CEDH · CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG — 15 septembre 2010

.s3ABFC313 { font-size:10pt } .s598389F9 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:12pt } .sDB9EB187 { font-weight:bold } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .s87C74EA6 { font-size:8pt; font-weight:bold; vertical-align:super; color:#000000 } .s2EF62ED2 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:12pt } .sFBC99493 { font-style:italic } .s4894483B { margin-top:0pt; margin-left:35.45pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:12pt } .s76CF415B { page-break-before:always; clear:both } .s2E932ED2 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:11pt } .sE3D66594 { border:0.75pt solid #000000; border-collapse:collapse } .s132A6D70 { height:44.45pt } .s2304E19B { border-right-style:double; border-right-width:1.5pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:4.65pt; padding-left:5.03pt } .s598389F8 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:11pt } .s152196C9 { border-left-style:double; border-left-width:1.5pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:4.65pt } .s5B8637C { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt } .sB178B59B { font-size:7.33pt; font-weight:bold; vertical-align:super } .sB673203C { border-style:solid; border-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt } .s8EC1446F { border-style:solid double solid solid; border-width:0.75pt 1.5pt 0.75pt 0.75pt; padding-right:4.65pt; padding-left:5.03pt } .s56A4C55 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:double; border-left-width:1.5pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:4.65pt } .s22155D7A { height:23.25pt } .s876D4AB2 { text-decoration:underline; color:#0069d6 } .s5A04E78A { height:18.9pt } .s4735D7A { height:20.55pt } .s2865D7A { height:20.85pt } .sE52A5D7A { height:21.15pt } .s4A06B0A7 { height:18.25pt } .sE4EC5D7A { height:21.35pt } .s97E2263B { height:20.3pt } .sE48B5D7A { height:21.25pt } .s3C68E78A { height:19.6pt } .s2BA2B0A7 { height:19.35pt } .sE4C95D7A { height:21.05pt } .s3D45D7A { height:20.65pt } .s2E75D7A { height:20.95pt } .s9845263B { height:20.6pt } .s971C263B { height:20.9pt } .s4355D7A { height:20.75pt } .s3B15D7A { height:20.35pt } .s9866263B { height:20.7pt } .sA6784500 { height:35.3pt } .s55601073 { height:21pt } .s98A8263B { height:20.5pt } .s29BE6C23 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt } .s78B6B604 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt } .s90F1A5F0 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:double; border-right-width:1.5pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; padding-right:4.65pt; padding-left:5.03pt } .sBD204368 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:double; border-left-width:1.5pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:4.65pt } .sF6A12959 { width:33%; height:1px; text-align:left } .s5FFF0A7E { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:8pt } .s846B54EF { font-size:5.33pt; vertical-align:super; color:#0069d6 } Resolution CM/ResDH(2010)122 [1]   Execution of the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in 36 cases against France   (see Appendix)     The Committee of Ministers, under the terms of Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, which provides that the Committee supervises the execution of final judgments of the European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter “the Convention” and “the Court”);   Having regard to the judgments transmitted by the Court to the Committee once they had become final, and following the Court’s finding of violations of the Convention in these cases;   Having invited the government of the respondent state to inform the Committee of the measures taken to comply with its obligation under Article 46, paragraph 1, of the Convention to abide by the judgments;   Having examined the information provided by the government in accordance with the Committee’s Rules for the application of Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention;   Having satisfied itself that the respondent state paid the applicants the just satisfaction provided in the judgments,   Recalling that the general measures required to prevent similar violations to those found by the Court in these cases have already been adopted in leading cases (see the relevant final resolutions cited in the appended table);   Noting furthermore, as the government considers and given the particular circumstances of each case, that no individual measure is necessary apart from the payment of just satisfaction,   DECLARES, having examined the measures taken by the respondent state, that it has exercised its functions under Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention in these cases and   DECIDES to close the examination of these cases.   Appendix to Resolution CM/ResDH(2010)122   Information on the measures taken to comply with the judgments in 36 cases against France   Cases under examination Reference cases already closed Application N o Case name Date of judgment Date of final judgment Reference Final Resolution 44451/98 A.A.U 19/06/2001 19/09/2001 DH(98)361 53118/99 Boiseau 19/02/2002 19/05/2002 DH(98)361 70160/01 AON Conseil and Courtage SA and others 25/01/2007 25/04/2007 ResDH(2006)32 73893/01 Besseau 07/03/2006 07/06/2006 ResDH(2003)94 44404/02 Cour 03/10/2006 03/01/2007 CM/ResDH(2008)05 53425/99 Dumas 23/09/2003 24/03/2004 CM/ResDH(2008)39 41522/98 Gaultier 28/03/2006 28/06/2006 CM/ResDH(2007)42 66224/01 Gosselin 13/09/2005 13/12/2005 ResDH(2003)50 and CM/ResDH(2007)39 348/03 Ong 14/11/2006 14/02/2007 CM/ResDH(2008)05 23054/03 S.U. 10/10/2006 10/01/2007 CM/ResDH(2007)42 7217/05 E.T. 03/10/2006 03/01/2007 CM/ResDH(2007)42 41943/98 L.L. 07/02/2002 07/05/2002 CM/ResDH(2008)39 51360/99 Marschner 28/09/2004 28/12/2004 CM/ResDH(2007)39 CM/ResDH(2008)12 27314/02 Vallar 04/10/2007 04/01/2008 CM/ResDH(2008)38 68673/01 Mathieu 27/10/2005 27/01/2006 CM/ResDH(2007)42 38287/02 Van Glabeke 07/03/2006 07/06/2006 CM/ResDH(2007)42 42272/98 Potier 08/11/2005 08/02/2006 CM/ResDH(2007)39 52621/99 Schwarkmann 08/02/2005 08/05/2005 CM/ResDH(2007)39 13324/04 Association Avenir d’Alet 14/02/2008 06/04/2009 CM/ResDH(2007)44 18130/05 Bochet 10/04/2008 29/09/2008 CM/ResDH(2007)44 77240/01 CED Viandes and others 27/07/2006 27/10/2006 CM/ResDH(2007)44 42122/04 A.X.A. 24/07/2008 24/10/2008 CM/ResDH(2008)71 44562/04 Fonfrede 16/10/2008 16/01/2009 CM/ResDH(2008)71 19/05 Laudette 11/06/2009 11/09/2009 CM/ResDH(2008)13 36109/03 Leroy 02/10/2008 06/04/2009 CM/ResDH(2008)71 38984/04 Garnier Rémy 22/05/2008 29/09/2008 CM/ResDH(2008)71 21148/02 Garriguenc 10/07/2008 10/10/2008 ResDH(2003)50 2078/04 Cretello 23/01/2007 23/04/2007 ResDH(2003)50 CM/ResDH(2007)39 32157/06 Gunes 20/11/2008 20/02/2009 CM/ResDH(2008)12 59584/00 Rivas 01/04/2004 01/07/2004 CM/ResDH(2009)126 77655/01 Relais du Min S.A.R.L. 20/12/2005 20/03/2006 CM/ResDH(2008)13 12876/04 S.C.I Plelo-Cadiou 22/11/2007 02/06/2008 CM/ResDH(2008)13 3211/05 Vuillemin 19/09/2006 19/12/2006 CM/ResDH(2008)13 16022/02 Roux 25/04/2006 25/07/2006 CM/ResDH(2007)79 12332/03 Castelot 24/04/2008 Friendly settlement - 61104/00 Quillevere 27/10/2005 Friendly settlement -     [1] Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 15 September 2010 at the 1092nd meeting of the Ministers’ Deputies