CEDH · CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG — 9 avril 2026

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s2EF17D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:2pt } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s34DFC730 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s10950C61 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sA43C3626 { width:28.35pt; font-family:Arial; display:inline-block } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s6B505E72 { margin:0pt; padding-left:0pt } .s329183A { margin-top:14pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-family:Arial; font-size:14pt; text-transform:uppercase } .s2D9C6089 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s84651E4E { margin-top:14pt; margin-left:14.2pt; margin-bottom:3pt; text-align:justify } .s69DCC830 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sC986E16F { font-family:Arial; color:#ffffff } .sA10C00D6 { width:14.54pt; font-family:Arial; display:inline-block } .s27603DD6 { width:111.07pt; font-family:Arial; display:inline-block } .s935FFEBF { width:7.54pt; font-family:Arial; display:inline-block } .sDCEB1D12 { width:138.09pt; font-family:Arial; display:inline-block } .s4ACA9207 { page-break-before:always; clear:both; mso-break-type:section-break } .s6DB91820 { text-align:center } .s1B7D1A3D { width:58.06%; margin-right:auto; margin-left:auto; border-collapse:collapse } .s6BAEACEA { width:29.48%; border:0.75pt solid #838383; padding:1.4pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .sDF237D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:8pt } .sE1A7A04C { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#424242 } .s7D2CE868 { width:28.46%; border:0.75pt solid #838383; padding:1.4pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .s14565F93 { width:21.06%; border:0.75pt solid #838383; padding:1.4pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .sA0AAF7B8 { width:21%; border:0.75pt solid #838383; padding:1.4pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .s779875C9 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; letter-spacing:-0.2pt; color:#424242 } .sDE408F3C { width:29.48%; border:0.75pt solid #838383; padding:1.4pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s64CB013C { width:28.46%; border:0.75pt solid #838383; padding:1.4pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .s22C4A0DC { width:21.06%; border:0.75pt solid #838383; padding:1.4pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sDBD7B000 { width:21%; border:0.75pt solid #838383; padding:1.4pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top }   FOURTH SECTION DECISION Application no. 4637/23 LTD. ILIYARD against Georgia (see appended table) The European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section), sitting on 9   April 2026 as a Committee composed of:   Anne Louise Bormann , President ,   Sebastian Răduleţu,   András Jakab , judges , and Viktoriya Maradudina, Acting Deputy Section Registrar, Having regard to the above application against Georgia lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) on 17   January 2023, Having deliberated, decides as follows: FACTS AND PROCEDURE The applicant company’s details are set out in the appended table. The applicant company was represented by Mr   V. Macharashvili, a lawyer practising in Tbilisi. The applicant’s complaints under Article 1 of Protocol   No.   1 and Article   13 of the Convention concerning the freezing of its assets and the lack of any effective remedy in domestic law were communicated to the Georgian Government (“the Government”), represented by their Agent, Mr   B. Dzamashvili, of the Ministry of Justice. On 19   January 2024 the applicant company informed the Registry that the matter underlying the application had been resolved at domestic level and it did not wish to pursue the application. THE LAW In the light of the foregoing, the Court concludes that the applicant may be regarded as no longer wishing to pursue the application (Article   37   §   1   (a) of the Convention). Furthermore, in accordance with Article   37   §   1 in fine , the Court finds no special circumstances regarding respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and the Protocols thereto which require the continued examination of the application. Accordingly, the case should be struck out of the list. For these reasons, the Court, unanimously, Decides to strike the application out of its list of cases. Done in English and notified in writing on 13 May 2026.     Viktoriya Maradudina   Anne Louise Bormann   Acting Deputy Registrar   President   APPENDIX Application raising complaints under Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 and Article 13 of the Convention (freezing of assets and lack of any effective remedy in domestic law)   Application no. Date of introduction Applicant’s name Year of registration Date of the applicant’s last letter to the Court   Reason for withdrawal   4637/23 17/01/2023   LTD. ILIYARD 2009 19/01/2024 Matter resolved at domestic level