CEDH · CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG — 26 septembre 2012

.s3ABFC313 { font-size:10pt } .sFE10DC93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .sDB9EB187 { font-weight:bold } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .s5EE9E87A { font-size:6.67pt; font-weight:bold; vertical-align:super; color:#000000 } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s2007D3CB { width:100%; border:0.75pt solid #000000; border-collapse:collapse } .sD81AB0A7 { height:11.35pt } .sB43C4489 { width:55.72%; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s5FFF0A7F { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:9pt } .sAD4B1CE7 { width:44.28%; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s19FFF39 { width:55.72%; border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s405E7B99 { width:44.28%; border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sE501E53 { width:55.72%; border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s655405EA { width:44.28%; border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sFBC99493 { font-style:italic } .s5A722CD { margin-top:0pt; margin-left:35.45pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s3985515B { margin-top:0pt; margin-left:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sF6A12959 { width:33%; height:1px; text-align:left } .s5FFF0A7E { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:8pt } .s846B54EF { font-size:5.33pt; vertical-align:super; color:#0069d6 } Resolution CM/ResDH(2012)141 [1] 37 cases against «   the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia   » Execution of decisions of the European Court of Human Rights   Case, Application No. Date of decision BELJA, application No 21354/05 02/11/2010 BOSILKOVA, application No 31708/07 06/12/2011 DAVCEVA, application No 29725/07 18/01/2011 DIMOV, application No 11792/07 06/12/2011 EFTIMOVSKA, application No 22612/07 18/01/2011 FIDANOVSKA, application No 22231/07 06/12/2011 GADZOV & GICEV, application No 25190/07 15/03/2011 GLIGOROV, application No 6233/08 16/11/2010 HASAN-OZGUN, application No 35621/04 06/12/2011 JANA RISTOVA & others, application No 31114/07 06/12/2011 JANAKIEV, application No 24379/07 15/03/2011 JANEV, application No 31169/07 18/01/2011 JANEVSKA I, application No 34190/07 21/09/2010 JONCEVSKA, application No 11086/07 15/11/2011 JOVANOVA & others, application No 29880/07 13/03/2012 JOVANOVA, application No 20212/11 13/03/2012 KITANOVSKI, application No 47210/06 21/09/2010 MALCEVA, application No 6438/07 06/12/2011 MILANOV, application No 25136/07 18/01/2011 MITEVSKA-AVRAMOVA, application No 30760/05 15/11/2011 MITEVSKI, application No 53445/07 15/03/2011 NAKOV II, application No 31863/07 21/09/2010 NIKOLOVSKA & others, application No 31697/07 18/01/2011 NIKOLOVSKA, application No 22793/07 21/09/2010 PETRUSEV, application No 17410/07 06/12/2011 RIBARSKI & others, application No 25175/07 15/03/2011 SABANSKI, application No 15891/07 18/01/2011 STOJANOV and others, application No 25677/07 15/03/2011 SUZANA RISTOVA & others, application No 27254/07 16/11/2010 TOPUZOVI, application No 24136/05 18/01/2011 TRAJCEVSKI, application No 27240/07 02/11/2010 VASILEV, application No 6235/08 15/03/2011 VASILEV, application No 6225/08 16/11/2010 VELKOV, application No 22719/07 15/11/2011 VILA & others, application No 29493/05 12/04/2011 VRETOVSKI & others, application No 44562/06 31/01/2011 ZEPCESKA, application No 45999/07 15/11/2011   The Committee of Ministers, under the terms of Article 39, paragraph 4, of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, which provides that the Committee supervises the execution of friendly settlements as they appear in decisions of the European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter “the Convention” and “the Court”);   Considering that in these cases the Court, having taken formal note of friendly settlements reached by the government of the respondent State and the applicants, and having been satisfied that the settlements were based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention or its Protocols, decided, unanimously, to strike these cases out of its list;   Having satisfied itself that the terms of the friendly-settlements were executed by the respondent State,   DECLARES that it has exercised its functions under Article 39, paragraph 4, of the Convention and   DECIDES to close their examination. [1] Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 26 September 2012 at the 1150th Meeting of the Ministers’ Deputies.