CEDH · CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG — 15 mai 2012

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s523616E0 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; font-size:14pt } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s662121A1 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s3B3A5DE9 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:36pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s4070A5A6 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:24pt; text-align:center; page-break-after:avoid } .sC7EAD8B { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; text-decoration:underline } .s3FE17F4 { margin-top:24pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s10950C61 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .sA1D3DA2E { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:justify } THIRD SECTION Application no. 37243/03 Ionel Cristian ŞERBAN against Romania lodged on 20 October 2003 The facts and complaints in this case have been summarised in the Court’s partial decision on admissibility, which is available in HUDOC. QUESTIONS TO THE PARTIES   1.     Was the length of the criminal proceedings initiated against the applicant in breach of the “reasonable time” requirement of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention?   2.     Have there been interferences with the applicant’s rights under Article   8 § 1 of the Convention on account of: a)     the monitoring of his correspondence during his detention in the detention facility of the Police General Inspectorate? b)     the fact that the prosecutor obtained from the private operator of the applicant’s mobile phone a list of all his conversations and recorded in a report all the data found on the SIM card of the mobile phone seized from him? c)     the interception and recording of his private conversations?   If so, were those interferences in accordance with the law and necessary in terms of Article 8 § 2?   3.     Has the applicant suffered discrimination in the enjoyment of his Convention rights on the ground of the dismissal of his request for the award of the benefit for exposure to radiation, contrary to Article 14 of the Convention read in conjunction with Article   1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention?   The Government are invited to submit further information regarding the conditions under which the applicant worked at the police station while criminal proceedings against him were pending.