CEDHCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
CEDH · CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG — 14 septembre 2012
- ECLI
- ECLI:CEDH:001-113591
- Date
- 14 septembre 2012
- Publication
- 14 septembre 2012
droits fondamentauxCEDH
Source : DILA / Judilibre · open data
Mes notes
privées · visibles par vous seulRésumé structuré
version préliminaireFaits
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Procédure
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Question juridique
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Solution
source officielleCommunicated
Résumé généré automatiquement — à vérifier avec la décision originale.
Analyse IA non disponible
Générez un résumé intelligent de cette décision
Texte intégral
.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s523616E0 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; font-size:14pt } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s3E839E41 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:30pt; text-align:center } .sDA30A789 { margin-top:30pt; margin-bottom:36pt; text-align:center } .s2D57E2E { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; text-decoration:underline; text-transform:uppercase } .s967D43C6 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s3B3A5DE9 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:36pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .sEC1B78D0 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:36pt; text-align:justify } .sACBC61AB { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:36pt; text-align:justify } .s5E854663 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:36pt; text-indent:36pt; text-align:justify; font-size:14pt } .s1CBBD6E0 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .sC7EAD8B { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; text-decoration:underline } .sD3B7A4BE { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:36pt; text-align:justify; font-size:14pt } .sA1D3DA2E { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:justify } SECOND SECTION Application no. 58802/12 A.A. against Switzerland lodged on 11 September 2012 STATEMENT OF FACTS FACTS The applicant claims to be from Central Darfur and to belong in the paternal line to the ethnic group of the Fur and in the maternal line to the ethnic group of the Bergo. In Switzerland he has been politically active as member of the Sudanese Liberation Movement/Unit and the Darfur Peace and Development Centre (DFEZ). COMPLAINTS Relying on Article 2 and 3 of the Convention the applicant fears that his deportation to Sudan would expose him to the risk of being killed or ill-treated and tortured. Relying on Article 13 of the Convention, the applicant claims that he does not have an effective remedy at national level to enforce his rights under Article 2 and 3 of the Convention.   QUESTION TO THE PARTIES   In the light of the applicant’s claims and the documents which have been submitted, would he face a risk of being subjected to treatment in breach of Article 3 of the Convention if the deportation order were enforced?Citations
Aucune citation répertoriée pour cette décision.
Décisions connexes
Aucune décision similaire identifiée pour le moment.
Synthèse
- Juridiction
- CEDH
- Chambre
- CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
- Date
- 14 septembre 2012
- Matière
- droits fondamentaux
Référence
ECLI:CEDH:001-113591
Données disponibles
- Texte intégral
- Résumé officiel