CEDH · CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG — 12 mars 2026
- ECLI
- ECLI:CE:ECHR:2026:0312DEC001294825
- Date
- 12 mars 2026
- Publication
- 12 mars 2026
Mes notes
privées · visibles par vous seulRésumé structuré
version préliminaireFaits
Une société a saisi la Cour européenne des droits de l'homme contre la République de Croatie pour violation de l'article 6 § 1 de la Convention (durée excessive des procédures civiles). La société était représentée par un avocat. Les griefs ont été communiqués au gouvernement croate. Les parties ont signé des déclarations de règlement amiable prévoyant l'abandon des revendications de la société en échange d'un paiement par le gouvernement d'un montant en euros, majoré d'intérêts en cas de retard.
Procédure
La Cour a reçu les déclarations de règlement amiable signées par les parties. Le gouvernement s'est engagé à verser un montant déterminé dans un délai de trois mois, sous peine de paiement d'intérêts. Le paiement constitue la résolution définitive du litige.
Question juridique
La Cour européenne des droits de l'homme est-elle compétente pour examiner une affaire lorsque les parties ont conclu un règlement amiable mettant fin au litige ?
Solution
source officielleRadiation de l'affaire du rôle de la Cour conformément à l'article 39 de la Convention.
Texte intégral
.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s2EF17D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:2pt } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s34DFC730 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s10950C61 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .sEB98FB19 { margin-top:0pt; margin-left:14.2pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s927C53B8 { width:14.15pt; font-family:Arial; display:inline-block } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s6B505E72 { margin:0pt; padding-left:0pt } .s329183A { margin-top:14pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-family:Arial; font-size:14pt; text-transform:uppercase } .s2D9C6089 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s84651E4E { margin-top:14pt; margin-left:14.2pt; margin-bottom:3pt; text-align:justify } .s69DCC830 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sC986E16F { font-family:Arial; color:#ffffff } .sA10C00D6 { width:14.54pt; font-family:Arial; display:inline-block } .sBED24249 { width:127.41pt; font-family:Arial; display:inline-block } .s935FFEBF { width:7.54pt; font-family:Arial; display:inline-block } .sDCEB1D12 { width:138.09pt; font-family:Arial; display:inline-block } .s4ACA9207 { page-break-before:always; clear:both; mso-break-type:section-break } .s6DB91820 { text-align:center } .s88830249 { width:100%; margin-right:auto; margin-left:auto; border-collapse:collapse } .s53FA449 { width:12.18%; border:0.75pt solid #838383; padding:1.4pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .sDF237D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:8pt } .sE1A7A04C { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#424242 } .s3A096F2 { width:16.24%; border:0.75pt solid #838383; padding:1.4pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .sAB680AA7 { width:13.54%; border:0.75pt solid #838383; padding:1.4pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .s9A4CB672 { width:14.9%; border:0.75pt solid #838383; padding:1.4pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .sCC7380B3 { font-family:Arial; font-size:6pt; font-weight:bold; vertical-align:super; color:#424242 } .sAB95A5CB { font-family:Arial; font-size:5.33pt; font-weight:bold; vertical-align:super; color:#424242 } .s6C8EE9ED { width:14.68%; border:0.75pt solid #838383; padding:1.4pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .s2ADD3E8D { width:12.18%; border:0.75pt solid #838383; padding:1.4pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s73CDF3CF { width:16.24%; border:0.75pt solid #838383; padding:1.4pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .s674AE27E { width:13.54%; border:0.75pt solid #838383; padding:1.4pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sF9321351 { width:14.9%; border:0.75pt solid #838383; padding:1.4pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sCC3DAF6D { width:14.68%; border:0.75pt solid #838383; padding:1.4pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sF6A12959 { width:33%; height:1px; text-align:left } .s5FFF0A7E { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:8pt } .sA4BC3E2E { font-family:Arial; font-size:5.33pt; vertical-align:super; color:#000000 }   FIRST SECTION DECISION Application no. 12948/25 SEGES D.O.O. against Croatia (see appended table) The European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting on 12   March   2026 as a Committee composed of:   Raffaele Sabato , President ,   Artūrs Kučs,   Anna Adamska-Gallant , judges , and Viktoriya Maradudina, Acting Deputy Section Registrar, Having regard to the above application against the Republic of Croatia lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) on 17   April 2025, Having regard to the formal declarations accepting a friendly settlement of the case, Having deliberated, decides as follows: FACTS AND PROCEDURE The applicant company’s details are set out in the appended table. The applicant company was represented by Mr D. Štivić, a lawyer practising in Županja. The applicant company’s complaints under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention concerning the excessive length of civil proceedings were communicated to the Croatian Government (“the Government”). The Court received the friendly-settlement declarations, signed by the parties, under which the applicant company agreed to waive any further claims against Croatia in respect of the facts giving rise to this application, subject to an undertaking by the Government to pay it the amounts detailed in the appended table. These amounts will be payable within three months from the date of notification of the Court’s decision. In the event of failure to pay this these amounts within the above-mentioned three-month period, the Government undertake to pay simple interest on them, from the expiry of that period until settlement, at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points. The payment will constitute the final resolution of the case. THE LAW The Court takes note of the friendly settlement reached between the parties. It is satisfied that the settlement is based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and the Protocols thereto and finds no reasons to justify a continued examination of the application. In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the case out of the list. For these reasons, the Court, unanimously, Decides to strike the application out of its list of cases in accordance with Article   39 of the Convention. Done in English and notified in writing on 2 April 2026.     Viktoriya Maradudina   Raffaele Sabato   Acting Deputy Registrar   President   APPENDIX Application raising complaints under Article   6 § 1 of the Convention (excessive length of civil proceedings) Application no. Date of introduction Applicant’s name Year of registration Representative’s name and location Date of receipt of Government’s declaration Date of receipt of Applicant’s declaration Amount awarded for non-pecuniary damage (in euros) [1] Amount awarded for costs and expenses (in euros) [2] 12948/25 17/04/2025   SEGES D.O.O. 2002   Štivić Dražen Županja 31/12/2025 06/11/2025 2,600 500   [1] Plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicant company. [2] Plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicant company.Citations
Aucune citation répertoriée pour cette décision.
Décisions connexes
Aucune décision similaire identifiée pour le moment.
Synthèse
- Juridiction
- CEDH
- Chambre
- CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
- Formation
- 25
- Dispositif
- Radiation
- Date
- 12 mars 2026
- Matière
- droits fondamentaux
Référence
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2026:0312DEC001294825