CEDH · CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG — 14 septembre 2011

.s3ABFC313 { font-size:10pt } .s598389F9 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:12pt } .sDB9EB187 { font-weight:bold } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .s87C74EA6 { font-size:8pt; font-weight:bold; vertical-align:super; color:#000000 } .s2EF62ED2 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:12pt } .sFBC99493 { font-style:italic } .s85646119 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:justify; font-size:12pt } .s4894483B { margin-top:0pt; margin-left:35.45pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:12pt } .s589818D7 { margin-top:0pt; margin-left:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:justify; font-size:12pt } .s76CF415B { page-break-before:always; clear:both } .sE3D66594 { border:0.75pt solid #000000; border-collapse:collapse } .s23C05D7A { height:24.65pt } .sCC09754F { border-right-style:double; border-right-width:1.5pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:4.65pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:middle } .s598389F7 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:10pt } .sEEDC99 { border-left-style:double; border-left-width:1.5pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:4.65pt; vertical-align:middle } .s88A4DB4E { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:middle } .sDD8F0D07 { border-style:solid; border-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:middle } .sD4D22087 { border-style:solid double solid solid; border-width:0.75pt 1.5pt 0.75pt 0.75pt; padding-right:4.65pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:middle } .s17E350CC { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:double; border-left-width:1.5pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:4.65pt; vertical-align:middle } .s3D45D7A { height:20.65pt } .sA0611542 { color:#000000 } .s876D4AB2 { text-decoration:underline; color:#0069d6 } .s2865D7A { height:20.85pt } .s3C68E78A { height:19.6pt } .s399B5D7A { height:22.35pt } .s1DB03B0D { margin-top:0pt; margin-left:72.6pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:-72.6pt; text-align:center; font-size:10pt } .s2C03B0A7 { height:19.45pt } .s4735D7A { height:20.55pt } .s5A04E78A { height:18.9pt } .s282E263B { height:22.9pt } .sD8D1073 { height:28pt } .sE4EC5D7A { height:21.35pt } .sE52A5D7A { height:21.15pt } .s22155D7A { height:23.25pt } .sF36B263B { height:25.9pt } .sDB7367AC { margin-top:0pt; margin-left:70pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:-70pt; text-align:center; font-size:10pt } .s5992263B { height:26.9pt } .s3614B0A7 { height:17.75pt } .s11BEB50D { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:middle } .sEAD70FA9 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:middle } .s19AE6B43 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:double; border-right-width:1.5pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; padding-right:4.65pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:middle } .s7E485226 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:double; border-left-width:1.5pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:4.65pt; vertical-align:middle } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sF6A12959 { width:33%; height:1px; text-align:left } .s5FFF0A7E { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:8pt } .s846B54EF { font-size:5.33pt; vertical-align:super; color:#0069d6 } Resolution CM/ResDH(2011)101 [1]   Execution of the judgments of the European Court of Human Rights in 18 cases against France   (Applications Nos. (see Appendix))     The Committee of Ministers, under the terms of Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, which provides that the Committee supervises the execution of final judgments of the European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter “the Convention” and “the Court”);   Having regard to the final judgments transmitted by the Court to the Committee,   Having invited the government of the respondent state to inform the Committee of the measures taken to comply with its obligation under Article 46, paragraph 1, of the Convention to abide by the judgments;   Having examined the information provided by the government in accordance with the Committee’s Rules for the application of Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention;   Having satisfied itself that the respondent state paid the applicants the just satisfaction provided in the judgments,   DECLARES, having examined the measures taken by the respondent state, that it has exercised its functions under Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention in these cases and   DECIDES to close the examination of these cases.     Appendix to Resolution CM/ResDH(2011)101   Information on the judgments in 18 cases against France   Cases under examination Reference cases already closed Case (Application No.) Judgment of Final on Closure decision Reference Final Resolution Debboub ( 37786/97 ) 9/11/1999 9/02/2000 Mar 2011 1108 meeting Muller against France CM/ResDH(2003)50 Pannullo and Forte (37794/97) 30/10/2001 30/01/2002 Mar 2011 1108 meeting / Perhirin ( 44081/98 ) 8/04/2003 8/07/2003 Mar 2011 1108 meeting Sapl and other cases against France CM/ResDH(2005)63 Broca and Texier-Micault ( 27928/02 , 31694/02) 30/10/2003 30/01/2004 Mar 2011 1108 meeting Sapl and other cases against France CM/ResDH(2005)63 Kanoun (35589/97) 03/10/2000 03/01/2001 Feb 2004 871 meeting Hermant against France CMResDH(2003)88 Watt (71377/01) 28/09/2004 28/12/2004 Mar 2011 1108 meeting Sapl and other cases against France CM/ResDH(2005)63 Blondet ( 49451/99 ) 5/10/2004 5/01/2005 Mar 2011 1108 meeting Muller against France CM/ResDH(2003)50 Ouattara ( 57470/00 ) 2/8/2005 30/11/2005 Mar 2011 1108 meeting Barrillot and other cases against France CM/ResDH(2007)39 Barbier (76093/01) 17/01/2006 17/04/2006 Mar 2011 1108 meeting / Gruais and Bousquet (67881/01) 10/01/2006 10/042006 June 2010 1086 meeting / Beaucaire ( 22945/02 ) 6/6/2006 6/09/2006 Mar 2011 1108 meeting Raffi and other cases against France CM/ResDH(2008)12 Pessino ( 40403/02 ) 10/10/2006 12/02/2007 Mar 2011 1108 meeting / Guillard (24488/04) 15/01/2009 15/04/2009 Mar 2011 1108 meeting / Sartory (40589/07) 24/09/2009 1/03/2010 Dec 2010 1100 meeting / Malet (24997/07) 11/02/2010 11/05/2010 Mar 2011 1108 meeting Barrillot and other cases against France CM/ResDH(2007)39 Grifhorst (28336/02) 26/02/2009 26/05/2009, 10/12/2009 – Friendly settlement Dec 2010 1100 meeting   Moon (39973/03) 09/07/2009 09/10/2009, 22/04/2010 – Friendly settlement Dec 2010 1100 meeting   Roland Dumas (34875/07) 15/07/2010 15/10/2010 June 2011 1115 meeting Paturel and other cases against France CM/ResDH(2011)57   [1] Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 14 September 2011 at the 1120th Meeting of the Ministers’ Deputies