CEDHCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG27
CEDH · CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG — 26 mars 2026
- ECLI
- ECLI:CE:ECHR:2026:0326DEC002199622
- Date
- 26 mars 2026
- Publication
- 26 mars 2026
droits fondamentauxCEDH
Source : DILA / Judilibre · open data
Mes notes
privées · visibles par vous seulRésumé structuré
version préliminaireFaits
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Procédure
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Question juridique
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Solution
source officielleStruck out of the list
Résumé généré automatiquement — à vérifier avec la décision originale.
Analyse IA non disponible
Générez un résumé intelligent de cette décision
Texte intégral
.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s2EF17D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:2pt } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s10950C61 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sA43C3626 { width:28.35pt; font-family:Arial; display:inline-block } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s6B505E72 { margin:0pt; padding-left:0pt } .s329183A { margin-top:14pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-family:Arial; font-size:14pt; text-transform:uppercase } .s2D9C6089 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s46DB5BA6 { margin-top:14pt; margin-left:14.2pt; margin-bottom:3pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s69DCC830 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s100B4D8F { width:28.86pt; font-family:Arial; display:inline-block } .sC986E16F { font-family:Arial; color:#ffffff } .s55548CBF { width:142.72pt; font-family:Arial; display:inline-block } .sA10C00D6 { width:14.54pt; font-family:Arial; display:inline-block } .sFD0F2AB0 { width:121.74pt; font-family:Arial; display:inline-block } .s935FFEBF { width:7.54pt; font-family:Arial; display:inline-block } .sDCEB1D12 { width:138.09pt; font-family:Arial; display:inline-block }   THIRD SECTION DECISION Application no. 21996/22 Spyridon PANAGIOTOPOULOS against Greece The European Court of Human Rights (Third Section), sitting on 26   March 2026 as a Committee composed of:   Diana Kovatcheva , President ,   Canòlic Mingorance Cairat,   Vasilka Sancin , judges , and Viktoriya Maradudina, Acting Deputy Section Registrar, Having regard to the above application against the Hellenic Republic lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) on 11   May 2021, Having deliberated, decides as follows: FACTS AND PROCEDURE The applicant, Mr Spyridon Panagiotopoulos, was born in 1979. He was represented by Mr Ch. Ladis and Ms M. Daliani, two lawyers practising in Athens. The applicant’s complaints under Article 3 of the Convention concerning the inadequate conditions of detention, as well as under Article   13 of the Convention concerning the lack of an effective remedy in domestic law in respect of such conditions were communicated to the Greek Government (“the Government”) On 26   November 2025 the Government informed the Registry that the applicant had died on 17 July 2022. They asked the Court to strike the application out of the list of cases since no heirs, close family members or any other person claiming to have a legitimate interest, expressed the wish to pursue the proceedings. By a letter dated 19   December 2025 sent through the Court’s Electronic Communication Service (eComms), the applicant’s representative was informed accordingly and was invited to indicate by 16 January 2026 whether there is a person who wishes to pursue the proceedings before the Court and provide a written statement explaining their legitimate interest in having the proceedings pursued, as well as supporting documents to that effect. Following the first representative’s letter of 16 January 2026 requesting a one-month extension of the set time-limit, the Court decided by a letter dated 19   January 2026 to grant the extension requested, setting a new time-limit until 16 February 2026. The applicant’s first representative downloaded the Court’s letter on the eComms platform on 20 January 2026. However, to this date, no response has followed. THE LAW In the light of the foregoing, the Court concludes that the applicant’s heirs, if any, do not wish to pursue the application within the meaning of Article   37   §   1   (a) of the Convention. Accordingly, the case should be struck out of the list. For these reasons, the Court, unanimously, Decides to strike the application out of its list of cases. Done in English and notified in writing on 16   April 2026.   {signature_p_1}   {signature_p_2}   Viktoriya Maradudina   Diana Kovatcheva   Acting Deputy Registrar   President  Citations
Aucune citation répertoriée pour cette décision.
Décisions connexes
Aucune décision similaire identifiée pour le moment.
Synthèse
- Juridiction
- CEDH
- Chambre
- CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
- Formation
- 27
- Date
- 26 mars 2026
- Matière
- droits fondamentaux
Référence
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2026:0326DEC002199622
Données disponibles
- Texte intégral