     28/11/2022 18/03/2025 29/04/2025 06/06/2025 Received by the applicant on 19/06/2025   54512/22 28/12/2022 Adrian-Ion BICU 1987     15/02/2023 18/03/2025 29/04/2025 06/06/2025 Received on 18/06/2025, illegible signature