CEDH · CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG — 15 mai 2012

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s523616E0 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; font-size:14pt } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s662121A1 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s3B3A5DE9 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:36pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s4070A5A6 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:24pt; text-align:center; page-break-after:avoid } .sC7EAD8B { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; text-decoration:underline } .s58F58C49 { margin-top:24pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:justify } .s10950C61 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } THIRD SECTION Application no. 8712/06 Marius Eugen MĂRCUŞ against Romania lodged on 24 February 2006 The facts and complaints in this case have been summarised in the Court’s partial decision on admissibility, which is available in HUDOC. QUESTION TO THE PARTIES   Was the applicant subjected to inhuman and degrading treatment, in breach of Article 3 of the Convention, on account of the material conditions of his detention, in particular overcrowding, in Timişoara Prison and in Jilava Prison Hospital?   The Government are invited to submit information concerning the material conditions of the applicant’s detention in Timişoara Prison and in Jilava Prison Hospital, specifically with regard to the applicant’s allegations of lack of sufficient beds, small cells and the fact that he was forced to share his cell with up to forty other detainees.