CEDH · CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG — 19 février 2026

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s2EF17D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:2pt } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s34DFC730 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s10950C61 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sB9D5CABB { width:28.35pt; display:inline-block } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s3AAE10DF { margin-top:14pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s3CA22BA { font-family:Arial; text-transform:uppercase } .s2D9C6089 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s46DB5BA6 { margin-top:14pt; margin-left:14.2pt; margin-bottom:3pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s69DCC830 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s22DFA96B { width:28.86pt; display:inline-block } .sC986E16F { font-family:Arial; color:#ffffff } .sC5599237 { width:142.72pt; display:inline-block } .sC646A315 { width:14.54pt; display:inline-block } .s7FB0030E { width:111.07pt; display:inline-block } .s9852CA4C { width:7.54pt; display:inline-block } .s9E436411 { width:138.09pt; display:inline-block } .s4ACA9207 { page-break-before:always; clear:both; mso-break-type:section-break } .s6DB91820 { text-align:center } .s8BB62139 { margin-right:auto; margin-left:auto; border-collapse:collapse } .s7B0B20EB { border:0.75pt solid #838383; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; background-color:#dfdfdf } .sDF237D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:8pt } .sE1A7A04C { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#424242 } .sEB6A263B { height:28.3pt } .s8FB2C7C8 { border:0.75pt solid #838383; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt } .s6B505E72 { margin:0pt; padding-left:0pt } .s4F2ADFDB { text-align:center; font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; list-style-position:inside } .sBB6163A7 { width:2.48pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold }   FOURTH SECTION DECISION Application no. 459/22 Ion-Constantin NUCŞOIU against Romania and 7 other applications (see appended table) The European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section), sitting on 19   February 2026 as a Committee composed of:   Anne Louise Bormann , President ,   Sebastian Răduleţu,   András Jakab , judges , and Viktoriya Maradudina, Acting Deputy Section Registrar, Having regard to the above applications against Romania lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) on the various dates indicated in the appended table, Having deliberated, decides as follows: FACTS AND PROCEDURE The list of the applicants is set out in the appendix. The applicants’ complaints under Article 3 of the Convention concerning the inadequate conditions of detention were communicated to the Romanian Government, who submitted observations on the admissibility and merits. The observations were forwarded to the applicants, who were invited to submit their own observations (see the appended table for the relevant dates). No reply was received by the Court. By letters sent by registered post, the applicants were notified that the time allowed for the submission of their observations had expired (see the appended table for the relevant dates). The applicants’ attention was further drawn to Article 37 § 1 (a) of the Convention, which provides that the Court may strike an application out of its list of cases where the circumstances lead to the conclusion that the applicant does not intend to pursue the application. No reply to these letters has been received by the Court. The registered letters were returned to the Court (see details in the appended table). THE LAW In the light of the foregoing, and in the absence of any special circumstances regarding respect for the rights guaranteed by the Convention and the Protocols thereto, the Court, in accordance with Article   37   §   1   (a) of the Convention, considers that it is no longer justified to continue the examination of the application. Accordingly, the cases should be struck out of the list. For these reasons, the Court, unanimously, Decides to join the applications; Decides to strike the applications out of its list of cases. Done in English and notified in writing on 12 March 2026.   {signature_p_1}   {signature_p_2}   Viktoriya Maradudina   Anne Louise Bormann   Acting Deputy Registrar   President APPENDIX List of applications raising complaints under Article   3 of the Convention (inadequate conditions of detention) No. Application no. Date of introduction Applicant’s name Year of birth Date of the applicant’s last letter to the Court Date of sending Government’s observations to the applicant Time-limit for submission of response by the applicant Date of the Court’s registered letter Date of return of the registered letter     459/22 25/01/2022 Ion-Constantin NUCŞOIU 1982 28/02/2022 31/03/2025 12/05/2025 25/09/2025 Returned to the Court on 14/11/2025 with mention “unclaimed”     54753/22 16/12/2022 Csaba CARABA 1978 02/02/2023 18/06/2025 30/07/2025 25/09/2025 Returned to the Court on 10/11/2025 with mention “unclaimed”     54840/22 21/12/2022 Tudorel PAVEL 1985 06/10/2023 19/05/2025 30/06/2025 28/08/2025 Returned to the Court on 23/10/2025 with mention “unclaimed”     57200/22 18/01/2023 Mihai VARGA 2000 03/02/2025 19/05/2025 30/06/2025 28/08/2025 Returned to the Court on 23/10/2025 with mention “unclaimed”     1854/23 01/03/2023 Ion-Claudiu BURULEA 1980 11/04/2023 22/05/2025 03/07/2025 12/09/2025 Returned to the Court on 23/10/2025 with mention “applicant was released from detention on 19/04/2024”     17470/23 12/07/2023 Dan-Florin-Gabriel TURCU 1995 23/08/2023 22/05/2025 03/07/2025 12/09/2025 Returned to the Court on 23/10/2025 with mention “applicant was released from detention”     19288/23 27/06/2023 Petrică COJOCARU 1989 05/02/2024 22/05/2025 03/07/2025 12/09/2025 Returned to the Court on 23/10/2025 with mention “moved”     20514/23 22/06/2023 Ionel-Marian GAVRILĂ 1970 26/07/2023 22/05/2025 03/07/2025 12/09/2025 Returned to the Court on 23/10/2025 with mention “applicant was released from detention on 14/03/2025”