CEDH · CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG — 14 mars 2012

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s523616E0 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; font-size:14pt } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s3E839E41 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:30pt; text-align:center } .sDA30A789 { margin-top:30pt; margin-bottom:36pt; text-align:center } .sC7EAD8B { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; text-decoration:underline } .s967D43C6 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s3B3A5DE9 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:36pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s4070A5A6 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:24pt; text-align:center; page-break-after:avoid } .sCDABDDB1 { margin-top:24pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } FIFTH SECTION Application no. 11161/11 K.A.B. against Sweden lodged on 22 December 2010 STATEMENT OF FACTS THE FACTS The applicant, an Iraqi national, claims that he was ill-treated in his country of origin. After arriving in Sweden, he applied for asylum. COMPLAINT The applicant complains that an implementation of the deportation order to return him to Iraq would violate his rights under Article 3 of the Convention. QUESTION TO THE PARTIES Would the applicant face a risk of being subjected to treatment in breach of Article 3 of the Convention if the deportation order were implemented? In particular, given that the Migration Court accepted that he was at risk in Diyala and Baghdad, what reason is there to think that he would not be at risk in Anbar?