CEDH · CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG — 7 mai 2026
- ECLI
- ECLI:CE:ECHR:2026:0507DEC000828320
- Date
- 7 mai 2026
- Publication
- 7 mai 2026
Mes notes
privées · visibles par vous seulRésumé structuré
IAFaits
Le demandeur, représenté par un avocat, a saisi la Cour européenne des droits de l'homme le 29 janvier 2020 pour se plaindre de l'absence de prévention, d'enquête et de réparation concernant des actes de violence scolaire dont il aurait été victime. Le demandeur réside sur des territoires occupés où les services postaux ukrainiens ou internationaux ne fonctionnent pas. Le 18 novembre 2025, la Cour a demandé à son représentant de confirmer la poursuite de la procédure, mais la lettre n'a pas été consultée. Plusieurs tentatives de contact téléphonique ont échoué, rendant tout échange impossible.
Procédure
La Cour a tenté à plusieurs reprises de contacter le demandeur ou son représentant sans succès. Aucune nouvelle information de contact n'a été fournie par le demandeur pour permettre la poursuite de la procédure. La Cour a appliqué l'article 37 § 1 (a) de la Convention, qui permet de rayer une affaire du rôle lorsque les circonstances indiquent que le demandeur n'entend pas poursuivre sa requête.
Question juridique
La Cour européenne des droits de l'homme peut-elle rayer une affaire de son rôle lorsque le demandeur, résidant sur des territoires occupés, ne peut être contacté malgré les tentatives répétées de la Cour et que son représentant n'a pas confirmé la poursuite de la procédure ?
Solution
Texte intégral
.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s2EF17D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:2pt } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s10950C61 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sA43C3626 { width:28.35pt; font-family:Arial; display:inline-block } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s6B505E72 { margin:0pt; padding-left:0pt } .s329183A { margin-top:14pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-family:Arial; font-size:14pt; text-transform:uppercase } .s84651E4E { margin-top:14pt; margin-left:14.2pt; margin-bottom:3pt; text-align:justify } .s2D9C6089 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s69DCC830 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sC986E16F { font-family:Arial; color:#ffffff } .sA10C00D6 { width:14.54pt; font-family:Arial; display:inline-block } .sD3C5A1EB { width:132.75pt; font-family:Arial; display:inline-block } .s935FFEBF { width:7.54pt; font-family:Arial; display:inline-block } .sDCEB1D12 { width:138.09pt; font-family:Arial; display:inline-block }   FIFTH SECTION DECISION Application no. 8283/20 Mykhaylo Grygorovych KUKOVYNETS against Ukraine The European Court of Human Rights (Fifth Section), sitting on 7   May   2026 as a Committee composed of:   Andreas Zünd , President ,   Vahe Grigoryan,   Sébastien Biancheri , judges , and Viktoriya Maradudina, Acting Deputy Section Registrar, Having regard to the above application against Ukraine lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) on 29   January 2020, Having deliberated, decides as follows: FACTS AND PROCEDURE The applicant, Mr Mykhaylo Grygorovych Kukovynets, was born in 2008 and lives in Tokmak, Zaporizhzhya Region, which is currently not controlled by Ukraine. The applicant was represented by Mr A.M. Seliverstov, a lawyer who has practiced in Tokmak at the material time. The last communication from the applicant was his application lodged on 29   January 2020, in which he complained about the alleged failure of the State to prevent, investigate and redress school violence in his respect. The applicant resides on the occupied territories of Ukraine, where Ukrainian or international postal services do not operate. On 18 November 2025 the applicant’s representative was requested to confirm whether the applicant maintained his application before the Court. His attention was drawn to Article 37 § 1 (a) of the Convention, which provides that the Court may strike a case out of its list of cases where the circumstances lead to the conclusion that the applicant does not intend to pursue the application. However, the Court’s letter, sent through the Court’s Electronic Communication Service (eComms), was not downloaded by the applicant’s representative. The Registry’s numerous attempts to reach the applicant or his representative by telephone were unsuccessful. It follows that there is no effective contact with the applicant. THE LAW The Court notes that all the available means to contact the applicant have been tried without success. The applicant did not provide the Court with any new contact information which could have allowed the Court to conduct further proceedings. In the light of the foregoing, and in the absence of any special circumstances regarding respect for the rights guaranteed by the Convention and the Protocols thereto, the Court, in accordance with Article 37 § 1 (a) of the Convention, considers that it is no longer justified to continue the examination of the application (see Bryska and Others v Ukraine [Committee] (dec.), nos. 11706/13 and 5 others, 2 November 2023, and Zhadan and Others v Ukraine [Committee] (dec.), nos. 29283/13 and 26   others, 14 December 2023). The Court, however, reiterates that under Article 37 § 2 of the Convention it may decide to restore the application to its list of cases if it considers that the circumstances justify such a course. Accordingly, the case should be struck out of the list. For these reasons, the Court, unanimously, Decides to strike the application out of its list of cases. Done in English and notified in writing on 28 May 2026.     Viktoriya Maradudina   Andreas Zünd   Acting Deputy Registrar   PresidentCitations
Aucune citation répertoriée pour cette décision.
Décisions connexes
Aucune décision similaire identifiée pour le moment.
Synthèse
- Juridiction
- CEDH
- Chambre
- CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
- Formation
- 29
- Date
- 7 mai 2026
- Matière
- droits fondamentaux
Référence
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2026:0507DEC000828320
Données disponibles
- Texte intégral