CEDHCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG26
CEDH · CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG — 16 décembre 2025
- ECLI
- ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:1216JUD001869320
- Date
- 16 décembre 2025
- Publication
- 16 décembre 2025
droits fondamentauxCEDH
Source : DILA / Judilibre · open data
Mes notes
privées · visibles par vous seulRésumé structuré
version préliminaireFaits
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Procédure
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Question juridique
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Solution
source officielleViolation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing);Violation of Article 7 - No punishment without law (Article 7-1 - Nullum crimen sine lege)
Résumé généré automatiquement — à vérifier avec la décision originale.
Analyse IA non disponible
Générez un résumé intelligent de cette décision
Texte intégral
.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .sFE10DC93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s665E407E { margin-top:66pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .s34DFC730 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s10950C61 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s2E932ED2 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:11pt } .s4ACA9207 { page-break-before:always; clear:both; mso-break-type:section-break } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sB9D5CABB { width:28.35pt; display:inline-block } .s3AAE10DF { margin-top:14pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s3CA22BA { font-family:Arial; text-transform:uppercase } .s6B505E72 { margin:0pt; padding-left:0pt } .sDECD9755 { margin-left:11.67pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; padding-left:6.78pt; font-family:Arial; text-transform:uppercase } .sDA7B489D { margin-top:14pt; margin-left:15pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; padding-left:3.45pt; font-family:Arial; text-transform:uppercase } .s5C5C410E { margin-top:14pt; margin-left:18.34pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; padding-left:0.11pt; font-family:Arial; text-transform:uppercase } .sD11CFAB7 { margin-top:14pt; margin-left:15.01pt; margin-bottom:3pt; text-align:justify; padding-left:1.99pt; font-family:Arial } .sFBC99493 { font-style:italic } .s2D9C6089 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s69DCC830 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sC986E16F { font-family:Arial; color:#ffffff } .sB6A7F5BF { width:17.54pt; display:inline-block } .s235C1871 { width:137.76pt; display:inline-block } .s5D826FD4 { width:25.88pt; display:inline-block } .s1B61D60 { width:156.43pt; display:inline-block } .sD00444C6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt } .sA1D3DA2E { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:justify } .sC295E44D { border:0.75pt solid #949494; border-collapse:collapse } .sD271F6F6 { border-right:0.75pt solid #949494; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .s598389F7 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:10pt } .sEECE831 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .s3E08F9CA { border-right:0.75pt solid #949494; border-left:0.75pt solid #949494; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .s2EB42ED2 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:10pt } .sF6B4CE32 { border-right:0.75pt solid #949494; border-left:0.75pt solid #949494; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:middle; background-color:#dfdfdf } .sC54D2024 { border-left:0.75pt solid #949494; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .sDF42CB81 { border-top:0.75pt solid #949494; border-right:0.75pt solid #949494; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s905DCB37 { margin-left:23pt; text-align:center; padding-left:13pt; font-family:Arial; font-size:10pt } .sE8934522 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s5AE0EB7 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:middle } .s85D71A24 { border-top:0.75pt solid #949494; border-left:0.75pt solid #949494; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sF876DC6D { margin-left:24.46pt; text-align:center; padding-left:13pt; font-family:Arial; font-size:10pt } .sBACC1DED { margin-left:30.02pt; text-align:center; padding-left:13pt; font-family:Arial; font-size:10pt } .s3DE46EBF { border-top:0.75pt solid #949494; border-right:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sD3B88E32 { border-top:0.75pt solid #949494; border-right:0.75pt solid #949494; border-left:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sA30831E3 { border-top:0.75pt solid #949494; border-left:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top }     SECOND SECTION CASE OF KARSLI AND OTHERS v. TÜRKİYE (Applications nos. 18693/20 and 1,435 others – see appended list)             JUDGMENT   STRASBOURG 16 December 2025   This judgment is final but it may be subject to editorial revision. In the case of Karslı and Others v. Türkiye, The European Court of Human Rights (Second Section), sitting as a Committee composed of:   Jovan Ilievski , President ,   Péter Paczolay,   Juha Lavapuro , judges , and Dorothee von Arnim, Deputy Section Registrar, Having regard to: the applications against the Republic of Türkiye lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) by the applicants listed in the appended table (“the applicants”), on the various dates indicated therein; the decision to give notice of the complaints under Article 6 § 1 (the right to a fair trial) and Article   7 of the Convention (no punishment without law) to the Turkish Government (“the Government”) represented by their Agent, Mr Abdullah   Aydın, Head of the Department of Human Rights of the Ministry of Justice of the Republic of Türkiye; the parties’ observations; the decision to reject the Government’s objection to the examination of the applications by a Committee; Having deliberated in private on 25 November 2025, Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on that date: SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE 1.     The case concerns the applicants’ convictions for membership of an armed terrorist organisation described by the Turkish authorities as the “Fetullahist Terror Organisation/Parallel State Structure” ( Fetullahçı Terör Örgütü / Paralel Devlet Yapılanması , hereinafter referred to as “the FETÖ/PDY”), considered by the authorities to be behind the coup attempt that took place in Türkiye on 15 July 2016. The broader domestic background and context to the present applications was set out by the Court in Yüksel Yalçınkaya v. Türkiye ([GC], no. 15669/20, §§ 10-22 and 108 ‑ 40, 26   September 2023). 2.     The applicants’ convictions were based decisively on their use of an encrypted messaging application by the name of “ByLock”. The domestic authorities and courts considered that the ByLock application was designed for the exclusive use of the members of the FETÖ/PDY and that the establishment of the use of that application was sufficient on its own for conviction under Article 314 § 2 of the Criminal Code for membership of an armed terrorist organisation (ibid., §§ 155-65 and 257). 3 .     Other evidence against the applicants, if any, involved mainly an admission of using ByLock, decrypted message content confirming use of that application or witness statements attesting to such use; membership of a trade union, association and/or foundation considered to be affiliated with the FETÖ/PDY; account activities at Bank Asya, which was considered by the authorities to be a part of the financial structure of the FETÖ/PDY; possession of pro-FETÖ/PDY publications or other audio-visual material; participation in trips considered to have been organised by the FETÖ/PDY and records of exit from and entry to Türkiye; donations to FETÖ/PDY-affiliated foundations; participation in various demonstrations considered to be in support of the FETÖ/PDY or in other organisational activities; social media posts in favour of the organisation; residence in FETÖ/PDY student houses or dormitories; use of other messaging applications, such as Kakao Talk or Eagle, to communicate with other members of the organisation; HTS (Historical Traffic Search) records indicating communications with others prosecuted of the same offence or other digital evidence suggesting membership of the organisation; employment by and/or membership of FETÖ/PDY ‑ affiliated institutions, organisations or companies; witness statements as regards such employment and/or membership, or as regards other connections to the FETÖ/PDY. In the case of some of the applicants, the convictions were imposed without waiting for the submission to the case files of the detailed ByLock findings and evaluation reports – which potentially included decrypted content of communications over ByLock – on the ground that the establishment of the use of that application sufficed for conviction, irrespective of the nature and content of the communications. 4.     The individual applications lodged by the applicants with the Constitutional Court against their convictions were summarily dismissed by that court as being inadmissible, on the basis of its case-law endorsing the Court of Cassation’s landmark judgments on the matter (see Yüksel   Yalçınkaya , cited above, §§   169-88). THE COURT’S ASSESSMENT JOINDER OF THE APPLICATIONS 5.     Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single judgment. ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLES 7 AND 6 § 1 OF THE CONVENTION 6.     The applicants complained that their trials and convictions under Article   314   §   2 of the Criminal Code for membership of the FETÖ/PDY had violated the principle of no punishment without law under Article 7 of the Convention, as well as the right to a fair trial under Article 6 § 1, primarily for the reasons set out in Demirhan and Others v. Türkiye (nos. 1595/20 and 238   others, § 29, 22 July 2025). In particular, they complained of various alleged irregularities in the collection and admission in evidence of the ByLock data, as well as of the difficulties encountered in challenging them and the inadequacy of the reasoning in the courts’ decisions vis-à-vis that evidence, which in their opinion had rendered their trials unfair. 7.     The Government reiterated their observations as outlined in Demirhan and Others (ibid., §§ 31-34). They submitted that, while notice of the present applications had been given to them as raising issues similar to those addressed by the Court in Yüksel Yalçınkaya (cited above), the Court’s considerations in that judgment had related to the specific facts of that case. They argued that the Court should therefore refrain from extrapolating the findings made therein to the present applications and invited it to assess the criminal proceedings conducted against each applicant on the basis of their own particular circumstances. They claimed, in particular, that the convictions in the present applications had not been based solely on the applicants’ use of the ByLock application but had involved a wide variety of other evidence, not all of which had been subject to assessment in Yüksel Yalçınkaya (cited above; see the evidence listed in paragraph 3 above). The domestic courts, which had enjoyed direct contact with the evidence at issue, had established each   applicant’s membership of the armed terrorist organisation on an individual basis following a careful assessment of all the elements in their specific case files. 8.     The Court notes that these complaints are not manifestly ill-founded within the meaning of Article 35 § 3 (a) of the Convention or inadmissible on any other grounds. They must therefore be declared admissible. 9.     As regards the merits, the Court indeed observes that the evidence in respect of some of the applicants included material that was not at issue in Yüksel Yalçınkaya (cited above). That being said, having examined all the material and arguments submitted to it, the Court finds no reason in the present case to depart from its findings in Yüksel Yalçınkaya (cited above, §§   237-72 and 300-56), for the reasons set out in detail in Demirhan and Others (cited above, §§ 36-47). 10.     It notes in this connection that the finding of violations of Articles   7 and 6 §   1 of the Convention in Yüksel Yalçınkaya (cited above) had resulted notably from the domestic courts’ characterisation of the use of ByLock, according to which anyone whose use of ByLock was established could be convicted on that sole basis of membership of an armed terrorist organisation pursuant to Article 314 § 2 of the Criminal Code (ibid., §§ 364, 413 and 414). It therefore follows, as also underlined in Yüksel Yalçınkaya (cited above, §   414), and subsequently reiterated in Demirhan and Others (cited above, §   38) that the situation that led to a finding of a violation of Articles   7 and   6   §   1 of the Convention in that case was not prompted by an isolated incident or attributable to the particular turn of events specific to the facts of that case, but potentially applied to everyone convicted for membership of the FETÖ/PDY on the basis of their use of ByLock. 11.     The Court does not rule out that there may be other evidence in respect of some of the applicants, other than their use of ByLock, that may demonstrate their organic link with the FETÖ/PDY based on the continuity, diversity and intensity of their activities and their submission to its hierarchy as required under the Court of Cassation’s case-law (see Yüksel Yalçınkaya , cited above, § 184) and thus secure their conviction as charged. The fact nevertheless remains that the establishment of the mere use of ByLock served, on its own, as conclusive proof of the presence of all of the constituent elements of the crime of membership of an armed terrorist organisation as defined in domestic law. The Court has declared this approach of the domestic courts, which effectively imputed objective liability to the users of ByLock, to be in contravention of the principle of legality safeguarded under Article   7 of the Convention (ibid., §§ 271 and 272), and it sees no reason to find otherwise in the present case (see also Demirhan and Others , cited above, §   39). 12.     The Court would further note, as concerns specifically the applicants’ allegations under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention, that the criminal proceedings conducted separately against each applicant may indeed have shown differences in certain procedural respects, depending mainly on the evidence produced for or against the applicant and the administration of such evidence. However, irrespective of the possible particularities of each file, the domestic courts’ uniform and global approach to the use of ByLock has effectively defined the procedural framework of the criminal proceedings at issue, which have therefore suffered from the main shortcomings identified in Yüksel Yalçınkaya under Article 6 § 1 (cited above, § 345; see also Demirhan and Others , cited above, §§ 42-45). The Court concluded in these cases that the domestic courts’ failure to put in place appropriate safeguards vis ‑ à ‑ vis the use of the ByLock data as the key piece of evidence at issue to enable the applicants to challenge them effectively, to address the salient issues lying at the core of the case and to provide reasons justifying their decisions was incompatible with the very essence of the applicants’ procedural rights under Article 6   §   1. The Court accepts that the difficulties facing Türkiye in the aftermath of the attempted military coup of 15   July 2016 are undoubtedly a contextual factor which must be taken into account in cases such as the present one. Yet, for the reasons explained in detail in Yüksel Yalçınkaya (cited above, §§ 353-55), it has no basis on which to hold that the limitations on the applicants’ fair trial rights at issue were strictly required by the exigencies of the situation within the meaning of Article   15 of the Convention. 13 .     In view of the above considerations, the Court concludes that there has been a violation of Articles 7 and 6 § 1 of the Convention on the facts of the present case (see also ibid., §§ 272 and 356, and Demirhan and Others , cited above, § 46). OTHER ALLEGED VIOLATIONS OF THE CONVENTION 14.     The Court notes that some of the applicants also lodged complaints under other provisions of the Convention, such as Articles 5, 8, 9, 10, 11 and   14, or raised complaints relating to other aspects of Article 6 (as in Yüksel   Yalçınkaya , cited above, §§ 357, 358 368 and 374). However, having regard to the finding of violations of Articles 7 and 6 § 1 above (see paragraph   13), the Court considers that it has dealt with the main legal questions raised by the case and that there is no need to address the admissibility and merits of any remaining complaints (see, mutatis mutandis , Yüksel   Yalçınkaya , cited above, §§ 365, 367 and 373; Turan and Others v.   Turkey , nos. 75805/16 and 426 others, § 98, 23   November 2021; and Demirhan and Others , cited above, § 48). APPLICATION OF ARTICLE 41 OF THE CONVENTION 15.     The Court considers, for the reasons explained in Yüksel   Yalçınkaya (cited above, §§ 404, 411, 412 and 425; see also Demirhan and Others , cited above, § 53), that the finding of violations of Articles   7 and 6 § 1 of the Convention can be regarded as sufficient just satisfaction in respect of any non-pecuniary damage sustained by the applicants in the present case. It notes in this regard that the applicants have the possibility under Article 311 §   1   (f) of the Code of Criminal Procedure to have the domestic proceedings reopened following the delivery of the present judgment (see Yüksel   Yalçınkaya , cited above, § 411), and that the reopening of the proceedings in a manner compatible with the “conclusions and spirit” of the judgment would in principle constitute the most appropriate form of redress, should they so request. 16.     Furthermore, for the reasons set out in Demirhan and Others (cited above, §§   54-56), the Court makes no awards for costs and expenses in respect of follow-up applications of this type. FOR THESE REASONS, THE COURT, UNANIMOUSLY, Decides to join the applications; Declares the applicants’ complaints that their trials and convictions for membership of the FETÖ/PDY had violated the principle of no punishment without law under Article 7 of the Convention and the right to a fair trial under Article 6 § 1 – as concerns the rights of the defence in respect of the evidence underlying the conviction – admissible; Holds that there has been a violation of Article 7 of the Convention; Holds that there has been a violation of Article   6   §   1 of the Convention; Holds that there is no need to examine the admissibility and merits of the applicants’ remaining complaints; Holds that the finding of a violation constitutes in itself sufficient just satisfaction for any non-pecuniary damage sustained by the applicants; Dismisses the remainder of any claim made by the applicants for just satisfaction. Done in English, and notified in writing on 16 December 2025, pursuant to Rule   77   §§   2 and 3 of the Rules of Court.     Dorothee von Arnim   Jovan Ilievski   Deputy Registrar   President     APPENDIX List of cases:   No. Application no. Case name Lodged on Applicant Year of Birth Place of Residence Nationality Represented by   18693/20 Karslı v. Türkiye 20/04/2020 Ömer Faruk KARSLI 1990 Erzurum Turkish Mustafa Nuri AKBULUT   40489/19 Kırcılı v. Türkiye 29/07/2019 Ali KIRCILI 1976 Aydın Turkish Selim Savaş SEYİTLİGİL   60688/19 Kadıoğlu v. Türkiye 07/11/2019 İsmail KADIOĞLU 1979 Giresun Turkish Elif CİVELEKOĞLU   61481/19 Takyan v. Türkiye 12/11/2019 Mustafa TAKYAN 1992 Niğde Turkish Ahmet ÖZTÜRK   911/20 Karadağ v. Türkiye 09/12/2019 Ahmet KARADAĞ 1975 Edirne Turkish Ali Rıza KILIÇ   2203/20 Demirbaş v. Türkiye 26/12/2019 Musa DEMİRBAŞ 1976 Niğde Turkish Özcan AKINCI   3532/20 Kaya v. Türkiye 10/12/2019 Basri KAYA 1964 Adıyaman Turkish Şeyho SAYA   5486/20 Topal v. Türkiye 16/01/2020 Cebrail TOPAL 1983 Malatya Turkish     9952/20 Akarslan v. Türkiye 05/02/2020 Mustafa AKARSLAN 1976 Afyonkarahisar Turkish Reyhan AKARSLAN   10035/20 Kömür v. Türkiye 04/02/2020 Orkun KÖMÜR 1974 Osmaniye Turkish Şeyho SAYA   11829/20 Bulut v. Türkiye 13/02/2020 Akif BULUT 1990 Sivas Turkish Büşra LEVENT   12367/20 Taş v. Türkiye 28/02/2020 Abdullah TAŞ 1980 Kayseri Turkish     13062/20 Olğun v. Türkiye 22/02/2020 Soner OLĞUN 1992 Adana Turkish     13329/20 Danışman v. Türkiye 13/02/2020 Kazım DANIŞMAN 1973 Antalya Turkish     13734/20 Taşkın v. Türkiye 02/03/2020 Adnan TAŞKIN 1978 Antalya Turkish Fehmi GÜNDÜZ   14994/20 Vuruşkan v. Türkiye 16/03/2020 Yunus VURUŞKAN 1989 Çorum Turkish Neda BUYRUKÇU   15135/20 Kurt v. Türkiye 10/03/2020 İbrahim Gökhan KURT 1987 Malatya Turkish     15157/20 Çevik v. Türkiye 04/03/2020 Zeynal ÇEVİK 1986 Adıyaman Turkish     15695/20 Dural v. Türkiye 17/03/2020 Naim DURAL 1974 Kayseri Turkish Leman TALASLIOĞLU   16073/20 Körpe v. Türkiye 16/03/2020 Erol KÖRPE 1977 Çorum Turkish Neda BUYRUKÇU   16111/20 Erden v. Türkiye 20/03/2020 Gülşen ERDEN 1984 Manisa Turkish Arife YÜKSEKDAĞ ALTUNAY   16208/20 Erdoğmuş v. Türkiye 18/03/2020 Rüştü ERDOĞMUŞ 1967 Kütahya Turkish Hasan KILIÇ   16574/20 Kaya v. Türkiye 19/03/2020 Mustafa KAYA 1981 Kütahya Turkish     16750/20 Konur v. Türkiye 20/03/2020 Zeynel KONUR 1966 Kütahya Turkish     16767/20 Özcan v. Türkiye 14/04/2020 Halil ÖZCAN 1978 Kütahya Turkish Hasan KILIÇ   16835/20 Gürlek v. Türkiye 25/03/2020 Zehra GÜRLEK 1989 Kahramanmaraş Turkish Abdurrahim SIĞIRTMAÇ   16957/20 Albayrak v. Türkiye 18/03/2020 Ahmet ALBAYRAK 1972 Çorum Turkish Rukiye COŞGUN   17555/20 Kafa v. Türkiye 04/03/2020 Yusuf KAFA 1985 Afyonkarahisar Turkish     18009/20 Oktay v. Türkiye 14/04/2020 Ali OKTAY 1985 Balıkesir Turkish Kadir ÖZTÜRK   18477/20 Tolu v. Türkiye 21/04/2020 Yılmaz TOLU 1984 Gaziantep Turkish Ömer YÜZGEÇ   19079/20 Yilmaz v. Türkiye 21/04/2020 Murat YILMAZ 1975 Adıyaman Turkish Ömer YÜZGEÇ   19379/20 Dalkılınç v. Türkiye 30/04/2020 İbrahim DALKILINÇ 1971 Samsun Turkish Şeyma MISIRLIOĞLU   19512/20 Kani v. Türkiye 05/05/2020 Özcan KANİ 1974 Kütahya Turkish Hasan KILIÇ   20211/20 Kızılsekili v. Türkiye 20/03/2020 İbrahim KIZILSEKİLİ 1962 Burdur Turkish Havva ŞİMŞEK AKIN   20242/20 Yalçın v. Türkiye 14/05/2020 Tunay YALÇIN 1975 İzmir Turkish Özlem SUZAN   20255/20 Taş v. Türkiye 15/05/2020 Murat TAŞ 1982 Kayseri Turkish     20691/20 Aktaş v. Türkiye 30/04/2020 Engin AKTAŞ 1983 Denizli Turkish     20739/20 İlhan v. Türkiye 20/05/2020 Necati Vefa İLHAN 1972 Manisa Turkish Kamile ÖZBULUT   20869/20 Adiyeke v. Türkiye 11/05/2020 Ümran ADİYEKE 1992 Siirt Turkish Mehmet SATICI   21508/20 Bulmuş v. Türkiye 18/03/2020 Hacı Mehmet BULMUŞ 1975 Kayseri Turkish Ömer DELİGEZER   21516/20 Özbek v. Türkiye 27/05/2020 Bayram ÖZBEK 1983 Uşak Turkish Mehmet BAŞYİĞİT   21808/20 Salı v. Türkiye 21/05/2020 Salih SALI 1980 Manisa Turkish Mustafa SOYLU   22036/20 İslam v. Türkiye 21/04/2020 Ahmet İSLAM 1984 Aksaray Turkish     22054/20 Doğan v. Türkiye 02/05/2020 Azimet DOĞAN 1974 Kütahya Turkish Fatih DÖNMEZ   22223/20 Kökten v. Türkiye 29/04/2020 Mustafa KÖKTEN 1981 Adana Turkish Sinan TUMLUKOLÇU   22332/20 Köşker v. Türkiye 04/06/2020 Durdu KÖŞKER 1990 Adıyaman Turkish     23558/20 Taş v. Türkiye 14/05/2020 Ekrem TAŞ 1981 Manisa Turkish Arife YÜKSEKDAĞ ALTUNAY   23929/20 Ece v. Türkiye 02/06/2020 Şerif ECE 1975 Denizli Turkish Zeynep AYDOĞAN   24224/20 Can v. Türkiye 21/05/2020 Ahmet CAN 1985 Kilis Turkish     24286/20 İrsin v. Türkiye 13/05/2020 Mehmet İRSİN 1982 Malatya Turkish Eyüp KUTLUBAY   24338/20 Köroğlu v. Türkiye 08/05/2020 Sinan KÖROĞLU 1974 Erzincan Turkish Mehmet Burak UZUN   24772/20 Akgül v. Türkiye 29/05/2020 Burak AKGÜL 1984 Sivas Turkish     24823/20 Eserer v. Türkiye 29/05/2020 Sadık ESERER 1971 Erzurum Turkish     27415/20 Burkan v. Türkiye 13/04/2020 Bayram BURKAN 1986 Osmaniye Turkish Zehra KILIÇ   27579/20 Altunay v. Türkiye 15/06/2020 Hacı Bayram ALTUNAY 1966 Manisa Turkish Arife YÜKSEKDAĞ ALTUNAY   27761/20 Şen v. Türkiye 03/07/2020 Veysel ŞEN 1994 Balıkesir Turkish Mürüvet KARABAYIR   27905/20 Ayhan v. Türkiye 09/06/2020 İlhan AYHAN 1974 Manisa Turkish Arife YÜKSEKDAĞ ALTUNAY   27975/20 Akçay v. Türkiye 29/06/2020 Talat AKÇAY 1974 Manisa Turkish     28100/20 Poyraz v. Türkiye 22/06/2020 Bedri POYRAZ 1971 Ankara Turkish     28148/20 Akbaba v. Türkiye 09/06/2020 İzzet AKBABA 1973 Manisa Turkish Arife YÜKSEKDAĞ ALTUNAY   28258/20 Aksungur v. Türkiye 03/07/2020 Ferhat AKSUNGUR 1984 Manisa Turkish Kadir ÖZTÜRK   28756/20 Dönmez v. Türkiye 09/06/2020 Cafer DÖNMEZ 1971 Kırıkkale Turkish     28841/20 Sarı v. Türkiye 02/07/2020 Sami SARI 1981 Samsun Turkish     29198/20 Gişi v. Türkiye 02/07/2020 Yakup GİŞİ 1988 Kahramanmaraş Turkish     29236/20 Üstebay v. Türkiye 01/07/2020 Yavuz ÜSTEBAY 1989 İzmir Turkish Metin ÜSTEBAY   29357/20 Tombak v. Türkiye 01/06/2020 Nurdoğan TOMBAK 1983 Muğla Turkish     29628/20 Yeşildağ v. Türkiye 01/07/2020 Şuayip YEŞİLDAĞ Ordu Turkish Oğuzhan YILMAZ   29651/20 Çöller v. Türkiye 01/07/2020 Asım ÇÖLLER 1979 Ordu Turkish Oğuzhan YILMAZ   29811/20 Yavuz v. Türkiye 25/06/2020 Harun YAVUZ 1974 Samsun Turkish     29852/20 Mavzer v. Türkiye 25/06/2020 Ahmet MAVZER 1990 Kilis Turkish     30664/20 Gökhasan v. Türkiye 02/07/2020 Ümit GÖKHASAN 1974 Istanbul Turkish Naim UZUN   31723/20 Zeyniloğlu v. Türkiye 01/06/2020 Halit ZEYNİLOĞLU 1982 Manisa Turkish     32518/20 Yüzgeç v. Türkiye 27/07/2020 Kubilay YÜZGEÇ 1989 Elazığ Turkish Mustafa KÜÇÜK   34539/20 Ertem v. Türkiye 20/07/2020 Erhan ERTEM 1967 İzmir Turkish Ayşe AYGÜN   34738/20 Bilgili v. Türkiye 07/08/2020 Ali BİLGİLİ 1968 Kütahya Turkish     34763/20 Kaptı v. Türkiye 20/07/2020 Aydeniz KAPTI 1976 Uşak Turkish Ayşe AYGÜN   35290/20 Ulusoy v. Türkiye 09/06/2020 Şakir ULUSOY 1971 Manisa Turkish Arife YÜKSEKDAĞ ALTUNAY   36084/20 Bilben v. Türkiye 29/07/2020 Ramazan BİLBEN 1985 Manisa Turkish Burhan DEMİRCİ   36445/20 Ertakuş v. Türkiye 07/08/2020 Şakir ERTAKUŞ 1978 İzmir Turkish Çiğdem ÇALIŞ ÇAĞAN   36608/20 Burdurlu v. Türkiye 28/07/2020 Sami BURDURLU 1967 Manisa Turkish Zeynep BURDURLU   36615/20 Bilgin v. Türkiye 24/08/2020 Hasan Şahin BİLGİN 1985 Antalya Turkish     36852/20 Emirahmet v. Türkiye 07/08/2020 Mustafa EMİRAHMET 1976 ANKARA Turkish Hülya POLAT   36896/20 Asutay v. Türkiye 14/08/2020 Emine ASUTAY 1981 Mersin Turkish Aslı TEKŞAHİN   37506/20 Aslan v. Türkiye 20/08/2020 Mehmet Fatih ASLAN 1991 Istanbul Turkish Mehmet MİRZA   37513/20 Aşkın v. Türkiye 20/08/2020 Muhsin AŞKIN 1996 Istanbul Turkish Mehmet MİRZA   37924/20 Salman v. Türkiye 11/08/2020 Mustafa SALMAN 1975 Kayseri Turkish Özcan AKINCI   37940/20 Çelik v. Türkiye 14/08/2020 Metin ÇELİK 1990 Çankırı Turkish Kadir ÖZTÜRK   38904/20 Aşula v. Türkiye 01/09/2020 Ulviye AŞULA 1984 Istanbul Turkish Abdurrahman BAYRAMOĞLU   39314/20 Damarseçkin v. Türkiye 03/09/2020 Hakan DAMARSEÇKİN 1978 Patnos Turkish Sümeyye KETHÜDA   39559/20 Karaaslan v. Türkiye 03/09/2020 Hasan KARAASLAN 1973 Trabzon Turkish Sümeyye KETHÜDA   40323/20 Özcan v. Türkiye 24/08/2020 Safa ÖZCAN 1982 Osmaniye Turkish Özcan AKINCI   40530/20 Yılmaz v. Türkiye 26/08/2020 Rıza YILMAZ 1981 Istanbul Turkish Hacer YILMAZ   40640/20 Baylan v. Türkiye 26/08/2020 Ümit BAYLAN 1982 Balıkesir Turkish Nuriye Beyza BİLGEN GÜÇ   41930/20 Okur v. Türkiye 28/08/2020 Bülent OKUR 1978 İzmir Turkish     42175/20 Korkmaz v. Türkiye 04/09/2020 Güneri KORKMAZ 1991 Konya Turkish Rukiye COŞGUN   42460/20 Tunadurur v. Türkiye 17/09/2020 Ali Haydar TUNADURUR 1978 Balıkesir Turkish Abdurrahman ÇAKIR   42827/20 Türk v. Türkiye 15/09/2020 Taşkın TÜRK 1980 Elazığ Turkish Onur KÖSELİ   43101/20 Gökce v. Türkiye 09/09/2020 Hasan GÖKCE 1973 İzmir Turkish Halil ÇETİN   43195/20 Yüce v. Türkiye 08/09/2020 Ahmet YÜCE 1974 Berlin Turkish Fatih IŞIK   43368/20 Kaya v. Türkiye 17/09/2020 Mustafa KAYA 1977 Kırıkkale Turkish Tuğba AYGUR   43599/20 Arsan v. Türkiye 24/09/2020 Hakan ARSAN 1975 Afyonkarahisar Turkish Fatih AVŞAR   44259/20 Altuntaşlı v. Türkiye 02/09/2020 Onur ALTUNTAŞLI 1983 Gaziantep Turkish Merve MALGIR   44266/20 Dursun v. Türkiye 03/09/2020 Kadir DURSUN 1980 Istanbul Turkish     44388/20 Özdem v. Türkiye 05/10/2020 Seyyid Kutup ÖZDEM 1966 Aydın Turkish Gülümser ÖZDEM   44636/20 Saatçılar v. Türkiye 10/09/2020 Hüseyin SAATÇILAR 1991 Manisa Turkish Arife YÜKSEKDAĞ ALTUNAY   44731/20 Akpınar v. Türkiye 01/10/2020 İbrahim AKPINAR 1987 Istanbul Turkish Fatih GÜNDÜZ   44873/20 Uysal v. Türkiye 11/09/2020 Serhat UYSAL 1991 Istanbul Turkish     44969/20 Gözen v. Türkiye 19/08/2020 Ahmet GÖZEN 1982 Konya Turkish Kadir ÖZTÜRK   44981/20 Akmeşe v. Türkiye 30/09/2020 Yunus AKMEŞE 1987 Niğde Turkish İmran AKMEŞE   45159/20 Sağlam v. Türkiye 29/09/2020 Osman SAĞLAM 1973 Trabzon Turkish Feyza Nur SAĞLAM   45465/20 Baştuğ v. Türkiye 05/10/2020 Abdullah BAŞTUĞ 1993 Malatya Turkish Hanifi KARTAL   45680/20 Ekici v. Türkiye 06/10/2020 Ahmet EKİCİ 1982 Konya Turkish Mehmet Nur TERZİ   45788/20 Ay v. Türkiye 30/09/2020 Ramazan AY 1990 Elazığ Turkish Reşat YARATAN   46288/20 Yıldırım v. Türkiye 16/10/2020 Turgay YILDIRIM 1977 Krefeld Turkish     46491/20 Kefli v. Türkiye 08/10/2020 Sulfi KEFLİ 1984 Antalya Turkish     46564/20 Saydam v. Türkiye 08/10/2020 Ali SAYDAM 1976 Hatay Turkish Dudu ERTUNÇ   46577/20 Çelik v. Türkiye 07/10/2020 Murat ÇELİK 1986 İzmir Turkish Özlem SUZAN   46700/20 Ünal v. Türkiye 12/10/2020 Mustafa ÜNAL 1976 Ankara Turkish Zeynep Sacide SERTER   47197/20 Nazlıoğlu v. Türkiye 19/10/2020 Köksal NAZLIOĞLU 1990 Ankara Turkish     47205/20 Kaya v. Türkiye 15/10/2020 Hasan KAYA 1980 Manisa Turkish Tuğçe Fatma YILDIZ   47660/20 Obudan v. Türkiye 14/10/2020 Melike OBUDAN 1990 Osmaniye Turkish Süleyman Hüseyin YILMAZ   47897/20 Kocaağa v. Türkiye 23/10/2020 Zülfiye KOCAAĞA 1980 Balıkesir Turkish Burcu HAS   47930/20 Kaya v. Türkiye 16/10/2020 Yılmaz KAYA 1972 Çorum Turkish Fatih DÖNMEZ   48385/20 Gezgin v. Türkiye 22/09/2020 Kenan GEZGİN 1982 Kocaeli Turkish Özlem DEMİR GEZGİN   48965/20 Tunç v. Türkiye 30/10/2020 Halil TUNÇ 1982 Balıkesir Turkish Burcu HAS   48984/20 Fent v. Türkiye 11/04/2020 Bekir FENT 1985 Balıkesir Turkish Sinem GÖÇMEZ   49056/20 Arslan v. Türkiye 24/09/2020 Said ARSLAN 1988 Balıkesir Turkish Muhammed Talha YILMAZ   49581/20 Erdoğan v. Türkiye 19/10/2020 Medeni ERDOĞAN 1986 Çanakkale Turkish Adnan ERDOĞAN   50062/20 Leblebici v. Türkiye 30/10/2020 Fatih Mehmet LEBLEBİCİ 1966 Elazığ Turkish İlhan ÖNGÖR   50080/20 Deniz v. Türkiye 30/10/2020 Nurettin DENİZ 1991 Kahramanmaraş Turkish     50111/20 Demir v. Türkiye 26/10/2020 Ferhat DEMİR 1978 Kahramanmaraş Turkish Şeyho SAYA   50171/20 Erdinç v. Türkiye 30/10/2020 Veysel ERDİNÇ 1980 Elazığ Turkish Ferhat YİĞİT   50678/20 Koyuncu v. Türkiye 06/11/2020 Bayram KOYUNCU 1986 Istanbul Turkish Mesut Enes AKBULUT   51014/20 Dulkadir v. Türkiye 12/11/2020 Osman DULKADİR 1985 Istanbul Turkish     51378/20 Aydoğdu v. Türkiye 09/11/2020 Muhammet AYDOĞDU 1977 İzmir Turkish Seçkin KESKİN   51724/20 Ulaş v. Türkiye 19/11/2020 İsmail ULAŞ 1967 Ankara Turkish Ömer Furkan ULAŞ   51728/20 Şahan v. Türkiye 17/11/2020 Fatma ŞAHAN 1991 Kayseri Turkish Sueda YILMAZ   52047/20 Canbulat v. Türkiye 09/11/2020 İbrahim CANBULAT 1977 Kütahya Turkish Mehmet BAŞYİĞİT   52062/20 Işık v. Türkiye 16/11/2020 İshak IŞIK 1980 Yozgat Turkish İrem DANACIOĞLU GÜNEŞ   52462/20 Dağdaş v. Türkiye 19/11/2020 Şevket DAĞDAŞ 1961 Konya Turkish Zümrüt ŞAHİN   52912/20 Çuhadar v. Türkiye 25/11/2020 Soner ÇUHADAR 1989 Istanbul Turkish     53050/20 Başkurt v. Türkiye 24/11/2020 Hasan BAŞKURT İzmir Turkish Muhammet ÜSTÜN   53136/20 Arıcı v. Türkiye 23/11/2020 İbrahim ARICI 1988 Gaziantep Turkish İdris TAŞKIN   53190/20 Avcı v. Türkiye 26/11/2020 Ercan AVCI 1980 İzmir Turkish Gülhis YÖRÜK   53958/20 Sert v. Türkiye 01/12/2020 Osman SERT 1969 Adana Turkish Sinan TUMLUKOLÇU   54340/20 Temel v. Türkiye 20/11/2020 Bayram TEMEL 1980 Antalya Turkish İsa ÇELİK   54590/20 Uluçay v. Türkiye 16/11/2020 Sadık ULUÇAY 1989 Sivas Turkish Mücahit AYDIN   54596/20 Gürkan v. Türkiye 16/11/2020 Akif GÜRKAN 1979 Isparta Turkish Arife YÜKSEKDAĞ ALTUNAY   54874/20 Keleş v. Türkiye 20/11/2020 Mesut KELEŞ 1991 Çanakkale Turkish     55030/20 Yılan v. Türkiye 10/12/2020 Mehmet YILAN 1984 Gaziantep Turkish Adem UZAK   55159/20 Demir v. Türkiye 26/11/2020 Alaettin DEMİR 1972 Antalya Turkish İshak IŞIK   55235/20 Türk v. Türkiye 18/11/2020 Mehmet TÜRK 1976 Manisa Turkish Mehmet MİRZA   55262/20 Arslanhan v. Türkiye 02/12/2020 Kemal ARSLANHAN 1986 Bönen Turkish     55419/20 Kaymak v. Türkiye 16/11/2020 Zekeriya KAYMAK 1978 Afyonkarahisar Turkish Hüsnü Şahin BÜLBÜL   55636/20 Ozan v. Türkiye 03/12/2020 Turgut OZAN 1986 Balıkesir Turkish Merve OZAN   26/21 Dal v. Türkiye 14/12/2020 Ahmet Kürşat DAL 1980 Manisa Turkish Arife YÜKSEKDAĞ ALTUNAY   112/21 Gürbüz v. Türkiye 14/12/2020 Yasir GÜRBÜZ 1992 Manisa Turkish Arife YÜKSEKDAĞ ALTUNAY   1219/21 Kabak v. Türkiye 28/12/2020 Yalçın KABAK 1978 Manisa Turkish Ozan ŞENYER   1739/21 Yakar v. Türkiye 30/12/2020 Halil YAKAR 1984 Agri Turkish Ali ARTUK   1747/21 Ünlü v. Türkiye 11/12/2020 Mansur ÜNLÜ 1983 Kütahya Turkish Büşra KESER   1841/21 Şencan v. Türkiye 15/12/2020 Nurcan ŞENCAN 1987 Ordu Turkish Ekrem KAYA   2206/21 Zenginler v. Türkiye 29/12/2020 Mustafa ZENGİNLER 1986 Kocaeli Turkish Gökhan DİRİCAN   2684/21 Minnetoğlu v. Türkiye 15/12/2020 Abdulhakim MİNNETOĞLU 1980 Malatya Turkish Enes Malik KILIÇ   2938/21 Yıldız v. Türkiye 09/12/2020 İbrahim YILDIZ 1978 Antalya Turkish Nurgül YAYMAN   2953/21 Çınar v. Türkiye 04/01/2021 Basri ÇINAR 1989 Afyonkarahisar Turkish     3053/21 Buyurman v. Türkiye 08/01/2021 Sinan BUYURMAN 1992 Şırnak Turkish Ersan BARKIN   3456/21 Karacan v. Türkiye 28/12/2020 Mustafa KARACAN 1971 Manisa Turkish Arife YÜKSEKDAĞ ALTUNAY   3637/21 Sarı v. Türkiye 29/12/2020 Ercan SARI 1975 Manisa Turkish Kadir ÖZTÜRK   3727/21 Demirci v. Türkiye 29/12/2020 Eyüp DEMİRCİ 1977 Kahramanmaraş Turkish Ahmet ÇOBANOĞLU   4042/21 Şentürk v. Türkiye 26/11/2020 Kani ŞENTÜRK 1974 İzmir Turkish Mehmet Ali UÇAR   4519/21 Öztürk v. Türkiye 08/01/2021 Ferhat ÖZTÜRK 1989 Deventer Turkish Kadir ÖZTÜRK   4908/21 Sönmez v. Türkiye 10/12/2020 Sebati SÖNMEZ 1979 Antalya Turkish     5302/21 Apacık v. Türkiye 11/01/2021 Ahmet APACIK 1993 Elazığ Turkish Mehmet Sıddık KARAGÖZ   6978/21 Çınar v. Türkiye 18/01/2021 Gökhan ÇINAR 1990 Aydın Turkish Meliha Gülsüm ŞAHİN SOYTÜRK   7175/21 Kurşun v. Türkiye 21/01/2021 Hakan Özer KURŞUN 1984 Sakarya Turkish Ahmet EROL   7789/21 Doğan v. Türkiye 21/01/2021 Kadir DOĞAN 1981 Kahramanmaraş Turkish Leyla MESUTOĞLU   8735/21 Yılmaz v. Türkiye 14/01/2021 Ali Rıza YILMAZ 1973 Kocaeli Turkish Cahit ÇİFTÇİ   8738/21 Yıldız v. Türkiye 19/01/2021 Ahmet YILDIZ 1987 Mersch Turkish Ahmet EROL   8877/21 Beyaztaş v. Türkiye 02/02/2021 Ekrem BEYAZTAŞ 1970 Erzurum Turkish Yılmaz POLAT   9674/21 Erbay v. Türkiye 29/01/2021 Mehmet ERBAY 1986 Manisa Turkish Arife YÜKSEKDAĞ ALTUNAY   10064/21 Altun v. Türkiye 27/01/2021 Yunus ALTUN 1988 Elazığ Turkish     10094/21 Zencir v. Türkiye 01/02/2021 Ali ZENCİR 1984 Kahramanmaraş Turkish     10099/21 Saraç v. Türkiye 10/02/2021 Yıldırım SARAÇ 1984 Eskişehir Turkish Elif Nurbanu OR   10226/21 Çetin v. Türkiye 02/02/2021 Osman ÇETİN 1974 Istanbul Turkish     10262/21 Aksakal v. Türkiye 27/01/2021 Mehmet AKSAKAL 1976 Malatya Turkish     10369/21 Taniş v. Türkiye 28/01/2021 Aydın TANIŞ 1985 Mersin Turkish Kadir ÖZTÜRK   10579/21 Çelebi v. Türkiye 01/02/2021 Kurban ÇELEBİ 1974 Erzurum Turkish Fatih TOPAL   10581/21 Çalar v. Türkiye 05/02/2021 Ahmet ÇALAR 1980 İzmir Turkish Nesrin BAL   10951/21 Kent v. Türkiye 12/02/2021 Murat KENT Gaziantep Turkish İdris TAŞKIN   11139/21 Can v. Türkiye 18/02/2021 Adem CAN 1980 Aydın Turkish Mehmet MİRZA   11173/21 Kahraman v. Türkiye 09/02/2021 Reşit KAHRAMAN 1979 Kilis Turkish Kadir ÖZTÜRK   11311/21 Baştuğ v. Türkiye 15/02/2021 Murat BAŞTUĞ 1975 Ordu Turkish Büşra URLU   11483/21 Uğurlu v. Türkiye 15/02/2021 Murat UĞURLU 1980 Ordu Turkish Büşra URLU   11576/21 Çimen v. Türkiye 16/02/2021 Nurullah ÇİMEN Manisa Turkish     11601/21 Yeşilyurt v. Türkiye 17/02/2021 Ömer YEŞİLYURT 1985 Bursa Turkish Fatma BABAYİĞİT   11853/21 Kurman v. Türkiye 12/02/2021 Ferhat KURMAN 1986 İzmir Turkish Mert DİNÇ   11862/21 Başkurt v. Türkiye 16/02/2021 Ersin BAŞKURT 1986 Mersin Turkish Merve MALGIR   11869/21 Hocaoğlu v. Türkiye 29/01/2021 Ahmet HOCAOĞLU 1978 Samsun Turkish Mehmet ÖNCÜ   11874/21 Karaboğa v. Türkiye 03/02/2021 Muammer KARABOĞA 1975 İzmir Turkish Özlem SUZAN   11945/21 Sağır v. Türkiye 22/01/2021 Mehmet SAĞIR 1980 Manisa Turkish Arife YÜKSEKDAĞ ALTUNAY   11956/21 Ahmedali v. Türkiye 16/12/2020 Asliddin AHMEDALİ 1979 Ankara Kirghizstan, Turkish Süeda KADIOĞLU   11961/21 Ülkemen v. Türkiye 15/02/2021 Sinan ÜLKEMEN 1974 Afyonkarahisar Turkish Rana Nuran ÖZKÖKELİ   12088/21 Duysak v. Türkiye 21/12/2020 Raşit DUYSAK 1962 Manisa Turkish Arife YÜKSEKDAĞ ALTUNAY   12092/21 Vardal v. Türkiye 20/01/2021 Fahri VARDAL 1974 İzmir Turkish Kadir ÖZTÜRK   12095/21 Yılmazkeçeci v. Türkiye 04/02/2021 Celal YILMAZKEÇECİ 1978 Manisa Turkish Özgür ÖZÇAM   12178/21 Yılmaz v. Türkiye 21/01/2021 Kerem YILMAZ 1987 Kocaeli Turkish Esma YILMAZ   12197/21 Karslı v. Türkiye 27/02/2021 Şahin KARSLI 1993 Erzurum Turkish     12363/21 Gündüz v. Türkiye 25/02/2021 Mustafa Yasin GÜNDÜZ 1980 İzmir Turkish     12401/21 Kaya v. Türkiye 29/01/2021 Ahmet KAYA 1978 Manisa Turkish     12619/21 Kılıç v. Türkiye 15/02/2021 Emrah KILIÇ 1986 Nevşehir Turkish     12950/21 Bayraktar v. Türkiye 18/02/2021 Fatih Suha BAYRAKTAR 1968 Manisa Turkish Havva ALAN ÖZCEL   12964/21 Yılmaz v. Türkiye 17/02/2021 Emrah Yusuf YILMAZ 1984 Manisa Turkish     13142/21 Baran v. Türkiye 31/12/2020 Talip BARAN 1985 İzmir Turkish     13290/21 Tamer v. Türkiye 05/03/2021 Hüseyin Fatih TAMER 1993 Isparta Turkish Abdullah Erkam TAMER   13377/21 Semerci v. Türkiye 23/02/2021 Mustafa SEMERCİ 1975 Burdur Turkish Kadir ÖZTÜRK   13394/21 Çakır v. Türkiye 22/02/2021 Mehmet Serkan ÇAKIR 1974 Denizli Turkish     13442/21 Taşbulut v. Türkiye 05/03/2021 Cengiz TAŞBULUT 1991 Ağrı Turkish     13461/21 Altınbaş v. Türkiye 26/02/2021 Seyhan ALTINBAŞ 1986 İzmir Turkish Seçkin KESKİN   13724/21 Çarık v. Türkiye 05/03/2021 Orhan ÇARIK 1986 Manisa Turkish Tuğba YIKMAZ   13873/21 Karataş v. Türkiye 01/03/2021 Ali KARATAŞ 1967 Kastamonu Turkish Muammer ŞENLİK   13988/21 Koçak v. Türkiye 01/03/2021 Mehmet Sefa KOÇAK 1981 Adana Turkish İlhan ÖNGÖR   14023/21 Geldim v. Türkiye 02/03/2021 Ali GELDİM 1968 Çorum Turkish Fatih DÖNMEZ   14077/21 Aydın v. Türkiye 23/02/2021 Mustafa Suat AYDIN 1990 Elazığ Turkish     14079/21 Akbay v. Türkiye 10/03/2021 Feyza AKBAY 1983 Manisa Turkish Emre ATES   14623/21 Kuşçu v. Türkiye 23/02/2021 Uğur KUŞÇU 1986 Manisa Turkish İlknur KUŞÇU   14753/21 Bayram v. Türkiye 24/02/2021 Mustafa BAYRAM 1982 Tokat Turkish Hasan YILMAZ   14772/21 Doğan v. Türkiye 09/02/2021 Ümit DOĞAN 1978 Kahramanmaraş Turkish     14777/21 Sıdar v. Türkiye 18/02/2021 Oğuz Cabbar SIDAR 1981 Adana Turkish     15011/21 Karataş v. Türkiye 02/03/2021 Mevlüt KARATAŞ 1986 Sivas Turkish Mücahit AYDIN   15213/21 Altay v. Türkiye 10/03/2021 Nurullah ALTAY 1988 Manisa Turkish Arife YÜKSEKDAĞ ALTUNAY   15304/21 Uzun v. Türkiye 12/03/2021 Selahattin UZUN 1986 Malatya Turkish İbrahim Halil UZUN   15421/21 Çelik v. Türkiye 10/03/2021 Ulvi ÇELİK 1984 Erzurum Turkish     15535/21 Karakuş v. Türkiye 10/03/2021 Tamer KARAKUŞ 1986 Manisa Turkish Kadir ÖZTÜRK   15578/21 Yılmaz v. Türkiye 18/03/2021 Rasim YILMAZ 1970 Ankara Turkish Hamdi Kenan SEVİNÇ   15714/21 Özkan v. Türkiye 09/03/2021 Fatih ÖZKAN 1985 Ankara Turkish Meral ÖZKAN   15852/21 Göçeren v. Türkiye 08/03/2021 Osman GÖÇEREN 1973 Karaman Turkish Rukiye COŞGUN   15929/21 Özdiken v. Türkiye 19/03/2021 Süleyman ÖZDİKEN 1960 Aydın Turkish İlyas ÖZDİKEN   15950/21 Alkan v. Türkiye 10/03/2021 İbrahim ALKAN 1972 Burdur Turkish Muhammed Sabit CAN   15964/21 Doğar v. Türkiye 19/03/2021 Gökhan DOĞAR 1980 Osmaniye Turkish     16004/21 Kıymaz v. Türkiye 09/12/2020 Ramazan KIYMAZ 1980 Manisa Turkish     16072/21 Yıldırım v. Türkiye 15/03/2021 Fatih YILDIRIM 1983 Elazığ Turkish Ayla TUNÇDEMİR   16097/21 Sarıkaya v. Türkiye 15/02/2021 Cebrail SARIKAYA 1976 Bolu Turkish Enes Malik KILIÇ   16100/21 Kaftan v. Türkiye 18/03/2021 Mehmet Ali KAFTAN 1966 Afyonkarahisar Turkish Fatima Büşra KAFTAN   16103/21 Konukseven v. Türkiye 18/02/2021 Tahir KONUKSEVEN 1980 Yozgat Turkish     16148/21 Toprak v. Türkiye 02/03/2021 Hayri TOPRAK 1966 Mersin Turkish Muhsin Enes TOPRAK   16162/21 Çayır v. Türkiye 05/03/2021 Habib ÇAYIR 1977 Uşak Turkish Hüseyin Vadi DALKILIÇ   16204/21 Kaplantepe v. Türkiye 19/03/2021 Tahsin KAPLANTEPE 1987 Istanbul Turkish Enes Malik KILIÇ   16306/21 Çelikoğlu v. Türkiye 19/03/2021 Murat ÇELİKOĞLU 1979 Manisa Turkish İhsan MAKAS   16328/21 Özdamar v. Türkiye 04/03/2021 Ayşe ÖZDAMAR 1985 Kayseri Turkish Naile ALTIPARMAK   16767/21 Erturan v. Türkiye 15/03/2021 Kadir ERTURAN 1970 Nevşehir Turkish Kadir ÖZTÜRK   16954/21 Erbay v. Türkiye 24/03/2021 Yücel ERBAY 1983 Eskişehir Turkish Atıl KARADUMAN   17134/21 Uyan v. Türkiye 11/03/2021 Hasan Hüseyin UYAN 1972 Burdur Turkish Havva ŞİMŞEK AKIN   17394/21 Akıncı v. Türkiye 26/02/2021 Kamil AKINCI 1983 Balıkesir Turkish Mehmet Ali KAYA   17623/21 Arıkan v. Türkiye 24/03/2021 Muhammed ARIKAN 1989 Kastamonu Turkish İrem TATLIDEDE   17718/21 Coşar v. Türkiye 23/03/2021 Osman Güven COŞAR 1974 İzmir Turkish     17888/21 Çakırca v. Türkiye 15/03/2021 Kenan ÇAKIRCA 1963 Kırıkkale Turkish Mustafa KOÇ   17989/21 Karabürk v. Türkiye 19/03/2021 Süleyman KARABÜRK 1980 Istanbul Turkish     18040/21 Tutumlu v. Türkiye 26/03/2021 Süleyman TUTUMLU 1978 Antalya Turkish Samet YILMAZ   18087/21 Kılınç v. Türkiye 30/03/2021 Yakup KILINÇ 1975 Horst Turkish     18150/21 Erarslan v. Türkiye 26/03/2021 Süleyman ERARSLAN 1983 Kırşehir Turkish     18160/21 Kalpaklı v. Türkiye 26/03/2021 Mücahit KALPAKLI 1991 Düzce Turkish Ayşe AYAZMA   18169/21 Kınalı v. Türkiye 23/03/2021 Murat KINALI 1977 Balıkesir Turkish Kamile KILDAN   18213/21 Yılmaz v. Türkiye 29/03/2021 Gökhan YILMAZ 1984 Istanbul Turkish     18214/21 Yılmaz v. Türkiye 30/03/2021 Ebubekir YILMAZ 1986 Aydın Turkish Buket YILMAZ   18218/21 Kalkan v. Türkiye 13/03/2021 Emrah KALKAN 1988 Mardin Turkish     18221/21 Ildırım v. Türkiye 29/03/2021 Kadir ILDIRIM 1989 Niğde Turkish     18320/21 Akman v. Türkiye 30/03/2021 Ali AKMAN 1975 Uşak Turkish Mehmet BAŞYİĞİT   18397/21 Satı v. Türkiye 25/03/2021 Ramazan SATI 1980 Batman Turkish     18494/21 Turan v. Türkiye 02/04/2021 Halil TURAN 1987 Ağrı Turkish Ali ARTUK   18516/21 Sarı v. Türkiye 26/03/2021 Yakup SARI 1994 Düzce Turkish     18654/21 Can v. Türkiye 07/04/2021 Samet CAN 1987 İzmir Turkish Necip CAN   19009/21 Engin v. Türkiye 01/04/2021 Gökhan ENGİN 1974 Mersin Turkish Yavuz Selim ÇELİK   19043/21 Sarıyıldız v. Türkiye 30/03/2021 Muhammed Fatih SARILYILDIZ 1971 Nevşehir Turkish Zehra KARAKULAK BOZDAĞ   19093/21 Yavaşer v. Türkiye 26/03/2021 İbrahim YAVAŞER 1991 Antalya Turkish Adnan ERDOĞAN   19173/21 Demir v. Türkiye 01/04/2021 Muhammet DEMİR 1985 Konya Turkish Mustafa DEMİRCAN   19339/21 Pınarlı v. Türkiye 31/03/2021 Musa PINARLI 1981 Tekirdağ Turkish Zeynep POLAT   19357/21 Karadaş v. Türkiye 29/03/2021 Furkan KARADAŞ 1988 Van Turkish Harun IŞIK   19522/21 Eroğlu v. Türkiye 23/03/2021 Hasan EROĞLU 1989 Osmaniye Turkish Muhammed Murat POYRAZ   19591/21 Turhan v. Türkiye 05/04/2021 Oktay TURHAN 1973 Ankara Turkish Burhan DEMİRCİ   19593/21 Gündüz v. Türkiye 01/04/2021 Hülya GÜNDÜZ 1991 Antalya Turkish Nurgül YAYMAN   19613/21 Sert v. Türkiye 06/04/2021 Cemal SERT 1981 Malatya Turkish Enes Malik KILIÇ   19729/21 Yıldırım v. Türkiye 05/04/2021 İbrahim Hakkı YILDIRIM 1987 Antalya Turkish Hanife YILDIRIM   20016/21 Ciddi v. Türkiye 08/04/2021 Ali CİDDİ 1982 Afyonkarahisar Turkish Kadir ÖZTÜRK   20019/21 Yazgan v. Türkiye 19/03/2021 Vahit YAZGAN 1969 İzmir Turkish Mehmet Nur TERZİ   20083/21 Atlıhan v. Türkiye 14/04/2021 Fahri ATLIHAN 1961 Aydın Turkish Tarık AVŞAR   20142/21 Öztürk v. Türkiye 08/04/2021 Yavuz ÖZTÜRK 1972 İzmir Turkish Bülent ÖNÜR   20212/21 Bürcü v. Türkiye 06/04/2021 İsmail BÜRCÜ 1985 Bursa Turkish Ahmet Serdar GÜNEŞ   20297/21 Gökkaya v. Türkiye 07/04/2021 Merve GÖKKAYA 1990 Konya Turkish Merve ÇALIŞKAN   20342/21 Küçük v. Türkiye 13/04/2021 Mehmet KÜÇÜK 1953 İzmir Turkish Samed TEKİN   20411/21 Vilut v. Türkiye 13/04/2021 Ahmet VİLUT 1973 Afyonkarahisar Turkish     20450/21 Kavak v. Türkiye 06/04/2021 Recep KAVAK 1987 Mardin Turkish Mehmet Ali KAYA   20483/21 Kibar v. Türkiye 07/04/2021 Dağıstan KİBAR 1974 İzmir Turkish Kurtuluş BAŞTİMAR   20626/21 Yıldırım v. Türkiye 16/04/2021 Ali YILDIRIM 1991 Eskişehir Turkish Burhan DEMİRCİ   20893/21 Kadıoğlu v. Türkiye 06/04/2021 Yasin KADIOĞLU 1978 Istanbul Turkish Hatice YILMAZ   20908/21 Orhan v. Türkiye 05/04/2021 Murat ORHAN 1985 Karabük Turkish Erdal TEMİZALTIN   21122/21 Aykut v. Türkiye 13/04/2021 İsmail AYKUT 1977 Denizli Turkish Burhan DEMİRCİ   21183/21 Karaca v. Türkiye 16/04/2021 Pınar Ayşe KARACA 1994 Erzurum Turkish Muhammed YILDIRIM   21195/21 Cenker v. Türkiye 13/04/2021 Oğuz CENKER 1983 Kütahya Turkish Merve MENGİ ELTUTAN   21319/21 Eskiağyar v. Türkiye 19/04/2021 Hamza ESKİAĞYAR 1985 Afyonkarahisar Turkish Eyyüp SAĞIR   21519/21 Kaya v. Türkiye 22/03/2021 Musa KAYA 1982 Elazığ Turkish Yeter KAYA   21646/21 Doboğlu v. Türkiye 09/04/2021 Murat DOBOĞLU 1984 Giresun Turkish Abdullah TIKMAN   21778/21 Aydın v. Türkiye 09/04/2021 Yalçın AYDIN 1975 Denizli Turkish     21781/21 Acar v. Türkiye 25/04/2021 Yusuf ACAR 1976 Manisa Turkish Hanım ACAR   21856/21 Karaçalı v. Türkiye 14/04/2021 Özgür KARAÇALI 1977 Kahramanmaraş Turkish Fatma YILMAZ   21859/21 Manav v. Türkiye 08/04/2021 Samet MANAV 1985 Kayseri Turkish İlhan ÖNGÖR   22139/21 Canbolat v. Türkiye 05/04/2021 Kelam CANBOLAT 1975 Van Turkish Erdal TEMİZALTIN   22227/21 Öztürk v. Türkiye 21/04/2021 Özkan Öner ÖZTÜRK 1975 Malatya Turkish Miyesser ÖZTÜRK   22234/21 Mayatin v. Türkiye 15/04/2021 Ergün MAYATİN 1990 Çorum Turkish     22328/21 Özdemir v. Türkiye 19/04/2021 Kenan ÖZDEMİR 1989 Manisa Turkish Mehmet Ali KAYA   22336/21 Yağcı v. Türkiye 19/04/2021 Kerim YAĞCI 1977 Nevşehir Turkish Mehmet Akif ACAR   22353/21 Sayan v. Türkiye 18/03/2021 Alişan SAYAN 1974 Kayseri Turkish Kadir ÖZTÜRK   22389/21 Dalaklı v. Türkiye 19/04/2021 Bayram DALAKLI 1985 Manisa Turkish Mehmet Ali KAYA   22504/21 Karakış v. Türkiye 27/04/2021 Salih KARAKIŞ 1987 Denizli Turkish Mehmet MİRZA   22514/21 Akarçay v. Türkiye 08/04/2021 Murat AKARÇAY 1970 Manisa Turkish Adem BEDİR   22564/21 Yayla v. Türkiye 20/04/2021 Mustafa Erol YAYLA 1978 Kayseri Turkish Köksal KORKMAZ   22642/21 Aydın v. Türkiye 20/04/2021 İhsan AYDIN 1978 Manisa Turkish     22668/21 Türker v. Türkiye 21/04/2021 Mecnun TÜRKER 1969 Yozgat Turkish Duygu BUDAK   22745/21 Utku v. Türkiye 26/04/2021 Hatice UTKU 1984 Deinze Turkish Muhammet Nuri UTKU   22825/21 Uçan v. Türkiye 21/04/2021 Musa Can UÇAN 1980 Diyarbakır Turkish Lezgin Ahmet BAYBAŞİN   22828/21 Atak v. Türkiye 22/04/2021 Sümer ATAK 1980 Kayseri Turkish Üsame İNAN   23115/21 Tüter v. Türkiye Articles de loi cités
Article 6 CEDHArticle 6-1 CEDHArticle 7 CEDHArticle 7-1 CEDH
Citations
Aucune citation répertoriée pour cette décision.
Décisions connexes
Aucune décision similaire identifiée pour le moment.
Synthèse
- Juridiction
- CEDH
- Chambre
- CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
- Formation
- 26
- Date
- 16 décembre 2025
- Matière
- droits fondamentaux
Référence
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:1216JUD001869320
Données disponibles
- Texte intégral