CEDHCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG29
CEDH · CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG — 9 avril 2026
- ECLI
- ECLI:CE:ECHR:2026:0409DEC005779017
- Date
- 9 avril 2026
- Publication
- 9 avril 2026
droits fondamentauxCEDH
Source : DILA / Judilibre · open data
Mes notes
privées · visibles par vous seulRésumé structuré
version préliminaireFaits
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Procédure
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Question juridique
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Solution
source officielleStruck out of the list
Résumé généré automatiquement — à vérifier avec la décision originale.
Analyse IA non disponible
Générez un résumé intelligent de cette décision
Texte intégral
.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s2EF17D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:2pt } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s10950C61 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sA43C3626 { width:28.35pt; font-family:Arial; display:inline-block } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s6B505E72 { margin:0pt; padding-left:0pt } .s329183A { margin-top:14pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-family:Arial; font-size:14pt; text-transform:uppercase } .sB853CD26 { font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt } .s84651E4E { margin-top:14pt; margin-left:14.2pt; margin-bottom:3pt; text-align:justify } .s2D9C6089 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s69DCC830 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sC986E16F { font-family:Arial; color:#ffffff } .sA10C00D6 { width:14.54pt; font-family:Arial; display:inline-block } .sD3C5A1EB { width:132.75pt; font-family:Arial; display:inline-block } .s935FFEBF { width:7.54pt; font-family:Arial; display:inline-block } .sDCEB1D12 { width:138.09pt; font-family:Arial; display:inline-block }   FIFTH SECTION DECISION Application no. 57790/17 RAST, TOV against Ukraine The European Court of Human Rights (Fifth Section), sitting on 9   April   2026 as a Committee composed of:   Andreas Zünd , President,   Diana Sârcu,   Mykola Gnatovskyy , judges, and Viktoriya Maradudina, Acting Deputy Section Registrar, Having regard to the above application against Ukraine lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) on 21   July 2017, Having deliberated, decides as follows: FACTS AND PROCEDURE The applicant company, Rast, TOV, was registered in 2003. It was represented by Mr R.V. Veresha, a lawyer practising in Chernigiv, Ukraine. The applicant company’s complaint under Article   6   §   1 of the Convention concerning the breach of the principle of legal certainty due to allegedly contradictory court decisions in two cases concerning validity of an auction at which the applicant company sought to buy some real estate was communicated to the Ukrainian Government (“the Government”), who submitted observations on the admissibility and merits. By letter dated 23 January 2026, sent via the Court’s Electronic Communication Service (eComms), the applicant company was notified that the period allowed for submission of its observations had expired on 25   September 2025 and that no extension of time had been requested. The   applicant company’s attention was drawn to Article   37   §   1   (a) of the   Convention, which provides that the Court may strike an application out of its list of cases where the circumstances lead to the conclusion that the applicant does not intend to pursue the application. The applicant company received that letter on 27   January 2026. However, no response followed. THE LAW In the light of the foregoing, and in the absence of any special circumstances regarding respect for the rights guaranteed by the Convention and the Protocols thereto, the Court, in accordance with Article   37   §   1   (a) of the Convention, considers that it is no longer justified to continue the   examination of the application. Accordingly, the case should be struck out of the list. For these reasons, the Court, unanimously, Decides to strike the application out of its list of cases. Done in English and notified in writing on 13 May 2026.     Viktoriya Maradudina   Andreas Zünd   Acting Deputy Registrar   President  Citations
Aucune citation répertoriée pour cette décision.
Décisions connexes
Aucune décision similaire identifiée pour le moment.
Synthèse
- Juridiction
- CEDH
- Chambre
- CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
- Formation
- 29
- Date
- 9 avril 2026
- Matière
- droits fondamentaux
Référence
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2026:0409DEC005779017
Données disponibles
- Texte intégral