CEDH · CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG — 4 décembre 2025

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s2EF17D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:2pt } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s34DFC730 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s10950C61 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sB9D5CABB { width:28.35pt; display:inline-block } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s3AAE10DF { margin-top:14pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s3CA22BA { font-family:Arial; text-transform:uppercase } .s2D9C6089 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s84651E4E { margin-top:14pt; margin-left:14.2pt; margin-bottom:3pt; text-align:justify } .s69DCC830 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s22DFA96B { width:28.86pt; display:inline-block } .sC986E16F { font-family:Arial; color:#ffffff } .sC5599237 { width:142.72pt; display:inline-block } .sC646A315 { width:14.54pt; display:inline-block } .s7FB0030E { width:111.07pt; display:inline-block } .s9852CA4C { width:7.54pt; display:inline-block } .s9E436411 { width:138.09pt; display:inline-block } .s4ACA9207 { page-break-before:always; clear:both; mso-break-type:section-break } .s6DB91820 { text-align:center } .s8BB62139 { margin-right:auto; margin-left:auto; border-collapse:collapse } .s3695F815 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .sDF237D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:8pt } .sEECE831 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .sE8934522 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s6B505E72 { margin:0pt; padding-left:0pt } .s4F2ADFDB { text-align:center; font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; list-style-position:inside } .sBB6163A7 { width:2.48pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .sBCF36575 { height:36.95pt }   FOURTH SECTION DECISION Application no. 24267/21 Marian BONCIU against Romania and 13 other applications (see appended table) The European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section), sitting on 4   December 2025 as a Committee composed of:   Anne Louise Bormann , President ,   Sebastian Răduleţu,   András Jakab , judges , and Viktoriya Maradudina, Acting Deputy Section Registrar, Having regard to the above applications lodged on the various dates indicated in the appended table, Having deliberated, decides as follows: FACTS AND PROCEDURE The list of the applicants and the relevant details are set out in the appendix. The applicants’ complaints under Article 3 of the Convention concerning the inadequate conditions of detention and the lack of any effective remedy in domestic law, were communicated to the Romanian Government, who submitted observations on the admissibility and merits. The observations were forwarded to the applicants, who were invited to submit their own observations (see the appended table for the relevant dates). No reply was received by the Court. By letters sent by registered post, the applicants were notified that the time allowed for the submission of their observations had expired (see the appended table for the relevant dates). The applicants’ attention was further drawn to Article 37 § 1 (a) of the Convention, which provides that the Court may strike an application out of its list of cases where the circumstances lead to the conclusion that the applicant does not intend to pursue the application. No reply to these letters has been received by the Court. The registered letters were received by the applicants or the applicants’ relatives (see details in the appended table). THE LAW Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single judgment. In the light of the foregoing, and in the absence of any special circumstances regarding respect for the rights guaranteed by the Convention and the Protocols thereto, the Court, in accordance with Article   37   §   1   (a) of the Convention, considers that it is no longer justified to continue the examination of the applications. Accordingly, the cases should be struck out of the list. For these reasons, the Court, unanimously, Decides to join the applications; Decides to strike the applications out of its list of cases. Done in English and notified in writing on 8 January 2026.   {signature_p_1}   {signature_p_2}   Viktoriya Maradudina   Anne Louise Bormann   Acting Deputy Registrar   President   APPENDIX List of applications raising complaints under Article   3 of the Convention (inadequate conditions of detention) No. Application no. Date of introduction Applicant’s name Year of birth Date of the applicant’s last letter to the Court Date of sending Government’s observations to the applicant Time-limit for submission of response by the applicant Date of the Court’s registered letter Date of receipt of the registered letter     24267/21 31/05/2021 Marian BONCIU 1994         31/05/2022 18/03/2025 29/04/2025 18/06/2025 04/07/2025 Illegible signature       31797/21 14/06/2021 Iulian-Darius BOARIU 1991         27/07/2021 18/03/2025 29/04/2025 18/06/2025 02/07/2025 Signed for receipt by the applicant’s father       37806/21 13/08/2021 Dorel BARBU 1975         07/03/2022 18/03/2025 29/04/2025 18/06/2025 30/06/2025 Handed over to the recipient (according to information on the website of the Romanian Post)       58202/21 12/11/2021 Ciprian-Vasile PORCESCU 1984         29/11/2021 18/03/2025 29/04/2025 18/06/2025 03/07/2025 Signed for receipt by the applicant’s father       61707/21 17/12/2021 Marius-Ioan CAŞCAVAL 1981         28/02/2022 18/03/2025 29/04/2025 18/06/2025 02/07/2025 Illegible signature       14850/22 08/04/2022 Gabriel TEODORESCU 1975         12/04/2022 25/03/2025 06/05/2025 18/07/2025 06/08/2025 Signed for receipt by the applicant     31332/22 18/07/2022 Silviu-Cristian IANCHIŞ 1990         04/09/2023 25/03/2025 06/05/2025 18/07/2025 05/08/2025 Illegible signature       32723/22 12/08/2022 Ionuţ DINU 1991         09/09/2024 25/03/2025 06/05/2025 18/07/2025 04/08/2025 Handed over to the recipient (according to information on the website of the Romanian Post)       35018/22 08/08/2022 Constantin-Ionuţ RĂDUCAN 1994         10/07/2023 24/03/2025 05/05/2025 18/07/2025 04/08/2025 Signed for receipt by the applicant’s mother     37250/22 12/09/2022 Claudiu-Florin STRUGARU 1996         04/11/2024 18/03/2025 29/04/2025 18/06/2025 02/07/2025 Signed for receipt by a relative of the applicant   38327/22 26/06/2023 Sorin-Paul SABADÎŞ 1993         10/08/2023 24/03/2025 05/05/2025 18/07/2025 06/08/2025 Signed for receipt by the Baia Mare prison’s authorities     41956/22 22/12/2022 Rupi BURCEA 1982         14/03/2025 24/03/2025 05/05/2025 18/07/2025 08/08/2025 Signed for receipt by a relative of the applicant   42392/22 23/12/2022 Csaba SUCIU 1982         19/02/2025 18/03/2025 29/04/2025 18/06/2025 02/07/2025 Signed for receipt by the applicant’s   46979/22 11/11/2022 Iacob TĂMĂŞAN 1985         10/07/2023 24/03/2025 05/05/2025 18/07/2025 06/08/2025 Illegible signature