CEDH · CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG — 14 septembre 2011

.s3ABFC313 { font-size:10pt } .s598389F9 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:12pt } .sDB9EB187 { font-weight:bold } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .s87C74EA6 { font-size:8pt; font-weight:bold; vertical-align:super; color:#000000 } .s2EF62ED2 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:12pt } .s4894483B { margin-top:0pt; margin-left:35.45pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:12pt } .s76CF415B { page-break-before:always; clear:both } .s6DB91820 { text-align:center } .sD0B5C7A1 { margin-right:auto; margin-left:auto; border:0.75pt solid #000000; border-collapse:collapse } .sE4024500 { height:37.3pt } .s64645784 { border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:bottom } .s598389F8 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:11pt } .s4B46122D { border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.4pt; vertical-align:bottom } .s553C38BC { border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.4pt; vertical-align:bottom } .s23FE5D7A { height:24.45pt } .s2E932ED2 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:11pt } .s7F15877A { border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:bottom } .s46938418 { border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.4pt; vertical-align:bottom } .s7C18482A { padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.4pt; vertical-align:bottom } .sF6A12959 { width:33%; height:1px; text-align:left } .s5FFF0A7E { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:8pt } .s846B54EF { font-size:5.33pt; vertical-align:super; color:#0069d6 } .sFBC99493 { font-style:italic } Resolution CM/ResDH(2011)141 [1]   Execution of the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in 7 cases against Poland   (see Appendix)     The Committee of Ministers, under the terms of Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, which provides that the Committee supervises the execution of final judgments of the European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter “the Convention” and “the Court”);   Having regard to the judgments transmitted by the Court to the Committee once they had become final, and following the Court’s finding of violations of the Convention in these cases;   Having invited the government of the respondent state to inform the Committee of the measures taken to comply with its obligation under Article 46, paragraph 1, of the Convention to abide by the judgments;   Having examined the information provided by the government in accordance with the Committee’s Rules for the application of Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention;   Having further satisfied itself that the respondent state paid the applicants the just satisfaction provided in the judgments,     DECLARES, in the light of the above that it has exercised its functions under Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention in these cases and   DECIDES to close the examination of these cases. Appendix to Resolution CM/ResDH(2011)141   Information on the judgments in 7 cases against Poland       Application   Case   Judgment of   Final on   Decision to close   39510/98 A.S. 20/06/2006 23/10/2006 June 2010 1086th meeting 26624/95 Worwa 27/11/2003 14/06/2004 July 2006 970th meeting 37522/02 Zmarzlak 15/01/2008 15/04/2008 June 2010 1086th meeting 54723/00 Brudnicka and others 03/03/2005 03/06/2005 June 2010 1086th meeting 63131/00 Gębura 06/03/2007 06/06/2007 June 2010 1086th meeting 49913/99 Zielonka 08/11/2005 08/02/2006 December 2009 1072nd meeting 38797/03 Ambruszkiewicz 04/05/2006 23/10/2006 June 2010 1086th meeting   [1] Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 14 September 2011 at the 1120th Meeting of the Ministers’ Deputies