CEDH · CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG — 14 septembre 2011

.s3ABFC313 { font-size:10pt } .s598389F9 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:12pt } .sDB9EB187 { font-weight:bold } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .s87C74EA6 { font-size:8pt; font-weight:bold; vertical-align:super; color:#000000 } .s2EF62ED2 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:12pt } .sFBC99493 { font-style:italic } .s4894483B { margin-top:0pt; margin-left:35.45pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:12pt } .s76CF415B { page-break-before:always; clear:both } .sE3D66594 { border:0.75pt solid #000000; border-collapse:collapse } .s6108529E { border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt } .s598389F8 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:11pt } .s32ABB12B { border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt } .s97028CF8 { border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt } .s22155D7A { height:23.25pt } .s5B8637C { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt } .sB673203C { border-style:solid; border-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt } .sED1A34C5 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt } .sAC5BC9B1 { font-size:7.33pt; vertical-align:super; color:#0069d6 } .s30AC1F85 { font-size:7.33pt; vertical-align:super } .s29BE6C23 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt } .s78B6B604 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt } .sCEE978D { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sF6A12959 { width:33%; height:1px; text-align:left } .s5FFF0A7E { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:8pt } .s846B54EF { font-size:5.33pt; vertical-align:super; color:#0069d6 } .s5FFF0A7F { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:9pt } .s53FC23F3 { font-size:6pt; font-style:italic; vertical-align:super; color:#0069d6 } .s9091C2C9 { font-size:8pt; font-style:italic } .s62A2B7B8 { font-size:5.33pt; font-style:italic; vertical-align:super; color:#0069d6 } Resolution CM/ResDH(2011)121 [1]   Execution of the judgments of the European Court of Human Rights in 11 cases against Italy   (see Appendix)     The Committee of Ministers, under the terms of Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, which provides that the Committee supervises the execution of final judgments of the European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter “the Convention” and “the Court”);   Having regard to the judgments transmitted by the Court to the Committee once they had become final, and following the Court’s finding of violations of the Convention in these cases;   Having invited the government of the respondent state to inform the Committee of the measures taken to comply with its obligation under Article 46, paragraph 1, of the Convention to abide by the judgments;   Having examined the information provided by the government in accordance with the Committee’s Rules for the application of Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention;   Having further satisfied itself that the respondent state paid the applicants the just satisfaction provided in the judgments, in conditions that seem to be accepted by the applicants,     DECLARES, in the light of the above, that it has exercised its functions under Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention in these cases and   DECIDES to close the examination of these cases. Appendix to Resolution CM/ResDH(2011)121   Information on the judgments in 11 cases against Italy     Case (Application No.) Judgment of Final on Closure decision ZAGARIA (58295/00) 27/11/2007 07/07/2008 December 2010 1100 meeting DE TRANA (64215/01) 16/10/2007 16/01/2008 December 2010 1100 meeting ORMANNI (30278/04) 17/07/2007 17/10/2007 December 2010 1100 meeting SCIORTINO [2] (30127/96) 18/01/2001 27/03/2002 March 2004 879 meeting CIGNOLI and others [3] (68309/01) 09/12/2008 09/06/2009 June 2011 1115 meeting BORTESI and others 2 (71399/01) 10/06/08 08/03/2010 June 2011 1115 meeting VESSICHELLI 2 (29290/02) 09/06/2009 09/09/2009 June 2011 1115 meeting MANDOLA 2 38596/02 30/06/2009 30/09/2009 June 2011 1115 meeting RICCI and others 2 (42021/02) 06/10/2009 06/01/2010 June 2011 1115 meeting VACCA 2 (8061/05) 08/12/2009 08/03/2010 June 2011 1115 meeting LUIGI SERINO (No. 3) 2 (21978/02) 12/10/2010 12/01/2011 June 2011 1115 meeting   [1] Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 14 September 2011 at the 1120th Meeting of the Ministers’ Deputies [2] The Committee of Ministers is supervising the adoption of outstanding measures in the context of the Ceteroni group (No.   22461/93). [3] These cases are similar to that of Sarnelli, closed by Resolution CM/ResDH(2010)93.