CEDH · CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG — 6 décembre 2012

.s3ABFC313 { font-size:10pt } .sFE10DC93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .sDB9EB187 { font-weight:bold } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .s5EE9E87A { font-size:6.67pt; font-weight:bold; vertical-align:super; color:#000000 } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s2007D3CB { width:100%; border:0.75pt solid #000000; border-collapse:collapse } .sB43C4489 { width:55.72%; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s5FFF0A7F { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:9pt } .sAD4B1CE7 { width:44.28%; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s19FFF39 { width:55.72%; border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s405E7B99 { width:44.28%; border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sEC838919 { height:3.5pt } .s9ECAA7DC { height:8.7pt } .sE501E53 { width:55.72%; border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s655405EA { width:44.28%; border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sA8507A40 { margin-top:0pt; margin-left:35.4pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sF6A12959 { width:33%; height:1px; text-align:left } .s5FFF0A7E { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:8pt } .s846B54EF { font-size:5.33pt; vertical-align:super; color:#0069d6 } Resolution CM/ResDH(2012)186 [1] 42 cases against Hungary Execution of decisions of the European Court of Human Rights   Case, Application No. Date of decision Balint, application No 29086/09 20/03/2012 Barasits, application No 59718/09 03/04/2012 Berényi, application No 30288/06 20/03/2012 Béres-Deák, application No 18428/09 13/12/2011 Bodnar ,application No 48345/09 20/03/2012 Dianovszki, application No 48103/07 18/10/2011 Eösöly, application No 334/09 13/12/2011 Fodor, application No 14551/09 20/03/2012 Fodor, application No 58978/08 13/12/2011 Gajdos, application No 24590/09 03/04/2012 Gallai, application No 11834/09 13/12/2011 Gazda, application No 37370/09 03/04/2012 Gergely and others, application No 57095/08 13/12/2011 Gyöngyössyné Kiss, application No 55734/08 13/12/2011 Gyura, application No 63999/09 17/07/2012 Havrilla, application No 38188/09 03/04/2012 Horvat and Margittai, application No 14947/10 17/07/2012 Jozsef Kovács, application No 50375/08 15/11/2011 Kodrean, application No 17687/09 20/03/2012 Kometa 99 Zrt, application No 46785/07 09/11/2010 Korom, application No 49620/09 20/03/2012 Laszlo Kiss, application No 13847/09 13/12/2011 Legendi, application No 27814/09 03/04/2012 Lendvay, application No 13670/09 13/12/2011 Liberais Plusz Kft, application No 1771/09 13/12/2011 Lovász, application No 619/09 13/12/2011 Mazioné Walter, application No 44350/07 20/03/2012 Meszaros, application No 58174/09 13/12/2011 Pekariné Kozma and others,application No 31353/09 20/03/2012 Purcsel, application No 56071/09 20/03/2012 R.E. Bt., application No 3713/08 13/12/2011 RIH Kft, application No 46769/08 13/12/2011 Rozgoniy, application No 46771/08 13/12/2011 Rozsa and Habony, application No 2810/09 13/12/2011 Rusz, application No 46987/08 15/11/2011 Szabolcs Németh, application No 9837/10 15/11/2011 Schesztak, application No 18548/09 13/12/2011 Süli, application No 29137/09 20/03/2012 Szarka and others, application No 37245/08 13/12/2011 Szebelledi, application No 57193/09 03/04/2012 Tanberger, application No 54216/08 13/12/2011 Toma, application No 600/09 13/12/2011   The Committee of Ministers, under the terms of Article 39, paragraph 4, of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, which provides that the Committee supervises the execution of friendly settlements as they appear in decisions of the European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter “the Convention” and “the Court”);   Considering that in these cases the Court, having taken formal note of friendly settlements reached by the government of the respondent state and the applicants, and having been satisfied that the settlements were based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention or its Protocols, decided, unanimously, to strike these cases out of its list;   Having satisfied itself that the terms of the friendly-settlements were executed by the respondent State,   DECLARES that it has exercised its functions under Article 39, paragraph 4, of the Convention and   DECIDES to close their examination. [1] Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 6 December 2012 at the 1157th Meeting of the Ministers’ Deputies.