CEDH · CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG — 14 septembre 2011

.s3ABFC313 { font-size:10pt } .s598389F9 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:12pt } .sDB9EB187 { font-weight:bold } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .s87C74EA6 { font-size:8pt; font-weight:bold; vertical-align:super; color:#000000 } .s2EF62ED2 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:12pt } .s7F74B77E { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:6pt; font-size:12pt } .sF8AEFD1F { margin-top:0pt; margin-left:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:12pt } .sFBC99493 { font-style:italic } .s4894483B { margin-top:0pt; margin-left:35.45pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:12pt } .s76CF415B { page-break-before:always; clear:both } .sFB5BB313 { width:29.88pt; display:inline-block } .sE3D66594 { border:0.75pt solid #000000; border-collapse:collapse } .s41E9DBF5 { border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s598389F8 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:11pt } .s24AC208E { border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sFBD4F1DF { margin-top:0pt; margin-left:8.75pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:11pt } .sF004B676 { border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sDA754500 { height:32.9pt } .sB30C44B0 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sC3AB69A { border-style:solid; border-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s2342A031 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s5A58263B { height:26.3pt } .s23FE5D7A { height:24.45pt } .s546C9D04 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s40B7A780 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s4F2EDFF { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s49A78FE0 { width:26.55pt; display:inline-block } .s876D4AB2 { text-decoration:underline; color:#0069d6 } .sF66F4DA4 { width:23.21pt; display:inline-block } .sF6A12959 { width:33%; height:1px; text-align:left } .s5FFF0A7E { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:8pt } .s846B54EF { font-size:5.33pt; vertical-align:super; color:#0069d6 } Resolution CM/ResDH(2011)167 [1]   Execution of the judgments of the European Court of Human Rights 11 cases against Turkey   (see details in Appendix)     The Committee of Ministers, under the terms of Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, which provides that the Committee supervises the execution of final judgments of the European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter “the Convention” and “the Court”);   Having regard to the judgments transmitted by the Court to the Committee once they had become final;   Recalling that the violations of the Convention found by the Court in these cases concerns late payment of compensation for expropriation and of default interest (violations of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1) (see details in Appendix);   Having invited the government of the respondent state to inform the Committee of the measures taken to comply with its obligation under Article   46, paragraph 1, of the Convention to abide by the judgments;   Having examined the information provided by the government in accordance with the Committee’s Rules for the application of Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention;   Having satisfied itself that the respondent state paid the applicants the just satisfaction provided in the judgments (see details in Appendix),   Recalling that a finding of violations by the Court requires, over and above the payment of just satisfaction awarded by the Court in its judgments, the adoption by the respondent state, where appropriate: - of individual measures to put an end to the violations and erase their consequences so as to achieve as far as possible restitutio in integrum ; and   - of general measures preventing similar violations;   DECLARES, having examined the measures taken by the respondent state (see Appendix) that it has exercised its functions under Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention in these cases and   DECIDES to close the examination of these cases. Appendix to Resolution CM/ResDH(2011)167   Information about the measures to comply with the judgments in 11 cases against Turkey   Introductory case summary   These cases concern the violation of the applicants’ right to the peaceful enjoyment of their possessions due to the administration’s delay in paying additional compensation granted by domestic courts for expropriation of their property, and on account of the considerable difference between the rate of default interest applicable at the material time and the average inflation rate in Turkey (violations of Article 1 of Protocol No.   1).   I.   Payment of just satisfaction and individual measures   a) Details of just satisfaction   Case and application number Judgment of Final on Pecuniary damage Non-pecuniary damage Costs and expenses Total Senaş Servis Endüstrisi A.Ş., (19520/02) 21/10/2008 06/04/2009 117 175 EUR - 1000 EUR 118 175 EUR Paid on 24/06/2009 Gülşen and others (54902/00) 3/05/2007 03/08/2007 533   330 EUR - - 533   330 EUR Paid on 31/10/2007 Bildirici (43227/04) 8/06/2010 08/09/2010 14   200 EUR - - 14   200 EUR Paid on 01/12/2010 Üçpınar (41479/05) 21/07/2009 21/10/2009 21 700 EUR - - 21 700 EUR Paid on 22/02/2010 Terece and others (41054/98) 24/10/2006 24/01/2007 173 000 EUR - 1 500 EUR 174 500 EUR Paid on 17/12/2007 Çırak and others (33433/02) 22/07/2008 26/01/2009 10   557 EUR - - 10557 EUR Paid on 22/04/2009 Kurt and Fırat (26828/03) 21/04/2009 21/07/2009 1 100 EUR 6   000 EUR - 7 100 EUR Paid on 04/11/2009 Mehmet Siret Atalay (3816/03) 31/03/2009 14/09/2009 3 500 EUR - - 3 500 EUR Paid on 14/12/2009 Kemal Özer and others (783/03) 20/10/2009 20/01/2010 13 000 EUR - - 13 000 EUR Paid on 29/04/2010 Doğangün (30302/03) 02/06/2009 02/09/2009 - EUR 5000 - EUR 5000 Paid on 02/12/2009 Erdoğan ve Fırat (15121/03) 02/06/2009 20/07/2010 02/09/2009 20/10/2010 13   350 EUR - - 13   350 EUR Paid on 02/12/2009   b) Individual measures   Given the just satisfaction awarded in respect of the damages sustained by the applicants, no other individual measure was considered necessary by the Committee of Ministers.     II.   General measures   Measures have already been taken to prevent similar violations (See Resolutions ResDH(2001)70 and ResDH(2001)71 closing the Aka and Akkuş cases) including in particular the entry into force on 1   January   2000 of Law No.   4489 which aligned the legal rate of default interest with the annual discount rate applied by the Turkish Central Bank to short-term debt (this rate is kept under constant review in the light in particular of the recorded rate of inflation in the country).   III.   Conclusions of the respondent state   The government considers that no individual measure is required, apart from the payment of the just satisfaction, that the general measures adopted will prevent similar violations and that Turkey has thus complied with its obligations under Article   46, paragraph 1, of the Convention. [1] Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 14 September 2011 at the 1120th Meeting of the Ministers’ Deputies